[MiNe 109]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

On Aug 31, 8:14 pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 31, 4:34 pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

ScottW2 wrote:
rabid liberal lunacy

Yes, that rabid opposition to torture

I suggest you go to South Waziristan and stage a protest where
torture is real and rampant.

There's been enough torture to protest right here in the USA.

Who's been tortured here in the USA beside the members of
your church every Sunday?

Yes, torture is just like a church service.

Padilla, for one.

and lunatic desire to care for our
neighbors.

What are you doing to care for your "neighbors"?
You don't and can't care for squat. You want others to care for
you.

Perhaps you're sufficiently sociopathic to believe that.

It's a matter of economics.

Keep telling yourself that, like it's scientific.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 31, 9:21*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 31, 7:17*pm, Jenn wrote:

In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
* What are you doing to care for your "neighbors"?
* You don't and can't care for squat.

Good grief, Scott.

*Stepen is the socialist chickenhawk of our times.

Uh-oh! 2pid used the "S" word! LoL.

*This and the fact that after all this time you think
that I could be "blaming the victim".

* You agreed with sshtard who said the victim was like a co-
conspirator.
*I don't know how much more blaming of a victim you can get.

So if you get into a car with a driver you know to be drunk, you have
no responsibility for absolutely anything that happens to you as a
result.

Got it, 2pid.

Have you looked up "responsibility" and "blame" yet, 2pid? (Rhetorical
question.)

Duh.

You're not worth addressing anymore. *Catch ya'll later...

* I've heard the run away speech before.

"Boredom" and "being tired of dealing with imbecility" is not
synonymous with "running away", my 'brave' dumb 'friend'. LoL.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Aug 31, 8:23*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,





*"ScottW" wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:14 pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 31, 4:34 pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
rabid liberal lunacy

Yes, that rabid opposition to torture

*I suggest you go to South Waziristan and stage a protest where
torture is real and rampant.

There's been enough torture to protest right here in the USA.

*Who's been tortured here in the USA beside the members of
your church every Sunday?

Yes, torture is just like a church service.

Threats of death and eternal damnation in the fires of hell.

I can safely say that is not the case at my church.

I'll bet you've got some great organ riffs to insert there.

I play for church services, not radio soap operas.

Padilla, for one.

Proof enough.

and lunatic desire to care for our
neighbors.

* What are you doing to care for your "neighbors"?
* You don't and can't care for squat. *You want others to care for
you.

Perhaps you're sufficiently sociopathic to believe that.

* It's a matter of economics.

Keep telling yourself that, like it's scientific.

It's subjective perception. Will you be paying higher taxes
or receiving greater benefits?
A simple question you won't answer.

Since you're the economics wiz, you know how to set up a simple graph
comparing tax level and benefit level but it is not a simple question.

I'll probably pay more in premiums (not taxes) but get more benefit
because I could make a claim without fear of rescission or rate hikes.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Sep 1, 2:15*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:23*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:14 pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 31, 4:34 pm, MiNe 109 *
wrote:
In article

om,

*ScottW2 wrote:
rabid liberal lunacy

Yes, that rabid opposition to torture

*I suggest you go to South Waziristan and stage a protest where
torture is real and rampant.

There's been enough torture to protest right here in the USA.

*Who's been tortured here in the USA beside the members of
your church every Sunday?

Yes, torture is just like a church service.

*Threats of death and eternal damnation in the fires of hell.

I can safely say that is not the case at my church.

Must be some crazy scientologist cult.

Yes, scientologists sing hymns at their church services.

*I'll bet you've got some great organ riffs to insert there.

I play for church services, not radio soap operas.

Funeral durge?

It's 'dirge,' and there are no funerals at my church.

Padilla, for one.

Proof enough.

If that's proof to you, you're a bigger loon than I give you
credit for.

Since you've recently proven you don't know what you mean when you say
'loon' this is safely ignored.

If you meant 'lunatic,' funny you should mention it as Padilla is
reportedly deranged as a result of domestic torture.

and lunatic desire to care for our
neighbors.

* What are you doing to care for your "neighbors"?
* You don't and can't care for squat. *You want others to care
for
you.

Perhaps you're sufficiently sociopathic to believe that.

* It's a matter of economics.

Keep telling yourself that, like it's scientific.

*It's subjective perception. * Will you be paying higher taxes
*or receiving greater benefits?
A simple question you won't answer.

Since you're the economics wiz, you know how to set up a simple graph
comparing tax level and benefit level but it is not a simple question.

It is for me.

Simple, as in simply unanswerable as stated by you.

I'll probably pay more in premiums (not taxes) but get more benefit
because I could make a claim without fear of rescission or rate hikes.

LoL. Sounds like your a car going round and round.
Bottom line, you didn't answer but clearly you're too afraid of your
insurance provider to use them. Obama's fear tactic has worked.

Your views speak for themselves.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

LoL. Sounds like your a car going round and round.
Bottom line, you didn't answer but clearly you're too afraid of your
insurance provider to use them. Obama's fear tactic has worked.

Your views speak for themselves.

So you got him to speak. Now get him to roll over.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Sep 1, 4:54*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Sep 1, 2:15*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:23*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:14 pm, MiNe 109 *
wrote:
In article

om,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 31, 4:34 pm, MiNe 109 *
wrote:
In article

ps.c
om,

*ScottW2 wrote:
rabid liberal lunacy

Yes, that rabid opposition to torture

*I suggest you go to South Waziristan and stage a protest
where
torture is real and rampant.

There's been enough torture to protest right here in the USA.

*Who's been tortured here in the USA beside the members of
your church every Sunday?

Yes, torture is just like a church service.

*Threats of death and eternal damnation in the fires of hell.

I can safely say that is not the case at my church.

*Must be some crazy scientologist cult.

Yes, scientologists sing hymns at their church services.

I'll defer to your expertise. I find them too creepy to around.

No, you went fishing and came up empty.

*I'll bet you've got some great organ riffs to insert there.

I play for church services, not radio soap operas.

* Funeral durge?

It's 'dirge,' and there are no funerals at my church.

Not when you play 'em. I thought you were just an
employee but not it's "your" church. Don't tell me your
one of the flock?

I assume you think you're matching wits. Okay, I won't tell you.

Padilla, for one.

Proof enough.

* If that's proof to you, you're a bigger loon than I give you
credit for.

Since you've recently proven you don't know what you mean when you say
'loon' this is safely ignored.

LoL. Another copout.

You spoke too soon.

If you meant 'lunatic,' funny you should mention it as Padilla is
reportedly deranged as a result of domestic torture.

You didn't think he was deranged a bit earlier than that?

No.

and lunatic desire to care for our
neighbors.

* What are you doing to care for your "neighbors"?
* You don't and can't care for squat. *You want others to
care
for
you.

Perhaps you're sufficiently sociopathic to believe that.

* It's a matter of economics.

Keep telling yourself that, like it's scientific.

*It's subjective perception. * Will you be paying higher taxes
*or receiving greater benefits?
A simple question you won't answer.

Since you're the economics wiz, you know how to set up a simple graph
comparing tax level and benefit level but it is not a simple question.

*It is for me.

Simple, as in simply unanswerable as stated by you.

Bottom line, it doesn't appear you intend to go on the gov't
program but choose to stick with a private insurer. Why?

You assume wrong.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 1, 10:52*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
*ScottW2 wrote:

*Bottom line, it doesn't appear you intend to go on the gov't
program but choose to stick with a private insurer. *Why?

You assume wrong.

Cut 2pid some slack, Stephen. He admitted that he doesn't understand
what question marks are for.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Sep 1, 10:52*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
*ScottW2 wrote:

*Bottom line, it doesn't appear you intend to go on the gov't
program but choose to stick with a private insurer. *Why?

You assume wrong.

Cut 2pid some slack, Stephen. He admitted that he doesn't understand
what question marks are for.

D U M B, everyone's accusing me.

Stephen