| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination
Hello.
I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, making grotesquely mistaken statements. On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. Frank B Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:45:10 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 14 Mar 2005 23:34:42 -0000, Andre Jute wrote: Quad ESLs - 57 or 63? Pinkerton's lies debunked Try to tell the difference between lies and an honest mistake. Oh, I forgot, you're so far gone that you don't know the difference between lies and reality. A short synopsis, for those who don't know this clown: Born 1945 in Oudtshoorn, South Africa, Andre Jute McCoy was educated at the Universities of Stellenbosch (South Africa) and Adelaide. He has had a variety of occupations and interests, including advertising (he became a partner in an advertising company at the age of 23 and retired at 26), intelligence officer, racing driver, big game hunter, actor, critic of theatre, music and art, magazine editor, public relations officer and professional gambler..... Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy, between 1978 and 1988. This sad old clown leaves Walter Mitty in the dust, and you can judge his basic character from his self-admitted time as an 'intelligence officer' - ever read about the lovely boys of BOSS? Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 14 Mar 2005 23:34:42 -0000, Andre Jute wrote: Quad ESLs - 57 or 63? Pinkerton's lies debunked Try to tell the difference between lies and an honest mistake. Oh, I forgot, you're so far gone that you don't know the difference between lies and reality. I'm not inclinded to be so tolerant, Mike. No ****! Pinko got this dumb misunderstanding from the Quad site where they say that from 1957 to 1966 PJW developed electrostats. That's all it says; it can mean anything or nothing but in fact is specifically intended to mean nothing without being challenged. Pinko was just tripped up by a copywriter who probably the day before wrote about soap and the day after about salad cream. It wasn't some old Yarpie hack who normally writes potboiler 'thrillers', was it? The blustering fool Pinkerton doesn't just tell a lie, he uses the lie to malign an audio designer, Peter Walker, whose feet he isn't fit to lick: Just another typical lie from the sad Jute sack. And it's revealing that Walker had already started work on the '63 three years before the '57 even went on sale in 1966. In other words, the useless poseur Pinkerton claims Walker sold the 57 while knowing it wasn't good enough. The '63 is an *entirely* different speaker, and if the tired old hack Jute knew anything about industry, he'd be well aware that you use sales from existing products to develop better ones. The '57 was the best that PJW could make in 1957, but he knew that more was possible, and he took a *long* time to get the '63 ready for production, during which time the '57 kept the cash flowing. This is the speaker that was voted the greatest audiophile invention of the 20th century! But Pinkerton---a failed salaryman, an "engineer" who for a living essentially cleans up the computers of more creative people!---thinks its creator was a fool and a crook. What a pluperfect ****** this Pinkerton is. What a pathetic liar Jute is - but evertone on RAT already knows this. Pinko starts hurling insults every time we catch him out in these silly mistakes and lies. He calls Phil Allison "a cretin" for correcting his (Pinkerton's) ignorance. Allison *is* a foul-mouthed cretin - as are you. On this occasion, I was wrong. Some of us accept being wrong, add the truth to our memory banks, and move on. You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the god old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn. Pinkerton gets it grotesquely wrong and then screeches at me "you're too used to writing pot-boiler fiction". You are, that's obvious with every one of your pathetic self-pitying posts. I can't be bothered to straighten out this poor moron Pinkerton who cannot even distinguish engineering texts and other professional handbooks from literary fiction. There doesn't seem to be anything of value in Pinkerton's life, just spiteful lies about more creative men. He's worthless. As worthless as 'Andrew McCoy'? I think not....................... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stewart Pinkerton" BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, Bull****, no such 'posturing' took place. ** The record shows the exact opposite - the good for nothing Pommy **** constantly postures as an expert Quad ESLs. making grotesquely mistaken statements. Again with the 'grotesque'? I made *one* simple error of fact, ** The record shows that Pinko the ****ing Turd chose to mindlessly abuse folk who were posting very well known FACTs about the matter. As he does regularly and constantly on many other matters. based on misleading information on Quad's own website. ** As anyone here could have told the Posturing Pommy **** - if he had simply revealed the source of WRONG info. On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. No abuse, simply accurate descripotions. ** Stewart Pinkerton is a piece of sub human garbage. Any convicted child molester you can name is far more worthy individual. ............. Phil |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:44:24 +0000, Ian Bell
wrote: I see RAT and UKRA continue to maintain their standards of invective. You can blame the two psycho-RATs for spreading it to UKRA. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ian Bell" wrote
I see RAT and UKRA continue to maintain their standards of invective. No, no, no, it's an insult to lump RAT and UKRA together. UKRA isn't in our league. Our standard of invective is **far** superior. I assume that's why Stew came to RAT...seeking a better quality of insult. cheers, Ian |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Mr Jute
I did not post my list of Pinkerton's lies in defense of you. You are demonstrably big enough to look after yourself. I acted because Pinkerton's public lack of rationality and decency is an insult to the profession of "engineer". Though I did save your private pages before you removed them, most of what I know about you is from public sources. There is nothing in my post that hasn't been in a newspaper or on television or on the radio or in one of your own books. That is the the point of my letter, that Pinkerton could with a minimum of effort have checked every one of his accusations and discovered them to be a lie. I take your point, that Pinkerton doesn't care that such grotesque accusations cannot be true and should not be made in public without extraordinary prior efforts at proof. But that is only another way of stating my reason of Pinkerton's irrationality and indecency. I understand your reluctance to entrust too many personal details to the net to be trivialized by what you call "the sneering, jeering slime", but you must allow me my own reasons for pointing out Pinkerton's grotesque lies and distortions. If other engineers do not join you in putting down a malevolent liar who calls himself an "engineer", who will? Your sincerely, Frank B. Andre Jute wrote: rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination Come on, Frank. I was just going to let the idiot Pinkerton twist on the vine. I mean, who in his right mind will believe the slimeball Pinkerton's racist accusation of -- wait for it -- child murder! The poor little man is obviously disturbed. Anyhow, why give the little ****** all that information about me? If he wants to know, he can go buy one of my books, put money in my pocket, then read the blurbs. I don't explain myself to slime, and I am not grateful when you do it. It is for this reason that years ago I pulled my private netsite, clearly the original source of most of your concentrated information. You are apparently a rational, hardworking guy. But you have failed to understand that the hatred Pinkerton bears me isn't rational. He wouldn't hate me less if I tried to be less obviously smarter than him. Jon Yaeger gave us the text the other day: "Right or wrong" Jute is wrong because those irrational dickheads Yeager and his buddy Pinkerton do not like me; facts are irrelevant. It is my existence that bothers them, my insistence on truth making them look shabby all the time. I'm the Jew in their fraudulent Hall of Heroes. Even if I moved out of Pinkerton's sun, he would still hate me for being born principled. It is a sort of curse we Calvinists bear bravely. (Well, at least laughing all the way to the bank.) You can't argue with terrorists and Pinkerton is a silicon terrorist on a tube conference. Everything you said is right and brilliantly argued, but Pinkerton will not grasp a word of it through his haze of self-justified hatred. Okay? As for your first two wives bringing me into your marital bed, that's a small price to pay for the privilege of being married to a graphic designer. At least the bedspread will be pleasing and the bedside books interestingly designed--and by me! Hee-hee. Let the silly little pudding-pull Pinkerton run. Certainly someone who has to tell everyone he bought not one but two Vorsprung Durch Technic (in the hope of seeming young, thrusting, modern, advanced?) is not worthy of the attentions of a man who married two graphic designers in succession and can even spell reprographics, never mind know what it is. Pinkerton is a nobody who will wear himself out soon enough, a lightweight who will blow away on his own foul breath. Andre Jute wrote: Hello. I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, making grotesquely mistaken statements. On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. Frank B Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:45:10 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 14 Mar 2005 23:34:42 -0000, Andre Jute wrote: Quad ESLs - 57 or 63? Pinkerton's lies debunked Try to tell the difference between lies and an honest mistake. Oh, I forgot, you're so far gone that you don't know the difference between lies and reality. A short synopsis, for those who don't know this clown: Born 1945 in Oudtshoorn, South Africa, Andre Jute McCoy was educated at the Universities of Stellenbosch (South Africa) and Adelaide. He has had a variety of occupations and interests, including advertising (he became a partner in an advertising company at the age of 23 and retired at 26), intelligence officer, racing driver, big game hunter, actor, critic of theatre, music and art, magazine editor, public relations officer and professional gambler..... Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy, between 1978 and 1988. This sad old clown leaves Walter Mitty in the dust, and you can judge his basic character from his self-admitted time as an 'intelligence officer' - ever read about the lovely boys of BOSS? Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 14 Mar 2005 23:34:42 -0000, Andre Jute wrote: Quad ESLs - 57 or 63? Pinkerton's lies debunked Try to tell the difference between lies and an honest mistake. Oh, I forgot, you're so far gone that you don't know the difference between lies and reality. I'm not inclinded to be so tolerant, Mike. No ****! Pinko got this dumb misunderstanding from the Quad site where they say that from 1957 to 1966 PJW developed electrostats. That's all it says; it can mean anything or nothing but in fact is specifically intended to mean nothing without being challenged. Pinko was just tripped up by a copywriter who probably the day before wrote about soap and the day after about salad cream. It wasn't some old Yarpie hack who normally writes potboiler 'thrillers', was it? The blustering fool Pinkerton doesn't just tell a lie, he uses the lie to malign an audio designer, Peter Walker, whose feet he isn't fit to lick: Just another typical lie from the sad Jute sack. And it's revealing that Walker had already started work on the '63 three years before the '57 even went on sale in 1966. In other words, the useless poseur Pinkerton claims Walker sold the 57 while knowing it wasn't good enough. The '63 is an *entirely* different speaker, and if the tired old hack Jute knew anything about industry, he'd be well aware that you use sales from existing products to develop better ones. The '57 was the best that PJW could make in 1957, but he knew that more was possible, and he took a *long* time to get the '63 ready for production, during which time the '57 kept the cash flowing. This is the speaker that was voted the greatest audiophile invention of the 20th century! But Pinkerton---a failed salaryman, an "engineer" who for a living essentially cleans up the computers of more creative people!---thinks its creator was a fool and a crook. What a pluperfect ****** this Pinkerton is. What a pathetic liar Jute is - but evertone on RAT already knows this. Pinko starts hurling insults every time we catch him out in these silly mistakes and lies. He calls Phil Allison "a cretin" for correcting his (Pinkerton's) ignorance. Allison *is* a foul-mouthed cretin - as are you. On this occasion, I was wrong. Some of us accept being wrong, add the truth to our memory banks, and move on. You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the god old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn. Pinkerton gets it grotesquely wrong and then screeches at me "you're too used to writing pot-boiler fiction". You are, that's obvious with every one of your pathetic self-pitying posts. I can't be bothered to straighten out this poor moron Pinkerton who cannot even distinguish engineering texts and other professional handbooks from literary fiction. There doesn't seem to be anything of value in Pinkerton's life, just spiteful lies about more creative men. He's worthless. As worthless as 'Andrew McCoy'? I think not....................... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Jon Yaeger
writes in article , at wrote on 3/15/05 10:55 PM: Hello. I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, making grotesquely mistaken statements. On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. Frank B Tell us a bit about yourself, Frank. You say you are the longest Jute-watcher here, but based upon a Google search you have been rather absent before December 2004. Your first sentence, however, is vaguely familiar . . . I have seen the same wording about Jute's text allegedly being a bible for the auto industry appear on this N.G. The way you number Pinkerton's sins is a standard Jute trademark (like the 229 abuses!) It is hard to imagine that anyone else would find Jute so interesting that they would have an in depth knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his life, as the above other displays. I can't help but conclude that it was all composed by Mr. Jute himself, using a new sockpuppet. After all, that's one of Jutey-Fruity's proven devices . . . Or is that Nomen, George Orwell, Anon, etc?? Nice try. If it's Andre's book on designing and building specials, then it's one of the most amateurish books on the subject I've seen. Far, far better to get one of Alan Staniforth's books on a similar subject. But seeing how AJ is such a hero (sic) here, perhaps someone would like to make an offer to buy my VGC copy of his book? -- Chris Morriss |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ian Bell wiffled:
I see RAT and UKRA continue to maintain their standards of invective. It's why I lurk! Not a lot of point doing much else ATM.  -- Despite appearances, it is still legal to put sugar on cornflakes. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination
rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio By Frank B's numbering system, these are probably "Pinkerton Lies Nos 954 through 993". Looks like every time Pinkerton breathes out, a lie escapes his lips. Lest we forget, I entered this forum with some *factual* deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions on which he based You stormed in here and attempted to bully me into accepting you as my guru. Your fascist style is well captured by your own description "deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions ". Your attitude was hostile and your beliefs predigested prejudice. I treated your impertinence with the contempt it deserved. the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. This outright, instantly disprovable lie is so grotesque (hee-hee!) that I am giving it a thread of its own. At this point, it was *he* who started four separate pure attack threads, Really? I just dug a hole in the ground, Pinko, with a few notes about incompetent techies, not naming you. You dived face first into it, screeching, "I'm guilty, I'm guilty." As for calling you the "organ grinder's monkey", it appears to me that you entirely missed the pun on "Arnie's monkey". Everyone else got it and laughed their heads off. It is not my problem if you are accident-prone and humourless. without ever addressing the technical points at hand. You must be suffering reading comprehension deficit disorder, Pinko. I addressed all your points, insofar as they were valid or even interesting, or at least those worth discussion in a tube context, to the extent that I had time for digressions, in various articles I published on the Fiultra netsite and on RAT, for instance in my explanation of why excessive NFB (and big ali heatsinks!) cause Borg Pinkotrontrash to sound like ****. http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20100.htm http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...dre%20Jute.htm But in any event, what makes you think I need a fool like you as a technical advisor? I have vastly more experience with 300B than you and qualified technical advice is a phone call away or available right here on RAT from people with vastly better manners than you possess and, it goes without saying, far more technical knowledge. You're surplus to requirements, Pinko, and anyway useless because you can't be trusted to tell the truth on professional electronic matters, as we saw in Quad ESL debate and so many other times. I seldom start fights, Only daily... but I'm certainly capable of finishing them................ Threats are such a waste of breath. Andre Jute Here is Pinko's weaselling reply to Frank B given in full for connoisseurs of slime: The character assassin Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 15 Mar 2005 19:55:58 -0800, wrote: Hello. I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. Grotesque? A simple cut and paste from an Aussie literary website is 'grotesque'? BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, Bull****, no such 'posturing' took place. making grotesquely mistaken statements. Again with the 'grotesque'? I made *one* simple error of fact, based on misleading information on Quad's own website. Who'd doing the 'grotesque' misrepresenting here? On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. No abuse, simply accurate descripotions. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." No lie, but based on Jute's own admission that he had put some kid up in front of a firing squad. I though you said you were familiar with Jute? Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. Fact? You think if BOSS wanted Jute dead, he'd still be alive? PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. What's with the 'grotesque' numbering system, you lying sack of ****? FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. Prove it. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". Have you read any of them? FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. More pathetic Walter Mitty stuff - if BOSS had tried to kill Jute, they'd have succeeded, first time. And how pray, did this all become public knowledge? Andrew McCoy is listed in the Fantasy section of a literary website - and for good reason, as we see in these ever more fantastical posts. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) Oh dear, the tales get wilder and wilder.............. and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. That's what he'd like you to think, the reality is more like Billy Liar or Walter Mitty. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. No, just a sad old asshole, crying into his Guinness and spewing bile on Usenet. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; Just another typical Jute lie. even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! BWAHAHA! Yet *another* 'glittering career'? Baron Munchausen would fall at his feet in admiration...................... Have you any idea how pathetic is this sycophancy for a sociopathic asshole like Jute? Of course, it's much more likely that you *are* Jute, since he tends to use lots of sockpuppets. It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. BWAHAHAHA! Frank B More like Andre JM.......... My 'attempted character assassination' is a simple lift from a literary website, plus a retelling of Jute's own admission, and Jute's character should be very clear from his hate-filled and spiteful posts in this forum. Lest we forget, I entered this forum with some *factual* deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions on which he based the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. At this point, it was *he* who started four separate pure attack threads, without ever addressing the technical points at hand. I seldom start fights, but I'm certainly capable of finishing them................ Now, **** off back to the drawer, sockpuppet. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks, Frank, I see the message you posted for me and I have
discovered the right proxy finder to work with my Mac. You can trash the other messages I asked you to post as I've made a successful test and reckon I can handle it. Thanks for the help. -- Andre Jute wrote: Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio By Frank B's numbering system, these are probably "Pinkerton Lies Nos 954 through 993". Looks like every time Pinkerton breathes out, a lie escapes his lips. Lest we forget, I entered this forum with some *factual* deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions on which he based You stormed in here and attempted to bully me into accepting you as my guru. Your fascist style is well captured by your own description "deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions ". Your attitude was hostile and your beliefs predigested prejudice. I treated your impertinence with the contempt it deserved. the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. This outright, instantly disprovable lie is so grotesque (hee-hee!) that I am giving it a thread of its own. At this point, it was *he* who started four separate pure attack threads, Really? I just dug a hole in the ground, Pinko, with a few notes about incompetent techies, not naming you. You dived face first into it, screeching, "I'm guilty, I'm guilty." As for calling you the "organ grinder's monkey", it appears to me that you entirely missed the pun on "Arnie's monkey". Everyone else got it and laughed their heads off. It is not my problem if you are accident-prone and humourless. without ever addressing the technical points at hand. You must be suffering reading comprehension deficit disorder, Pinko. I addressed all your points, insofar as they were valid or even interesting, or at least those worth discussion in a tube context, to the extent that I had time for digressions, in various articles I published on the Fiultra netsite and on RAT, for instance in my explanation of why excessive NFB (and big ali heatsinks!) cause Borg Pinkotrontrash to sound like ****. http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20100.htm http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...dre%20Jute.htm But in any event, what makes you think I need a fool like you as a technical advisor? I have vastly more experience with 300B than you and qualified technical advice is a phone call away or available right here on RAT from people with vastly better manners than you possess and, it goes without saying, far more technical knowledge. You're surplus to requirements, Pinko, and anyway useless because you can't be trusted to tell the truth on professional electronic matters, as we saw in Quad ESL debate and so many other times. I seldom start fights, Only daily... but I'm certainly capable of finishing them................ Threats are such a waste of breath. Andre Jute Here is Pinko's weaselling reply to Frank B given in full for connoisseurs of slime: The character assassin Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 15 Mar 2005 19:55:58 -0800, wrote: Hello. I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. Grotesque? A simple cut and paste from an Aussie literary website is 'grotesque'? BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, Bull****, no such 'posturing' took place. making grotesquely mistaken statements. Again with the 'grotesque'? I made *one* simple error of fact, based on misleading information on Quad's own website. Who'd doing the 'grotesque' misrepresenting here? On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. No abuse, simply accurate descripotions. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." No lie, but based on Jute's own admission that he had put some kid up in front of a firing squad. I though you said you were familiar with Jute? Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. Fact? You think if BOSS wanted Jute dead, he'd still be alive? PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. What's with the 'grotesque' numbering system, you lying sack of ****? FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. Prove it. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". Have you read any of them? FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. More pathetic Walter Mitty stuff - if BOSS had tried to kill Jute, they'd have succeeded, first time. And how pray, did this all become public knowledge? Andrew McCoy is listed in the Fantasy section of a literary website - and for good reason, as we see in these ever more fantastical posts. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) Oh dear, the tales get wilder and wilder.............. and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. That's what he'd like you to think, the reality is more like Billy Liar or Walter Mitty. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. No, just a sad old asshole, crying into his Guinness and spewing bile on Usenet. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; Just another typical Jute lie. even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! BWAHAHA! Yet *another* 'glittering career'? Baron Munchausen would fall at his feet in admiration...................... Have you any idea how pathetic is this sycophancy for a sociopathic asshole like Jute? Of course, it's much more likely that you *are* Jute, since he tends to use lots of sockpuppets. It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. BWAHAHAHA! Frank B More like Andre JM.......... My 'attempted character assassination' is a simple lift from a literary website, plus a retelling of Jute's own admission, and Jute's character should be very clear from his hate-filled and spiteful posts in this forum. Lest we forget, I entered this forum with some *factual* deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions on which he based the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. At this point, it was *he* who started four separate pure attack threads, without ever addressing the technical points at hand. I seldom start fights, but I'm certainly capable of finishing them................ Now, **** off back to the drawer, sockpuppet. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
The slimy character assassin Stewart Pinkerton
wrote: the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. This is an outright, instantly disprovable lie. Hardware prototypes of various input topologies were built and thorougly tested and published more than a year ago on the sites of the RAT contributors John Byrns and Mick, and again on my Fiultra site last November. On the Byrns site for well over a year now: http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/HWAFhorn.jpg On Mick's prototype site for well over a year now: http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html where it is actually described as "work in progress". On the Fiultra site since 4 November: http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20190.htm http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...20T91HWAF3.jpg The photographs show hardware, layout plan, etc, etc, plus the horn for which the amp is intended. Also on the Fiultra site is extensive discussion of other aspects of the project. http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20100.htm On RAT there has been extensive discussion of the prototype development for well over a year and it is repeatedly referred to on RAT for over a year as in use with various speakers, being tested against other topologies, etc. With all of that standing, let's hear Pinkerton's lie again: the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. Contrast an amp for which Stewart Pinkerton demanded three months to design, build, test and describe it. After three months he delivered a sketch with the device numbers missing! It was unbuilt, untested, undescribed, a despicable travesty. If there is a mythical, non-existent amp, it is Pinkerton's KISSass silicon homage to my 300B project. Pinkerton is as sullen as a rejected woman and now you know why. The KISS Amp 300B project was temporarily halted because of Pinkerton's constant heckling and the tide of silicon **** he washed over us, but now that we have at long last seen the dumb 1960s cookbook circuit he put up as competition, I have been discussing in private mail with other RATs when precisely we should resume the KISS project. Andre Jute The Pinkerton Education Fund: give a buck to teach this fool to lie better The slimy character assassin Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 15 Mar 2005 19:55:58 -0800, wrote: Hello. I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. Grotesque? A simple cut and paste from an Aussie literary website is 'grotesque'? BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, Bull****, no such 'posturing' took place. making grotesquely mistaken statements. Again with the 'grotesque'? I made *one* simple error of fact, based on misleading information on Quad's own website. Who'd doing the 'grotesque' misrepresenting here? On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. No abuse, simply accurate descripotions. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." No lie, but based on Jute's own admission that he had put some kid up in front of a firing squad. I though you said you were familiar with Jute? Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. Fact? You think if BOSS wanted Jute dead, he'd still be alive? PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. What's with the 'grotesque' numbering system, you lying sack of ****? FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. Prove it. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". Have you read any of them? FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. More pathetic Walter Mitty stuff - if BOSS had tried to kill Jute, they'd have succeeded, first time. And how pray, did this all become public knowledge? Andrew McCoy is listed in the Fantasy section of a literary website - and for good reason, as we see in these ever more fantastical posts. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) Oh dear, the tales get wilder and wilder.............. and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. That's what he'd like you to think, the reality is more like Billy Liar or Walter Mitty. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. No, just a sad old asshole, crying into his Guinness and spewing bile on Usenet. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; Just another typical Jute lie. even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! BWAHAHA! Yet *another* 'glittering career'? Baron Munchausen would fall at his feet in admiration...................... Have you any idea how pathetic is this sycophancy for a sociopathic asshole like Jute? Of course, it's much more likely that you *are* Jute, since he tends to use lots of sockpuppets. It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. BWAHAHAHA! Frank B More like Andre JM.......... My 'attempted character assassination' is a simple lift from a literary website, plus a retelling of Jute's own admission, and Jute's character should be very clear from his hate-filled and spiteful posts in this forum. Lest we forget, I entered this forum with some *factual* deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions on which he based the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. At this point, it was *he* who started four separate pure attack threads, without ever addressing the technical points at hand. I seldom start fights, but I'm certainly capable of finishing them................ Now, **** off back to the drawer, sockpuppet. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chris Morriss wrote:
If it's Andre's book on designing and building specials, then it's one of the most amateurish books on the subject I've seen. Far, far better to get one of Alan Staniforth's books on a similar subject. But seeing how AJ is such a hero (sic) here, perhaps someone would like to make an offer to buy my VGC copy of his book? -- Chris Morriss Too bad you didn't get along with my book, Chris, but it probably wasn't written with you in mind. If you like Mr Staniforth's book better, it is obviously meant for you. Horses for courses. If your copy of my book is clean, I would be interested as it is twenty years since I last had a copy and I've been eyeing the new Chevrolet ali engines LS2 -2 -6 and their 6 liter ironblock equivalents which might make a nice bit of horsepower in a lighweight lane-hacker to take my bicycle to safer places to cycle. How much do you want and in what currency, including postage to Ireland? Andre Jute In message , Jon Yaeger writes in article , at wrote on 3/15/05 10:55 PM: Hello. I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, making grotesquely mistaken statements. On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. Frank B Tell us a bit about yourself, Frank. You say you are the longest Jute-watcher here, but based upon a search you have been rather absent before December 2004. Your first sentence, however, is vaguely familiar . . . I have seen the same wording about Jute's text allegedly being a bible for the auto industry appear on this N.G. The way you number Pinkerton's sins is a standard Jute trademark (like the 229 abuses!) It is hard to imagine that anyone else would find Jute so interesting that they would have an in depth knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his life, as the above other displays. I can't help but conclude that it was all composed by Mr. Jute himself, using a new sockpuppet. After all, that's one of Jutey-Fruity's proven devices . . . Or is that Nomen, George Orwell, Anon, etc?? Nice try. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did anyone else notice this is Andre signing a post made from Frank B's
email address? wrote: Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio By Frank B's numbering system, these are probably "Pinkerton Lies Nos 954 through 993". Looks like every time Pinkerton breathes out, a lie escapes his lips. Lest we forget, I entered this forum with some *factual* deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions on which he based You stormed in here and attempted to bully me into accepting you as my guru. Your fascist style is well captured by your own description "deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions ". Your attitude was hostile and your beliefs predigested prejudice. I treated your impertinence with the contempt it deserved. the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. This outright, instantly disprovable lie is so grotesque (hee-hee!) that I am giving it a thread of its own. At this point, it was *he* who started four separate pure attack threads, Really? I just dug a hole in the ground, Pinko, with a few notes about incompetent techies, not naming you. You dived face first into it, screeching, "I'm guilty, I'm guilty." As for calling you the "organ grinder's monkey", it appears to me that you entirely missed the pun on "Arnie's monkey". Everyone else got it and laughed their heads off. It is not my problem if you are accident-prone and humourless. without ever addressing the technical points at hand. You must be suffering reading comprehension deficit disorder, Pinko. I addressed all your points, insofar as they were valid or even interesting, or at least those worth discussion in a tube context, to the extent that I had time for digressions, in various articles I published on the Fiultra netsite and on RAT, for instance in my explanation of why excessive NFB (and big ali heatsinks!) cause Borg Pinkotrontrash to sound like ****. http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20100.htm http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...dre%20Jute.htm But in any event, what makes you think I need a fool like you as a technical advisor? I have vastly more experience with 300B than you and qualified technical advice is a phone call away or available right here on RAT from people with vastly better manners than you possess and, it goes without saying, far more technical knowledge. You're surplus to requirements, Pinko, and anyway useless because you can't be trusted to tell the truth on professional electronic matters, as we saw in Quad ESL debate and so many other times. I seldom start fights, Only daily... but I'm certainly capable of finishing them................ Threats are such a waste of breath. Andre Jute Here is Pinko's weaselling reply to Frank B given in full for connoisseurs of slime: The character assassin Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 15 Mar 2005 19:55:58 -0800, wrote: Hello. I'm probably the longest Jute-watcher here, since Mr Jute's text on automobile design was pressed into my hand as my bible on my first day at work right out of college. Normally I just lurk but Pinkerton's grotesque character assassination of Mr Jute should not pass unchallenged. Grotesque? A simple cut and paste from an Aussie literary website is 'grotesque'? BACKGROUND:After a quick glance at the internet, Stewart Pinkerton postured on RAT and UKRA as an expert on Quad electrostatics, Bull****, no such 'posturing' took place. making grotesquely mistaken statements. Again with the 'grotesque'? I made *one* simple error of fact, based on misleading information on Quad's own website. Who'd doing the 'grotesque' misrepresenting here? On the basis of these erroneous conclusions, Pinkerton abused Phil Allison and Andre Jute as cretins and suchlike. When others forced Pinkerton to retract, far from apologizing about the lies he told about them, Pinkerton further abused Messrs Allison and Jute. No abuse, simply accurate descripotions. PINKERTON LIE NO 311: Now, in desperation, Pinkerton tries character assassination. On the sole evidence that Mr Jute was born in South Africa, Pinkerton makes the racist slur that Mr Jute is a child murderer: "You however, are a sad and bitter old hack, crying into his Guinness about the good old days when you could have black kids shot at dawn." No lie, but based on Jute's own admission that he had put some kid up in front of a firing squad. I though you said you were familiar with Jute? Here are some facts that have been in the papers and on the BBC and are reprinted on Mr Jute's book jackets. FACT: The apartheid government twice sent assassins after Mr Jute for his work for freedom for oppressed people. That is precisely the opposite of what Stewart Pinkerton, on no evidence whatsoever, tries to make out. Fact? You think if BOSS wanted Jute dead, he'd still be alive? PINKERTON LIE NO 312: On the basis that Mr Jute once worked in intelligence, Pinkerton accuses him of having been a member of BOSS, the apartheid secret police. What's with the 'grotesque' numbering system, you lying sack of ****? FACT: Pinkerton didn't ask where Mr Jute was an intelligence officer or what sort of an intelligence officer before he starts spraying lies; he just makes grotesque assumptions. Mr Jute was not a member of BOSS, ever. But the assassins who tried to kill Mr Jute were employed by BOSS. The truth is precisely the opposite of the lie Pinkerton tells. Prove it. PINKERTON LIE NO 313: It is widely known that between engineering and other professional texts in more esoteric subjects on which he has knowledge, Mr Jute writes novels, some of them under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy. This Pinkerton describes as "Also wrote some potboilers under the name Andrew McCoy" which according to Pinkerton are "worthless". Have you read any of them? FACT: The reason the apartheid government (for whom Pinkerton makes the racist claim that Mr Jute committed child murders) twice sent the BOSS assassins (of whom Pinkerton claims Mr Jute was a member) to kill Mr Jute was precisely for the books under the pseudonym Andrew McCoy (according to Pinkerton "worthless potboilers"). Actually, it is easy to find out that these novels were highly reviewed in the best media around the world. The New York Times called Atrocity Week 'a towering landmark in the literature of violence'; the apartheid government agreed and sent assassins after Mr Jute. More pathetic Walter Mitty stuff - if BOSS had tried to kill Jute, they'd have succeeded, first time. And how pray, did this all become public knowledge? Andrew McCoy is listed in the Fantasy section of a literary website - and for good reason, as we see in these ever more fantastical posts. The Insurrectionist, a novel, remember (according to Pinkerton a 'worthless potboiler'), was reviewed by the BBC on the main news by the Director of the Institute for Strategic Studies as 'a blueprint for a black revolution'; the apartheid government agreed and tried to kill Mr Jute for it; the book was widely translated (I first read it in Spanish) Oh dear, the tales get wilder and wilder.............. and in all those languages used as a textbook by revolutionaries; it was a prescribed text in the antiterrorist training of soldiers and civil servants at British universities (my brother had it in his course given by Brigadier Richard Clutterbuck). CONCLUSION: Mr Jute, whatever you may think of his short way with fools, is a libertarian and humanitarian intellectual who has affected the course of history on two continents. That's what he'd like you to think, the reality is more like Billy Liar or Walter Mitty. He is a renaissance man, an artist, an engineer, a soldier, a thinker, a revered teacher. No, just a sad old asshole, crying into his Guinness and spewing bile on Usenet. Pinkerton is a postman of junk mail; Just another typical Jute lie. even there Mr Jute, a sort of demi-god to graphic designers (both my first two wives were graphic designers) and one of the world's leading experts in the esoteric science of print reprographics, knows more about Pinkerton's business than Pinkerton ever will! BWAHAHA! Yet *another* 'glittering career'? Baron Munchausen would fall at his feet in admiration...................... Have you any idea how pathetic is this sycophancy for a sociopathic asshole like Jute? Of course, it's much more likely that you *are* Jute, since he tends to use lots of sockpuppets. It is difficult not to conclude that Pinkerton's attempted character assassinations of Mr Jute are the result of Pinkerton's envy of a superior human being. BWAHAHAHA! Frank B More like Andre JM.......... My 'attempted character assassination' is a simple lift from a literary website, plus a retelling of Jute's own admission, and Jute's character should be very clear from his hate-filled and spiteful posts in this forum. Lest we forget, I entered this forum with some *factual* deconstructions of Jute's worthless assumptions on which he based the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. At this point, it was *he* who started four separate pure attack threads, without ever addressing the technical points at hand. I seldom start fights, but I'm certainly capable of finishing them................ Now, **** off back to the drawer, sockpuppet. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dances With Sockpuppets wrote:
Did anyone else notice this is Andre signing a post made from Frank B's email address? I noticed. Andre posted this as an apparent explanation. "Thanks, Frank, I see the message you posted for me and I have discovered the right proxy finder to work with my Mac. You can trash the other messages I asked you to post as I've made a successful test and reckon I can handle it. Thanks for the help. -- Andre Jute" If it looks like a sock, and acts like a sock, and smells like a sock... |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 16 Mar 2005 16:04:24 -0800, wrote:
The slimy character assassin Stewart Pinkerton wrote: the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. This is an outright, instantly disprovable lie. Nope, it's an obvious truth, since in *none* of the links given below, is there *any* sign of a simple 300B amplifier, i.e. KISS. It's vapourware, and even it did exist, it would still be based on demonstrably false premises. Hardware prototypes of various input topologies were built and thorougly tested and published more than a year ago on the sites of the RAT contributors John Byrns and Mick, and again on my Fiultra site last November. On the Byrns site for well over a year now: http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/HWAFhorn.jpg On Mick's prototype site for well over a year now: http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html where it is actually described as "work in progress". On the Fiultra site since 4 November: http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20190.htm http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...20T91HWAF3.jpg The photographs show hardware, layout plan, etc, etc, plus the horn for which the amp is intended. Also on the Fiultra site is extensive discussion of other aspects of the project. http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20100.htm On RAT there has been extensive discussion of the prototype development for well over a year and it is repeatedly referred to on RAT for over a year as in use with various speakers, being tested against other topologies, etc. With all of that standing, let's hear Pinkerton's lie again: the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. What 'lie'? Show me in *any* place on the face of this earth, a two-stage amplifier with 300B output tube, designed and built by Andre Jute. It doesn't exist, it's a myth spread by RAT's most notorious liar and sociopath. Contrast an amp for which Stewart Pinkerton demanded three months to design, build, test and describe it. After three months he delivered a sketch with the device numbers missing! It was unbuilt, untested, undescribed, a despicable travesty. If there is a mythical, non-existent amp, it is Pinkerton's KISSass silicon homage to my 300B project. Pinkerton is as sullen as a rejected woman and now you know why. No way is KISASS a 'homage' to anything, especially not to your non-existent flea-power abomination. KISASS is quite simply an easy to build SS alternative having a similar transfer function to a single-ended tube amp, less than ten watts output power, and no loop feedback. That's it, nothing more. I supplied recommended active devices, it will work with lots of alternatives, but will be somewhat less linear than with the recommended MJL4281/MJL4302 pair. BTW, the underlying philosophy and circuit details were described at length on RAT, so stop lying. The KISS Amp 300B project was temporarily halted because of Pinkerton's constant heckling and the tide of silicon **** he washed over us, but now that we have at long last seen the dumb 1960s cookbook circuit he put up as competition, I have been discussing in private mail with other RATs when precisely we should resume the KISS project. Sure you have, Andy, sure you have. BTW, if KISS exists, why are you having to 'resume the project'? Pathetic. BTW, your '60s cookbook' comment is just hilariously, for someone who is supposed to be 'designing' an amp straight of a '20s cookbook................... -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
[Andre's] simple 300B amplifier, i.e. KISS. It's vapourware, and even it did exist, it would still be based on demonstrably false premises. Coming and going, facing both ways, you can't get there from here... Which is it, Pinko? Pinkerton is totally deranged with hatred and envy. Everyone on RAT has seen the KISS 300B project. Poor Pinkerton even tried to set himself up as its guru. But now, to suit his swingeing mood this minute (before it swings wildly to another extreme), the project never existed and is anyway based on "false premises". (More of the same irrational ranting in his full post quoted below.) The posturing fool Pinkerton, as he did in the Quad ESL debate, dipped for ten seconds into a netsite and then start posturing as an expert on the newsgroups, on the basis of his misunderstanding of the information calling people who rejected his importunations all kinds of names, in this thread among others "sociopathic liar". Without proof of course. We can see who the disruptive sociopath is. Nobody invited Pinko to RAT; nobody wants him except the dishonest garage trader Yaeger who also believes that "Jute is wrong even when he is right, isn't he?" Is there anyone to whom it isn't yet clear that Pinkerton came to RAT specifically on some silly silicon crusade to disrupt the KISS 300B project? The proof that Pinkerton doesn't understand the first thing about an ultrafi SE amp is his risible statement--I burst out laughing and spilt Corton Rouge over my keyboard--that the Pinkerton Travesty (if it is ever built) will have "a similar transfer function to a single-ended tube amp". Clearly this posturing old fool needs to review the--"non-existent" hee-hee!--KISS 300B literature some more, with particular reference to what I say about harmonic distribution. I think enough has been said to explain why in future I shall just ignore this tired old flame merchant Pinkerton's spittle-spraying posturing and get on with productive work. Andre Jute The Real McCoy Quality Control Stamp is withheld from Stewart Pinkerton for cause Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 16 Mar 2005 16:04:24 -0800, wrote: The slimy character assassin Stewart Pinkerton wrote: the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. This is an outright, instantly disprovable lie. Nope, it's an obvious truth, since in *none* of the links given below, is there *any* sign of a simple 300B amplifier, i.e. KISS. It's vapourware, and even it did exist, it would still be based on demonstrably false premises. Hardware prototypes of various input topologies were built and thorougly tested and published more than a year ago on the sites of the RAT contributors John Byrns and Mick, and again on my Fiultra site last November. On the Byrns site for well over a year now: http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/HWAFhorn.jpg On Mick's prototype site for well over a year now: http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html where it is actually described as "work in progress". On the Fiultra site since 4 November: http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20190.htm http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...20T91HWAF3.jpg The photographs show hardware, layout plan, etc, etc, plus the horn for which the amp is intended. Also on the Fiultra site is extensive discussion of other aspects of the project. http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS%20100.htm On RAT there has been extensive discussion of the prototype development for well over a year and it is repeatedly referred to on RAT for over a year as in use with various speakers, being tested against other topologies, etc. With all of that standing, let's hear Pinkerton's lie again: the (so far mythical) KISS amplifier. What 'lie'? Show me in *any* place on the face of this earth, a two-stage amplifier with 300B output tube, designed and built by Andre Jute. It doesn't exist, it's a myth spread by RAT's most notorious liar and sociopath. Contrast an amp for which Stewart Pinkerton demanded three months to design, build, test and describe it. After three months he delivered a sketch with the device numbers missing! It was unbuilt, untested, undescribed, a despicable travesty. If there is a mythical, non-existent amp, it is Pinkerton's KISSass silicon homage to my 300B project. Pinkerton is as sullen as a rejected woman and now you know why. No way is KISASS a 'homage' to anything, especially not to your non-existent flea-power abomination. KISASS is quite simply an easy to build SS alternative having a similar transfer function to a single-ended tube amp, less than ten watts output power, and no loop feedback. That's it, nothing more. I supplied recommended active devices, it will work with lots of alternatives, but will be somewhat less linear than with the recommended MJL4281/MJL4302 pair. BTW, the underlying philosophy and circuit details were described at length on RAT, so stop lying. The KISS Amp 300B project was temporarily halted because of Pinkerton's constant heckling and the tide of silicon **** he washed over us, but now that we have at long last seen the dumb 1960s cookbook circuit he put up as competition, I have been discussing in private mail with other RATs when precisely we should resume the KISS project. Sure you have, Andy, sure you have. BTW, if KISS exists, why are you having to 'resume the project'? Pathetic. BTW, your '60s cookbook' comment is just hilariously, for someone who is supposed to be 'designing' an amp straight of a '20s cookbook................... -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chris Morriss said:
If it's Andre's book on designing and building specials, then it's one of the most amateurish books on the subject I've seen. Far, far better to get one of Alan Staniforth's books on a similar subject. And later: How about 15 Euros plus whatever the postage costs? Seriously, if I thought someone's book was " most amateurish", I'd be happy to ship it back to him for free. In this world, money replaces dignity. -- Sander de Waal " SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. " |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
François Yves Le Gal wrote:
WTF is 'Corton Rouge'? Could be some Corton, an excellent red wine from Burgundy. Or a misspelled Cordon Rouge. Given the use of the upper case 'R' in Rouge, I suspect it's a giveaway that *someone* doesn't know what they're talking about when it comes to Champagne |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stimpy wrote: Fran=E7ois Yves Le Gal wrote: WTF is 'Corton Rouge'? Could be some Corton, an excellent red wine from Burgundy. Or a misspelled Cordon Rouge. Given the use of the upper case 'R' in Rouge, I suspect it's a giveaway that *someone* doesn't know what they're talking about when it comes to Champagne Nah, Stimpy, I'm happy to admit I know little about champagne (1) and could care less. The bubbles just rot your gut faster. In the summer I like Lambrusco, a cheap Italian sparkling wine which I drink out of a bottle-sized beer stein like coolie. If I really can't avoid breaking out the champers, I serve Roederer's Kristal. When someone else forces champagne on me I make a scandalous resistance by demanding sec 'for my sweet tooth'. And no, a misspelling denoting ignorance is not the sort of error I commit. I'm talking about a red wine called generically Corton Rouge by Anglophones the same way we invariably would refer to claret whenever we had a French academic to dinner at college. It rarely failed to infuriate. But do tell us everything you know about bubbly. Stimpy. Not much else to do on RAT right now. Andre Jute Sipping a nicely chilled New Zealand White Cloud as an aperitif to my midnight snack; with the midnight snack I shall drink a strictly medicinal glass of Errazzuriz Reserva cab sav from Chile; and afterwards I shall dip into a bottle of Mas Amiel (a dessert Grenache, like having a chocolate treeoutside your window) I opened at 6pm. By then I shall just be mellow enough to write the gallstone of RAT a charming letter, and another to suck up to Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". (1) Yeah, I know you want me to spell champagne with a capital. I don't think so but thanks for your thoughts all the same. I'm not a fashion victim, and I have a lifelong record of resistance to hypocritical, self-serving French political correctness. I laboured in that vineyard before President Bush (a great man) even discovered where France is on the map. Can't blame him. A few elections from now it will not be necessary for an American president to know where France is. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andre Jute Sipping a nicely chilled New Zealand White Cloud as an aperitif to my midnight snack; with the midnight snack I shall drink a strictly medicinal glass of Errazzuriz Reserva cab sav from Chile; and afterwards I shall dip into a bottle of Mas Amiel (a dessert Grenache, like having a chocolate treeoutside your window) I opened at 6pm. By then I shall just be mellow enough to write the gallstone of RAT a charming letter, and another to suck up to Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". Dined at Taco Bell tonite. Enjoyed a crisp nachos grande served with diced, ripened tomatoes, fluffy sour cream, and frijoles refritos, served atop corn chips, known in the native tongue as "fritos." My delicious repast was accompanied by two regular beef tacos, with sauce picante. The bubbly was a diet Pepsi, a naughty indulgence in this birthplace of Coca Cola. Subsequently, the digestive process was herald by a mellow and robust belch. At the urging of signals from the nether regions I made my way to their powder room, where I proceeded to . . . . . Narcissism's grand, isn't it? W.G.A.S. - The dishonest garage trader |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jon Yaeger wrote: Andre Jute Sipping a nicely chilled New Zealand White Cloud as an aperitif to my midnight snack; with the midnight snack I shall drink a strictly medicinal glass of Errazzuriz Reserva cab sav from Chile; and afterwards I shall dip into a bottle of Mas Amiel (a dessert Grenache, like having a chocolate treeoutside your window) I opened at 6pm. By then I shall just be mellow enough to write the gallstone of RAT a charming letter, and another to suck up to Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". Narcissism's grand, isn't it? Try a dictionary, Jon-John. How can anyone who eats and drinks like I do, and looks like what he is, a sixteen-stone retired sportsman, be a narcissist? Put your mind in gear, man. Dined at Taco Bell tonite. Cooked for my family. Superb vegetable lasagna. Recipe: Finely slice three baby leeks. The ones grown in Welsh soil taste best. Dip Israeli tomatoes in boiling water, peel and chop. Mix a little very concentrated vegetable stock cooked with white wine with a quarter teaspoon of Marmite so no one can accuse you of being a vegetarian. Cook and finely some chop enough leaf spinach to make up the required amount of filling.. Grate strong cheddar cheese. Dubliner Mature is best. Or you can use one of the fancy varietals from the Isle of Man. The oak smoked does not cook well (it eats superbly!) but I love the mature cheddar with whole peppercorns and the garlic and chives variety. Put butter, mustard and grated nutmeg in a pan for the white sauce. Peel several baby carrots and put them through the side of the grater intended to slice cheese into flat sheets. Lay out all the other ingredients instantly to hand, also implements. Don't start cooking until you are ready to cook everything in one smooth progression or you will burn something or overcook it. Warm up two plates and the oven. Wipe the lasagna dish with garlic-steeped olive oil. Put a good bit of the same olive oil in the bottom of one pan and heat on stove. Into hot oil drop sliced leek and carrot. Toss in oil, sear to seal. Only amateur cooks worry about slight edge-burning; the experienced knows it gives taste. Add tomatoes and stock. Cover and simmer (don't overcook!) while making white sauce in saucepan with mustard and nutmeg. Note that not salt is added, nor pepper. (The leek has a peppery taste and the nutmeg will bring out the other flavours.) When white sauce is ready, add half a glass of red wine (not cheap ****--if you won't drink it, don't cook with it) to the filling as you take it off the heat (safe for children--the alcohol will evaporate in the oven) and a small bit of cheese to the white sauce ditto. Build the lasagna in the dish (as explained on the lasagna packet, if you don't know how; never buy lasagna you have to pre-cook because it takes too much time, is actually an expert joh, and anyway the use-as-is variety tastes better; try common Roma brand). Sprinkle top layer of sauce with grated cheese. Dust with paprika. Cook for 30m or until al dente (test with fork). Make enough to serve without anything else except perhaps a green salad or sorbet afterwards. (This is comfort food; no point in mean servings.) Serve with red wine, preferably Chilean or Australian varietals. Wash the pots and implements, chopping boards, counters, stove and floor while you wait for the food to cook. If you want to be fancier, substitute ham or cooked chicken for one of the other ingredients in the filling. It takes much longer than you think, or than any cookbook tells you. Allow at least 2h between start and serving times. Dined at Taco Bell tonite. Enjoyed a crisp nachos grande served with diced, ripened tomatoes, fluffy sour cream, and frijoles refritos, served atop corn chips, known in the native tongue as "fritos." My delicious repast was accompanied by two regular beef tacos, with sauce picante. The bubbly was a diet Pepsi, a naughty indulgence in this birthplace of Coca Cola. Subsequently, the digestive process was herald by a mellow and robust belch. At the urging of signals from the nether regions I made my way to their powder room, where I proceeded to . . . . . Narcissism's grand, isn't it? W.G.A.S. - The dishonest garage trader You don't really put that **** in your face, do you, Yaeger? That stuff in the filling, that you call :"beef" may come off a cow but it is mechanically recovered "meat", MRM, and it comes off the heads and everywhere else where the abattoir men can't cut a piece that will look good at the butcher's. The pieces they recover it from are not washed first so MRM is full of snot and **** and even less desirable stuff out of animal glands. That is why you are supposed to cook sausages over very high heat and for a good long time, to kill all that crap. I'm not bull****ting you. When I wrote that in one of the most overregulated jurisdictions in the world that **** (literally) is sold in every supermarket as sausage, I got a letter asking me please not to make any more trouble. When I went hillwalking with an agricultural cabinet minister, he asked me to consider the jobs at stake. They knew I was right! (1) But is is worse than that. They don't separate the brains and backbone stem either before taking the MRM. so you are in danger of Creuzfeld-Jacob Disease, CJD, which will eat your brains and eventually kill you rather unpleasantly. I wouldn't wish CJD even on an dishonest garage trader like you. Mend your diet. Andre Jute (1) I ate half a dozen selected sausages the other day, beef, pork, lamb, chicken, a couple of special mixtures. My butcher, who made the sausages on his premises in plain sight, has a book in which the number and name of each animal in the saugage can be traced. He doesn't sell anything he can't trace to a local farm and particular animal. (Of course Ireland is the most expensive country in Europe to live in; someone has to pay for all this safety.) The sausages were about 1,25 Euro each, say a dollar and a half American, which is not expensive if the alternative is dying disgustingly. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jon Yaeger wrote: Andre Jute Sipping a nicely chilled New Zealand White Cloud as an aperitif to my midnight snack; with the midnight snack I shall drink a strictly medicinal glass of Errazzuriz Reserva cab sav from Chile; and afterwards I shall dip into a bottle of Mas Amiel (a dessert Grenache, like having a chocolate treeoutside your window) I opened at 6pm. By then I shall just be mellow enough to write the gallstone of RAT a charming letter, and another to suck up to Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". Narcissism's grand, isn't it? Try a dictionary, Jon-John. How can anyone who eats and drinks like I do, and looks like what he is, a sixteen-stone retired sportsman, be a narcissist? Put your mind in gear, man. Dined at Taco Bell tonite. Cooked for my family. Superb vegetable lasagna. Recipe: Finely slice three baby leeks. The ones grown in Welsh soil taste best. Dip Israeli tomatoes in boiling water, peel and chop. Mix a little very concentrated vegetable stock cooked with white wine with a quarter teaspoon of Marmite so no one can accuse you of being a vegetarian. Cook and finely some chop enough leaf spinach to make up the required amount of filling.. Grate strong cheddar cheese. Dubliner Mature is best. Or you can use one of the fancy varietals from the Isle of Man. The oak smoked does not cook well (it eats superbly!) but I love the mature cheddar with whole peppercorns and the garlic and chives variety. Put butter, mustard and grated nutmeg in a pan for the white sauce. Peel several baby carrots and put them through the side of the grater intended to slice cheese into flat sheets. Lay out all the other ingredients instantly to hand, also implements. Don't start cooking until you are ready to cook everything in one smooth progression or you will burn something or overcook it. Warm up two plates and the oven. Wipe the lasagna dish with garlic-steeped olive oil. Put a good bit of the same olive oil in the bottom of one pan and heat on stove. Into hot oil drop sliced leek and carrot. Toss in oil, sear to seal. Only amateur cooks worry about slight edge-burning; the experienced knows it gives taste. Add tomatoes and stock. Cover and simmer (don't overcook!) while making white sauce in saucepan with mustard and nutmeg. Note that not salt is added, nor pepper. (The leek has a peppery taste and the nutmeg will bring out the other flavours.) When white sauce is ready, add half a glass of red wine (not cheap ****--if you won't drink it, don't cook with it) to the filling as you take it off the heat (safe for children--the alcohol will evaporate in the oven) and a small bit of cheese to the white sauce ditto. Build the lasagna in the dish (as explained on the lasagna packet, if you don't know how; never buy lasagna you have to pre-cook because it takes too much time, is actually an expert joh, and anyway the use-as-is variety tastes better; try common Roma brand). Sprinkle top layer of sauce with grated cheese. Dust with paprika. Cook for 30m or until al dente (test with fork). Make enough to serve without anything else except perhaps a green salad or sorbet afterwards. (This is comfort food; no point in mean servings.) Serve with red wine, preferably Chilean or Australian varietals. Wash the pots and implements, chopping boards, counters, stove and floor while you wait for the food to cook. If you want to be fancier, substitute ham or cooked chicken for one of the other ingredients in the filling. It takes much longer than you think, or than any cookbook tells you. Allow at least 2h between start and serving times. Dined at Taco Bell tonite. Enjoyed a crisp nachos grande served with diced, ripened tomatoes, fluffy sour cream, and frijoles refritos, served atop corn chips, known in the native tongue as "fritos." My delicious repast was accompanied by two regular beef tacos, with sauce picante. The bubbly was a diet Pepsi, a naughty indulgence in this birthplace of Coca Cola. Subsequently, the digestive process was herald by a mellow and robust belch. At the urging of signals from the nether regions I made my way to their powder room, where I proceeded to . . . . . Narcissism's grand, isn't it? W.G.A.S. - The dishonest garage trader You don't really put that **** in your face, do you, Yaeger? That stuff in the filling, that you call :"beef" may come off a cow but it is mechanically recovered "meat", MRM, and it comes off the heads and everywhere else where the abattoir men can't cut a piece that will look good at the butcher's. The pieces they recover it from are not washed first so MRM is full of snot and **** and even less desirable stuff out of animal glands. That is why you are supposed to cook sausages over very high heat and for a good long time, to kill all that crap. I'm not bull****ting you. When I wrote that in one of the most overregulated jurisdictions in the world that **** (literally) is sold in every supermarket as sausage, I got a letter asking me please not to make any more trouble. When I went hillwalking with an agricultural cabinet minister, he asked me to consider the jobs at stake. They knew I was right! (1) But is is worse than that. They don't separate the brains and backbone stem either before taking the MRM. so you are in danger of Creuzfeld-Jacob Disease, CJD, which will eat your brains and eventually kill you rather unpleasantly. I wouldn't wish CJD even on an dishonest garage trader. Mend your diet. Andre Jute (1) I ate half a dozen selected sausages the other day, beef, pork, lamb, chicken, a couple of special mixtures. My butcher, who made the sausages on his premises in plain sight, has a book in which the number and name of each animal in the saugage can be traced. He doesn't sell anything he can't trace to a local farm and particular animal. (Of course Ireland is the most expensive country in Europe to live in; someone has to pay for all this safety.) The sausages were about 1,25 Euro each, say a dollar and a half American, which is not expensive if the alternative is dying disgustingly. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stimpy wrote: wrote: And no, a misspelling denoting ignorance is not the sort of error I commit. I'm talking about a red wine called generically Corton Rouge by Anglophones the same way we invariably would refer to claret whenever we had a French academic to dinner at college. It rarely failed to infuriate. Generically it's called Corton, or at a push, Corton rouge. Never Corton Rouge (1) Yeah, I know you want me to spell champagne with a capital. I don't think so but thanks for your thoughts all the same. I'm not a fashion victim, and I have a lifelong record of resistance to hypocritical, self-serving French political correctness. I laboured in that vineyard before President Bush (a great man) even discovered where France is on the map. Can't blame him. A few elections from now it will not be necessary for an American president to know where France is. What's a discussion about Champagne got to do with the US president? It doesn't matter, its OT. I have never been to France, so I have no idea about how correct they are, and I have no clue as to whether France will be such an insignificant power on the planet within say 12 years that the US president can ignore France totally. The US is desperately developing robotic soldiers, so that foreign "regime adjustments" will be all the easier, and in 20 years the world will be a very differently ruled kinda place. But I can't rely on my crystal ball for low thd. But in general, I like French culture, food, and wine, music, art, films, architecture, etc, etc, etc, and so many of their ideas. There is much I wouldn't like, but I am happily 12,000 miles away, and the wine made here is a decent drop. In 1,000 years, the planet will be about stuffed completely, at the current rate of the rape of nature, and resources, and french fries and McDonalds both won't have great significance. Humanity, and perhaps hu-womanity will have long evolved into some other genetically modified species, able to live in the garbage of its past. Patrick Turner. |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article . com,
wrote: By then I shall just be mellow enough to write the gallstone of RAT a charming letter, and another to suck up to Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". Hi Andre, You have confused Stewart's design with mine, Stewart calls his the "KISASS", mine is called the KISSASS, being much closer to the original 300B design, all single ended, and even using an output transformer. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Byrns wrote: In article . com, wrote: Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". Hi Andre, You have confused Stewart's design with mine, Stewart calls his the "KISASS", mine is called the KISSASS, being much closer to the original 300B design, all single ended, and even using an output transformer. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ The world just isn't a fair place. Look at it: You had the originality to be first with transistor amp that sounds like a tube amp, you had the initiative and honesty to build it and test it, you named it cleverly, and what is your reward? Your reward is for this wretched johnnycomelately (by 38 years!) Pinkerton to steal the name of your amp for his travesty of my 300B, which he hasn't even had the decency to build. Your reward is that even good people now confuse the wretched Pinkerton Travesty with your amp. I'd catch a quick shower, John, just in case some of the slime that Pinkerton drags about everywhere with him has rubbed off on you via Pinkerton's theft No, the world isn't fair. I shall also in future make a sincere effort not to confuse you KISSASS amp with Pinkerton's KISASS Travesty. Andre Jute |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:47:03 -0000, "Stimpy" wrote: WTF is 'Corton Rouge'? Could be some Corton, an excellent red wine from Burgundy. Or a misspelled Cordon Rouge. The name Corton Rouge is correct. It is an excellent red from the vineyards of Burgundy. I have two bottles of very fine 1973 in my small wine cellar. I thought to open one of them when I complete my KISS amp. Iain |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Iain M Churches wrote:
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:47:03 -0000, "Stimpy" wrote: WTF is 'Corton Rouge'? Could be some Corton, an excellent red wine from Burgundy. Or a misspelled Cordon Rouge. The name Corton Rouge is correct. Corton rouge rather than Corton Rouge surely? |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ian Iveson" wrote in message . uk... "Ian Bell" wrote I see RAT and UKRA continue to maintain their standards of invective. No, no, no, it's an insult to lump RAT and UKRA together. UKRA isn't in our league. Our standard of invective is **far** superior. I assume that's why Stew came to RAT...seeking a better quality of insult. cheers, Ian Well, he certainly didn't come here for the warm thermionic glow:-) Iain |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .com,
wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article . com, wrote: Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". Hi Andre, You have confused Stewart's design with mine, Stewart calls his the "KISASS", mine is called the KISSASS, being much closer to the original 300B design, all single ended, and even using an output transformer. The world just isn't a fair place. Look at it: You had the originality to be first with transistor amp that sounds like a tube amp, you had the initiative and honesty to build it and test it, you named it cleverly, and what is your reward? Hi Andre, I fear that I have confused you with my solid state amplifier designs, there are two that I have mentioned in this thread. The first amplifier, that I built 38 years ago, is very much like Stewart's "KISASS" design, except it is biased for class AB operation, doesn't have all the extra power supply filtering that Stewart added, and has a negative feedback loop from the junction of the two output stage emitter resistors back to the base of the input transistor. I am toying with the idea of converting this amplifier to class A operation as per the current fashion, but that will require that I pull some turns off the power transformer secondary to avoid more dissipation than my "heat sinks" can handle. Modifying the power transformer shouldn't be a big problem if I decide to carry out this scheme, as I already modified the power transformer secondary when I first built the amplifier. Your reward is for this wretched johnnycomelately (by 38 years!) Pinkerton to steal the name of your amp for his travesty of my 300B, which he hasn't even had the decency to build. Your reward is that even good people now confuse the wretched Pinkerton Travesty with your amp. The second amplifier, my "KISSASS" design, which I created in response to Iain's challenge, is at this point only a paper amplifier like Stewart's "KISASS". The confusion may arise from the fact that I mentioned that I have an output transformer suitable for my "KISSASS" design, which I coincidentally also wound 38 years ago. This transformer has both an 8 Ohm primary and 8 Ohm secondary, and is wound on a relatively large stack of iron that I salvaged from an SE amplifier of about twice the power of my "KISSASS" design. There is no air gap in the transformer as I originally built it, but with luck I should be able to restore the air gap. Bottom line, don't confuse my "KISSASS" paper design with the amplifier I built 38 years ago that is similar to Stewart's "KISASS". Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Byrns wrote: In article .com, wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article . com, wrote: Pinko after he was supine enough to name his amp KISSASS in homage to my KISS; poor fellow -- I wonder if his entire life is as much of a catastrophe as that so-called "design". Hi Andre, You have confused Stewart's design with mine, Stewart calls his the "KISASS", mine is called the KISSASS, being much closer to the original 300B design, all single ended, and even using an output transformer. The world just isn't a fair place. Look at it: You had the originality to be first with transistor amp that sounds like a tube amp, you had the initiative and honesty to build it and test it, you named it cleverly, and what is your reward? Hi Andre, I fear that I have confused you with my solid state amplifier designs, there are two that I have mentioned in this thread. The first amplifier, that I built 38 years ago, is very much like Stewart's "KISASS" design, except it is biased for class AB operation, doesn't have all the extra power supply filtering that Stewart added, and has a negative feedback loop from the junction of the two output stage emitter resistors back to the base of the input transistor. I am toying with the idea of converting this amplifier to class A operation as per the current fashion, but that will require that I pull some turns off the power transformer secondary to avoid more dissipation than my "heat sinks" can handle. Modifying the power transformer shouldn't be a big problem if I decide to carry out this scheme, as I already modified the power transformer secondary when I first built the amplifier. Your reward is for this wretched johnnycomelately (by 38 years!) Pinkerton to steal the name of your amp for his travesty of my 300B, which he hasn't even had the decency to build. Your reward is that even good people now confuse the wretched Pinkerton Travesty with your amp. The second amplifier, my "KISSASS" design, which I created in response to Iain's challenge, is at this point only a paper amplifier like Stewart's "KISASS". The confusion may arise from the fact that I mentioned that I have an output transformer suitable for my "KISSASS" design, which I coincidentally also wound 38 years ago. This transformer has both an 8 Ohm primary and 8 Ohm secondary, and is wound on a relatively large stack of iron that I salvaged from an SE amplifier of about twice the power of my "KISSASS" design. There is no air gap in the transformer as I originally built it, but with luck I should be able to restore the air gap. Bottom line, don't confuse my "KISSASS" paper design with the amplifier I built 38 years ago that is similar to Stewart's "KISASS". Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ Thanks for taking the time to unconfuse me. I think I have it now. Question to be answered when you have built the KISSASS: Is it dollar for dollar better than the 38 year-old design? I hope the transformer on your KISSASS meets your expectations in overcoming Pinkerton's failures to meet the KISS guidelines which caused the near-universal rejection of Pinkerton's so-called KISASS Travesty. Remember that the power requirement is only 3W. I look forward to your report in the fullness of time when you have built the KISSASS. Andre Jute |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .com,
wrote: Thanks for taking the time to unconfuse me. I think I have it now. Question to be answered when you have built the KISSASS: Is it dollar for dollar better than the 38 year-old design? I hope the transformer on your KISSASS meets your expectations in overcoming Pinkerton's failures to meet the KISS guidelines which caused the near-universal rejection of Pinkerton's so-called KISASS Travesty. Remember that the power requirement is only 3W. I look forward to your report in the fullness of time when you have built the KISSASS. Hi Andre, I don't think I will be building my current "KISSASS" design because I don't believe it would have the desired tube sound. The problem is that it clips much too sharply and suddenly. Just below the clipping point the distortion is all second harmonic, but when pushed even slightly into clipping, with say 10% overdrive, the second harmonic disappears completely, and is replaced by a comb like spectrum of all the harmonics beyond the second. I believe this is caused by two factors, the first being that transistors naturally clip very suddenly, unlike tubes which have a soft clipping effect, and in addition my amplifier uses negative feedback which magnifies the harmonics above the second once clipping starts. Stewart's amplifier should be better in this regard as the negative feedback used in his amplifier is not as egregious as in my amplifier, but his amplifier probably still would suffer from the sharp clipping effect of transistors, the effect just wouldn't be magnified by the negative feedback as in my initial design. To have a true solid state equivalent to the 300B amplifier I will have to first find a way to remove the negative feedback, which is not easily accomplished in my current design which depends on the negative feedback loop to establish the DC operating point for the transistors, and also to provide the required input resistance with only two transistors. It would probably be easy enough to retain negative feedback at DC to stabilize the operating point while eliminating the feedback in the audio band, but that would cause the input resistance to be too low. A third transistor would probably be needed to restore the input resistance to the desired value. Eliminating the feedback should bring my design into parity with Stewart's, but at that point both would still suffer from the sudden onset of clipping and the rich harmonic spectrum that produces. To fix that problem would require the development of a simple circuit to produce a soft clipping effect similar to tubes, which is a trickier problem, or I am sure Stewart would have already incorporated such a circuit in his design. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Easter approaches, whether Stewart Pinkerton? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
| Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity = His Delusional Attack Threads | Audio Opinions | |||
| For John, definitely not the thread Once more into the breach, dear friends | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Linear Mode
