Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career,"Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
In article , "Steve King"
wrote: At this point, I believe that soundhaspriority has only one priority: to keep this thread going, to keep some attention on himself. Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. He's now decided he's an expert for the IEEE, and is already embarrassing local IEEE members who have banned him from their meetings. My son Bob was told to stop embarrassing me, other dentists question me constantly about the mental illness afflicting Bob and most urge me to get him out of my house so that I can live my last days in peace. Unfortunately, Bob can NEVER admit he's been beaten, or he's wrong. He spent 12 years in college trying to write a thesis that was totally without any scientific merit. Drexel University ejected him from any further studies and spending of MY mone. When Drexel got tired of his bleating about not giving him a degree, he sued them. And even after he was proven IN COURT to have been wrong, he insisted on appealing to the Supreme Court in Washington. And then he criticized THE SUPREME COURT and HIS OWN LAWYER for "erroneous legal reasoning"! He then wanted ME to fund a lawsuit against his LAWYER! So you're not going to change him, god knows his mother tried and it killed her. Dr. Sylvan Morein, DDS PROVEN PUBLISHED FACTS about my Son, Robert Morein -- Bob Morein History -- http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/l...ws/4853918.htm Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court By L. STUART DITZEN Philadelphia Inquirer PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart. They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to challenge his dismissal. The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw. "It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we do come to a larger issue here." An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly "pleasantly" eccentric. A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed by the media and the public. Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser. But it has been the subject of much attention in academia. Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and computer engineering. Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school! BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it patented. A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life. In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea. An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life. Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition. Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's money to cover up his lack of productivity. That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions. Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the state Superior Court. The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic affairs was reasserted. The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary litigation, that would have been the end of it. But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing. Daddy throws more money down the crapper. His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without compensation. "Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what happened to him is pretty common." It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge, the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are. Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim that his idea was stolen - "preposterous." "I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg. "We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than pursuing self-destructive litigation." No **** sherlock. The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser, Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea. His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes and electronic systems. The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a nuclear plant or a computer. My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of Robert Morein, only sawdust. Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata, through a university lawyer, declined to comment. At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in 1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It related to estimation theory. Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in industrial processes. Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the problem Kalata had presented. Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron. K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors. Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he became alienated from Kalata. As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron. The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the patent to lapse. No one made any money from it. Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein. In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and asked for a new faculty adviser. The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein. He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work. Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to complete his thesis. So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers (a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant! Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him. Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the usenet proves it. Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will." So much for political machine judges. The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only about 100 of them. Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the Pennsylvania courts. Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it. Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS. "I had to seek closure," he said. Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence. Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence". BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a bulletlike stream of water. FAILED STUDENT FAILED MOVIE MAKER FAILED SCREENWRITER FAILED INVESTOR FAILED DRIVER FAILED SON FAILED PARENTS FAILED INVENTOR FAILED PLAINTIFF FAILED HOMOSEXUAL FAILED HUMAN FAILED FAILED But none of it is what he had imagined for himself. "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing." |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
"Sylvan Morein, DDS" wrote ...
Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases. At this point I don't care if this personage is the guy suffering from some mental illness in Oz, or if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career,"Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
In article , "Richard Crowley"
wrote: No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases, if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. How dare you! I'm one of the very few who use my real name when discussing my sick son Bob! http://www.iaortho.org/schedule%20of%20CE%20courses.htm And there's a picture of me he http://www.iaortho.org/2004_photos.htm I'm the poorly dressed old guy called "mentor and techer" standing with my colleagues. Too bad I couldn't mentor or teach my own flesh and blood. Unfortunately, Bob can NEVER admit he's been beaten, or he's wrong. He spent 12 years in college trying to write a thesis that was totally without any scientific merit. Drexel University ejected him from any further studies and spending of MY mone. When Drexel got tired of his bleating about not giving him a degree, he sued them. And even after he was proven IN COURT to have been wrong, he insisted on appealing to the Supreme Court in Washington. And then he criticized THE SUPREME COURT and HIS OWN LAWYER for "erroneous legal reasoning"! He then wanted ME to fund a lawsuit against his LAWYER! So you're not going to change him, god knows his mother tried and it killed her. Dr. Sylvan Morein, DDS |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
"Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Sylvan Morein, DDS" wrote ... Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases. At this point I don't care if this personage is the guy suffering from some mental illness in Oz, or if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. It's Brian L. McCarty. He's been doing this forever. My father has never been on usenet. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Moreinsaid. "It's a very gnawing thing."
soundhaspriority wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Sylvan Morein, DDS" wrote ... Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases. At this point I don't care if this personage is the guy suffering from some mental illness in Oz, or if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. It's Brian L. McCarty. He's been doing this forever. My father has never been on usenet. The story about Bob Morein's University experience is correct though. " A recent Pennsylvania case has reaffirmed the right of colleges and universities to make academic decisions without fear of reprisal by the courts. In Morein v. Drexel University, et al., doctoral student Robert Morein challenged the right of Drexel University to dismiss him on academic grounds. Judge Esther R. Sylvester of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas initially ordered Drexel to refund Morein's tuition. The Pennsylvania Superior Court, however, reversed that decision, reaffirming the longstanding principle that faculty-not courts-should make academic decisions. Morein enrolled in Drexel's electrical engineering Ph.D. program in 1986. After eight years, the university dismissed him for failing to make satisfactory progress toward his dissertation. Morein filed a lawsuit against Drexel and five faculty members, including the university's president, claiming breach of contract, negligence, and denial of due process. A panel of three attorney arbitrators initially found in favor of the university. Morein appealed and Judge Sylvester retried the case. The trial court ruled in favor of Morein, holding that the university had not fulfilled its contractual responsibility to educate him properly. The court entered a final judgment in favor of Morein for $44,914 in back tuition and ordered Drexel to remove all failing grades from his transcript. The university appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which reversed the ruling in a 2-1 decision. At issue before the Superior Court was whether the trial court erred by substituting its own judgment for the academic judgment of Drexel's faculty members. The American Council on Education, the Association of Independent Colleges & Universities of Pennsylvania, and numerous colleges and universities in the commonwealth filed an amicus brief on Drexel's behalf. In reversing Judge Sylvester, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reiterated the well-established U.S. Supreme Court and Pennsylvania precedent that holds that courts must show deference to academic institutions, their faculty, and their academic decisions. While the Superior Court acknowledged that a student can bring an action against a university for breach of contract, it rejected the trial court's attempt to second-- guess the university's academic decision making under the guise of claiming that the university had breached its contract to educate a student properly. The Superior Court held that Judge Sylvester's wholesale disregard of the qualifications and judgments of Drexel's faculty was improper and without any basis in fact or record. The Superior Court also found that the faculty had repeatedly reminded Morein of his academic deficiencies and that he had refused to correct them. This case reaffirms the right of a private university to dismiss a student on academic grounds and highlights the inappropriateness of courts that attempt to substitute their judgments for the academic decisions of a university and its faculty. " http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...10/ai_n8971754 As for Bob's appeal to the Supreme Court..... http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Suprem...-17eal2001.pdf Graham |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
The Drexel Case
"Pooh Bear" wrote in message ... soundhaspriority wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Sylvan Morein, DDS" wrote ... Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases. At this point I don't care if this personage is the guy suffering from some mental illness in Oz, or if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. It's Brian L. McCarty. He's been doing this forever. My father has never been on usenet. The story about Bob Morein's University experience is correct though. " A recent Pennsylvania case has reaffirmed the right of colleges and universities to make academic decisions without fear of reprisal by the courts. In Morein v. Drexel University, et al., doctoral student Robert Morein challenged the right of Drexel University to dismiss him on academic grounds. Judge Esther R. Sylvester of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas initially ordered Drexel to refund Morein's tuition. The Pennsylvania Superior Court, however, reversed that decision, reaffirming the longstanding principle that faculty-not courts-should make academic decisions. Morein enrolled in Drexel's electrical engineering Ph.D. program in 1986. After eight years, the university dismissed him for failing to make satisfactory progress toward his dissertation. Morein filed a lawsuit against Drexel and five faculty members, including the university's president, claiming breach of contract, negligence, and denial of due process. A panel of three attorney arbitrators initially found in favor of the university. Morein appealed and Judge Sylvester retried the case. The trial court ruled in favor of Morein, holding that the university had not fulfilled its contractual responsibility to educate him properly. The court entered a final judgment in favor of Morein for $44,914 in back tuition and ordered Drexel to remove all failing grades from his transcript. The university appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which reversed the ruling in a 2-1 decision. At issue before the Superior Court was whether the trial court erred by substituting its own judgment for the academic judgment of Drexel's faculty members. The American Council on Education, the Association of Independent Colleges & Universities of Pennsylvania, and numerous colleges and universities in the commonwealth filed an amicus brief on Drexel's behalf. In reversing Judge Sylvester, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reiterated the well-established U.S. Supreme Court and Pennsylvania precedent that holds that courts must show deference to academic institutions, their faculty, and their academic decisions. While the Superior Court acknowledged that a student can bring an action against a university for breach of contract, it rejected the trial court's attempt to second-- guess the university's academic decision making under the guise of claiming that the university had breached its contract to educate a student properly. The Superior Court held that Judge Sylvester's wholesale disregard of the qualifications and judgments of Drexel's faculty was improper and without any basis in fact or record. The Superior Court also found that the faculty had repeatedly reminded Morein of his academic deficiencies and that he had refused to correct them. This case reaffirms the right of a private university to dismiss a student on academic grounds and highlights the inappropriateness of courts that attempt to substitute their judgments for the academic decisions of a university and its faculty. " http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...10/ai_n8971754 As for Bob's appeal to the Supreme Court..... http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Suprem...-17eal2001.pdf Graham Yes, it is correct. The case was reversed because the Superior Court found that educational malpractice was not a cause for suit in Pennsylvania. It did not establish that there was no educational malpractice. The U.S. Supreme Court hears only 1.5% of the 7000 cases brought before it annunally. Therefore, there was no U.S. Supreme Court Decision. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
"Pooh Bear" wrote
in message soundhaspriority wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Sylvan Morein, DDS" wrote ... Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases. At this point I don't care if this personage is the guy suffering from some mental illness in Oz, or if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. It's Brian L. McCarty. He's been doing this forever. My father has never been on usenet. The story about Bob Morein's University experience is correct though. " A recent Pennsylvania case has reaffirmed the right of colleges and universities to make academic decisions without fear of reprisal by the courts. In Morein v. Drexel University, et al., doctoral student Robert Morein challenged the right of Drexel University to dismiss him on academic grounds. Judge Esther R. Sylvester of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas initially ordered Drexel to refund Morein's tuition. The Pennsylvania Superior Court, however, reversed that decision, reaffirming the longstanding principle that faculty-not courts-should make academic decisions. Morein enrolled in Drexel's electrical engineering Ph.D. program in 1986. After eight years, the university dismissed him for failing to make satisfactory progress toward his dissertation. Morein filed a lawsuit against Drexel and five faculty members, including the university's president, claiming breach of contract, negligence, and denial of due process. A panel of three attorney arbitrators initially found in favor of the university. Morein appealed and Judge Sylvester retried the case. The trial court ruled in favor of Morein, holding that the university had not fulfilled its contractual responsibility to educate him properly. The court entered a final judgment in favor of Morein for $44,914 in back tuition and ordered Drexel to remove all failing grades from his transcript. The university appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which reversed the ruling in a 2-1 decision. At issue before the Superior Court was whether the trial court erred by substituting its own judgment for the academic judgment of Drexel's faculty members. The American Council on Education, the Association of Independent Colleges & Universities of Pennsylvania, and numerous colleges and universities in the commonwealth filed an amicus brief on Drexel's behalf. In reversing Judge Sylvester, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reiterated the well-established U.S. Supreme Court and Pennsylvania precedent that holds that courts must show deference to academic institutions, their faculty, and their academic decisions. While the Superior Court acknowledged that a student can bring an action against a university for breach of contract, it rejected the trial court's attempt to second-- guess the university's academic decision making under the guise of claiming that the university had breached its contract to educate a student properly. The Superior Court held that Judge Sylvester's wholesale disregard of the qualifications and judgments of Drexel's faculty was improper and without any basis in fact or record. The Superior Court also found that the faculty had repeatedly reminded Morein of his academic deficiencies and that he had refused to correct them. This case reaffirms the right of a private university to dismiss a student on academic grounds and highlights the inappropriateness of courts that attempt to substitute their judgments for the academic decisions of a university and its faculty. " http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...10/ai_n8971754 As for Bob's appeal to the Supreme Court..... http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Suprem...-17eal2001.pdf From the "truth is stranger is fiction" department - Last time I reminded Robert Morein about these true relevant facts, he wrote a letter to the pastor of my church about what a bad person I was. In Robert Morein land - it's un-Christian to tell the truth. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
|
#9
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
The Drexel Case
soundhaspriority wrote: "Pooh Bear" wrote in message ... soundhaspriority wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Sylvan Morein, DDS" wrote ... Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases. At this point I don't care if this personage is the guy suffering from some mental illness in Oz, or if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. It's Brian L. McCarty. He's been doing this forever. My father has never been on usenet. The story about Bob Morein's University experience is correct though. " A recent Pennsylvania case has reaffirmed the right of colleges and universities to make academic decisions without fear of reprisal by the courts. In Morein v. Drexel University, et al., doctoral student Robert Morein challenged the right of Drexel University to dismiss him on academic grounds. Judge Esther R. Sylvester of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas initially ordered Drexel to refund Morein's tuition. The Pennsylvania Superior Court, however, reversed that decision, reaffirming the longstanding principle that faculty-not courts-should make academic decisions. Morein enrolled in Drexel's electrical engineering Ph.D. program in 1986. After eight years, the university dismissed him for failing to make satisfactory progress toward his dissertation. Morein filed a lawsuit against Drexel and five faculty members, including the university's president, claiming breach of contract, negligence, and denial of due process. A panel of three attorney arbitrators initially found in favor of the university. Morein appealed and Judge Sylvester retried the case. The trial court ruled in favor of Morein, holding that the university had not fulfilled its contractual responsibility to educate him properly. The court entered a final judgment in favor of Morein for $44,914 in back tuition and ordered Drexel to remove all failing grades from his transcript. The university appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which reversed the ruling in a 2-1 decision. At issue before the Superior Court was whether the trial court erred by substituting its own judgment for the academic judgment of Drexel's faculty members. The American Council on Education, the Association of Independent Colleges & Universities of Pennsylvania, and numerous colleges and universities in the commonwealth filed an amicus brief on Drexel's behalf. In reversing Judge Sylvester, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reiterated the well-established U.S. Supreme Court and Pennsylvania precedent that holds that courts must show deference to academic institutions, their faculty, and their academic decisions. While the Superior Court acknowledged that a student can bring an action against a university for breach of contract, it rejected the trial court's attempt to second-- guess the university's academic decision making under the guise of claiming that the university had breached its contract to educate a student properly. The Superior Court held that Judge Sylvester's wholesale disregard of the qualifications and judgments of Drexel's faculty was improper and without any basis in fact or record. The Superior Court also found that the faculty had repeatedly reminded Morein of his academic deficiencies and that he had refused to correct them. This case reaffirms the right of a private university to dismiss a student on academic grounds and highlights the inappropriateness of courts that attempt to substitute their judgments for the academic decisions of a university and its faculty. " http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...10/ai_n8971754 As for Bob's appeal to the Supreme Court..... http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Suprem...-17eal2001.pdf Graham Yes, it is correct. The case was reversed because the Superior Court found that educational malpractice was not a cause for suit in Pennsylvania. It did not establish that there was no educational malpractice. The U.S. Supreme Court hears only 1.5% of the 7000 cases brought before it annunally. Therefore, there was no U.S. Supreme Court Decision. Could you perhaps elaborate on why you hadn't completed your thesis after 8 yrs of study ? Graham |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
The Drexel Case
Could you perhaps elaborate on why you hadn't completed your thesis after 8 yrs of study ? Graham Graham, The answer should be obvious to anyone who peruses rec.audio.marketplace. Jon |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Idiots rally! Film suppressed!
Chevdoborg stuttered: But at least he doesn't come off stupid, like you always do. Droll to hear somebody who adores Arnii Krooborg calling somebody -- anybody -- "stupid". -- A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
Chevdo wrote:
In article , says... if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. But at least he doesn't come off stupid, like you always do. Is school out already? It's only April! |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Idiots rally! Film suppressed!
George M. Middius wrote: A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic. Hahahaha l.o.l. |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Moreinsaid. "It's a very gnawing thing."
Sylvan Morein, DDS wrote:
In article , "Richard Crowley" wrote: No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases, if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. How dare you! I'm one of the very few who use my real name when discussing my sick son Bob! Nonetheless, to go about stalking your son, if there is any truth to your being his father, when he is not even referring to you is pretty damned sick. Think about it. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
|
#16
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
Chevdo wrote:
So far, I haven't been able to think of a solution to this problem. That's easy, stop acting like such a **** head. End of problem. |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
Bob Cain said: How dare you! I'm one of the very few who use my real name when discussing my sick son Bob! Nonetheless, to go about stalking your son, if there is any truth to your being his father, when he is not even referring to you is pretty damned sick. Think about it. Bwian's conscience was surgically removed. -- A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic. |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
It's a forgery by Brian L. McCarty
"Bob Cain" wrote in message ... Sylvan Morein, DDS wrote: In article , "Richard Crowley" wrote: No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases, if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. How dare you! I'm one of the very few who use my real name when discussing my sick son Bob! Nonetheless, to go about stalking your son, if there is any truth to your being his father, when he is not even referring to you is pretty damned sick. Think about it. My pop is not on usenet. The poster is Brian L. McCarty, who currently resides in Cairns, Australia. Note the pathj. Highwinds Media is an Australian ISP. Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ne wshub.sdsu.edu!peer01.west.cox.net!cox.net!hwmnpee r01.phx!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.phx!newsfe03.phx.highwinds-media.com.POSTED!976fb0cf!not-for-mail |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
The Drexel Case
"Pooh Bear" wrote in message ... soundhaspriority wrote: "Pooh Bear" wrote in message ... soundhaspriority wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Sylvan Morein, DDS" wrote ... Well, that's very obvious, Steve. " is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics. No matter how many times you plonk these sick wackos, they keep coming back with new aliases. At this point I don't care if this personage is the guy suffering from some mental illness in Oz, or if there really is such a person as "Sylvan Morein, DDS" he comes off as equally sick. It's Brian L. McCarty. He's been doing this forever. My father has never been on usenet. The story about Bob Morein's University experience is correct though. " A recent Pennsylvania case has reaffirmed the right of colleges and universities to make academic decisions without fear of reprisal by the courts. In Morein v. Drexel University, et al., doctoral student Robert Morein challenged the right of Drexel University to dismiss him on academic grounds. Judge Esther R. Sylvester of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas initially ordered Drexel to refund Morein's tuition. The Pennsylvania Superior Court, however, reversed that decision, reaffirming the longstanding principle that faculty-not courts-should make academic decisions. Morein enrolled in Drexel's electrical engineering Ph.D. program in 1986. After eight years, the university dismissed him for failing to make satisfactory progress toward his dissertation. Morein filed a lawsuit against Drexel and five faculty members, including the university's president, claiming breach of contract, negligence, and denial of due process. A panel of three attorney arbitrators initially found in favor of the university. Morein appealed and Judge Sylvester retried the case. The trial court ruled in favor of Morein, holding that the university had not fulfilled its contractual responsibility to educate him properly. The court entered a final judgment in favor of Morein for $44,914 in back tuition and ordered Drexel to remove all failing grades from his transcript. The university appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which reversed the ruling in a 2-1 decision. At issue before the Superior Court was whether the trial court erred by substituting its own judgment for the academic judgment of Drexel's faculty members. The American Council on Education, the Association of Independent Colleges & Universities of Pennsylvania, and numerous colleges and universities in the commonwealth filed an amicus brief on Drexel's behalf. In reversing Judge Sylvester, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reiterated the well-established U.S. Supreme Court and Pennsylvania precedent that holds that courts must show deference to academic institutions, their faculty, and their academic decisions. While the Superior Court acknowledged that a student can bring an action against a university for breach of contract, it rejected the trial court's attempt to second-- guess the university's academic decision making under the guise of claiming that the university had breached its contract to educate a student properly. The Superior Court held that Judge Sylvester's wholesale disregard of the qualifications and judgments of Drexel's faculty was improper and without any basis in fact or record. The Superior Court also found that the faculty had repeatedly reminded Morein of his academic deficiencies and that he had refused to correct them. This case reaffirms the right of a private university to dismiss a student on academic grounds and highlights the inappropriateness of courts that attempt to substitute their judgments for the academic decisions of a university and its faculty. " http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...10/ai_n8971754 As for Bob's appeal to the Supreme Court..... http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Suprem...-17eal2001.pdf Graham Yes, it is correct. The case was reversed because the Superior Court found that educational malpractice was not a cause for suit in Pennsylvania. It did not establish that there was no educational malpractice. The U.S. Supreme Court hears only 1.5% of the 7000 cases brought before it annunally. Therefore, there was no U.S. Supreme Court Decision. Could you perhaps elaborate on why you hadn't completed your thesis after 8 yrs of study ? Graham, I don't want to go into it here. However, the professor had one Ph.D student who started with him before me and still wasn't finished when I left. Eventually, he got out, but it was very painful. |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
Chevdo wrote: snip If they wind up finding out the superior person's real name, they do serious damage to that person's employment opportunities. All employers should Google new applicants, and when they Google me, and see all the obscene slander attatched to my name, they'll inevitably move on to a less controversial applicant.. So far, I haven't been able to think of a solution to this problem. Change your name to Jim Smith, or something similar. Smart con men choose a name that is one of the 50 most common surnames of British Isles extraction, _excepting_ Smith or Jones, because much of the population has one of those. Smith stands out as possibly bogus, but Davis, Thompson, Stewart, etc. etc. doesn't. Exceptions exist. Polish names are common in Wisconsin, Italian and Jewish names in New Jersey, Swedish names in Minnesota. "Doe" is actually a very uncommon surname. |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
IEEE article "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
-Question for John Atkinson- | Audio Opinions | |||
-Question for John Atkinson- | General | |||
Short speaker stands Bob Morein says "I don't really have areplacement career, It's a very gnawing thing." | Marketplace | |||
Correction for Ludovic | Audio Opinions | |||
SACD - DVD-a other stuff "I don't really have a replacementcareer," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing." | Audio Opinions |