Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
Hi all
I'm just trying to set up my revox pr 99 myself: I bought an alignment tape and I've tried to follow the procedure. It seems that all is going well... (forgive me but these are my first alignments..), I've got a recorded signal that's pretty similar to what's on the SOURCE signal. The problem is that on the SOURCE I have a signal that's a lot weaker in the low end that what is coming in. I've not taken it apart the machine yet, but in the manual I don't see anything referring to the eq of the input signal... Any pointers? thank you in advance. -- Emiliano Grilli Linux user #209089 http://www.emillo.net |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
"Emiliano Grilli" wrote in message
... Hi all I'm just trying to set up my revox pr 99 myself: I bought an alignment tape and I've tried to follow the procedure. It seems that all is going well... (forgive me but these are my first alignments..), I've got a recorded signal that's pretty similar to what's on the SOURCE signal. The problem is that on the SOURCE I have a signal that's a lot weaker in the low end that what is coming in. I've not taken it apart the machine yet, but in the manual I don't see anything referring to the eq of the input signal... There should not be any EQ on the input signal. How are you listening to what's coming in, and how are you listening to what's coming out of the Revox? Peace, Paul |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:19:16 -0500, Emiliano Grilli wrote
(in article ): Hi all I'm just trying to set up my revox pr 99 myself: I bought an alignment tape and I've tried to follow the procedure. It seems that all is going well... (forgive me but these are my first alignments..), I've got a recorded signal that's pretty similar to what's on the SOURCE signal. The problem is that on the SOURCE I have a signal that's a lot weaker in the low end that what is coming in. I've not taken it apart the machine yet, but in the manual I don't see anything referring to the eq of the input signal... Any pointers? thank you in advance. -- Emiliano Grilli Linux user #209089 http://www.emillo.net I'm confused. Source is what's coming in. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
On 21 Gen, 17:45, "Paul Stamler" wrote:
"Emiliano Grilli" wrote in message ... Hi all I'm just trying to set up my revox pr 99 myself: I bought an alignment tape and I've tried to follow the procedure. It seems that all is going well... (forgive me but these are my first alignments..), I've got a recorded signal that's pretty similar to what's on the SOURCE signal. The problem is that on the SOURCE I have a signal that's a lot weaker in the low end that what is coming in. I've not taken it apart the machine yet, but in the manual I don't see anything referring to the eq of the input signal... There should not be any EQ on the input signal. How are you listening to what's coming in, and how are you listening to what's coming out of the Revox? I have the line out of the revox connected to a stereo channel on my soundcraft folio mixer, and the line in is taking the output of the soundcard, which also goes to the mixer, so I can A/B the revox (both SOURCE and REPRODUCE) and the soundcard. Peace, Paul thanks -- Emiliano Grilli Linux user #209089 http://www.emillo.net |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
On 21 Gen, 17:56, Ty Ford wrote:
I'm confused. Source is what's coming in. Yes, but I have the same signal on the console, and there I hear a lot of bass that isn't there on the deck, monitoring SOURCE. Regards, Ty Ford thanks -- Emiliano Grilli Linux user #209089 http://www.emillo.net |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
On Jan 21, 12:00 pm, Emiliano Grilli
wrote: Yes, but I have the same signal on the console, and there I hear a lot of bass that isn't there on the deck, monitoring SOURCE. Listening tests are good, but if you're trying to solve a problem, or determine if there's a problem and where it is, measurements are better. If I'm interpreting your setup correctly, you have the console output connected to the input of your recorder and the output of the recorder connected back into the console. You're switching (at the console) between listening to the direct console output (as fed to the recorder) and what's coming out of the recorder? And you're losing bass, even with the recorder set to Input Monitor? There's something very wrong here, either with the recorder, the console input that you're usinjg to monitor the recorder, or the hookup. Proper alignment requires some references - a known, or at least fixed (sine wave) input source and, for playback alignment, a standard test tape. If the recorder is operating properly and it's properly connected to your monitoring system, you can make some adjustments so that it sounds best, but you won't know where you are in reference to the rest of the world, and you may be making problems for yourself. Alignment is simple, but you can't do it without test equipment. And there's no sense in doing an alignment until you fix all the real problems, which it appears that you have. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
"Emiliano Grilli" wrote in message
... On 21 Gen, 17:45, "Paul Stamler" wrote: The problem is that on the SOURCE I have a signal that's a lot weaker in the low end that what is coming in. I've not taken it apart the machine yet, but in the manual I don't see anything referring to the eq of the input signal... There should not be any EQ on the input signal. How are you listening to what's coming in, and how are you listening to what's coming out of the Revox? I have the line out of the revox connected to a stereo channel on my soundcraft folio mixer, and the line in is taking the output of the soundcard, which also goes to the mixer, so I can A/B the revox (both SOURCE and REPRODUCE) and the soundcard. Three things. First off, how carefully are you matching the levels in the Folio channels devoted to the soundcard and the Revox? A small difference in level will sound like a change in bass response. Second: Are you absolutely certain the two channels of the Folio have flat frequency response? I don't know the board, so don't know if the EQ can be swtiched out, but if not, have you measured to make sure the response is really flat when the controls are set to flat? Third: The Revox has XLR outputs; the Folio has 1/4" inputs. Exactly how are you converting? XLR to TRS? Again, I don't know the board, so I don't know if the stereo inputs come in on a single 1/4" "stereo" jack (tip for L, ring for R) or a pair of them. Please tell me. Peace, Paul |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
On 21 Gen, 19:08, Mike Rivers wrote:
On Jan 21, 12:00 pm, Emiliano Grilli wrote: Yes, but I have the same signal on the console, and there I hear a lot of bass that isn't there on the deck, monitoring SOURCE. Listening tests are good, but if you're trying to solve a problem, or determine if there's a problem and where it is, measurements are better. If I'm interpreting your setup correctly, you have the console output connected to the input of your recorder and the output of the recorder connected back into the console. You're switching (at the console) between listening to the direct console output (as fed to the recorder) and what's coming out of the recorder? No, the input of the recorder is connected to the output of my soundcard thru a (cheap, sorry) patchbay that routes the soundcard output also to the console. And you're losing bass, even with the recorder set to Input Monitor? Yes, it's not a loss as if you would listening to a vinyl without RIAA eq, but there's surely a loss in the bass area. There's something very wrong here, either with the recorder, the console input that you're usinjg to monitor the recorder, or the hookup. Proper alignment requires some references - a known, or at least fixed (sine wave) input source and, for playback alignment, a standard test tape. I have the test tape, and for feeding the tones I'm using sine waves generated by csound. If the recorder is operating properly and it's properly connected to your monitoring system, you can make some adjustments so that it sounds best, but you won't know where you are in reference to the rest of the world, and you may be making problems for yourself. Alignment is simple, but you can't do it without test equipment. And there's no sense in doing an alignment until you fix all the real problems, which it appears that you have. As far as I can tell the recorder works, in the sense that it records well what's on the SOURCE, but that signal is already degraded in bass response... thank you -- Emiliano Grilli Linux user #209089 http://www.emillo.net |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
Emiliano Grilli wrote:
I'm just trying to set up my revox pr 99 myself: I bought an alignment tape and I've tried to follow the procedure. It seems that all is going well... (forgive me but these are my first alignments..), I've got a recorded signal that's pretty similar to what's on the SOURCE signal. The problem is that on the SOURCE I have a signal that's a lot weaker in the low end that what is coming in. You have bad coupling caps. If you have the monitor switch set to source, you are listening just through the line amplifiers and not through the tape itself or the record or play EQ. So if this is affecting your low end, you have bad coupling caps in the line amplifier stages. I would have a tendency just to shotgun out all of the Philips electrolytics personally. Just because if some are bad, others will soon follow. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
On 21 Gen, 19:13, "Paul Stamler" wrote:
Third: The Revox has XLR outputs; the Folio has 1/4" inputs. Exactly how are you converting? XLR to TRS? Again, I don't know the board, so I don't know if the stereo inputs come in on a single 1/4" "stereo" jack (tip for L, ring for R) or a pair of them. Please tell me. That hint led me to the solution... I'm feeling very lame for not being able to spot the problem by hear, but double checking the connections I've found that the two cables connecting the revox outs to the console were reversed in polarity Now it's so much better. Thank you very much for helping me. I have another question The manual instruct me to feed the recorder with a 1 khz tone at the "desired operating level" when calibrating the inputs. I'm using csound for generating the tone, and the opcode ampdb (http:// mitpress.mit.edu/e-books/csound/fpage/pub/csbook/Manual4.0/valcnv/ dbamp.htm) for setting its level. If I understand correctly this level is going to represent 0 VU on the machine's meters, is that right? What is considered a good value for this operating level compared with 0db digital? Peace, Paul thanks -- Emiliano Grilli Linux user #209089 http://www.emillo.net |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
"Emiliano Grilli" wrote in message
... I have another question The manual instruct me to feed the recorder with a 1 khz tone at the "desired operating level" when calibrating the inputs. I'm using csound for generating the tone, and the opcode ampdb (http:// mitpress.mit.edu/e-books/csound/fpage/pub/csbook/Manual4.0/valcnv/ dbamp.htm) for setting its level. If I understand correctly this level is going to represent 0 VU on the machine's meters, is that right? What is considered a good value for this operating level compared with 0db digital? That's going to depend on your sound card and how many volts it puts out for 0dB digital, and what you're going to use the Revox for. The following assumes that the sound card will be the source of whatever you record on the Revox -- in other words, you're dubbing from the computer into the Revox. Really, the issue is what kind of "nominal" level you record at. If your *average* level is, say, -14dBFS when recording digitally (this would be the level a VU meter would read), then that should correspond to 0 VU on the Revox. The Revox is measuring average level, while the digital system works only with peak levels. If it were me, since I use -14dBFS as a nominal level in digital, I'd generate a 1kHz tone at -14dBFS and set the Revox's nominal 0VU level to that signal. How many actual volts that might be will, as I said, depend on your sound card. If, on the other hand, you'll be recording from your mixer into the Revox, then it's probably a good idea to set the VUs for +4dBu (about 1.23V) input level 0 VU. That's a good world standard. Do your level monitoring on the Revox, not the mixer's LEDs. Peace, Paul |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Revox PR99 Mk III question
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:25:14 -0500, Paul Stamler wrote
(in article ): "Emiliano Grilli" wrote in message ... I have another question The manual instruct me to feed the recorder with a 1 khz tone at the "desired operating level" when calibrating the inputs. I'm using csound for generating the tone, and the opcode ampdb (http:// mitpress.mit.edu/e-books/csound/fpage/pub/csbook/Manual4.0/valcnv/ dbamp.htm) for setting its level. If I understand correctly this level is going to represent 0 VU on the machine's meters, is that right? What is considered a good value for this operating level compared with 0db digital? That's going to depend on your sound card and how many volts it puts out for 0dB digital, and what you're going to use the Revox for. The following assumes that the sound card will be the source of whatever you record on the Revox -- in other words, you're dubbing from the computer into the Revox. Really, the issue is what kind of "nominal" level you record at. If your *average* level is, say, -14dBFS when recording digitally (this would be the level a VU meter would read), then that should correspond to 0 VU on the Revox. The Revox is measuring average level, while the digital system works only with peak levels. If it were me, since I use -14dBFS as a nominal level in digital, I'd generate a 1kHz tone at -14dBFS and set the Revox's nominal 0VU level to that signal. How many actual volts that might be will, as I said, depend on your sound card. If, on the other hand, you'll be recording from your mixer into the Revox, then it's probably a good idea to set the VUs for +4dBu (about 1.23V) input level 0 VU. That's a good world standard. Do your level monitoring on the Revox, not the mixer's LEDs. Peace, Paul Just an observation. As we get farther and farther away from analog tape recording, it becomes increasingly important to remember that there was a lot of craft involved in setting a machine up and maintaining it. At this point in the analog tape machine life cycle, there are fewer and fewer people who have the experience to know how to work on the machines. Be careful of anyone pushing analog tape technology as a great way to record. They may not have the skills to keep their machine in spec. Then too, the circuits in analog tape machines are getting pretty old. Unless they have been carefully maintained down to components on the boards, they can sound pretty nasty. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Revox PR99: how many rack units? | Pro Audio | |||
FA:Studer A80 and Revox Pr99 Service Manuals | Pro Audio | |||
aligning revox pr99 without manual | Pro Audio | |||
REVOX PR99 Bias Adjustment | Pro Audio | |||
REVOX PR99 ? | Pro Audio |