[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 26, 12:06*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 2:43*am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"James Smith" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote :

(Please forgive my intrusion back to the group. *It's probably
temporary, but I thought that I'd check in to see if anything is
different, and I see three topics of interest...)

Irresistable opportunities to name-drop?

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. *We all have our own burdens to
bear.

So Stephen (IIRC) mentioned someone who I knew and was very fond of, and
I posted my thoughts on her. *A high crime, for sure.


Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath!

As far as my comment about you, it was just the truth!

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 26, 12:07*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 5:57*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky beats the hell out of the drum.

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Does Scottie know about your deep-seated fear of women *?

"At least" I have a deep seated desire for women!

That makes two of us.

Yet, I don't think that we are competing for the same prey!

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 26, 2:04*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Jenn said:

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Does Scottie know about your deep-seated fear of women? ?

"At least" I have a deep seated desire for women!

That makes two of us.

Scottie told Sacky your not normal, he believed it, your going to burn in
Hell.

Abnormal people don't burn in hell.
I don't think anyone burns in hell.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 26, 2:12*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 26, 2:04*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

Jenn said:

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Does Scottie know about your deep-seated fear of women? ?

"At least" I have a deep seated desire for women!

That makes two of us.

Scottie told Sacky your not normal, he believed it, your going to burn in
Hell.

Abnormal people don't burn in hell.
I don't think anyone burns in hell.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 26, 2:12*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 26, 2:04*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

Jenn said:

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Does Scottie know about your deep-seated fear of women? ?

"At least" I have a deep seated desire for women!

That makes two of us.

Scottie told Sacky your not normal, he believed it, your going to burn in
Hell.

Abnormal people don't burn in hell.

2pid still has a shot then.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 26, 2:10*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 26, 12:06*pm, Jenn wrote:





In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 2:43*am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"James Smith" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote :

(Please forgive my intrusion back to the group. *It's probably
temporary, but I thought that I'd check in to see if anything is
different, and I see three topics of interest...)

Irresistable opportunities to name-drop?

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. *We all have our own burdens to
bear.

So Stephen (IIRC) mentioned someone who I knew and was very fond of, and
I posted my thoughts on her. *A high crime, for sure.

Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath!

An offer hard to refuse I'm sure.

As far as my comment about you, it was just the truth!

Name dropping is different than recalling events from a professional
career.

What you're saying is that a studio musician who says "I was on some
sessions for the last Sting album and I thought he was a really nice
guy" is "name dropping".

Is C.C. Sabathia name dropping if he mentions he had dinner with Derek
Jeter?

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 26, 4:29*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 26, 2:10*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 26, 12:06*pm, Jenn wrote:

In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 2:43*am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"James Smith" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote :

(Please forgive my intrusion back to the group. *It's probably
temporary, but I thought that I'd check in to see if anything is
different, and I see three topics of interest...)

Irresistable opportunities to name-drop?

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. *We all have our own burdens to
bear.

So Stephen (IIRC) mentioned someone who I knew and was very fond of, and
I posted my thoughts on her. *A high crime, for sure.

Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath!

An offer hard to refuse I'm sure.

As far as my comment about you, it was just the truth!

Name dropping is different than recalling events from a professional
career.

What you're saying is that a studio musician who says "I was on some
sessions for the last Sting album and I thought he was a really nice
guy" is "name dropping".

Is C.C. Sabathia name dropping if he mentions he had dinner with Derek
Jeter?

Is Bratzi' name dropping when he claims to having had sex with MM's
corpse?

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 12:07*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 5:57*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky beats the hell out of the drum.

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Does Scottie know about your deep-seated fear of women *?

"At least" I have a deep seated desire for women!

That makes two of us.

Yet, I don't think that we are competing for the same prey!

I don't prowl. Never have.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 12:06*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 2:43*am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"James Smith" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote :

(Please forgive my intrusion back to the group. *It's probably
temporary, but I thought that I'd check in to see if anything is
different, and I see three topics of interest...)

Irresistable opportunities to name-drop?

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. *We all have our own burdens to
bear.

So Stephen (IIRC) mentioned someone who I knew and was very fond of, and
I posted my thoughts on her. *A high crime, for sure.


Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath!

As inviting as that is, I think that I'll pass on the smelling. I
wouldn't find meeting you though.


As far as my comment about you, it was just the truth!

Well, sorry if it comes off that way, but it's not the truth. I've just
mentioned some friends when it relates to the conversation. I should
know better than to display humanity around here.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
MiNe 109 wrote:

In article

,
Jenn wrote:

In article
,
Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 2:43*am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"James Smith" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote :

(Please forgive my intrusion back to the group. *It's probably
temporary, but I thought that I'd check in to see if anything is
different, and I see three topics of interest...)

Irresistable opportunities to name-drop?

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. We all have our own burdens to
bear.

So Stephen (IIRC) mentioned someone who I knew and was very fond of, and
I posted my thoughts on her. A high crime, for sure.

I'm happy you shared. I knew you mentioned playing gigs and I wondered
if you had memories of Mary. I had no idea you had a friendship!

Name-dropping would be me mentioning the time I rode in an Indiana
University elevator with James Galway. He's short, but still taller than
the guitarist he was touring with, Kazuhito Yama****a.

lol Fun. Yeah, namedropping would be me telling about who I had a
drink with following playing in the house band in the LA Folk Festival 2
years ago. That was fun as well!


Scottie and Sackie seem to be in attack mode at all times. Kinda trollie.

Yep.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

Yet, I don't think that we are competing for the same prey!

I don't prowl. Never have.

Sacky doesn't believe in Venus.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. *We all have our own burdens to
bear.

Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath!

As inviting as that is, I think that I'll pass on the smelling. I
wouldn't find meeting you [_____?] though.

You left out some words. My guess would be "especially rewarding".

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

*We all have our own burdens to bear.

As far as my comment about you, it was just the truth!

Well, sorry if it comes off that way, but it's not the truth. I've just
mentioned some friends when it relates to the conversation.

Sacky was clearly drunk when he said that. At worst, your disclaimer was
needlessly polite.

I should know better than to display humanity around here.

That's another way of putting it.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 26, 5:43*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 26, 12:07*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 5:57*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky beats the hell out of the drum.

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Does Scottie know about your deep-seated fear of women *?

"At least" I have a deep seated desire for women!

That makes two of us.

Yet, I don't think that we are competing for the same prey!

I don't prowl. *Never have.

You just grovel and fawn

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 5:43*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 26, 12:07*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 26, 5:57*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky beats the hell out of the drum.

Nope, just the truth.

sometimes you do come off as a fawning sycophant.

Does Scottie know about your deep-seated fear of women *?

"At least" I have a deep seated desire for women!

That makes two of us.

Yet, I don't think that we are competing for the same prey!

I don't prowl. *Never have.

You just grovel and fawn

Yes, that's it. Uh huh.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 26, 4:01*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

Is Bratzi' *name dropping when he claims to having had sex with MM's
corpse?

Are you drunk...again?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

Is Bratzi' *name dropping when he claims to having had sex with MM's
corpse?

Are you drunk...again?

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 26, 6:58*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Is Bratzi' *name dropping when he claims to having had sex with MM's
corpse?

Are you drunk...again?

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.


then Shhh! should be sloppy

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky belched:

Are you drunk...again?

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.

then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 26, 11:08*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky belched:

Are you drunk...again?

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

Why would Clyde say I "dragged [2pid] to obedience school" if he was
sober.

Clyde is clearly and obviously three sheets to the wind.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

Sacky belched:

Are you drunk...again?

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

Why would Clyde say I "dragged [2pid] to obedience school" if he was
sober.

Clyde is clearly and obviously three sheets to the wind.

Sure seems so.

OTOH, at least the Sackster is trying to fill in for Witless while the pooch
is away on bereavement leave.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 27, 12:08*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky belched:

Are you drunk...again?

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 27, 3:12*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

Why would Clyde say I "dragged [2pid] to obedience school" if he was
sober.


I didn't say that, George did.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 27, 3:18*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Sacky belched:

Are you drunk...again?

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

Why would Clyde say I "dragged [2pid] to obedience school" if he was
sober.

Clyde is clearly and obviously three sheets to the wind.

Sure seems so.

OTOH, at least the Sackster is trying to fill in for Witless while the pooch
is away on bereavement leave.

Please don't make me go out and find a bunch of OT articles to` post.
And don't make me dream up oblique non-English references
to my intended messages.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky's confused.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

Why would Clyde say I "dragged [2pid] to obedience school" if he was
sober.

I didn't say that, George did.

No, I said YOU drag Witless to school. Or at least you go through the
motions.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky disses Witlessmongrel BEHIND HIS BACK!

OTOH, at least the Sackster is trying to fill in for Witless while the pooch
is away on bereavement leave.

Please don't make me go out and find a bunch of OT articles to` post.
And don't make me dream up oblique non-English references
to my intended messages.

"Make" you? You don't even remember cooking up your own plan?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 27, 2:43�am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
�then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

Is it me? I hope I haven't been entrusted with that duty. I hate
picking up dog poop.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 27, 8:57*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 27, 2:43 am, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

Is it me? I hope I haven't been entrusted with that duty. I hate
picking up dog poop.

I think this is a result of the misperception 2pid has that I'm trying
to "oppress" his 'differing POV' or make him conform to mine.

There's a world of difference between oppressing 2pid and making a
fool of him.

Meanwhile, if 2pid was a Dem I'd have to strongly consider becoming a
republican.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 27, 12:09�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 27, 8:57�am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 27, 2:43 am, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

Is it me? I hope I haven't been entrusted with that duty. I hate
picking up dog poop.

I think this is a result of the misperception 2pid has that I'm trying
to "oppress" his 'differing POV' or make him conform to mine.

There's a world of difference between oppressing 2pid and making a
fool of him.

Meanwhile, if 2pid was a Dem I'd have to strongly consider becoming a
republican.

I feel that stronge urge to be whatever he isn't as well.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 27, 3:43*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

that is exaqctly who it is

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 27, 3:43*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky's confused.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

Why would Clyde say I "dragged [2pid] to obedience school" if he was
sober.
I didn't say that, George did.

No, I said YOU drag Witless to school. Or at least you go through the
motions.

no i don't, but thanks for the complement anyway.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 27, 3:44*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky disses Witlessmongrel BEHIND HIS BACK!

OTOH, at least the Sackster is trying to fill in for Witless while the pooch
is away on bereavement leave.

Please don't make me go out and find a bunch of OT articles to` post.
And don't make me dream up oblique non-English references
to my intended messages.

"Make" you? You don't even remember cooking up your own plan?

you were talking about me filling in for Scott.
\Posting OT blog links would seem to be part of the deal.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 27, 3:56*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 27, 12:09 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"



wrote:
On Sep 27, 8:57 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 27, 2:43 am, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

Is it me? I hope I haven't been entrusted with that duty. I hate
picking up dog poop.

I think this is a result of the misperception 2pid has that I'm trying
to "oppress" his 'differing POV' or make him conform to mine.

There's a world of difference between oppressing 2pid and making a
fool of him.

Meanwhile, if 2pid was a Dem I'd have to strongly consider becoming a
republican.

I feel that stronge urge to be whatever he isn't as well.

I already qaulify, I am not an engineer.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

grrrrr-ROWF!

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

that is exaqctly who it is

I disagree quite strongly.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

duh-Sacky reveals the truth of my suspicion.

No, I said YOU drag Witless to school. Or at least you go through the
motions.

no i don't, but thanks for the complement anyway.

Your illeterite.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

Sacky disses Witlessmongrel BEHIND HIS BACK!

OTOH, at least the Sackster is trying to fill in for Witless while the pooch
is away on bereavement leave.

Please don't make me go out and find a bunch of OT articles to` post.
And don't make me dream up oblique non-English references
to my intended messages.

"Make" you? You don't even remember cooking up your own plan?

you were talking about me filling in for Scott.
\Posting OT blog links would seem to be part of the deal.

Nobody's stopping you.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 27, 6:25*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 27, 3:56*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 27, 12:09 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 27, 8:57 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 27, 2:43 am, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

Is it me? I hope I haven't been entrusted with that duty. I hate
picking up dog poop.

I think this is a result of the misperception 2pid has that I'm trying
to "oppress" his 'differing POV' or make him conform to mine.

There's a world of difference between oppressing 2pid and making a
fool of him.

Meanwhile, if 2pid was a Dem I'd have to strongly consider becoming a
republican.

I feel that stronge urge to be whatever he isn't as well.

I already qaulify, I am not an engineer.

There is no evidence that 2pid is either. There's just a bunch of
Internet resume BS.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 27, 6:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 27, 3:43*am, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

that is exaqctly who it is

And how do I attempt to make 2pid "obedient"?

Oh, wait. I know where you're going with this. You're referring to the
fact that I always push 2pid's face in his own doo-doo. LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 27, 6:55*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
grrrrr-ROWF!

Sacky dogs the pony.

Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive
anybody to drink.
*then Shhh! should be sloppy

An IKYABWAI? How pathetic.

no, it is not
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to
make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you.

Nor is it Shhhh.

that is exaqctly who it is

I disagree quite strongly.

Neither one of them has a very good grasp of reality. I suppose that's
why they're friends.