Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
tomrp
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bias problem in KT88-6550 mono-block amps

I have a pair of Minnesota Audio Labs MAL 6550 mono block amplifiers,
very nice sounding amps copied after the Dynaco Mark III's. They have
cathode biasing, a set screw to get the tubes to read the same amount
of millivolts and an adjustment knob, which adjusts the bias in both
tubes. I was told by a local tech that they were very nice sounding
amps, good build quality, etc. The problem is I adjust bias to
..049-.050mv and they are good for maybe 10 minutes and occasionally
one tube goes to zero and the other jumps to .089 or so. I turn off
the amp and wait a few minutes and turn it back on and it is fine,
both tubes are back to .049. Sometimes it can be fine for several
hours. I have 3 sets of tubes(Valve art, Svetlana, and EI KT90's) and
it doesn't seem to matter, the problem is with all 3 sets and with
both amps.

The amps are about 7-9 years old. Any ideas as to where to start?

Thanks,

please respond to
  #2   Report Post  
Ian Iveson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"tomrp" wrote

[succinct description of problem, see below]


your test suggests the bias circuit is at fault.

does your circuit connect the two cathodes together with a pot,
whose wiper goes to ground via another pot configured as a variable
resistor? Each cathode would then have its own bypass capacitor to
ground.

apart from the operation of the valves, there are two ways in which
current can rise in one valve. Either the resistance it sees to
ground reduces, or the voltage across the bottom pot must fall. For
the current to rise in one valve, the opposite of one of these
conditions must be true.

if one capacitor were leaky, then the first condition would be true,
and more current would flow in that valve. But less current would
flow down that leg of the pot, and so less due to that valve would
flow through the bottom pot. The voltage across the bottom pot would
fall, and the other valve would also pass more current.

if the bottom pot were leaky, both valves would pass more current.
If open circuit, then neither would pass current.

if one side of the top pot is leaking to the wiper, the valve on
that side will pass more current, and this extra current will pass
through the bottom pot, increasing the voltage across it, so the
other valve would pass less current.

if one side of the top pot is rising in resistance (eg going open
circuit) then the opposite of the above would be the case, giving
the same scenario, but with less total current.

I would guess the last of these possibilities. Could be a dry solder
joint between the top pot and the cathode of the valve that switches
off. Or a problem in the pot itself such as a crack in the track.

could be totally wrong, as ever.

cheers, Ian

I have a pair of Minnesota Audio Labs MAL 6550 mono block

amplifiers,
very nice sounding amps copied after the Dynaco Mark III's. They

have
cathode biasing, a set screw to get the tubes to read the same

amount
of millivolts and an adjustment knob, which adjusts the bias in

both
tubes. I was told by a local tech that they were very nice

sounding
amps, good build quality, etc. The problem is I adjust bias to
.049-.050mv and they are good for maybe 10 minutes and

occasionally
one tube goes to zero and the other jumps to .089 or so. I turn

off
the amp and wait a few minutes and turn it back on and it is fine,
both tubes are back to .049. Sometimes it can be fine for several
hours. I have 3 sets of tubes(Valve art, Svetlana, and EI KT90's)

and
it doesn't seem to matter, the problem is with all 3 sets and with
both amps.

The amps are about 7-9 years old. Any ideas as to where to start?



  #3   Report Post  
Patrick Turner
 
Posts: n/a
Default



tomrp wrote:

I have a pair of Minnesota Audio Labs MAL 6550 mono block amplifiers,
very nice sounding amps copied after the Dynaco Mark III's. They have
cathode biasing, a set screw to get the tubes to read the same amount
of millivolts and an adjustment knob, which adjusts the bias in both
tubes. I was told by a local tech that they were very nice sounding
amps, good build quality, etc. The problem is I adjust bias to
.049-.050mv and they are good for maybe 10 minutes and occasionally
one tube goes to zero and the other jumps to .089 or so. I turn off
the amp and wait a few minutes and turn it back on and it is fine,
both tubes are back to .049. Sometimes it can be fine for several
hours. I have 3 sets of tubes(Valve art, Svetlana, and EI KT90's) and
it doesn't seem to matter, the problem is with all 3 sets and with
both amps.

The amps are about 7-9 years old. Any ideas as to where to start?

Thanks,

please respond to


We cannot advise until we see the schematic.

Is there a url where it may be seen?

Patrick Turner.


  #4   Report Post  
Ian Iveson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Patrick Turner" wrote

We cannot advise until we see the schematic.


Didn't stop me. No harm in a shot in the dark.

the Dynaco has fixed bias + some shared cathode bias with no bypass
and no balance adjustment AFAIK. Tom says his are cathode biased
with balance adjustment. Are there lots of ways of doing this?

A search suggests that Tom has tried and failed to find a circuit
diagram.

cheers, Ian


  #5   Report Post  
tomrp
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have been unable to find a schematic for these amps, or much of any
info. Thanks, Ivan, for the help. It gives me a place to start.

Regards,

Tom

Ian Iveson" wrote in message . uk...
"Patrick Turner" wrote

We cannot advise until we see the schematic.


Didn't stop me. No harm in a shot in the dark.

the Dynaco has fixed bias + some shared cathode bias with no bypass
and no balance adjustment AFAIK. Tom says his are cathode biased
with balance adjustment. Are there lots of ways of doing this?

A search suggests that Tom has tried and failed to find a circuit
diagram.

cheers, Ian



  #6   Report Post  
Ian Iveson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"tomrp" wrote

It gives me a place to start.


or maybe not...

if it is a dynaco III clone, then it is a combination of fixed and
cathode bias, with the two cathodes sharing the same, unbypassed
bias resistor. Adjustment is through an additional "fixed" bias
supply to the grids.

In that case, if one valve switches off, the voltage across the
cathode resistor drops, so the other valve will pass more current.
In this respect my previous argument still applies.

However, if the adjustment is to the fixed bias part of the circuit
like the dynaco, you may really need to trace the circuit, because
the dynaco lacks a DC balance control as far as I can see
http://www.triodeel.com/dynamk3.gif

It may possibly be a dry joint or poor socket connection or a short
to ground between the bias circuit and one grid. That valve may then
pass enough current for the common cathode resistor to turn the
other valve off.

Conversely, it could be a dry joint or poor socket connection to one
cathode as before, which would tip the balance the opposite way.

Could be lots of other things too.

If you can check whether the pots are associated with the cathodes
or the grids it would be a help. Much better if you could trace it
out, or tell us how it differs from the dynaco. Grids are more
likely I think. Could conceivably be both...

The point I am labouring is that, if the valves are balanced like a
see-saw across a shared cathode resistor, then your symptom can be
caused in four opposite ways: either side can be pushed or pulled,
and the result appears the same. Combine this with an intermittent
fault and things get tricky. Without a circuit you could have an
intractable problem.

cheers, Ian



  #7   Report Post  
Patrick Turner
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ian Iveson wrote:

"tomrp" wrote

It gives me a place to start.


or maybe not...

if it is a dynaco III clone, then it is a combination of fixed and
cathode bias, with the two cathodes sharing the same, unbypassed
bias resistor. Adjustment is through an additional "fixed" bias
supply to the grids.

In that case, if one valve switches off, the voltage across the
cathode resistor drops, so the other valve will pass more current.
In this respect my previous argument still applies.

However, if the adjustment is to the fixed bias part of the circuit
like the dynaco, you may really need to trace the circuit, because
the dynaco lacks a DC balance control as far as I can see
http://www.triodeel.com/dynamk3.gif

It may possibly be a dry joint or poor socket connection or a short
to ground between the bias circuit and one grid. That valve may then
pass enough current for the common cathode resistor to turn the
other valve off.

Conversely, it could be a dry joint or poor socket connection to one
cathode as before, which would tip the balance the opposite way.

Could be lots of other things too.

If you can check whether the pots are associated with the cathodes
or the grids it would be a help. Much better if you could trace it
out, or tell us how it differs from the dynaco. Grids are more
likely I think. Could conceivably be both...

The point I am labouring is that, if the valves are balanced like a
see-saw across a shared cathode resistor, then your symptom can be
caused in four opposite ways: either side can be pushed or pulled,
and the result appears the same. Combine this with an intermittent
fault and things get tricky. Without a circuit you could have an
intractable problem.

cheers, Ian


He has the circuit.

But he has no schematic apparently.

My way if I'd never seen the amp before in my life would be to
catch it in the act of playing up while its upside down on the bench,
and prod around measuring evrything quickly, lest something fry,
before I could catch it in the act of frying.
If the bias current changes for either tube suddenly, and another pair
of tubes
also does the same thing, it ain't the tubes, its most likely the bias
circuit,
or a stuffed coupling cap.


Sometimes you can get an intermittent tube socket.
90% of tube sockets faults are due to the pin grippers working
open, and not gripping the pins tightly.
Usually its the grid pin that goes open, and the tube is unbiased, and
it
then starts to develop a positive charge on its grid, and the tube
current begins to climb,
and in a minute or two you have a red hot anode, and possible tube
meltdown.
spontaneous reconnection of the grid pin won't stop the runaway
because by this time the grid has become hot.
The amp must be turned off, and left a few minutes to cool,
then if the grid id reconnected, the tube may be OK.

Many old amps have had their tubes removed and plugged back in so many
times
that many of the grippers have become dodgy, and the tubes almost would
fall out
if the amp was turned upside down.
Get an awl and prize *all* the contacts of all grippers together a
little.
File the awl to a shape which fits down into the hole for the pin entry.

Don't over do it, and don't break the plastic socket material.
Ceramic sockets are prone to easy breakage.

But then if the fault didn't hit me in the eye, I'd trace the around the
circuit
and draw my own schematic of what is present in the amp in the bias and
output stage.

Armed with information, the fault would reveal itself.

If indeed it is like the schematic at
http://www.triodeel.com/dynamk3.gif
then if one tube stops conducting, the other will conduct more
as there appears to be a 112 ohm common cathode R.

And there is no way of balancing the currents of the two tubes.
Nice one Dynaco! it must have caused lotsa swearing by lotsa owners over
the years,
and maybe even premature tube death.

Quad II also have a common R for the cathodes of KT66,
and sometimes I see amps with 90mA in one tube and
35 mA in the other, and the sound is mud.

A better baising schematic is at
http://www.turneraudio.com.au/htmlwe...0ulabinteg.htm
Since drawing that schematic 4 years ago, I have found it more prudent
to use 100k bias R
instead of the 220k shown, since often 6550 tubes start conducting
some grid current even at idle, and instead of a slight negative grid
with respect to the
bias supply, you can get a couple of volts positive across the bias R,
which turns the tube on more, which causes even more positive charge to
develop at the grid
so tha even with say -40v at the bias pot the can be -38 at the grid.
Maybe KT88 suffere the same problem.
EHKT88, EH6550, and Sovtek KT88 are all identical internally.
I don't know if they start conducting grid current after say 1,000 hrs
of use,
but of twelve JAN GE6550 type A tubes I bought in 1995,
about 4 began to run about up to 2 volts across their 220k bias R,
and then they seemed to stay like that.
Individual bias pots for each output tube is a good idea,
but the balance idea I use in the schematic above works fine,
and I have a two transistor circuit which takes a signal off the 10 ohm
cathode R
and if there is more than 5mA difference in bias current an LED turns
on.
as long as there is enough turn travel to balance the amp
so the led stays turned off, all is well, but if the
pot won't balance the bias currents, one or both tubes has drifted too
far,
and a new set is required.
LEDs weren't around when Dynaco was designed.
Using a twin triode and neon tubes for a balance indicator circuit was
too hard and costly.

Patrick Turner.





  #9   Report Post  
Pooh Bear
 
Posts: n/a
Default


tomrp wrote:

I have a pair of Minnesota Audio Labs MAL 6550 mono block amplifiers,
very nice sounding amps copied after the Dynaco Mark III's. They have
cathode biasing,


No they don't.

You need a heck of a lot of negative volts on the grid - not mere
millivolts !

a set screw to get the tubes to read the same amount
of millivolts and an adjustment knob, which adjusts the bias in both
tubes. I was told by a local tech that they were very nice sounding
amps, good build quality, etc. The problem is I adjust bias to
.049-.050mv and they are good for maybe 10 minutes and occasionally
one tube goes to zero and the other jumps to .089 or so. I turn off
the amp and wait a few minutes and turn it back on and it is fine,
both tubes are back to .049. Sometimes it can be fine for several
hours. I have 3 sets of tubes(Valve art, Svetlana, and EI KT90's) and
it doesn't seem to matter, the problem is with all 3 sets and with
both amps.

The amps are about 7-9 years old. Any ideas as to where to start?


The negative bias supply sounds iffy.


Graham

  #10   Report Post  
Pooh Bear
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ian Iveson wrote:

"tomrp" wrote

It gives me a place to start.


or maybe not...

if it is a dynaco III clone, then it is a combination of fixed and
cathode bias, with the two cathodes sharing the same, unbypassed
bias resistor.


A classic way to ensure bad results !


Adjustment is through an additional "fixed" bias
supply to the grids.

In that case, if one valve switches off, the voltage across the
cathode resistor drops, so the other valve will pass more current.
In this respect my previous argument still applies.

However, if the adjustment is to the fixed bias part of the circuit
like the dynaco, you may really need to trace the circuit, because
the dynaco lacks a DC balance control as far as I can see
http://www.triodeel.com/dynamk3.gif

It may possibly be a dry joint or poor socket connection or a short
to ground between the bias circuit and one grid. That valve may then
pass enough current for the common cathode resistor to turn the
other valve off.

Conversely, it could be a dry joint or poor socket connection to one
cathode as before, which would tip the balance the opposite way.

Could be lots of other things too.

If you can check whether the pots are associated with the cathodes
or the grids it would be a help. Much better if you could trace it
out, or tell us how it differs from the dynaco. Grids are more
likely I think. Could conceivably be both...

The point I am labouring is that, if the valves are balanced like a
see-saw across a shared cathode resistor, then your symptom can be
caused in four opposite ways: either side can be pushed or pulled,
and the result appears the same. Combine this with an intermittent
fault and things get tricky. Without a circuit you could have an
intractable problem.


Agreed.


Graham



  #11   Report Post  
keithw
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Tomrp,
I had basically the same thing happen in my HK Cit II (but with fixed
bias). I thought the grid 1 pin was loosing contact, so I cleaned the
sockets (why I didn't change them when I rebuilt the amp is another story).
I slapped another set of tubes in the amp and haven't had a problem since.
The old tubes getters were gray in color and were a RCA and GE mix, the new
set is Chinese KT88's. I haven't tried the Svetlana 6550C's yet. I still
want to test it out a bit longer before I risk the "Good Ones". BTW, I
reduced the main fuse from I believe 8amps to 4or5amps without any ill
effects. Save them tubes!

- Thank God We Don't Get The Government We Pay For. keithw...


"tomrp" wrote in message
om...
I have a pair of Minnesota Audio Labs MAL 6550 mono block amplifiers,
very nice sounding amps copied after the Dynaco Mark III's. They have
cathode biasing, a set screw to get the tubes to read the same amount
of millivolts and an adjustment knob, which adjusts the bias in both
tubes. I was told by a local tech that they were very nice sounding
amps, good build quality, etc. The problem is I adjust bias to
.049-.050mv and they are good for maybe 10 minutes and occasionally
one tube goes to zero and the other jumps to .089 or so. I turn off
the amp and wait a few minutes and turn it back on and it is fine,
both tubes are back to .049. Sometimes it can be fine for several
hours. I have 3 sets of tubes(Valve art, Svetlana, and EI KT90's) and
it doesn't seem to matter, the problem is with all 3 sets and with
both amps.

The amps are about 7-9 years old. Any ideas as to where to start?

Thanks,

please respond to



  #12   Report Post  
James Meyer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:58:02 GMT, "Ian Iveson"
wroth:

The point I am labouring is that, if the valves are balanced like a
see-saw across a shared cathode resistor, then your symptom can be
caused in four opposite ways: either side can be pushed or pulled,
and the result appears the same. Combine this with an intermittent
fault and things get tricky. Without a circuit you could have an
intractable problem.

cheers, Ian


I would suspect coupling capacitors at either output tube grid since the
amp works until thoroughly warmed up. Cap leakage gets worse with increased
temperature. If the problem can be duplicated with the bottom cover off so that
voltages at the tube base can be checked, that would be a good place to start.
Screen voltage changes will also affect cathode currents. No schematics needed
for that.

If all else fails, a schematic can be "reverse engineered" by simple
inspection and a little work with pencil and paper.

Jim

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Artists cut out the record biz [email protected] Pro Audio 64 July 9th 04 10:02 PM
Which 6550 for SVT reissue? roger Vacuum Tubes 172 February 29th 04 11:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"