Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
Is there a VST multiband processor that is compatible with Adobe Audition 1.5? Audition 3 has one, but I don't use that
version. On a similar note, has anyone found a decent compressor that works in Audition 1.5? I thought I'd finally found one while I was doing a preview, but then I noticed that I'd clicked on bypass. The source is spoken word. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 15-12-2015 00:13, mcp6453 wrote:
Is there a VST multiband processor that is compatible with Adobe Audition 1.5? Audition 3 has one, but I don't use that version. The one in Audition3 also works in 1.5, and is an Izotope, so get their stuff, it is great sounding. On a similar note, has anyone found a decent compressor that works in Audition 1.5? I thought I'd finally found one while I was doing a preview, but then I noticed that I'd clicked on bypass. The source is spoken word. The one in Audition 1.5 is excellent. Its presets are just examples, but you can design it to do just what you want and handdraw the characteristic that suits the task. You may need to find the Cool Edit manual to get a non dumbified explanation of it. Last time - and it is looong time ago - I did vox smoothing in analog hardware I used a two stage approach using both channels of my ADR Gemini compact with diffent ratios and time constants, one for lifting weak passages with slow release and one for compression of peaks with faster release. I can not remember what I did first, probably as written. Or think Izotope again. There also is a wawes thingie that should do wonders to vox, I did get a license to it when it was on sale, but the box it should have been installed on suffered what seems to be a total mobo failure so I never got around to test it. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 15-12-2015 01:37, Les Cargill wrote:
mcp6453 wrote: Is there a VST multiband processor that is compatible with Adobe Audition 1.5? Audition 3 has one, but I don't use that version. On a similar note, has anyone found a decent compressor that works in Audition 1.5? I thought I'd finally found one while I was doing a preview, but then I noticed that I'd clicked on bypass. The source is spoken word. These have worked on every host I ever tried them on ( n-Track, Sonar demo, REAPER ): http://www.gvst.co.uk/downloads.htm Thank you. I have not tried them on Audition. Gonna do just that, dunno when, hmm .. I should have parts for a dual xenon daw around ... thank you! Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 12/15/2015 2:02 AM, Peter Larsen wrote:
On 15-12-2015 00:13, mcp6453 wrote: Is there a VST multiband processor that is compatible with Adobe Audition 1.5? Audition 3 has one, but I don't use that version. The one in Audition3 also works in 1.5, and is an Izotope, so get their stuff, it is great sounding. How would I used the 3.0 multiband processor in 1.5? Is it a separate plug-in? Izotope is good stuff. On a similar note, has anyone found a decent compressor that works in Audition 1.5? I thought I'd finally found one while I was doing a preview, but then I noticed that I'd clicked on bypass. The source is spoken word. The one in Audition 1.5 is excellent. Its presets are just examples, but you can design it to do just what you want and handdraw the characteristic that suits the task. You may need to find the Cool Edit manual to get a non dumbified explanation of it. I guess I don't know how to set it. If I had a preset that worked, I'd probably be able to reverse engineer it to understand what I'm doing. My best solution is to use a Dorrough DAP310 analog processor, but then I have to process in real time, which is tough for two-hour shows. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
Peter Larsen wrote:
On 15-12-2015 01:37, Les Cargill wrote: mcp6453 wrote: Is there a VST multiband processor that is compatible with Adobe Audition 1.5? Audition 3 has one, but I don't use that version. On a similar note, has anyone found a decent compressor that works in Audition 1.5? I thought I'd finally found one while I was doing a preview, but then I noticed that I'd clicked on bypass. The source is spoken word. These have worked on every host I ever tried them on ( n-Track, Sonar demo, REAPER ): http://www.gvst.co.uk/downloads.htm Thank you. I have not tried them on Audition. Gonna do just that, dunno when, hmm .. I should have parts for a dual xenon daw around ... thank you! Kind regards Peter Larsen I forgot one caveat - if you save a project using n-Track 3.0 which has GSnap added to it, n-Track 3.0 will crash when you try to reopen it. You lose the project file. As with anything you download, trust but verify. -- Les Cargill |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
I forgot one caveat - if you save a project using n-Track 3.0 which has GSnap added to it, n-Track 3.0 will crash when you try to reopen it. You lose the project file. As with anything you download, trust but verify. -- Les Cargill Intersting.. I have nTrack 3.3 and use GSNAP ocasionaly and have not seen that I am curious, i have used only nTRACK and Audacity... I love nTracks spectrum analyzer / EQ combination display... I can hear and see a problem and lay an EQ direclty over it to resolve. what do you think of nTrack compared to pro tools or other mainstream DAWS? Mark |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 15 Dec 2015, mcp6453 wrote in rec.audio.pro:
How would I used the 3.0 multiband processor in 1.5? Is it a separate plug-in? Izotope is good stuff. Assuming you have both Audition 1.5 and 3 installed on the computer, find the file "Multiband Compressor.dll" - for me it's in the Plug-ins directory under the main Audition3 program folder. Then, in 1.5 go to Effects | Add/Remove VST directory and add that Plug-ins directory. You will get all the Audition 3 VST effects show up in 1.5. Unfortunately, though, the presets won't be available. You might also try copying 3's Multiband Compressor.dll to 1.5's own vstplugins directory. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 15 Dec 2015, Nil wrote in
rec.audio.pro: You might also try copying 3's Multiband Compressor.dll to 1.5's own vstplugins directory. This does, indeed, work. Remember to "Refresh the Effects List". |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 12/15/2015 6:46 PM, Nil wrote:
On 15 Dec 2015, mcp6453 wrote in rec.audio.pro: How would I used the 3.0 multiband processor in 1.5? Is it a separate plug-in? Izotope is good stuff. Assuming you have both Audition 1.5 and 3 installed on the computer, find the file "Multiband Compressor.dll" - for me it's in the Plug-ins directory under the main Audition3 program folder. Then, in 1.5 go to Effects | Add/Remove VST directory and add that Plug-ins directory. You will get all the Audition 3 VST effects show up in 1.5. Unfortunately, though, the presets won't be available. You might also try copying 3's Multiband Compressor.dll to 1.5's own vstplugins directory. I don't have 3.0 installed. Maybe I can find it somewhere. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 15 Dec 2015, mcp6453 wrote in rec.audio.pro:
On 12/15/2015 6:46 PM, Nil wrote: You might also try copying 3's Multiband Compressor.dll to 1.5's own vstplugins directory. I don't have 3.0 installed. Maybe I can find it somewhere. OK. I figured out a way to copy the presets over from 3 to 1.5, so let me know if you ever get that far. |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
|
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
what do you think of nTrack compared to pro tools or other mainstream DAWS?
Check out Reaper, realize that it's tits, gladly pay the $60. Compare n-Track to Fisher-Price from that point. |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
Tobiah wrote:
what do you think of nTrack compared to pro tools or other mainstream DAWS? Check out Reaper, realize that it's tits, gladly pay the $60. Compare n-Track to Fisher-Price from that point. n-Track uses a much simpler visual metaphor for certain things. So the Fisher-Price comparison works largely in its favor, in my opinion. I use both. An example: To record MIDI over a MIDI connector: n-Track: Set the appropriate MIDI in/out devices. Set the one icon to "MIDI recording". Press Record. REAPER: http://wiki.cockos.com/wiki/index.php/Recording_MIDI There is only a very small subset of things either can do that the other cannot, and since I didn't follow on with all the n-Track upgrades, I can't really complain. The only real problem I've run into is Waves' interpretation of DRM, which is a completely understandable. -- Les Cargill |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 16 Dec 2015, Les Cargill wrote in
rec.audio.pro: An example: To record MIDI over a MIDI connector: n-Track: Set the appropriate MIDI in/out devices. Set the one icon to "MIDI recording". Press Record. REAPER: http://wiki.cockos.com/wiki/index.php/Recording_MIDI You're not making a fair comparison here. Despite the title, this article is about much more than simply recording a MIDI track. It's also about setting MIDI up in the program and choosing something to play it back through. Recording MIDI in Reaper is pretty straightforward and simple. To make it even more so, you can set everything the way you like it and make a track template out of it that you can base future tracks upon. |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
Check out Reaper, realize that it's tits, gladly pay the $60.
Compare n-Track to Fisher-Price from that point. n-Track uses a much simpler visual metaphor for certain things. So the Fisher-Price comparison works largely in its favor, in my opinion. I use both. But Reaper has a way cooler name. |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
"Tobiah" wrote in message ... Check out Reaper, realize that it's tits, gladly pay the $60. Compare n-Track to Fisher-Price from that point. n-Track uses a much simpler visual metaphor for certain things. So the Fisher-Price comparison works largely in its favor, in my opinion. I use both. But Reaper has a way cooler name. And it kicks the Llama's ass ;-) Poly |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 5:26:14 PM UTC-5, polymod wrote:
"Tobiah" wrote in message ... Check out Reaper, realize that it's tits, gladly pay the $60. Compare n-Track to Fisher-Price from that point. n-Track uses a much simpler visual metaphor for certain things. So the Fisher-Price comparison works largely in its favor, in my opinion. I use both. But Reaper has a way cooler name. And it kicks the Llama's ass ;-) That's WinAmp!!! :-) Jack Poly |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
Nil wrote:
On 16 Dec 2015, Les Cargill wrote in rec.audio.pro: An example: To record MIDI over a MIDI connector: n-Track: Set the appropriate MIDI in/out devices. Set the one icon to "MIDI recording". Press Record. REAPER: http://wiki.cockos.com/wiki/index.php/Recording_MIDI You're not making a fair comparison here. Despite the title, this article is about much more than simply recording a MIDI track. It's also about setting MIDI up in the program and choosing something to play it back through. Recording MIDI in Reaper is pretty straightforward and simple. it is. It's just a few more steps than with n-track. I figured peopel would see the setup parts at the link and factor 'em out. To make it even more so, you can set everything the way you like it and make a track template out of it that you can base future tracks upon. Absolutely. -- Les Cargill |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On 16 Dec 2015, "polymod" wrote in
rec.audio.pro: And it kicks the Llama's ass ;-) That it does! Reaper takes a kicking and keeps on ticking. |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
"JackA" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 5:26:14 PM UTC-5, polymod wrote: "Tobiah" wrote in message ... Check out Reaper, realize that it's tits, gladly pay the $60. Compare n-Track to Fisher-Price from that point. n-Track uses a much simpler visual metaphor for certain things. So the Fisher-Price comparison works largely in its favor, in my opinion. I use both. But Reaper has a way cooler name. And it kicks the Llama's ass ;-) That's WinAmp!!! :-) And Reaper...both made by the same folks. Poly |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
"Nil" wrote in message ... On 16 Dec 2015, "polymod" wrote in rec.audio.pro: And it kicks the Llama's ass ;-) That it does! Reaper takes a kicking and keeps on ticking. +1! Poly |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
VST Multiband Processor
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 6:34:15 AM UTC-5, polymod wrote:
"JackA" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 5:26:14 PM UTC-5, polymod wrote: "Tobiah" wrote in message ... Check out Reaper, realize that it's tits, gladly pay the $60. Compare n-Track to Fisher-Price from that point. n-Track uses a much simpler visual metaphor for certain things. So the Fisher-Price comparison works largely in its favor, in my opinion. I use both. But Reaper has a way cooler name. And it kicks the Llama's ass ;-) That's WinAmp!!! :-) And Reaper...both made by the same folks. Ah, didn't know that!!! Thanks! In another newsgroup, it seems WinAmp died about Christmas!! Always enjoyed it, never really wanted the additional Video playing! Still use an outdated/old version; audio only!! Jack Poly |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
UAD-1 Multiband Compressor | Pro Audio | |||
Multiband Compressor For PT LE? | Pro Audio | |||
Multiband Limiter? | Pro Audio | |||
Can a new USD $200 effects processor sound better than a decade old USD $1000 processor? | Pro Audio | |||
Multiband compressor ? | Pro Audio |