Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... : On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:56:47 +0200, "Ruud Broens" : wrote: : : "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message : .. . : : On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:59:24 +0200, "Ruud Broens" : : wrote: : : : : : : Vinyl, on the best day of its life, is around 12 bits : : : equivalent. The widest dynamic range known on a music : : : master tape is around 80dB, 14 bits will allow a properly : : : dithered dynamic range of 81dB. What's the problem? : : :: snip, irrelevant : : : : : Explain why your claimed dynamic range of mastertapes is relevant : : to the establishment of a hifi standard of dynamic range. : : : : It sets the limit to what the replay medium need encompass. : : : : Actual music should set the dynamic range target, not some : : -- this is technically possible in the 80's -- arbitrary range. : : : : Actual live music never exceeds about 85-90dB, : : even under *very* exceptional circumstances, and is : : more commonly 65-70dB dynamic range. : : So you're saying a 90 dB dynamic range is there for the taking, : but your listening room's awfully noisy airco makes it impossible : to enjoy ? No wonder you claim all amps sound the same :-) : : Are you being deliberately obscure, or are you just stupid? I'm : referring to the dynamic range of the *original performance*. don't go into politics, SP - your rebuttals lack convincing power ;-) : : Besides, I live in the UK, and as is the norm here, I don't have : aircon. I do have one slow-running fan in the room, in my Krell, and : that does set the noise floor in the room, at something in the : mid-20s. It's a *very* quiet room - one advantage of living in the : country, with a concrete slab floor, 13" thick walls and deep triple : glazing. The *room* is certainly capable of achieving 90dB dynamic : range, even if there's no available *recording* with that range. : : : this century, they can attain higher master tape quality, Stewart: : : http://www.strongestudios.com/folio.html : : so your 80 dB sound like a gospel :-) : : : : You don't know much about recording, do you Ruud? There's no way that : : will exceed 65dB dynamic range. : : : : no numbers, but interesting anyway : : : http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/2192/essays7.html : : : : Rudy : : heard a concert grand played up close : : 80 dB for real ? no Sttway, Jose : : : : You are confusing dynamic range with maxiumum SPL, the *noise floor* : : will hardly ever be less than 40dB SPL. : : -- : -you mean, you've got _that much_ noise coming from your speakers : ... that's sad. : -- you are confusing facts with your overheated imagination, SP : --- omniscience claim noted. : : Your idiocy continues. That's the noise floor of the concert hall, : only studio recordings are able to get below a 30dB noise floor, and : that would require pretty quiet breathing on the part of the : performers. As noted above, with only me sitting quietly in it, my : listening room is somewhere in the mid-20s (very difficult to measure : due to self-noise in the microphone). Interesting tactic - first rewriting music as _live music_, then claiming from that point onwards that's what i wrote - taken lessons in the debating trade ? : : : Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering : : As from environmental factors, 27 dB daytime eq. reported in NL iirc. : That's in average living rooms, should be better in your dedicated room : , i presume. : : I have yet to find an *average* living room that quiet, I'd have said : that 30-35 dB was more normal in daytime, more for urban dwellings. : : I'm not confusing, i'm detracting one from the other, eh ? : in this case**, 110 - 20 = 90 dB range. : : From where did you get the 20? I got lucky - found it in a breakfast cereal box - where did you find your 40, P.? ....deceptive editing noted.....** : but anyway, surely you're not : saying that the background noise level in a listening room should : dictate the range that should be captured on a medium ? : : No, you completely misread what I wrote. For most people, it does : however set a limit of around 70-80dB in the replay system, from the : 30-35 of the room noise floor to the 105-110 of the system at the : listening position. agreed. Exceptionally quiet rooms housing exceptionally : powerful systems can extend this to a little more than 90dB, which is : wider than you'll ever need. a little more ? need ?? to use a direct quote: Bull****! evidently, _you_ misread music as live music ... without it, of course, you argumentation falls utterly apart. Have fun at the fringe festival, Rudy : -- : : Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Arny vs. Atkinson debat - Could someone post a blow by blow? | Audio Opinions | |||
The Bill May Report on Single-Ended Output Transformers for 300B etc | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Sub Amps - a Follow up Question | Tech | |||
Yet another DBT post | High End Audio | |||
Run Rabbit Run | Vacuum Tubes |