Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
is there any benefit to using cubase over adobe audition in terms of sound quality?
im really comfortable with audition and don't do anything complicated,
but its seems that cubase is the other really 'pro' software for pcs.. the only benefit i've found is that it saves and loads ten times faster than audition.. for me at least audition is so much easier to manipulate, with tiny buttons for volume, fx, panning for each channel so you don't have to open some huge cascade just to make minor tweaks.. audition has buttons at the bottom for easy horizontal or vertical zooming, with cubase you have to get the magnifying glass, choose the zoom function, etc.. urgh. plus audition has a really easy to use editing function. i'd be using the same vsts either way, recording in 32 bit floating point either way.. so should i stick with cubase, learn it and get used to it? or is there no difference with audition? i'm just a beginner to this multitrack recording thing and i'm sure there are a million things cubase does that audition doesn't, i just have found any yet that i seem to need also, is it reccomend to eq using auditions packaged eq or is it better to get a 'quality' eq vst? does stuff like that make a difference? thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"shaun" wrote in message ... im really comfortable with audition and don't do anything complicated, but its seems that cubase is the other really 'pro' software for pcs.. the only benefit i've found is that it saves and loads ten times faster than audition.. for me at least audition is so much easier to manipulate, with tiny buttons for volume, fx, panning for each channel so you don't have to open some huge cascade just to make minor tweaks.. audition has buttons at the bottom for easy horizontal or vertical zooming, with cubase you have to get the magnifying glass, choose the zoom function, etc.. urgh. plus audition has a really easy to use editing function. i'd be using the same vsts either way, recording in 32 bit floating point either way.. so should i stick with cubase, learn it and get used to it? or is there no difference with audition? i'm just a beginner to this multitrack recording thing and i'm sure there are a million things cubase does that audition doesn't, i just have found any yet that i seem to need also, is it reccomend to eq using auditions packaged eq or is it better to get a 'quality' eq vst? does stuff like that make a difference? thanks! Cubase is a midi sequencer package with excellent audio facilities. Audition is audio only (although you can load in a midi file to play along with) That's a short answer BC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
also, is it reccomend to eq using auditions packaged eq or is it better
to get a 'quality' eq vst? does stuff like that make a difference? thanks! Cubase is a midi sequencer package with excellent audio facilities. Audition is audio only (although you can load in a midi file to play along with) That's a short answer BC yeah i used cubase a while ago when i had a midi controller but now im just doing simple multitrack recording.. so from your answer am i to assume that there is no difference in the audio quality of the end result regardless of whether i use audition or cubase to record/mix/etc..? thanks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"shaun" wrote in message .. . also, is it reccomend to eq using auditions packaged eq or is it better to get a 'quality' eq vst? does stuff like that make a difference? thanks! Cubase is a midi sequencer package with excellent audio facilities. Audition is audio only (although you can load in a midi file to play along with) That's a short answer BC yeah i used cubase a while ago when i had a midi controller but now im just doing simple multitrack recording.. so from your answer am i to assume that there is no difference in the audio quality of the end result regardless of whether i use audition or cubase to record/mix/etc..? thanks I've used both myself but for audio only I much prefer Audition (I only have ver 1) as the editing facilities are so much better. I understand that Audition 1.5 has VST support so in multitrack mode that is going to be fantastic. Sonically, no difference, the bottom line is speed and ease of use and that is up to you i.e how confortable you feel with either program. BC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
shaun wrote: also, is it reccomend to eq using auditions packaged eq or is it better to get a 'quality' eq vst? does stuff like that make a difference? thanks! It can make a difference but (for example) Sony's EQ can get pricey. You should do OK with the supplied EQ's. Cubase is a midi sequencer package with excellent audio facilities. Audition is audio only (although you can load in a midi file to play along with) That's a short answer BC yeah i used cubase a while ago when i had a midi controller but now im just doing simple multitrack recording.. so from your answer am i to assume that there is no difference in the audio quality of the end result regardless of whether i use audition or cubase to record/mix/etc..? The most part of your sound quality is determined by the audio card, or interface. One thing I noticed with the bundled version of Cubase that came with my Echo Mia card was that it was a 16 bit program, even though the Mia is a 24 bit card ! Hopefully your version is newer and 24 bit. thanks |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why are my RADAR Bwavs out of time in Cubase SX | Pro Audio | |||
How well does Cubase SX resample when importing 44.1khz files in SX set to a higher samplerate?! | Pro Audio | |||
How well does Cubase SX resample when importing 44.1khz files in SX set to a higher samplerate?! | Pro Audio | |||
FS Cubase Sx 2.0 Complete DAW | Pro Audio | |||
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!sonar vs cubase: final verdict.. | Pro Audio |