"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:30:03 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.

Actually you *don't* make a heck of a lot less typos than anyone. You
made quite a few yesterday, you know.

Besides, who are you talking about when you refer to "bozos" that use
"cheap" newsreaders that lack spell-checkers? You certainly couldn't
be talking about me. Or Yustabe. Or Stephen. Or George. Or Paul
Dormer.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:30:03 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.

Actually you *don't* make a heck of a lot less typos than anyone. You
made quite a few yesterday, you know.

Besides, who are you talking about when you refer to "bozos" that use
"cheap" newsreaders that lack spell-checkers? You certainly couldn't
be talking about me. Or Yustabe. Or Stephen. Or George. Or Paul
Dormer.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:30:03 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.

Actually you *don't* make a heck of a lot less typos than anyone. You
made quite a few yesterday, you know.

Besides, who are you talking about when you refer to "bozos" that use
"cheap" newsreaders that lack spell-checkers? You certainly couldn't
be talking about me. Or Yustabe. Or Stephen. Or George. Or Paul
Dormer.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:30:03 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.

Actually you *don't* make a heck of a lot less typos than anyone. You
made quite a few yesterday, you know.

Besides, who are you talking about when you refer to "bozos" that use
"cheap" newsreaders that lack spell-checkers? You certainly couldn't
be talking about me. Or Yustabe. Or Stephen. Or George. Or Paul
Dormer.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarsment at his stupidity.
Then again he's probably too stupid to realise it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know. Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were this
stupid
and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

shrug

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarsment at his stupidity.
Then again he's probably too stupid to realise it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know. Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were this
stupid
and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

shrug

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarsment at his stupidity.
Then again he's probably too stupid to realise it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know. Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were this
stupid
and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

shrug

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarsment at his stupidity.
Then again he's probably too stupid to realise it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know. Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were this
stupid
and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

shrug

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarrassment at his
stupidity. Then again he's probably too stupid to realize it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know.

That's not it Weil.

First off, you could have researched this one yourself. we quickly gave you
a number of acronyms and words that you could have used quite profitably at
google. Or perhaps, you really aren't that good at searching with google?

Secondly, a bunch of different people who had no reason to lie to you, told
you almost exactly the same thing. Even Middius and I agreed for a while
until he got weird again.

Thirdly, this is a stupid simple issue. How did you graduate from High
School without learning this? How do you live life without seeing this
simple physical rule operate right before your eyes? How have you gone this
long without knowing why LPs are played at 33 1/3 rpm and what that really
means?

Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

Thing is Weil, you've got a long track record of doing the same thing on any
number of other topics. Admittedly some of them were not so clear-cut. But
many of them were almost this simple. I guess we didn't think how to search
low enough to find the limits of your inability to learn simple things.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were
this stupid and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarrassment at his
stupidity. Then again he's probably too stupid to realize it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know.

That's not it Weil.

First off, you could have researched this one yourself. we quickly gave you
a number of acronyms and words that you could have used quite profitably at
google. Or perhaps, you really aren't that good at searching with google?

Secondly, a bunch of different people who had no reason to lie to you, told
you almost exactly the same thing. Even Middius and I agreed for a while
until he got weird again.

Thirdly, this is a stupid simple issue. How did you graduate from High
School without learning this? How do you live life without seeing this
simple physical rule operate right before your eyes? How have you gone this
long without knowing why LPs are played at 33 1/3 rpm and what that really
means?

Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

Thing is Weil, you've got a long track record of doing the same thing on any
number of other topics. Admittedly some of them were not so clear-cut. But
many of them were almost this simple. I guess we didn't think how to search
low enough to find the limits of your inability to learn simple things.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were
this stupid and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarrassment at his
stupidity. Then again he's probably too stupid to realize it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know.

That's not it Weil.

First off, you could have researched this one yourself. we quickly gave you
a number of acronyms and words that you could have used quite profitably at
google. Or perhaps, you really aren't that good at searching with google?

Secondly, a bunch of different people who had no reason to lie to you, told
you almost exactly the same thing. Even Middius and I agreed for a while
until he got weird again.

Thirdly, this is a stupid simple issue. How did you graduate from High
School without learning this? How do you live life without seeing this
simple physical rule operate right before your eyes? How have you gone this
long without knowing why LPs are played at 33 1/3 rpm and what that really
means?

Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

Thing is Weil, you've got a long track record of doing the same thing on any
number of other topics. Admittedly some of them were not so clear-cut. But
many of them were almost this simple. I guess we didn't think how to search
low enough to find the limits of your inability to learn simple things.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were
this stupid and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:02:13 +1100, "Tony Pearce"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
What a maroon.

Yes he's probably red in the face by now with embarrassment at his
stupidity. Then again he's probably too stupid to realize it.

I guess I am. I'm too stupid to realize that there's no shame in
trying to find out things that I don't know.

That's not it Weil.

First off, you could have researched this one yourself. we quickly gave you
a number of acronyms and words that you could have used quite profitably at
google. Or perhaps, you really aren't that good at searching with google?

Secondly, a bunch of different people who had no reason to lie to you, told
you almost exactly the same thing. Even Middius and I agreed for a while
until he got weird again.

Thirdly, this is a stupid simple issue. How did you graduate from High
School without learning this? How do you live life without seeing this
simple physical rule operate right before your eyes? How have you gone this
long without knowing why LPs are played at 33 1/3 rpm and what that really
means?

Thing is, I wish more
people around here did it, instead of trying to hide their gaps in
knowledge.

Thing is Weil, you've got a long track record of doing the same thing on any
number of other topics. Admittedly some of them were not so clear-cut. But
many of them were almost this simple. I guess we didn't think how to search
low enough to find the limits of your inability to learn simple things.

One of many. Gosh Weil, I wish I would have figured out you were
this stupid and block-headed 3 years ago.

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

I didn't say this. In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.
Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me. I'm sorry that you find this strange. I think
it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public forum. Why
you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

I didn't say this. In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.
Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me. I'm sorry that you find this strange. I think
it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public forum. Why
you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

I didn't say this. In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.
Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me. I'm sorry that you find this strange. I think
it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public forum. Why
you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were more
educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic success becomes
startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people, and you can't admit it
to even yourself.

I didn't say this. In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.
Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me. I'm sorry that you find this strange. I think
it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public forum. Why
you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the cheap
newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd try a
little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were
more educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic
success becomes startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people,
and you can't admit it to even yourself.

I didn't say this.

True, you didnt'. But its the sort of thing that you would say.

In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.

Shrugging off is one of those things you do very well Weil, and that's a
relevant point. You're trying to shrug the cosmic meaning of this experience
you've been going through for several days.

Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

Asked and answered at this point.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me.

I guess that's what it is like inside the head of a person who is pretty
much unteachable.

I'm sorry that you find this strange.

You should be happy for me. Unlike you, I'm a pretty quick learn.

I think it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public
forum.

Weil, your self-confidence far over-reaches your grasp of how things really
are, especially in the so-called scientific world. What's sorely lacking is
the step where you realize that you are almost impossible to teach things
to, even things that are easily observed in day-to-day life, even things
that have been generally-agreed upon for ages.

Why you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

I didn't turn on you Weil. I just had one of those "Eureka" realizations. I
suspect that what I've leaned about you also applies to many in your clique,
the sockpuppet twins for sure. Essentially what I do here is to teach a few
little things about consumer audio. You're never going to get it because of
the fact that you are one, more unteachable than the next.

I mean look at the sockpuppet twins. They've just had their current houses
of lies collapse right in front of their faces, one w/r/t my house and one
w/r/t my main stereo. They didn't skip a beat. Facts mean nothing.
Intentional false statements they gratuitously make aren't lies. It's all a
head game, nothing more, nothing less.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were
more educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic
success becomes startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people,
and you can't admit it to even yourself.

I didn't say this.

True, you didnt'. But its the sort of thing that you would say.

In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.

Shrugging off is one of those things you do very well Weil, and that's a
relevant point. You're trying to shrug the cosmic meaning of this experience
you've been going through for several days.

Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

Asked and answered at this point.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me.

I guess that's what it is like inside the head of a person who is pretty
much unteachable.

I'm sorry that you find this strange.

You should be happy for me. Unlike you, I'm a pretty quick learn.

I think it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public
forum.

Weil, your self-confidence far over-reaches your grasp of how things really
are, especially in the so-called scientific world. What's sorely lacking is
the step where you realize that you are almost impossible to teach things
to, even things that are easily observed in day-to-day life, even things
that have been generally-agreed upon for ages.

Why you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

I didn't turn on you Weil. I just had one of those "Eureka" realizations. I
suspect that what I've leaned about you also applies to many in your clique,
the sockpuppet twins for sure. Essentially what I do here is to teach a few
little things about consumer audio. You're never going to get it because of
the fact that you are one, more unteachable than the next.

I mean look at the sockpuppet twins. They've just had their current houses
of lies collapse right in front of their faces, one w/r/t my house and one
w/r/t my main stereo. They didn't skip a beat. Facts mean nothing.
Intentional false statements they gratuitously make aren't lies. It's all a
head game, nothing more, nothing less.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were
more educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic
success becomes startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people,
and you can't admit it to even yourself.

I didn't say this.

True, you didnt'. But its the sort of thing that you would say.

In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.

Shrugging off is one of those things you do very well Weil, and that's a
relevant point. You're trying to shrug the cosmic meaning of this experience
you've been going through for several days.

Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

Asked and answered at this point.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me.

I guess that's what it is like inside the head of a person who is pretty
much unteachable.

I'm sorry that you find this strange.

You should be happy for me. Unlike you, I'm a pretty quick learn.

I think it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public
forum.

Weil, your self-confidence far over-reaches your grasp of how things really
are, especially in the so-called scientific world. What's sorely lacking is
the step where you realize that you are almost impossible to teach things
to, even things that are easily observed in day-to-day life, even things
that have been generally-agreed upon for ages.

Why you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

I didn't turn on you Weil. I just had one of those "Eureka" realizations. I
suspect that what I've leaned about you also applies to many in your clique,
the sockpuppet twins for sure. Essentially what I do here is to teach a few
little things about consumer audio. You're never going to get it because of
the fact that you are one, more unteachable than the next.

I mean look at the sockpuppet twins. They've just had their current houses
of lies collapse right in front of their faces, one w/r/t my house and one
w/r/t my main stereo. They didn't skip a beat. Facts mean nothing.
Intentional false statements they gratuitously make aren't lies. It's all a
head game, nothing more, nothing less.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were
more educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic
success becomes startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people,
and you can't admit it to even yourself.

I didn't say this.

True, you didnt'. But its the sort of thing that you would say.

In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.

Shrugging off is one of those things you do very well Weil, and that's a
relevant point. You're trying to shrug the cosmic meaning of this experience
you've been going through for several days.

Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

Asked and answered at this point.

IRT the rest of the post, I simply kept asking questions about things
that were unclear to me.

I guess that's what it is like inside the head of a person who is pretty
much unteachable.

I'm sorry that you find this strange.

You should be happy for me. Unlike you, I'm a pretty quick learn.

I think it shows self-confidence for someone to do that in a public
forum.

Weil, your self-confidence far over-reaches your grasp of how things really
are, especially in the so-called scientific world. What's sorely lacking is
the step where you realize that you are almost impossible to teach things
to, even things that are easily observed in day-to-day life, even things
that have been generally-agreed upon for ages.

Why you turned on me is an issue that you'll have to deal with.

I didn't turn on you Weil. I just had one of those "Eureka" realizations. I
suspect that what I've leaned about you also applies to many in your clique,
the sockpuppet twins for sure. Essentially what I do here is to teach a few
little things about consumer audio. You're never going to get it because of
the fact that you are one, more unteachable than the next.

I mean look at the sockpuppet twins. They've just had their current houses
of lies collapse right in front of their faces, one w/r/t my house and one
w/r/t my main stereo. They didn't skip a beat. Facts mean nothing.
Intentional false statements they gratuitously make aren't lies. It's all a
head game, nothing more, nothing less.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news "dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the
cheap newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd
try a little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

Clear example of "debating trade trick number one". I talk about
spell-checkers and suddenly the topic changes to typing skills.

I'm out of this subthread unless you start making sense, Weil.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news "dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the
cheap newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd
try a little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

Clear example of "debating trade trick number one". I talk about
spell-checkers and suddenly the topic changes to typing skills.

I'm out of this subthread unless you start making sense, Weil.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news "dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the
cheap newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd
try a little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

Clear example of "debating trade trick number one". I talk about
spell-checkers and suddenly the topic changes to typing skills.

I'm out of this subthread unless you start making sense, Weil.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:39:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news "dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:36:39 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Sockpuppet, not only can't you spell worth a hill of beans

Well, you can't either. What's yer point?

That I make a heck of a lot less typos than you bozos with the
cheap newsreaders that lack spell-checkers.



So now we are down to arguing over who is the better typist?
Run out of ideas, Arny?

Since you've just been clearly caught in a big lie, thought you'd
try a little "Look over there, cake", eh sockpuppet?

You still didn't answer my question about newsreaders. Could that
blather about "cheap newsreaders with no spellchecker" have been your
own variation of the above juvenile phrase that you routinely employ?
Is that cake on your face, or just egg?

Clear example of "debating trade trick number one". I talk about
spell-checkers and suddenly the topic changes to typing skills.

I'm out of this subthread unless you start making sense, Weil.

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:34:32 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:38:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's a sad admission in itself Arny.

Sad? Sue me for thinking too highly of you, Weil. I thought you were
more educatable than that. The reason for your lack of academic
success becomes startlingly clear. You can't learn like most people,
and you can't admit it to even yourself.

I didn't say this.

True, you didnt'. But its the sort of thing that you would say.

That's *two* apostrophe errors in one sentence. Well done!

In fact, I shrugged it off, but you deleted that.

Shrugging off is one of those things you do very well Weil, and that's a
relevant point. You're trying to shrug the cosmic meaning of this experience
you've been going through for several days.

No I haven't. I've been quite upfront with not only my questions but
with my willingness to ask questions.

Was this a mistake or was it an intentional attempt to say that I said
this about you? I'd like for you to explain this, if you would would.

Asked and answered at this point.

Actually you didn't. Was it intentional or accidential? And why do you
"mindread", which is something that you decry? Just curious...