Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
I will be running two subwoofers off my 4-channel amplifier. The amplifier
is rated 1500W and when the 4-channels are bridged it can deliver 2 x 300W rms. I am interested in the sony pentagonal subwoofer. There are four subwoofers made in this series. I am not sure which is best. http://www.bsscc.co.za/brandcat.asp?...o=7&ProdType=1 Will it be better to match the subwoofers power rating to the amp's? Or Is it better to buy a subwoofer with higher power rating and be sure it can't be blown. There is the 300Wrms 10" and 350W rms 12" and then there is the high power 400Wrms 10" and 500Wrms 12" Which two will run best off my amplifier? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
Actualy, your amplifier should be able to provide as much if not more
rms power than the sub can handle. This ensures you can get maximum volume from the sub without clipping. The only problem with this is, if you get really overzealous with the volume you will be able to blow your sub. Althogh clipping will kill a sub whether or not its beyond the rated limit. --Jeff pil wrote: I will be running two subwoofers off my 4-channel amplifier. The amplifier is rated 1500W and when the 4-channels are bridged it can deliver 2 x 300W rms. I am interested in the sony pentagonal subwoofer. There are four subwoofers made in this series. I am not sure which is best. http://www.bsscc.co.za/brandcat.asp?...o=7&ProdType=1 Will it be better to match the subwoofers power rating to the amp's? Or Is it better to buy a subwoofer with higher power rating and be sure it can't be blown. There is the 300Wrms 10" and 350W rms 12" and then there is the high power 400Wrms 10" and 500Wrms 12" Which two will run best off my amplifier? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
"anon" wrote in message news Actualy, your amplifier should be able to provide as much if not more rms power than the sub can handle. This ensures you can get maximum volume from the sub without clipping. The only problem with this is, if you get really overzealous with the volume you will be able to blow your sub. All very true. Althogh clipping will kill a sub whether or not its beyond the rated limit. And how do you expect it to do this? Clipping DOES NOT blow subs. Les When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 00:57:20 -0500, "Les" wrote:
"anon" wrote in message news Actualy, your amplifier should be able to provide as much if not more rms power than the sub can handle. This ensures you can get maximum volume from the sub without clipping. The only problem with this is, if you get really overzealous with the volume you will be able to blow your sub. All very true. Althogh clipping will kill a sub whether or not its beyond the rated limit. And how do you expect it to do this? Clipping DOES NOT blow subs. Les When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? It is NOT an audio myth you moron, and if you believe any differently you deserve all the destroyed drivers you get. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
Les
When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? Probably never. My recommendations still stands. --Jeff Les wrote: "anon" wrote in message news Actualy, your amplifier should be able to provide as much if not more rms power than the sub can handle. This ensures you can get maximum volume from the sub without clipping. The only problem with this is, if you get really overzealous with the volume you will be able to blow your sub. All very true. Althogh clipping will kill a sub whether or not its beyond the rated limit. And how do you expect it to do this? Clipping DOES NOT blow subs. Les When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
"anon" wrote in message ... Les When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? Probably never. You are likely right. The problem stems with "experts" who do not understand, or twist, some basic audio concepts. Then the noobs listen to the "experts" and the myth perpetuates. But what I would like to know is how clipping kills subs. My recommendations still stands. Half of your recommendation is fine, and I agreed with you. The other half is bull****. Tell us how clipping will kill your sub? If you stand behind it then you should be able to tell us how. If you cannot then how do you know it can? (The next part is directed at noone imparticular) To be honest I used to believe the myth too, as I heard it from an "expert". But once I turned 16 and actually looked at audio and it's concepts it did not add up. Once you actually analyze what you have been taught you might actually learn something. Until that time you are merely reciting something someone else actually learned. Les |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
Here goes...
Clipping occurs when the amplifier is no longer able to create an output waveform which is identical to the input waveform (obviously with an increase in amplitude) due to a lack of voltage on the rails. When the amplifier reaches a portion of the wave where this lack of voltage occurs, a flatspot is formed. These flat spots do not cause a problem except for in extreme circumstances. During this flat spot in the waveform, the speaker will either remain out or in relative to its neutral position. A speaker is cooled by the motion of the cone as it draws and expells air through the voice coil. Thus you can see that if the duration of this flat spot is long enough the lack of motion of the speaker will cause heat buildup in the voice coil which could lead to the speaker blowing. So yes, clipping can damage a speaker but only under extreme circumstances. --Jeff Les wrote: "anon" wrote in message ... Les When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? Probably never. You are likely right. The problem stems with "experts" who do not understand, or twist, some basic audio concepts. Then the noobs listen to the "experts" and the myth perpetuates. But what I would like to know is how clipping kills subs. My recommendations still stands. Half of your recommendation is fine, and I agreed with you. The other half is bull****. Tell us how clipping will kill your sub? If you stand behind it then you should be able to tell us how. If you cannot then how do you know it can? (The next part is directed at noone imparticular) To be honest I used to believe the myth too, as I heard it from an "expert". But once I turned 16 and actually looked at audio and it's concepts it did not add up. Once you actually analyze what you have been taught you might actually learn something. Until that time you are merely reciting something someone else actually learned. Les |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 03:17:57 GMT, anon wrote:
Here goes... Clipping occurs when the amplifier is no longer able to create an output waveform which is identical to the input waveform (obviously with an increase in amplitude) due to a lack of voltage on the rails. When the amplifier reaches a portion of the wave where this lack of voltage occurs, a flatspot is formed. Ok so far... These flat spots do not cause a problem except for in extreme circumstances. During this flat spot in the waveform, the speaker will either remain out or in relative to its neutral position. You're missing the vital point here though. If you analyse the clipped waveform, the 'sharp' edges contain much higher frequencies, which will get through the high-pass section of a crossover, and deliver very high voltage spikes to the tweeters, frying them. Chris Pollard -- CG Internet café, Tagum City, Philippines http://www.cginternet.net |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
"anon" wrote in message ... Here goes... Clipping occurs when the amplifier is no longer able to create an output waveform which is identical to the input waveform (obviously with an increase in amplitude) due to a lack of voltage on the rails. When the amplifier reaches a portion of the wave where this lack of voltage occurs, a flatspot is formed. It may be formed, but the speaker doesn't care. As long you don't send it flying out of it's basket or give it too much power. These flat spots do not cause a problem except for in extreme circumstances. Right, but it is not the "flat spots" it is the fact that under extreme clipping there is more power being delivered to the driver than before. And it *could* cause problems, if the amplifiers output power and the drivers input handling are close, but what blew the speaker was too MUCH power. Let's say you have a driver with a true handling of 100w and an amp capable of putting out 100w. If you sent that amp into extreme clipping and you ended up sending the speaker 140w (close enough number for examples sake) then over time you would damage the speaker. If you took that same speaker and fed it 140w from a non-clipped amp you would still damage the driver. The damage was the same, so did the clipping destroy that speaker? I think not. During this flat spot in the waveform, the speaker will either remain out or in relative to its neutral position. This is based on the false assumption that voltage determines the postion. The voltage does not determine the postion, but rather the acceleration. In square wave clipping the driver accelerates for 1/2 of the cycle one way then quickly changes and moves the other way during the other half. A driver does not stand still. The resulting motion of a square wave vs. a sine wave are actually quite similar. A speaker is cooled by the motion of the cone as it draws and expells air through the voice coil. See above. The driver would still keep moving. Thus you can see that if the duration of this flat spot is long enough the lack of motion of the speaker will cause heat buildup in the voice coil which could lead to the speaker blowing. IF it relied solely on the motion of the cone AND the cone actually stops (which you can experiement for yourself it never does) the that *could* be true. But since a driver rarely relies on the motion alone and it never stops then your example does not add up. You are working from false assumptions, which make everything after them false. If your reasoning was true then why doesn't every guitar speaker get damaged after a few minutes of severely clipping signal? So yes, clipping can damage a speaker but only under extreme circumstances. Nope. Delivering too much power damages a speaker. Clipping can lead to too much power being applied but nonetheless it was NOT the clipping that does the damage. It is an important difference to note. For some further reading check out http://www.rane.com/pdf/note128.pdf Les |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
"Phil Kile" wrote in message Les When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? It is NOT an audio myth you moron, and if you believe any differently you deserve all the destroyed drivers you get. Then prove me wrong, ****stick. Any idiot (such as yourself) can post a one sentence reply, but where's the meat? Take a look at my reply to Anon and dispute it, I dare you too. Then answer me two questions. (Although I doubt you will be able to even attempt a meaningful reply) Why don't guitar amps always have blown speakers? They are extremely clipped all the time. Why can't you blow a 500W driver using a severely clipped 10W amp? So, once you can figure out a way to defy physics let me know and I will take back my statements. Les |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
"Christopher Pollard" wrote in These flat spots do not cause a problem except for in extreme circumstances. During this flat spot in the waveform, the speaker will either remain out or in relative to its neutral position. You're missing the vital point here though. If you analyse the clipped waveform, the 'sharp' edges contain much higher frequencies, which will get through the high-pass section of a crossover, and deliver very high voltage spikes to the tweeters, frying them. Take a look at http://www.rane.com/pdf/note128.pdf It will explain how you damage those tweets so easily. Les |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
I agree with Les. Clipping cannot increase the maximum power output that an
amplifier can deliver. A clipped signal will more likely destroy a sub (IF THE AMPLIFIER CAN DELIVER ENOUGH POWER) than a normal signal Clipping cannot miraculously create more power inside the amp. It can only cause the amplifier to produce its maximum power constantly "Phil Kile" wrote in message ... On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 00:57:20 -0500, "Les" wrote: "anon" wrote in message news Actualy, your amplifier should be able to provide as much if not more rms power than the sub can handle. This ensures you can get maximum volume from the sub without clipping. The only problem with this is, if you get really overzealous with the volume you will be able to blow your sub. All very true. Althogh clipping will kill a sub whether or not its beyond the rated limit. And how do you expect it to do this? Clipping DOES NOT blow subs. Les When will this idiotic audio myth ever go away? It is NOT an audio myth you moron, and if you believe any differently you deserve all the destroyed drivers you get. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
It is NOT an audio myth you moron, and if you believe any differently
you deserve all the destroyed drivers you get. If 300 watts (clipped) can blow a "500 watt" sub, then it's not really a 500 watt sub, is it? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
Here goes...
You stood up to Les. At the very least, it shows you've got some balls. He's a relentless SOB. Clipping occurs when the amplifier is no longer able to create an output waveform which is identical to the input waveform (obviously with an increase in amplitude) due to a lack of voltage on the rails. When the amplifier reaches a portion of the wave where this lack of voltage occurs, a flatspot is formed. These flat spots do not cause a problem except for in extreme circumstances. During this flat spot in the waveform, the speaker will either remain out or in relative to its neutral position. I was with you up until this last sentence. The speaker won't stand still. It will keep moving because the inductance of the coil "rounds" the sharp edges. Every see a square wave that's low-pass filtered? That's what the cone motion will look like. A speaker is cooled by the motion of the cone as it draws and expells air through the voice coil. This is one of the cooling mechanisms, yes. Another cooling mechanism is that the coil being moved increases the effective surface area of radiation. In other words, moving a two inch coil one inch in one direction and then one inch in another direction gives you a total of four inches of cooling length, thereby doubling its effective surface area. This makes a major assumption though: it assumes that the coil is spending an equal amount of time at all positions within those four inches. This is true if it was a square wave. Under sinusoidal motion, this isn't the case! It would be concentrated towards the middle. This will DECREASE the effective surface area of the coil which should actually be detrimental to cooling! Thus you can see that if the duration of this flat spot is long enough the lack of motion of the speaker will cause heat buildup in the voice coil which could lead to the speaker blowing. But remember. We're talking about tens to hundreds Hertz. That's a lot of movement in the time it takes to heat up. So even if it did stand still in spots (which it doesn't), it wouldn't matter. Because it's going to be moving back and forth 50 times in a second. So what we care about is what's going on over the course of several seconds or minutes, not milliseconds. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
300W rms vs 500W rms running off 300W rms amp
During this flat spot in the waveform, the speaker will
either remain out or in relative to its neutral position. This is based on the false assumption that voltage determines the postion. The voltage does not determine the postion, but rather the acceleration. No, voltage determines position, not acceleration. (actually, that's wrong too. current determines position - but current is determined by the voltage, of course) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help: CD Player is intermittent when car is running | Car Audio | |||
what sub power rating for a 300W amp | Car Audio |