The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Descent into Mediocrity
Pardon the top posting:
Bose gets a lot of audiophile criticism, which is both deserved and
undeserved. I have sold stereo since 1980, never Bose, and I also have made
negative remarks about Bose. My take on Bose is this:
Bose's main flaw is overpricing, as the product dosn't live up to the price.
Superb marketing makes the name command Mercedes prices for Hyundai
performance. My point is that there is nothing wrong with a Hyundai, but if
priced at $30,000 and up many would be tempted to call it junk.
The 901 is a special case in one way and typical of Bose in others. In the
70's I briefly had a pair and found it different from all others. It is
special in that it's a small speaker that spreads a big sound all around a
room, and to many that is a great virtue. It is typical in that Bose works
hard to develop products that appeal to the average man.
I wouldn't buy Bose, I wouldn't sell Bose, but I see that Bose owners are
very happy with their speakers. I think this level of satisfaction is mostly
a result of brainwashing, but it is nevertheless real.
The Speaker and Stereo Store
Saint Louis Missouri
"Groom Lake" > wrote in message
> In > posted on Sun, 22 Aug
> 2004 12:11:10 -0500, Wylie Williams wrote:
> >I wouldn't buy Bose, I wouldn't sell Bose, but I see that Bose owners are
> >very happy with their speakers. I think this level of satisfaction is
> >a result of brainwashing, but it is nevertheless real.
> I too had a pair in the 70s, and after much more placement orientation
> than I was expecting, I finally got them to sound great. The small house
> I'm in for now isn't worth the trouble to find that sweet spot, but I'd
> definitely consider getting another pair later on someday when I have a
> larger dedicated listening room, maybe cheap, from some disenchanted
> soul that didn't understand the room echo and multipath issues. ;-)
I don't suggest that Bose is "bad" , only over-rated and over-priced. Most
if not nearly all the tech-types on these groups would agree. If not for the
price, for example, the Wave radio would be a very attractive niche product.
The product quality is good, and unlike many products, there is support for
parts and service.
I bought my wife a Cambridge Soundworks 88 CD instead. Less than 1/2 the
price, and comparable performance.
"Mark D. Zacharias" > wrote > I don't suggest that Bose is
"bad" , only over-rated and over-priced.
We agree. But there are many who post about Bose on the net who confuse
being a bad value with being a bad product, and call Bose junk.
Good for filling a room with sound and emptying a wallet but not much more.
"Wylie Williams" > wrote in message
> Pardon the top posting:
> Bose gets a lot of audiophile criticism, which is both deserved and
> undeserved. I have sold stereo since 1980, never Bose, and I also have
> negative remarks about Bose. My take on Bose is this:
> Bose's main flaw is overpricing, as the product dosn't live up to the
> Superb marketing makes the name command Mercedes prices for Hyundai
> performance. My point is that there is nothing wrong with a Hyundai, but
> priced at $30,000 and up many would be tempted to call it junk.
> The 901 is a special case in one way and typical of Bose in others. In
> 70's I briefly had a pair and found it different from all others. It is
> special in that it's a small speaker that spreads a big sound all around
> room, and to many that is a great virtue. It is typical in that Bose works
> hard to develop products that appeal to the average man.
> I wouldn't buy Bose, I wouldn't sell Bose, but I see that Bose owners are
> very happy with their speakers. I think this level of satisfaction is
> a result of brainwashing, but it is nevertheless real.
> Wylie Williams
> The Speaker and Stereo Store
> Saint Louis Missouri
> "Peter Sammon" > wrote in message
> > http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428
> > The Bottom Line Audio equipment is a wonderful hobby featuring many
> > different approaches to the science of sound by many different speaker
> > manufacturers. Respect one another's preferences.
> > Original Review date = Feb. 14, 2004:
> > I guess from the beginning of time itself humanity has shown its
> > strengths and weaknesses sometimes with very little subtlety. Certainly
> > we are a breed of beings quite capable of love, compassion, honesty,
> > integrity, good-hearted humor, good will, bravery and self sacrifice.
> > Unfortunately this very same breed is quite comfortable at times with
> > hatred, greed, lying, sarcasm, snobbishness, cheating, ignorance,
> > prejudice, cowardice and selfishness.
> > So why should someone who writes audio and video reviews for EPINIONS
> > submit an article opening with a paragraph the likes of what you have
> > just read? Well, because I have written what I consider to be a very
> > passionate review on the most passionate speaker system I have ever
> > encountered since the day I fell in love with the audio hobby. The
> > speaker system I'm referring to is the legendary Bose 901. Unfortunately
> > as popular as this speaker was and is, it is also loathed and hated by
> > many audiophiles for several reasons. Also unfortunate is the amount of
> > outright abuse Bose audiophiles receive when voicing their love for Bose
> > speakers.
> > You see, when the first reviews of the 901 went to press in 1968 they
> > were raves. Because of the raves and because the speakers were so
> > satisfyingly different from anything else at that time, the little Bose
> > Corporation enjoyed seemingly instant overnight success. The reviews
> > all from magazines that had many audio manufacturers including Bose
> > sponsor their print. Bose did run small black and white ads in everyone
> > of them. Then along came the first negative review from supposedly an
> > unbiased Stereophile magazine issue. This seemingly courageous
> > publication supposedly relied less on advertising for its income freeing
> > the reviewers to write whatever they felt like writing on given pieces
> > audio equipment. Unfortunately another negative reviewer voiced his
> > opinion on the 901 and Bose decided to pursuit the man in court.
> > The outcome of the trial was at first in favor of Bose but then the
> > court's decision was overturned later in favor of the reviewer's right
> > his own opinion. Here, I agree with the court's judgement as I believe
> > have the right to print exactly how we feel. The only problem I have
> > the particular reviewer in question was that it was discovered that the
> > gentleman was involved in starting a new speaker co. which may have
> > thrown more incentive in his direction to speak very negatively about
> > 901.
> > Well, sometimes success breeds hate and contempt and the Bose Corp.
> > to be a classic prime example...not entirely beyond their own fault. By
> > the late 70's the 901's were steamrolling along with enviable success
> > while high end audio dealers built up even more contempt with only a few
> > select high end stores carrying the Bose name. Bose incidentally started
> > marketing the 901 in the late 60's in high end fashion by carefully
> > selecting its authorized dealers using Fair Trade Laws to control or set
> > their product's prices. Even though Fair Trade Laws have been long since
> > repealed, they are now substituted by and replaced with "controlled
> > pricing" which basically accomplishes the same objective by not only
> > but many respectable brands. That is..."Lower the price of our product
> > below our set price without our authorization and we'll drop you like a
> > hot potato!"
> > Of course the benefits to the individual dealer is that no one will be
> > allowed to undersell him. Of course there are ways around this but I'll
> > save that for another topic.
> > Bose lawyers have been turned loose by Amar Bose to pursuit other
> > manufacturers that may possibly have infringed on the co.'s patents and
> > this fact has only added fuel to the fire. Battle lines were clearly
> > drawn between the high end and the highway discounters that sold Bose
> > speakers by the turn of the decade and by 1983 all high end publications
> > clearly ruled out any mention of the Bose 901 or any other Bose product
> > for that matter! Stereophile magazine which featured J Gordon Holt's
> > original negative review refused to even list the 901 as an acceptable
> > audiophile speaker. Yes, in 1983 if one were to walk into a specialized
> > high end store and mention the Bose 901 as a possible ultimate speaker
> > purchase then one was likely to find his or her way to the door rather
> > quickly with a merciless barrage of insults and sarcastic comments
> > at them as I have myself unfortunately experienced.
> > Thus the art of Bose bashing became quite popular and easy in many
> > audiophile corners and has found its way big time onto opinion web sites
> > such as this one. Here it is the year 2004 and I still hear the same
> > comments as the ones I experienced in 1973 only with more intensity and
> > motorized by even more hatred and contempt!
> > You will notice when an EPINIONS reviewer writes a most positive review
> > on the 901 or any other Bose speaker he or she is likely to receive some
> > rather negative comments by other members almost immediately. Also,
> > rave review will be answered shortly thereafter with an equally intense
> > negative review. There seems to be very little "middle of the road"
> > reaction to the Bose 901 and Bose speakers in general! Only one other
> > manufacturer has laid claim to this love/hate forum and that is Klipsch
> > with their horn loaded speaker systems. More than a very select group of
> > audio enthusiasts love the Klipsch approach but a tidal wave of so
> > audio experts will find tremendous fault with the product.
> > Sorry for the lengthy introduction to "The Art Of Bose Bashing" but I
> > feel you need to know why things are the way they are and that a bit of
> > history education is important in order to understand why the Bose
> > bashing occurs in the first place!
> > The Art Itself
> > Here are some typical so called observations Bose bashers use against
> > Bose admirers:
> > 1. Ignorance...Bose buyers are not aware of other high end brands
> > Bose sells in general low to mid-fi audio stores where they cannot be
> > compared to ultimate quality transducers. Also because of this situation
> > and because they never read Stereophile Magazine, Bose lovers are not
> > aware of excellent high end amplifier brands like Belles, Creek Audio,
> > Krell, Parasound, Mark Levinson, Conrad Johnson, Musical Fidelity,
> > Plinius, Rotel and Audio Research. Bose owners are not educated in the
> > art of true sound reproduction!
> > 2. Bose lovers are tone deaf or have just plain lost their hearing
> > completely.
> > 3. Bose lovers are gullible. They believe blindly in Bose's aggressive
> > advertising and marketing. They follow like sheep while the biggest con
> > artists in the business...Bose itself takes a P.T. Barnum approach = "A
> > sucker is born every minute." Bose products are overpriced, overhyped,
> > over marketed while under manufactured with cheaply made outdated
> > materials like paper woofers and tweeters along with foam surrounds as
> > opposed to polypropylene or composite materials like Kevlar with rubber
> > surrounds.
> > 4. Bose lovers are not attuned to or aware of audiophile listening
> > qualities such as deep well defined tight room shaking bass,
> > subleties/nuances in music, transient response [quick buildup and decay
> > of various musical sounds such as plucked strings], transparency,
> > accuracy, musical timbre, neutrality, proper soundstaging, discretion,
> > overtones, dynamic range and musically emotional involvement.
> > 5. If a Bose owner really rants and raves about his/her purchase and
> > joyfully explains his/her happiness about it and how ultimately
> > satisfying the whole thing is then the person is one of the following:
> > a. in denial
> > b. a Bose dealer
> > C. a big fat liar
> > d. all of the above.
> > Recently I was accused of lying and being a Bose dealer by a fellow site
> > member and it really was kind of funny to me because I have sometimes
> > dreamed of becoming a Bose dealer but that is not going to happen and I
> > really am not well off anyway so I have no capital to even backup such
> > idea! I probably would make a decent Bose salesman but have no intention
> > of getting involved with the hobby in that way. When I rave about a
> > product...that is exactly how I feel about the doggone thing and
> > certainly would not lie if I had been disappointed regardless of the
> > amount spent on the item. As a matter of fact there is soon to come
> > from yours truly a review about a used audio web site where I clearly
> > get taken and am not proud of my two purchases from the vendor as I
> > ultimately received nothing in return for my hard earned cash!
> > As I stated earlier in the article, Bose is not without deserving of
> > of the criticism the co. receives. Also, I would like to make it
> > extremely clear that not all criticisms of Bose speakers fall under
> > bashing". There are some really honest straightforward intelligent
> > negative observations by EPINIONS reviewers on Bose speakers. There were
> > a couple of reviews that I gave a VH rating even though I disagreed with
> > the assessment. But when someone tells me that they ran their regular
> > conventional speakers with the Bose 901's with the equalizer activated
> > and cannot understand why the sound is so bad...then I am liable to give
> > an NH rating to that review. The 901 e.q. will make conventional
> > sound horrible at best and even with the 901's running simultaneously
> > sound will be most incorrect! Also if someone theorizes how badly the
> > should sound without giving an actual accounting of at least a basic
> > audition, there too I am liable to give a low rating to that review.
> > You'd be surprised at how many Bose reviews here on EPINIONS actually
> > lack even the slightest hint of an honest listening evaluation.
> > Now as far as Bose deserving some criticism is concerned, I will explain
> > why they deserve what they get sometimes!
> > As Amar Bose built his co. around the flagship model 901 he realized the
> > need to expand his speaker line and within a decade from the 901's debut
> > the 301 , 501 and 601  models were born with clearly
> > superior sound to just about anything else in their respective price
> > classes. The Bose reputation for building quality transducers that went
> > beyond the norm grew! While the 301 was the new bookshelf champion the
> > other two models were award winning floorstanding designs that
> > represented good value.
> > At this point, Bose was fighting the trend of 4 channel reproduction and
> > eventually home theater configurations as the co. simply felt why add
> > extra channels for ambient [rear] reproduction when their own speakers
> > accomplished basically the same task quite naturally with their
> > direct/reflecting stereo design? Although the co. fought the trend for
> > sometime they finally decided to give in with the introduction of their
> > AV slimmed down 501 and 601 Series IV models along with their
> > systems which involved little cubes [sats] and bass modules. The
> > Acoustimass systems were great but something went wrong with the models
> > 501 and 601.
> > The 501's popularity was slipping after its original Series I
> > lowboy/fatboy design seemed to disappear overnight and then reappear
> > as quickly with a facelift in Series II during the late 70's. The
> > Acoustic Suspension principle was dropped in favor of a ported bass
> > design but the public just did not react favorably to the new designs
> > dealers found it tough to peddle as the price was just too close to the
> > outstanding 601 Series II model. The model vanished into the night! Then
> > out of nowhere in the mid 90's Bose introduced Series III and ultimately
> > Series IV around 2000 which gave the 501 a complete makeover with a new
> > seductive slim look but unfortunately the drivers were downsized and so
> > was the sound!
> > The 601 was an enormously popular model especially Series II and III
> > [1979-1997] which featured several Bose patents including the "Free
> > Array". This configuration boasted an 8" woofer mounted on top of the
> > rather large enclosure surrounded by no less than four 2 1/2" angled
> > tweeters crossed over at slightly different frequencies to eliminate
> > abnormalities and distortion. A second 8" woofer was mounted further
> > the front of the cabinet and the two woofers were ported in an ingenious
> > fashion that allowed the 601 Series II and III to reproduce bass
> > frequencies all the way down to 27 hz without ever sounding heavy yet
> > able to literally shake the very foundations beyond belief! The overall
> > sound was smooth, natural and involving and unlike the flagship model
> > 901, the clever design allowed the versatile 601 speaker to be placed in
> > just about any size room with equally great results.
> > Then along came 601 Series IV that actually appeared to be quite
> > seductive looking with its new slimmed down look but obviously could not
> > hold a candle to its predecessors because of the reduction of drivers
> > elimination of the "Free Space Array". The sound was noticebly inferior
> > to what Bose lovers had come to expect from the co.
> > Now, I figured if anyone could make smaller speakers sound great it
> > be Amar Bose but here clearly there was a distinct reduction in quality
> > in order to cut costs and in my view represents the co.'s saddest moment
> > in the art of speaker building. I guess the fact that my employer at
> > time had also "downsized" eliminating mine and thousands of others' jobs
> > did not help my frame of mind when I auditioned the model and I was left
> > with tears in my eyes after the depressing encounter with the 601 Series
> > IV.
> > Perhaps some of you wonderful people have not ever encountered a Bose
> > Series II or III speaker but if you find a friend who owns a pair
> > them to the Series IV model and you are liable to be sick to your
> > stomach! By direct comparison, the sound itself from the Series IV is so
> > constricted as if it was being squeezed through a tube in
> > fashion. Just looking at the units side by side also tells you that the
> > predecessors were superior builds! Why couldn't Bose just downsize the
> > physical size of the drivers while keeping with the wonderful "Free
> > Array" configuration? I can picture a 601 model with two quality 6"
> > woofers and four smaller tweeters in a slimmer tower design that could
> > actually improve upon the predecessors' quality. Many manufacturers
> > are making surprisingly wonderful sounding transducers with small
> > that have the unique ability to rattle windows when the music calls for
> > it!
> > If that wasn't bad enough, a new 701 model was introduced at higher
> > expense to the consumer with very little advantage over the 601 model
> > sonically speaking! To make matters worse, the 901 was dropped by many
> > highway discounters and with the berth of Best Buy stores featuring the
> > Bose 701 as the most expensive Bose speaker many Bose lovers perceived
> > the new floorstander as the top of the line 901's replacement. People
> > were simply unaware that the co. was still offering the 901 through the
> > internet and in local Bose Stores.
> > Thus many Bose admirers became disenchanted with the co.'s perceived
> > descent into mediocrity. Fortunately the smaller bookshelf 301 model
> > continued to improve with each new series with the current Series V
> > the most outstanding yet. Also, it is my understanding that Bose has
> > significant improvements in its newer 601 and 701 models but I cannot
> > confirm this as of yet. Hopefully I'll have a chance to audition the
> > newer breed soon. I really do not expect much.
> > Remember too that when Bose started out they were a small manufacturer
> > not unlike many high end companies of today with basic ads in selected
> > magazines and relying on word of mouth. Also, today you have literally
> > hundreds of speaker crafters to choose from as compared to considerably
> > less back in the 60's and 70's. Yes, Bose's current competition is
> > definitely fierce! This fact only adds to the perceived mediocrity.
> > Here are some current raps against Bose that DO NOT necessarily indicate
> > to me inferior quality:
> > 1. Bose never publishes Frequency Response Specifications.
> > 2. Bose does not replace model #'s often.
> > 3. Bose still uses paper woofers and foam surrounds as opposed to the
> > newer "space age" materials other manufacturers use. They sound too
> > different from conventional speakers.
> > 4. Bose relies too much on older rave reviews.
> > 5. Bose is lying about its 901 model boasting full range drivers as such
> > a driver does not really exist!
> > 6. Bose speakers require too much space in one's listening room in order
> > to successfully optimize the reflected sound.
> > 7. Bose speakers are setup in noisy malls with very little attention to
> > proper placement.
> > 8. Bose never talks about using expensive esoteric audiophile speaker
> > cables with their 901 model and suggests that regular 16 ga. or 18 ga.
> > zip cord is good enough!
> > 9. Bose Stores are setup in malls in Radio Shack-like fashion where the
> > 901 is sold with incentives such as a free gas grill. How can this
> > speaker maker be taken seriously as a manufacturer of high end speakers?
> > 10. Bose sales persons are offered tremendous spiffs [monetary
> > or commissions if you will] when they sell Bose speakers and that is the
> > real reason for the 901's success!
> > In reference to #1, Frequency Response specs can be deceiving as the
> > listening room itself must be considered and different rooms will make a
> > given model sound different itself depending on speaker placement, room
> > dimensions and acoustic properties. Aside from this fact, Bose was built
> > on the premise that such specifications are meaningless in the final
> > analysis. High end pros should know better than anyone else about this!
> > As for the full range driver rap, I'd say that I prefer the small driver
> > with equalization approach as opposed to woofers, tweeters and
> > that introduce their own distortions and often sound like woofers
> > tweeters and crossovers. Remember the object of the game is to make the
> > speakers disappear leaving the listener engulfed in the performance
> > itself! Martin Logan Sequels, B&W 801's and other large speakers from
> > Boston and Magnepan along with Dahlquist and Vandersteen have this
> > ability but personally where I think the Bose 901's win out is in their
> > fantastic tight bass response that makes the others seem a bit
> > overwhelming.
> > The use of good quality oxygen free copper speaker wire can provide
> > optimum hookup to one's amplifier and result in superior definition.
> > whole audiophile cable vs. 16 ga. zip cord thing originated from Julian
> > Hirsch's Stereo Review magazine article in the mid 80's about early
> > esoteric audiophile cables not really outperforming thick lamp cord sold
> > at the local hardware store and further fueled fire between Stereo
> > and Stereophile magazine followers. Hirsch simply observed that many
> > esoteric cables were expensive rip-offs and that 16 ga. zip cord was
> > at a much lower cost. However he did mention a 1 db improvement in
> > extreme ends of the audible spectrum with the esoteric stuff but was of
> > the opinion that the improvement was not audible and here is where I and
> > many others disagree with the well respected reviewer!
> > It has been demonstrated to me first hand by John Rutan the famed
> > proprietor of the well known Audio Connection store in Verona, New
> > what excellent wire from Kimber Kable can do. One does not have to spend
> > tons of money on this cable to receive sonically pleasing dividends.
> > Incidentally while on the subject do not get the wrong impression that I
> > hate high end stores. Nothing can be further from the truth. It's just
> > that I do find that more than a select few get snobbish when you tell
> > them that you are a Bose owner. John's store on the other hand takes a
> > different approach! Although he does not consider the 901 to be an
> > ultimately most accurate speaker system and that he and I disagree
> > respectfully on this matter, he would be perfectly happy to offer you an
> > amplifier along with honestly good speaker cables at more than
> > prices to help you improve your Bose experience. For this I and many
> > fellow Bose lovers are truly grateful to him and his wonderfully patient
> > and passionate staff! I'll definitely have more for you on this in
> > another article.
> > Listen, we all hear differently for whatever reasons. although no one
> > person's hearing may be perfect in itself, we all have our own
> > preferences and ideas about what sounds the best and I find this to be
> > very interestingly beautiful!
> > A friend of mine that I really do miss these days because we were
> > of a major corporate downsizing back in 1997...Dennis used to constantly
> > tell me about his admiration for JBL speakers. I explained my personal
> > dislike for them because of their overly bassy sound in the early 70's
> > but his excitement about the newer models with their Titanium tweeters
> > caused me to check the beasts out and indeed in many cases I found them
> > to be very accurate and pleasing transducers. Of course, there were a
> > models that I most assuredly did not care for and one in particular that
> > I reviewed for this site.
> > But because of Dennis's excitement and passion for the benevolent
> > manufacturer, I became aware of the newer JBL sound that was clearly
> > superior to the old one. By the way, he and I both agree with the use of
> > paper woofers as opposed to polypropylene used by companies like
> > Infinity. Again, I find Infinity's polypropylene woofered loudspeakers
> > be overly bassy with high coloration but I do hope to audition the newer
> > stuff soon.
> > Bose has treated their foam woofer surrounds with a material and this
> > seems to have aided in the fight against rotting. I'm not so sure about
> > going to rubber or Kevlar surrounds although they are wonderful for many
> > high end brands because the Bose drivers are so successfully powerful
> > well made with massive magnets and excellent voice coils that these
> > designs may not appreciably make a difference anyway in Bose's case. Do
> > you want to tamper with success?
> > As for Bose not changing and replacing model numbers often I feel that
> > this indeed is a huge plus for the co. as successful designs need to
> > slowly evolve as Matthew Polk has stated in the past. All too many
> > manufacturer model numbers change annually and old models are gone
> > any real benefits can be reaped. Also, it is generally smart to keep a
> > well respected model in the line that people can easily identify and
> > out! Do you hear me Sony?!!
> > Speaking of Polk, the co. may very well be headed for some bashing
> > by audiophiles as Polk speakers used to be sold strictly in high end
> > stores but now are sold at highway discounters. I guess you could call
> > Polk poking?!! All too many times when a manufacturer does this it is
> > perceived as a descent into mediocrity.
> > I do not care for tags such as low or mid fi. Keep an open mind when
> > audio shopping. Don't be fooled into thinking that high quality only
> > exists in high end shops but also do not think that low quality only
> > dwells in the highway malls! Do not think for one second that a high end
> > proprietor cannot save you money or satisfy your budget because believe
> > me he can! Conversely, don't feel that a department store won't steal
> > your hard earned cash.
> > The speaker buyer has a great field in front of him or her. There are
> > plenty of goodies to choose from! Audio shopping should be fun and a
> > pleasing experience but try not to let store atmosphere affect your
> > choice. This way you will widen the goal posts and kick the game winning
> > field goal!
> > Look, I don't care much for politics getting involved with audio
> > equipment reviews or any other matter. I do not like to play that game!
> > Recently, some comments have been made about politics being involved
> > more than one reviewer of the well respected Stereophile publication but
> > aside from that I do recommend picking up their guide to good sound just
> > as a reference and not as the Bible truth. I do respect Mr. Holt
> > he certainly opened up a can of worms back in 1971. He did at least do
> > a great service by bringing up the 901's sensitivity to different rooms
> > and room placement in general. Stereophile does list some great speakers
> > that you cannot audition at department stores. Just keep in mind that
> > there are many other speakers to choose from of equal or better quality
> > not listed in the publication and I defy anyone to tell me differently!
> > Also, do not be afraid of speaker brands that are unfamiliar to you.
> > Afterall, this is how excellent companies like Bose, AR, Advent, Polk
> > Definitive started out!
> > As for Bose 901 owners being ignorant of expensive high end brands and
> > models I would tell you this...Think about it...I mean really...do you
> > honestly feel that a person willing to spend about $1500 on a speaker
> > system would not at the very least be somewhat knowledgeable about some
> > of its competition? Of course we are going to see what else is out
> > #1 on my Bose Basher list is really presumptuous is it not?
> > As a matter of fact I would like all future Bose bashers to save us the
> > song and dance in their reviews and perhaps just make the degrading
> > remark by referencing my Bose Basher List! Instead of wasting everyone's
> > time and space plus your own precious time that you could use to
> > offer a constructive evaluation, just refer everyone to #1 or #5 or
> > whatever # from my list and spare everyone the devious cleverness of
> > wit!
> > Do note that most Bose bashers rate Bose products low to bring down the
> > overall rating without even mentioning details of an actual listening
> > test or audition. How can anyone write a believable review without
> > actually giving detailed listening evaluation is beyond me! Some bashers
> > are actually just repeating what they heard from their audiophile
> > friends. Generalizations, theories, cleverness and sarcasm seem to be
> > proud trademarks of the lowly common Bose basher.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Dscent into Mediocrity||RdM||Tech||3||August 26th 04 07:40 PM|
|The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity||Robert Morein||Audio Opinions||39||August 24th 04 12:59 AM|
|The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity||Clyde Slick||Audio Opinions||0||August 22nd 04 04:23 PM|
|The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Dscent into Mediocrity||Geoff Wood||Car Audio||2||August 22nd 04 02:16 PM|
|The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Dscent into Mediocrity||Geoff Wood||Tech||1||August 22nd 04 02:16 PM|