Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
A really fine orchestral SACD demo disk....
......the recent discussion here about ambiance or lack thereof got me
thinking about and then resampling many of my orchestral SACD disks. The one that impresses me the most as representing a really first class recording of an orchestra and piano coupled with an equally first class performance is the Phillips recording of Mozart's Piano Concertos K271 and K503, featuring Alred Brendel, with Sir Charles Mackerras leading the Scottish Chamber Orchestra. To begin with, this is first class Mozart-playing. This is perhaps the best I have ever heard Brendel play, and I am not alone in that opinion....I exposed this disk to my friend, the professional pianist, who had not heard it before and who has ambivalent feelings about Brendel (as do I). She sat in rapt attention throughout and proclaimed at the end that it perhaps the finest recording of these pieces she has ever heard, and her reference standard for Mozart is Martha Agerich, so her standards are high. So even should you not agree with me the sound, you will be doing yourself a favor regarding the music-making if you go out and buy this one. As to the recording itself, it is an "early" (i.g. June 2001) Polyhymnia all-DSD recording, with no disclosure of the actual recording location. In multichannel SACD mode, the piano is front and center (a first row perspective) perhaps highlighted a bit, perhaps not, with the orchestra spread naturally behind the piano, again about as you would hear sitting in the first through third rows. The depth sounds completely natural. The recording is not overly reverberant, nor overly warm. But it is also not cool and clinical...in fact the balance in this regard is nearly perfect. There is no distinct "hall sound" but there is a natural sounding ambiance to the recording. In multi-channel form, IMO the recording is near-perfection and very much akin to what I hear when I go to concerts. Brendel's playing is exquisitely nuanced, as is the orchestra behind him. The piano is full and natural in the bass, and pure, soft, and clear in the treble. Nary a hint of digititus. There is no compression, so one gets the full dynamic range, and to really hear it one needs to have the volume at realistic levels. Conceivably this could tax some systems; on mine it sounds marvelous. Switching to the stereo mix, but still in SACD, the sound stage loses quite a bit of its depth. The piano still sounds natural, but the orchestra is kind of "flat" very close behind it. Also, whoever did the mix got the violin (left) side of the orchestra a bit too strong in the mix, in my opinion. Accordingly the violins sound a little out of balance to me at times. But only by a small amount. While there is not the air or space around the orchestra that the multichannel has, the SACD stereo version still has SACD articulation. Just before the two minute mark in the first movement, the first and second violins and the violas all come in together, and it is possible to hear the individual instruments making up the sections (almost) and the sections differentiated one from the other (for sure). And as I mentioned before, the bass and the treble registers of the piano sound exceptionally life-like (I have recorded a lot of classical grand piano, and know good from bad in this respect). Finally, switching to CD. The sound remains very fine overall, as befits a DSD recording. But there are some subtle differences. First, although I can't be sure, I believe some (relatively) light compression has been applied. This results in the bass not sounding as natural as on the SACD layers. A prime example of this is just after the five minute mark of the first movement, where the low register is used by itself. In the SACD layers, the sound is full and natural, without being boomy, but definitely sound "round" as it does in a good hall. On the CD layer, this section has a slightly hollow "thunk" quality that I believe is related to compression, although conceivably it could be the transient quality of the medium itself. It is a quality that I often hear on CD orchestral versions that I don't hear on the SACD version (Walter's Beethoven Fifth is a prime example, Mingus's Ah Um is another). The other difference is at the high end of the strings register. On that section I mentioned above (just short of the two minute mark) when the three sections of strings come in in unison, it is still possible to hear that they are three sections, but at the very top of the frequency range their is a "smear". If the sections were like letters of icing on a cake, it is as if somebody drew a knife across the top of them, blending the letters together with a smear of colored icing. The effect is subtle, but it is there. And finally, as "collapsed" as the stereo SACD layer sounds compared to the multichannel, the CD version lacks yet less "air" and is flatter still. Don't get me wrong, this is still a fine recording as a CD....but the differences from SACD are there. In any case, I wanted to draw this recording to your attention. It is superb playing and superb sound no matter which media you use, and if you have a SACD player you are in for a real treat, especially if you are set up for multichannel. Highly recommended. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Issues with NI demo licensing and support | Pro Audio | |||
SACD v.s. XRCD : No Debate ? | High End Audio | |||
Great *sounding* CD recommendation? | Audio Opinions | |||
Great *sounding* CD recommendation? | General | |||
No surround channels playing Dark Side of Moon SACD | High End Audio |