[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 4:41*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or integrity and say
that this isn't 100% logical. That would obviously be absurd.

I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What does Yapper think
of that, I wonder?

Obviously the christians here don't have the character to defend
their religion.

ScottW

Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain absurd stuff.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
prod
igy.
com
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

*I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the
question: *
How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...

On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.

ScottW

You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.

You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
such a title.

But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
sign of character.

ScottW

Ok. I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf. Then there is the
whole "two Bobs" thing. Engage!

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

ig
y.
com
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to
be omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?



You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.



And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?



I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
one.



What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with
the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

I don't know about that Jenn, but you surely hold him up to a far lower
standard than your usual whipping boys, such as mysefl and Scott.

Wow, talk about your "pity party"! lol

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 20, 9:48*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 5:36*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On May 20, 3:56*pm, ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 1:40*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 20, 3:34*pm, ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 1:24*pm, Jenn wrote:
For Scott: *I'm against the throwing of such snot.

*One must ask, is this the best a person of character can do?

Not at all, 2pid. She could cast aspersions about other people's
military service, like some other "people of character" do here.

I don't need to cast aspersions about your service.
You did that bragging about discarding it as an act of protest
yourself.

Discard what, 2pid? I didn't throw anything away. One of us has a
"Major, Retired, U.S. Army" ID card. One of us does not. ;-)

*And one of us bragged that their "retirement" was an act of protest.

Bull****.

*A despicable use of military service and wholly inappropriate.

Not so, dim one. Look at what you are advocating: leading soldiers in
a hostile-fire zone without the expertise in the area one would be
leading in, and without a belief that what was going on was right.

As I said, you are a worthless, thoughtless piece of ****. In a
paraphrase of what gets said to me quite often, "Thank you for not
serving". You're a disaster.

*It's just more of your starship trooper BS.

Not at all, 2pid. It's the truth: you couldn't be bothered to devote
one nanosecond to what you're wailing about. Ditto politics. Weep weep
weep. wail wail wail. Whine whine whine. Bark bark bark. Yap yap yap.

If you earned any respect for your service you just as quickly
lost it forgetting what you serve.

And what is it that the military serves, 2pid? Do you even know?

Nope.

What an utter dumb****.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 20, 9:36*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 4:37*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

For the umpteenth time, Jenn, 2pid's deal is different. No offense
intended, this is formatted so 2pid can understand.

GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.

Arny's a jerk but you clones are the real sicko's around here.

I'm sick because I recognize your hypocrisy, your inanity, your
extreme stupidity and a bunch of other less-than-desireable traits
about you that nearly everybody else also recognizes but you do not?

Lol. Right.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 20, 9:35*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn wrote:

You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.

*You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
such a title.

What "title"? Guy? Were you awarded that "title" or is there something
you want to tell us? Lol

What an imbecile. Your poor brain stem. It's obviously so overtaxed
that it's absurd.

*But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
sign of character.

That's why you gang up on GOIA when he's a dick to Jenn.

What a worthless piece of **** you are, 2pid. You're beneath contempt,
actually. Lol

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 20, 9:39*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn wrote:





In article ,
*"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

*Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

For the umpteenth time, Jenn, 2pid's deal is different. No offense
intended, this is formatted so 2pid can understand.

GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.

Jenn bad because she say things to GOIA, who good. 2pid no say bad to
GOIA, because GOIA good. [Me forget to add: this also make 2pid good.]

2pid good because he say things to Shhhh! and George who bad. Jenn
bad
because she no say bad to Shhhh! or George, who also bad.

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or integrity and say
that this isn't 100% logical. That would obviously be absurd.

[GeoSynch]

SkiFastBadly wrote:

Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the discs),
which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD
player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
wireless capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm
loading, and will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play
OR will play random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?

If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of the The Absolute
Sound. Here is a link as to its contents:
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/

Of particular interest will be three articles on pages 47, 60 and especially
79.

This may also be of interest:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195


GeoSynch

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
would obviously be absurd.

I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
does Yapper think of that, I wonder?

Obviously the christians here don't have the character
to defend their religion.

Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
absurd stuff.

That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and unlike Jenn, some
Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" wrote in message

On May 20, 4:37 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 20, 5:57 pm, Jenn
wrote:





In article
,

ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 1:18 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
,

ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

igy.
com
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like
me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question:
How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared
to the never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.

ScottW

You give as well as you get with them. It's between you
guys. What is between Arny and me is just that. The
difference is I don't expect you to comment on Arny
when it doesn't involve you.

For the umpteenth time, Jenn, 2pid's deal is different.
No offense intended, this is formatted so 2pid can
understand.

GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.

Arny's a jerk but you clones are the real sicko's around
here.

The Middiot and ****R aren't so much sick, as examples of what happens when
the body graduates from High School, but the mind never leaves it.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

ig
y.
com
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like
me"?



You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.



And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?



I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
one.



What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I
show lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

I don't know about that Jenn, but you surely hold him up
to a far lower standard than your usual whipping boys,
such as mysefl and Scott.

Wow, talk about your "pity party"! lol

It's not a pity party, its a badge of courage.

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" wrote in message

On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:





"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
com
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I
show lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

Jenn really holding the Middiot up to a reasonable standard of behavior
would be like Skywalker criticizing Yoda. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:





"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

dig
y.
com
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like
me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I
show lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

ScottW

Are you afraid to post to Arny?

Jenn, he does it reasonbly often, but you're blind to it.

[Arny Krueger]

"Harry Lavo" wrote in message


You: education using MACs = foolish

...and unecessarily expensive.

musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record music

Very old school, and foolish and expensive.

Therefore, at best false premises.

But by implication then: education using MACs =
thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.

Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.

If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
using MACs in our offices.

No logical connection shown.

BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's posts, they come from a
computer that is running MS Windows.

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" wrote in message

On May 20, 6:59 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message



"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..

Ever see the stats for sales of Photoshop for the PC
versus Photoshop for the Mac?

Relative to market share, the MAC wins.

Prove it Harry. Provide a URL supporting this claim or
admit that you're making it up as you go along.

Looks to me like Adobe is turning their back on Apple.

http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/03/apple...bit-photoshop/

Something about Adobe being a well-managed company that follows long-term
market trends.

[Arny Krueger]

"GeoSynch" wrote in message

SkiFastBadly wrote:

Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
music, not the discs), which will hold the data as WAV,
not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player, meaning
it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
wireless capability to go out to the internet to
determine what CDs I'm loading, and will provide an easy
UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?

If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of
the The Absolute Sound. Here is a link as to its contents:
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/

Of particular interest will be three articles on pages
47, 60 and especially 79.

This may also be of interest:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195


"The Absolute Sound editor Robert Harley (in the December 2007 issue) has
published a seminal work comparing computer based Music Servers to
traditional dedicated CD playback. Mr. Harley rightfully concludes that
optical disc CD playback is inferior to hard-disk based playback.
This is really good news as I’ve been none too kind to the high-end industry
for dragging **s. Finally expensive rotational CD transports are now
officially declared obsolete and worthless. Pay particular attention to
Stereophile magazine who still frequently review (and carries ads) for the
most outrageously priced CD disc playback gear. (If only I could sell
tickets!)

Now that the rotational music era is finished, Mr. Harley with the
assistance of Karl Schuster, quickly moves on to provide a step-by-step
guide to turning your PC into a music server. It is the best single source
of concise information and puts the fragmented piece-meal Internet searches
to shame. "

Best single guide? That would be a first!

I've been advocating playing music on PCs since the 1990s, and gotten abused
by the usual RAO idiot trolls all along.

[Clyde Slick]

On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message

m





In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
would obviously be absurd.

I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
does Yapper think of that, I wonder?

*Obviously the christians here don't have the character
to defend their religion.
Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
absurd stuff.

That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and unlike Jenn, some
Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.-

Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time.

[Clyde Slick]

On 21 Mai, 07:20, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"GeoSynch" wrote in message







SkiFastBadly wrote:

Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
music, not the discs), which will hold the data as WAV,
not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player, meaning
it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
wireless capability to go out to the internet to
determine what CDs I'm loading, and will provide an easy
UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
random cuts? *And which will hold 500+ CDs?

If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of
the The Absolute Sound. Here is a link as to its contents:
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/

Of particular interest will be three articles on pages
47, 60 and especially 79.

This may also be of interest:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195

"The Absolute Sound editor Robert Harley (in the December 2007 issue) has
published a seminal work comparing computer based Music Servers to
traditional dedicated CD playback. Mr. Harley rightfully concludes that
optical disc CD playback is inferior to hard-disk based playback.
This is really good news as I’ve been none too kind to the high-end industry
for dragging **s. Finally expensive rotational CD transports are now
officially declared obsolete and worthless. Pay particular attention to
Stereophile magazine who still frequently review (and carries ads) for the
most outrageously priced CD disc playback gear. (If only I could sell
tickets!)

Now that the rotational music era is finished, Mr. Harley with the
assistance of Karl Schuster, quickly moves on to provide a step-by-step
guide to turning your PC into a music server. It is the best single source
of concise information and puts the fragmented piece-meal Internet searches
to shame. "

Best single guide? That would be a first!

I've been advocating playing music on PCs since the 1990s, and gotten abused
by the usual RAO idiot trolls all along.-

But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts out perfect cd
sound.

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message







In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
would obviously be absurd.

I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
does Yapper think of that, I wonder?

Obviously the christians here don't have the character
to defend their religion.

Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
absurd stuff.

That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and unlike
Jenn, some Christians both know and try to follow what
the Bible teaches.-

Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the
same time.

Got a chapter and verse for that one?

Nahh, I didn't think so.

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

On 21 Mai, 07:20, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"GeoSynch" wrote in message







SkiFastBadly wrote:

Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
music, not the discs), which will hold the data as WAV,
not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player, meaning
it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
wireless capability to go out to the internet to
determine what CDs I'm loading, and will provide an
easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will
play random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?

If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of
the The Absolute Sound. Here is a link as to its
contents: http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/

Of particular interest will be three articles on pages
47, 60 and especially 79.

This may also be of interest:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195

"The Absolute Sound editor Robert Harley (in the
December 2007 issue) has published a seminal work
comparing computer based Music Servers to traditional
dedicated CD playback. Mr. Harley rightfully concludes
that optical disc CD playback is inferior to hard-disk
based playback.
This is really good news as I’ve been none too kind to
the high-end industry for dragging **s. Finally
expensive rotational CD transports are now officially
declared obsolete and worthless. Pay particular
attention to Stereophile magazine who still frequently
review (and carries ads) for the most outrageously
priced CD disc playback gear. (If only I could sell
tickets!)

Now that the rotational music era is finished, Mr.
Harley with the assistance of Karl Schuster, quickly
moves on to provide a step-by-step guide to turning your
PC into a music server. It is the best single source of
concise information and puts the fragmented piece-meal
Internet searches to shame. "

Best single guide? That would be a first!

I've been advocating playing music on PCs since the
1990s, and gotten abused by the usual RAO idiot trolls
all along.-

But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts
out perfect cd sound.

Prove me wrong.

[Arny Krueger]

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article
,
Clyde Slick wrote:

On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message


om





In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
would obviously be absurd.

I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
does Yapper think of that, I wonder?

Obviously the christians here don't have the character
to defend their religion.
Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
absurd stuff.

That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and
unlike Jenn, some Christians both know and try to
follow what the Bible teaches.-

Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the
same time.

http://home9.inet.tele.dk/mha/Images/jesus-dinosaur.gif

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58362611@N00/431306643/

Wow, that's conclusive evidence about what the Bible teaches, Stephen. Did
you learn what you know about music from comic books or what? ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

Damned if you do...

Damned if you don't.

It is the sort of risk you have to take when you're dealing with people who
are hopelessly self-centered.

[Harry Lavo]

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message


You: education using MACs = foolish

..and unecessarily expensive.

musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record music

Very old school, and foolish and expensive.

Therefore, at best false premises.

But by implication then: education using MACs =
thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.

Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.

If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
using MACs in our offices.

No logical connection shown.

BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's posts, they come from
a computer that is running MS Windows.

Yep, because I've got years of legacy using PC's (back in the early '80's)
for business purposes....but if I were starting over I'd go MAC, as my
daughter the multimedia editor has done, and my niece, and my nephew, and my
sister and her husband. But I've got a ton of PC software, and I upgrade my
own gear, so it has been a natural evolution for me. But I'll flat out say
the MACs are better for media work, although its a lot closer than it used
to be in terms of getting the work done.....but the MAC is still head and
shoulders above the PC in operating system reliability.

[Harry Lavo]

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"ScottW" wrote in message

On May 20, 6:59 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message



"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..

Ever see the stats for sales of Photoshop for the PC
versus Photoshop for the Mac?

Relative to market share, the MAC wins.

Prove it Harry. Provide a URL supporting this claim or
admit that you're making it up as you go along.

Looks to me like Adobe is turning their back on Apple.

http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/03/apple...bit-photoshop/

Something about Adobe being a well-managed company that follows long-term
market trends.

Right. It has nothing to do with them moving to a complete overhaul/rewrite
of the software so that it is much more multiplatform in its basic
structure, does it? Postponing the 64 bit upgrade to the newer
software....THAT is a logical business decision (maybe not the best for
Photoshop loyalists) but certainly understandable.

[Arny Krueger]

"Harry Lavo" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message


You: education using MACs = foolish

..and unecessarily expensive.

musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record
music

Very old school, and foolish and expensive.

Therefore, at best false premises.

But by implication then: education using MACs =
thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.

Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.

If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
using MACs in our offices.

No logical connection shown.

BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's
posts, they come from a computer that is running MS
Windows.

Yep, because I've got years of legacy using PC's (back in
the early '80's) for business purposes....

Well, you started out right, Harry.

but if I were
starting over I'd go MAC, as my daughter the multimedia
editor has done,

I see that poor critical thinking may run in the family. Or maybe its a job
thing. My daughter worked in a lab that was run by Mac bigots.

and my niece, and my nephew, and my
sister and her husband.

Birds of a feather flock together, it seems.

But I've got a ton of PC
software, and I upgrade my own gear, so it has been a
natural evolution for me.

The point is Harry, that you don't practice what you preach, again.

But I'll flat out say the MACs are better for media work,

The market disagrees with you Harry. Every multimedia product worth its salt
runs primarily on a PC these days. If there are any exceptions, its because
McIntosh forcably keeps it from being ported to the dominant platform, in a
vain attempt to keep on selling their overpriced software.

although its a lot closer than
it used to be in terms of getting the work done.....but
the MAC is still head and shoulders above the PC in
operating system reliability.

Nahhh. It's also way down on compatiblity with most of the real world.

But I can see how someone who buys into High End Audio hype would carry the
same lack of critical thinking to their computer preferences, at least their
computer preferences in their dreams.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58362611@N00/431306643

"Jesus riding dinosaur"

That's a nice tunic JEE-zus is wearing. The highlights look like
polyester or rayon. Are anachronisms a problem for "real christians"?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

Ok. I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf. Then there is the
whole "two Bobs" thing. Engage!

I'm glad to hear you haven't suffered breast cancer, Jenn. Mazel tov.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

I don't know about that Jenn, but you surely hold him up to a far lower
standard than your usual whipping boys, such as mysefl and Scott.

Wow, talk about your "pity party"! lol

I think you're wearing the wrong party dress. Turdy's current frame of
mind indicates he's picturing this one:

http://tiny.cc/SKPfW

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.

Arny's a jerk but you clones are the real sicko's around here.

I'm sick because I recognize your hypocrisy, your inanity, your
extreme stupidity and a bunch of other less-than-desireable traits
about you that nearly everybody else also recognizes but you do not?

Now you've got it.

Lol. Right.

Well, really. Are you laughing or agreeing with Scottie? You ex-military
guys are sooooo complicated.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
MiNe 109 wrote:

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

Damned if you do...

Stephen

You noticed! ;-)

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"ScottW" wrote in message

On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:





"Jenn" wrote in message

.com
In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

dig
y.
com
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I
show lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

Jenn really holding the Middiot up to a reasonable standard of behavior
would be like Skywalker criticizing Yoda. ;-)

Idiotic statement.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
would obviously be absurd.

I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
does Yapper think of that, I wonder?

Obviously the christians here don't have the character
to defend their religion.

Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
absurd stuff.

That's because that's what the Bible teaches,

Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.

and unlike Jenn, some
Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.

You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

The Krooborg smacks its lips and orders a McFishBurger.

the MAC is still head and shoulders above the PC in
operating system reliability.

Nahhh[sic]. It's also way down on compatiblity with most of the real world.

Would you like fries with that, Arnii? How about a fake milkshake?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

and unlike Jenn, some
Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.

You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.

Did you consider the possibility that Arnii is practicing his new
standup routine?

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

ews.
prod
igy.
com
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

*I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the
question: *
How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...

On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.

ScottW

You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.

*You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
such a title.

*But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
sign of character.

ScottW

Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.

When he just starts spamming childish insult and vulgarities,
I'll be right on it.

You're already late.


ScottW

*Then there is the
whole "two Bobs" thing. *Engage!

Which one?

There's more than one set?

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 11:01*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW wrote:
On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

igy.
com
In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

.pro
dig
y.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
omniscient, and then play the pity card.

I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?

You took an
uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.

What's your beef with me?

Your lack of character.

More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't
answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
lack of character?

People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
because they aren't the brunt of their attention.

ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

*Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

ScottW

Are you afraid to post to Arny?

Post to Arny, Jenn seems to think you're scary.

Huh? lol

So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
obnoxious.
Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
I'd rather not have to.

Then don't post to them.


ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 21, 11:45Â*am, ScottW wrote:
On May 21, 12:31Â*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On May 20, 9:48Â*pm, ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 5:36Â*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 20, 3:56Â*pm, ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 1:40Â*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 20, 3:34Â*pm, ScottW wrote:

On May 20, 1:24Â*pm, Jenn wrote:
For Scott: Â*I'm against the throwing of such snot.

Â*One must ask, is this the best a person of character can do?

Not at all, 2pid. She could cast aspersions about other people's
military service, like some other "people of character" do here.

I don't need to cast aspersions about your service.
You did that bragging about discarding it as an act of protest
yourself.

Discard what, 2pid? I didn't throw anything away. One of us has a
"Major, Retired, U.S. Army" ID card. One of us does not. ;-)

Â*And one of us bragged that their "retirement" was an act of protest.

Bull****.

LoL, now you want to run away from your own history.
Perhaps another act of retirement is in order?

Well, in two years you and Clyde have gone from "Shhhh! is not a
retired military officer" to "But you Retired in Protest!" Perhaps in
another two years the trurh that you are apparently so afraid of will
sink through your Densium skull. Lol!

Here you go, 2pid: the very first mention of my reasons for retiring
from the military that I can find in Google, just for you!

************************************************** **********************
Semantics.... now you must define invasion for us.
Any military incursion inside their borders? How about air space?

Actually, I do not have to define anything for 'us.' In fact, there is
nothing that I 'must' do for you, 'us' or anybody else.

If you want to, why don't you define 'invasion' for 'us'?

Scott, without getting lost in minutiae and arguing about whatever
happened on April 3rd 1946 at 12:00, as is the typical response to any
claim or argument made on r.a.o that I've seen, and which is also the
track you are very much trying to go down here, the point is this:

Unlike the Roman, Macedonians, Greeks, Norse, Spanish, British,
French,
Germans, or any other 'empire' down throught the ages, we have not,
until now, tried to invade other nation-states to militarily conquer
other lands to make them bend to our will. We changed from the War
Department to the Department of Defense. That, to me, was more than
just a symbolic name change. We should change it back.

You, on the other hand, want to claim that actions such as this:

NICARAGUA
1981-90
Command operation, naval CIA directs exile (Contra) invasions, plants
harbor mines against revolution.

are exactly the same. I disagree.

You believe whatever you wish. I find this much more interesting than
debating minutiae with you:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11467986/

Particularly this quote:

At any rate, the school isn't just about operating in Iraq, Short
said,
but about preparing officers for the rest of their careers. "I think
*we're going to be in more of these wars*," he said. (Emphasis mine.)

So my point, before it gets lost in a boring (I should say *more*
boring) debate with you about what constitutes an invasion vs. another
operation in your mind, is this: we have, as a nation and a military,
turned a corner that I disagree with. That was what I said. That was
what I meant. That was, in part, why I chose to retire when I did. And
I stand by that statement.

On the bright side, another point that I've made is that the military
is very ill-suited to these missions. It appears that, after three
years, they're starting to figure that out. Unfortunately, as the
article says, in order to do the job right, we have to leave our
bases.
That is without question true, but that also exposes the troops to
higher levels of danger.

So Scott, you go on your merry little way and argue that the US has
acted exactly the same as the previous empire-building nations that
have had the biggest, baddest militaries on Earth have acted down
through history. I don't think that we have in the past. I think we
are
starting to now. You disagree. I predict the results will be the same
for us. You probably think that we will somehow get a different result
from what history has shown, just as rummy thinks that new weapons
mean
the underlying concepts of warfare have changed.

Whatever.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9?dmode=source
************************************************** *****************

Now let's see this, 2pid!
************************************************** ****************
brag (brăg)
v., bragged, brag·ging, brags.
v.intr.
To talk boastfully. See synonyms at boast1.
v.tr.
To assert boastfully.
n.

[Andrew Barss]

SkiFastBadly wrote:
: Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.

: Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the discs),
: which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD
: player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has wireless
: capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm loading, and
: will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
: random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?


A hard drive to hold the data (for portability, use an external HD).
I just losslessly ripped (to FLAC format files) about 400 CDs, which
take up about 140 GBs. You can get a HD larger than this for about $75.
(Get two, one for backup, if you're worried about crashing).


For actually getting the data to your stereo, one option is the
Squeezebox, sold by SlimDevices. Excellent DAC inside, and
very nice (and free) software. See:


http://www.slimdevices.com


the new model, with a video interface, is the Duet; the Classic
doesn't have this (but is a nice piece of equipment).

The hard drive can be attached to a Windows, Mac, or Limux computer, or to a network storage
drive.


-- Andy Barss

[Harry Lavo]

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message


You: education using MACs = foolish

..and unecessarily expensive.

musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record
music

Very old school, and foolish and expensive.

Therefore, at best false premises.

But by implication then: education using MACs =
thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.

Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.

If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
using MACs in our offices.

No logical connection shown.

BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's
posts, they come from a computer that is running MS
Windows.

Yep, because I've got years of legacy using PC's (back in
the early '80's) for business purposes....

Well, you started out right, Harry.

I started out logically, Arny, since I had a pretty good intuition as to
what my businesses needs would be. Religous certainty had nothing to do
with it.


but if I were
starting over I'd go MAC, as my daughter the multimedia
editor has done,

I see that poor critical thinking may run in the family. Or maybe its a
job thing. My daughter worked in a lab that was run by Mac bigots.


Ever hear of the Final Cut Pro Suite, Arny? Its the standard for this kind
of work. And it is a MAC program.



and my niece, and my nephew, and my
sister and her husband.

Educators, all. Again, using the standard tools of their trade, Arny. And
BTW they get them at good academic discounts...green again, Arny?

Birds of a feather flock together, it seems.


Didn't you mother ever tell you to just shut up if you ave nothing to say,
Arny?



But I've got a ton of PC
software, and I upgrade my own gear, so it has been a
natural evolution for me.

The point is Harry, that you don't practice what you preach, again.


What am I "preaching" Arny? Theirs that religiousity again...totally out
of line with reality.



But I'll flat out say the MACs are better for media work,

The market disagrees with you Harry. Every multimedia product worth its
salt runs primarily on a PC these days. If there are any exceptions, its
because McIntosh forcably keeps it from being ported to the dominant
platform, in a vain attempt to keep on selling their overpriced software.

Again, ever hear of Final Cut Pro, Arny? Aperture? These are professional
standards, as well as Photoshop for the MAC.

although its a lot closer than
it used to be in terms of getting the work done.....but
the MAC is still head and shoulders above the PC in
operating system reliability.

Nahhh. It's also way down on compatiblity with most of the real world.


I see. Dual boot is "way down on compatibility" Arny? How well do PC's run
MAC software, Arny. With or without dual boot?



But I can see how someone who buys into High End Audio hype would carry
the same lack of critical thinking to their computer preferences, at least
their computer preferences in their dreams.

You are the one saying I have a MAC preference, not me. Computers are
tools, Arny, not things to worship.

[SkiFastBadly]

"Andrew Barss" wrote in message
...
SkiFastBadly wrote:
: Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.

: Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the
discs),
: which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD
: player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
wireless
: capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm loading,
and
: will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will
play
: random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?


A hard drive to hold the data (for portability, use an external HD).
I just losslessly ripped (to FLAC format files) about 400 CDs, which
take up about 140 GBs. You can get a HD larger than this for about $75.
(Get two, one for backup, if you're worried about crashing).


For actually getting the data to your stereo, one option is the
Squeezebox, sold by SlimDevices. Excellent DAC inside, and
very nice (and free) software. See:


http://www.slimdevices.com


the new model, with a video interface, is the Duet; the Classic
doesn't have this (but is a nice piece of equipment).

The hard drive can be attached to a Windows, Mac, or Limux computer, or to
a network storage
drive.


-- Andy Barss

Thank you. Nice to get a serious answer that didn't degrade into a ****ing
contest.

Jesus, some people here need to get out and get some air.