Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Hi all....
Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... The fundamental problem here is the mp3s themselves. Mp3s 'throw away' some of the information in order to compress the file. I doubt that any mp3 player's electronics won't do the format justice. Whilst the mp3 *decoder* is a fixed standard, the encoders aren't however so you may get some improvement by using a superior encoder along with the highest bit rate possible. Graham |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... Hi, thanks for the answers. I know about compression, etc., but are there some MP3 players that, given high enough sample rates, or an uncompressed file, sounds better than other MP3 players? There seems to be a dearth of commentary about sound quality of MP3 players. Thanks. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
In article ,
Soundhaspriority wrote: In article , "CharlesBlackstone" wrote: Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... I'm looking to replace my rundown car with a really great Hyundai. I haven't been pleased with what I've seen. Anyone know of a Hyundai that is superior? Stop saving files as MP3. Use a player that handles a lossless format, and put up with the reduced playing capacity (still way better than a CD). Check Stereophile reviews for players that give reasonable results with good earphones. The original iPod Shuffle gave good results from the earphone connector (not much between DAC and socket). A Hyundia will get you across town just as quick and easily as a Rolls Royce. -- http://www.ericlindsay.com |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
CharlesBlackstone wrote: CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... Hi, thanks for the answers. I know about compression, etc., but are there some MP3 players that, given high enough sample rates, or an uncompressed file, sounds better than other MP3 players? I truly haven't a clue. I've never seen any manufacturer of one use sound quality as a selling point. There seems to be a dearth of commentary about sound quality of MP3 players. Because quality isn't their function ? Graham |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... CharlesBlackstone wrote: CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... Hi, thanks for the answers. I know about compression, etc., but are there some MP3 players that, given high enough sample rates, or an uncompressed file, sounds better than other MP3 players? I truly haven't a clue. I've never seen any manufacturer of one use sound quality as a selling point. There seems to be a dearth of commentary about sound quality of MP3 players. Because quality isn't their function ? I seem to recall that about two years ago either Stereophile or The Abso!ute Sound had very nice things to say about one of the iPods, the gist being that it had much better sound quality than any other portable mp3-type player, especially in the bass. You might wish to check the archives of those two mags. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions
their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. Trouble is, as I said, my iPod Nano is the 4GB model, and at 40-odd MB (IIRC) per song with lossless compression, you don't get much on there. Martin -- M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fleetie |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
"Fleetie" wrote in message ... Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. Trouble is, as I said, my iPod Nano is the 4GB model, and at 40-odd MB (IIRC) per song with lossless compression, you don't get much on there. Martin -- M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fleetie The new Nanos now include an 8GB model. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Fleetie wrote:
Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Eeyore wrote in
: CharlesBlackstone wrote: CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... Hi, thanks for the answers. I know about compression, etc., but are there some MP3 players that, given high enough sample rates, or an uncompressed file, sounds better than other MP3 players? I truly haven't a clue. I've never seen any manufacturer of one use sound quality as a selling point. There seems to be a dearth of commentary about sound quality of MP3 players. Because quality isn't their function ? Graham netkkkoping **** Bertie |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Eeyore wrote in
: CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... The fundamental problem here is the mp3s themselves. Mp3s 'throw away' some of the information in order to compress the file. I doubt that any mp3 player's electronics won't do the format justice. Whilst the mp3 *decoder* is a fixed standard, the encoders aren't however so you may get some improvement by using a superior encoder along with the highest bit rate possible. Graham netkkkpping wannabe Bertie |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
On 15 Oct 2006 12:21:08 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Fleetie wrote: Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. hee hee. five hundred watts? Of course you mean mW... |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Tim Padrick wrote: Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. You think 24/96 is lossy ? Graham |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
AZ Nomad wrote:
On 15 Oct 2006 12:21:08 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote: Fleetie wrote: Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. hee hee. five hundred watts? Of course you mean mW... No. Input current on the Prism is about two amps. It gets pretty warm while in normal use. I think the idle input current on the 5W Krell amp is something in the two-amp range as well. That's about typical. I'm assuming 110V power here. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Eeyore wrote:
Tim Padrick wrote: Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. You think 24/96 is lossy ? I think he is, in a somewhat less than coherent and direct way, referring to converter issues. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Scott Dorsey wrote: Eeyore wrote: Tim Padrick wrote: Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. You think 24/96 is lossy ? I think he is, in a somewhat less than coherent and direct way, referring to converter issues. I reckon today's 24 bit converters ought to be good enough for the job. Graham |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:56:28 -0500, Tim Padrick wrote:
"AZ Nomad" wrote in message ... On 15 Oct 2006 12:21:08 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote: Fleetie wrote: Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. hee hee. five hundred watts? Of course you mean mW... Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. You have no concept of mp3 compression. It is completely different than analog audio compression. If you put a digital audio stream through a lossless mp3 compression algorithm, it is indeed totally lossless. The digital data coming out is *exactly* the same as the data going in. |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
On 15 Oct 2006 13:26:43 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote:
AZ Nomad wrote: On 15 Oct 2006 12:21:08 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote: Fleetie wrote: Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. hee hee. five hundred watts? Of course you mean mW... No. Input current on the Prism is about two amps. It gets pretty warm while in normal use. I think the idle input current on the 5W Krell amp is something in the two-amp range as well. That's about typical. I'm assuming 110V power here. Are you seriously argueing that a headphone amp needs five hundred watts? What planet are you from? |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
On 15 Oct 2006 13:27:53 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Eeyore wrote: Tim Padrick wrote: Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. You think 24/96 is lossy ? I think he is, in a somewhat less than coherent and direct way, referring to converter issues. He hasn't the slightest clue of what mp3 compression is. |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
"AZ Nomad" wrote in message
... On 15 Oct 2006 12:21:08 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote: Fleetie wrote: Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. hee hee. five hundred watts? Of course you mean mW... Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
"CharlesBlackstone" wrote in message ups.com... Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... The best approach is to determine for sure that it's the mp3 coding that's responsible for the unpleasing sound. Can you play .wav files on your mp3 player? If so, load one of those and see how it sounds. If it still doesn't sound good--even with wav files--then it's the player not the lossy compression that's at fault. Find a player that sounds good uncompressed. Then is soon enough to experiment with mp3. Norm Strong |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:39:26 GMT, AZ Nomad
wrote: You have no concept of mp3 compression. An Do you? It is completely different than analog audio compression. If you put a digital audio stream through a lossless mp3 compression algorithm, it is indeed totally lossless. The digital data coming out is *exactly* the same as the data going in. Tell me;' what mp3 compression algorithms are completely lossless? |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
AZ Nomad said:
You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. hee hee. five hundred watts? Of course you mean mW... No. Input current on the Prism is about two amps. It gets pretty warm while in normal use. I think the idle input current on the 5W Krell amp is something in the two-amp range as well. That's about typical. I'm assuming 110V power here. Are you seriously argueing that a headphone amp needs five hundred watts? What planet are you from? Is this a Nelson Pass design, perhaps? ;-) -- "Due knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl miss steaks." |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:56:28 -0500, "Tim Padrick"
wrote: "AZ Nomad" wrote in message ... On 15 Oct 2006 12:21:08 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote: Fleetie wrote: Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. hee hee. five hundred watts? Of course you mean mW... Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. Don't be shy-= speak in an authoritative manner if you know wat yr talking about, Dilbert. |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
AZ Nomad wrote:
Are you seriously argueing that a headphone amp needs five hundred watts? What planet are you from? I'm not saying it needs it, but I'm saying it sure does sound good and it measures pretty damn well too. Yes, it's overkill for the job but there's nothing wrong with that. The constant attempt to cut every corner possible in attempts to make things more cheap and more portable is not beneficial to sound quality. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Eeyore wrote in
: Tim Padrick wrote: Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. You think 24/96 is lossy ? Graham Fjukkwit know nothing bertei |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
In article ,
Signal wrote: "CharlesBlackstone" wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... I forgot about the iPod Shuffle. This is alleged to have the best sound quality. Even if true, it seems like it would be a pain in the arse to use. |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
On 15 Oct 2006 14:40:24 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote:
AZ Nomad wrote: Are you seriously argueing that a headphone amp needs five hundred watts? What planet are you from? I'm not saying it needs it, but I'm saying it sure does sound good and it measures pretty damn well too. Yes, it's overkill for the job but there's nothing wrong with that. The constant attempt to cut every corner possible in attempts to make things more cheap and more portable is not beneficial to sound quality. Not only that, but you can use it to heat a medium sized room. ****, my amp for my main speakers doesn't need 500W even at 40-50% efficiency. |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
"Eeyore" wrote in
message Tim Padrick wrote: Losslesss compression? Neither the CD format nor even 24/96 are lossless. The compression methods are (audibly) lossless only if you did not have a very good sounding audio file to begin with. You think 24/96 is lossy ? Remember that in the eyes of an analog bigot, 24/96 is "lossy" compared to the "infinite resolution" and "infinite bandwidth" of analog. Back in the real world, as soon as music storage is involved, the bandwidth and resoluation of analog is very much less than that of good digital, even the "lowly" of the CD. |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
"CharlesBlackstone" wrote
in message ups.com Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... There have long been a number of portable digital players that supported uncompressed, lossless digital formats, including the same digital format as the CD. The iPod and my "ancient" Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox fit into that category. Any digital player that supports 44/16 .wav format files, and many can, is able to store audio CDs with zero loss of informtion. In terms of sound quality, the next major area of shortcoming of portable digital players relates to the maximum amplitude that their headphone jacks can provide. Most of them are hard put to deliver much more than a 1 volt RMS signal to an 8 ohm load. I mention 8 ohms because there are a number of headphones and earphones that have impedances speced in the 12-16 ohm range, and some may go slower within the audio range. These output power limitations are often a response to legal requirements. There are two circumventions to this problem. One is to pick "professsional" equipment that can legally avoid some consumer safety regulations. Another somewhat bulkier and inconvenient approach is to augment the output of the headphone jack of a consumer digtial player with an external amplifier. This amplifier should have a gain of from 6 to 12 db and provide a maximum output of from 2 to 5 volts RMS into an 8-16 ohm load. I don't personally know of any equipment that would meet all of these specs, but it seems like it should exist. I do see a number of web sources for headphone amplifiers that have the potential to meet these specs. I still have that Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox loaded with about 20 gigabytes of .wav files, and it has a more robust headphone jack than most. I've also had pretty good luck powering the low-priced but really pretty clean "Boostaroo" with an external 5 volt power supply for added dynamic range. I don't know if it would be an optimial solution, but if I had to replace my Nomad Jukebox tomorrow, I might be tempted to try a M-Audio Microtrack digital recorder/player. Unfortunately its headphone jack is speced to be a little on the weak side (under 1 volt), so an external headphone amp would still be required. |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Soundhaspriority wrote: In article , "CharlesBlackstone" wrote: Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... I'm looking to replace my rundown car with a really great Hyundai. I haven't been pleased with what I've seen. Anyone know of a Hyundai that is superior? Get it, jerkoff? Bob Morein Jerkoff? Did something I said upset you? Taken your meds today? Enjoy your life.... |
#32
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
Arnii Krooger, exemplar of kristianity ;-)
The Krooborg steps up to lead a Tolerance Prayer. an analog bigot How was church today, Arnii? I hope you told your pastor that you alienated yet another Kroopologist. That should earn you some points toward your Satanic Merit Badge. -- "Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible." A. Krooger, Aug. 2006 |
#33
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
"Signal" wrote in message
"CharlesBlackstone" wrote: There seems to be a dearth of commentary about sound quality of MP3 players. Google "Rightmark" and the name of the player you are interested in. There is some stuff out there. IME good advice. FWIW I also second Paul's comments about the iPod - the headphone jack has a fairly weak output, but with a suitable booster and a good load of uncompressed audio files, it can provide pretty good sound. |
#34
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Eeyore wrote: CharlesBlackstone wrote: CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... Hi, thanks for the answers. I know about compression, etc., but are there some MP3 players that, given high enough sample rates, or an uncompressed file, sounds better than other MP3 players? I truly haven't a clue. I've never seen any manufacturer of one use sound quality as a selling point. There seems to be a dearth of commentary about sound quality of MP3 players. Because quality isn't their function ? Graham Heh, yeah, however, MAudio uses some software (sorry, forgot the name) developed by (sorry, forgot their name too) that is supposed to give good sound, and they promote that. On the MP3 group it's touted. Also, some manufacturers use the Wolfson audio chips, that are supposed to be a better chip set. But some of those are obsolete. The previous Nano used them. I don't think the new ones use them or at least the same ones. But, I have no experience with these. Thanks much.... |
#35
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Harry Lavo wrote: "Eeyore" wrote in message ... CharlesBlackstone wrote: CharlesBlackstone wrote: Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... Thanks.... Hi, thanks for the answers. I know about compression, etc., but are there some MP3 players that, given high enough sample rates, or an uncompressed file, sounds better than other MP3 players? I truly haven't a clue. I've never seen any manufacturer of one use sound quality as a selling point. There seems to be a dearth of commentary about sound quality of MP3 players. Because quality isn't their function ? I seem to recall that about two years ago either Stereophile or The Abso!ute Sound had very nice things to say about one of the iPods, the gist being that it had much better sound quality than any other portable mp3-type player, especially in the bass. You might wish to check the archives of those two mags. Thanks much, I will. Used to be a Stereophile reader.... |
#36
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Scott Dorsey wrote: Fleetie wrote: Well, it's worth remembering that the iPod Nano, not that the OP mentions their type of MP3 player, does support a lossless compression method. The file size isn't that good, but at least it's lossless, and I'd expect the sound quality to be equivalent to that of a CD player; no reason why it shouldn't be. Presumably all modern iPods offer this option. You're still stuck with D/A converters and headphone preamps crammed into a tiny little box and designed to operate with as low power consumption as possible. I have trouble imagining that somethng that can operate off a couple NiCd cells is going to sound as good as the Prism converter and Krell headphone amp, which probably take a total of 500W to run. Of course, you can't carry them on the bus, but that's another issue. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." Thanks. Well, you CAN carry them on the bus.....but it would be a bit awkward... :-) |
#37
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
Arny Krueger wrote: "CharlesBlackstone" wrote in message ups.com Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... There have long been a number of portable digital players that supported uncompressed, lossless digital formats, including the same digital format as the CD. The iPod and my "ancient" Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox fit into that category. Any digital player that supports 44/16 .wav format files, and many can, is able to store audio CDs with zero loss of informtion. In terms of sound quality, the next major area of shortcoming of portable digital players relates to the maximum amplitude that their headphone jacks can provide. Most of them are hard put to deliver much more than a 1 volt RMS signal to an 8 ohm load. I mention 8 ohms because there are a number of headphones and earphones that have impedances speced in the 12-16 ohm range, and some may go slower within the audio range. These output power limitations are often a response to legal requirements. There are two circumventions to this problem. One is to pick "professsional" equipment that can legally avoid some consumer safety regulations. Another somewhat bulkier and inconvenient approach is to augment the output of the headphone jack of a consumer digtial player with an external amplifier. This amplifier should have a gain of from 6 to 12 db and provide a maximum output of from 2 to 5 volts RMS into an 8-16 ohm load. I don't personally know of any equipment that would meet all of these specs, but it seems like it should exist. I do see a number of web sources for headphone amplifiers that have the potential to meet these specs. I still have that Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox loaded with about 20 gigabytes of .wav files, and it has a more robust headphone jack than most. I've also had pretty good luck powering the low-priced but really pretty clean "Boostaroo" with an external 5 volt power supply for added dynamic range. I don't know if it would be an optimial solution, but if I had to replace my Nomad Jukebox tomorrow, I might be tempted to try a M-Audio Microtrack digital recorder/player. Unfortunately its headphone jack is speced to be a little on the weak side (under 1 volt), so an external headphone amp would still be required. Thanks for the great answer, Arny. Well, there's always Headroom's stuff, but this is for my cycling workout and I'm not keen on carrying the amp (though it would attach to the bike....hm....). I also carry my current Samsung YP-u1 around my neck all day, and it wouldn't work there. But I'm intrigued by your mention of "professional" equipment. I have been perusing MP3 stuff on the web for a while and haven't seen mention of such. Seems kinda antithetical to the whole idea of MP3. |
#38
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
High quality MP3 players?
In article . com,
"CharlesBlackstone" wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "CharlesBlackstone" wrote in message ups.com Hi all.... Anybody know of an MP3 player that has superior sound quality? I haven't been pleased with what I've heard. Clean, flat sound... There have long been a number of portable digital players that supported uncompressed, lossless digital formats, including the same digital format as the CD. The iPod and my "ancient" Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox fit into that category. Any digital player that supports 44/16 .wav format files, and many can, is able to store audio CDs with zero loss of informtion. In terms of sound quality, the next major area of shortcoming of portable digital players relates to the maximum amplitude that their headphone jacks can provide. Most of them are hard put to deliver much more than a 1 volt RMS signal to an 8 ohm load. I mention 8 ohms because there are a number of headphones and earphones that have impedances speced in the 12-16 ohm range, and some may go slower within the audio range. These output power limitations are often a response to legal requirements. There are two circumventions to this problem. One is to pick "professsional" equipment that can legally avoid some consumer safety regulations. Another somewhat bulkier and inconvenient approach is to augment the output of the headphone jack of a consumer digtial player with an external amplifier. This amplifier should have a gain of from 6 to 12 db and provide a maximum output of from 2 to 5 volts RMS into an 8-16 ohm load. I don't personally know of any equipment that would meet all of these specs, but it seems like it should exist. I do see a number of web sources for headphone amplifiers that have the potential to meet these specs. I still have that Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox loaded with about 20 gigabytes of .wav files, and it has a more robust headphone jack than most. I've also had pretty good luck powering the low-priced but really pretty clean "Boostaroo" with an external 5 volt power supply for added dynamic range. I don't know if it would be an optimial solution, but if I had to replace my Nomad Jukebox tomorrow, I might be tempted to try a M-Audio Microtrack digital recorder/player. Unfortunately its headphone jack is speced to be a little on the weak side (under 1 volt), so an external headphone amp would still be required. Thanks for the great answer, Arny. It WAS a great answer, IMV. Well, there's always Headroom's stuff, but this is for my cycling workout and I'm not keen on carrying the amp (though it would attach to the bike....hm....). I also carry my current Samsung YP-u1 around my neck all day, and it wouldn't work there. But I'm intrigued by your mention of "professional" equipment. I have been perusing MP3 stuff on the web for a while and haven't seen mention of such. Seems kinda antithetical to the whole idea of MP3. |
#39
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
Arnii Krooger, exemplar of kristianity ;-)
George M. Middius wrote: The Krooborg steps up to lead a Tolerance Prayer. an analog bigot How was church today, Arnii? I hope you told your pastor that you alienated yet another Kroopologist. That should earn you some points toward your Satanic Merit Badge. -- "Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible." A. Krooger, Aug. 2006 Hey George, I don't know you, but I'm glad of it. |
#40
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tubes,rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
|
|||
|
|||
Arnii Krooger, exemplar of kristianity ;-)
CharlesBlackstone said: The Krooborg steps up to lead a Tolerance Prayer. an analog bigot How was church today, Arnii? I hope you told your pastor that you alienated yet another Kroopologist. That should earn you some points toward your Satanic Merit Badge. Hey George, I don't know you, but I'm glad of it. Apparently you don't know the Krooborg either. ;-) -- "Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible." A. Krooger, Aug. 2006 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.audio.car FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (caution, this is HUGE) | Car Audio | |||
Just for Ludovic | Audio Opinions | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio |