Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
Is flat frequency response desirable?
On Jun 5, 11:39*pm, Steven Sullivan wrote:
wrote: On Jun 4, 4:50?am, Steven Sullivan wrote: If you are a scientist. ?Which you are not. IIRC, Dr. Sullivan has a Ph.D. in biochemistry. Not quite....'just' biology. ; -- A Ph.D. in "biology"? My Ph.D. is in microbiology. (Not that any of this makes one iota of difference when it comes to high end audio.) Norman Cell biology, if you want to be picky, though my training was really more in molecular developmental neurobiology; where I was, they didn't have a degree with that name at the time. While were at it; Biochemistry, Biology, Cell Biology, "whatever", the department's name was written on my diploma and it reads "Department of Micriobiology". Not that anyone is required to work in an area named on a diploma, which is just kind of a 'union card'. Since when did precision become picky? Norman M. Schwartz Regards, Norman -- -S We have it in our power to begin the world over again - Thomas Paine |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why are mic made with non flat frequency response? | Pro Audio | |||
Frequency Response of XM | High End Audio | |||
Frequency response | Pro Audio | |||
Frequency response | Pro Audio | |||
Mic Frequency Response | Pro Audio |