Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HT Receivers
I'm helping a friend in choosing a Home Theatre receiver and would like any
input from those who know more about them then I do, since I haven't considered them in 15 years or so. We've narrowed it down to Mostly Yamaha units and a couple JVC and Kenwood models My pick would probably be the Yaman HTR 5890 or RXV1500. Also in consideration are the JVC RX-D201S, and Kenwood VR9070. All are in the $500.00 range. Any pros or cons that you know of? Any prefernces? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey dances around a subject he's embarrassed to broach. All are in the $500.00 range. Any pros or cons that you know of? Any prefernces? Since you didn't tell us what your priorities are, we'll have to guess. My guess is you want one that gets hot enough to cook some bugs quickly. For that feature, Pioneer is the best. It throws out lots of heat. Just wrap your bugs in foil and put them on top of the box. Shouldn't take more than 3 or 4 minutes to crisp them up nicely. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
George Middius wrote: Mickey dances around a subject he's embarrassed to broach. All are in the $500.00 range. Any pros or cons that you know of? Any prefernces? Since you didn't tell us what your priorities are, we'll have to guess. My guess is you want one that gets hot enough to cook some bugs quickly. For that feature, Pioneer is the best. It throws out lots of heat. Just wrap your bugs in foil and put them on top of the box. Shouldn't take more than 3 or 4 minutes to crisp them up nicely. I've got a 100 watt 5 channel Pioneer. Doesn't get hot at all. George is wrong again. But he's right on the priorities. On these low/mid range receivers... its all about features... actually that even applies on the high end surround. Anyway after going through them at great length and deciding I didn't want to pay extra for any of the bs...my receiver cost me $150 and works fine. Setup was pretty easy and the thing isn't a foot and a half high. I've seen a few that now allow individual channel eq settings and thought that might be cool to better integrate mixmatched speakers but other than that.. I haven't felt I wanted anything more. ScottW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In , George Middius wrote :
Mickey dances around a subject he's embarrassed to broach. All are in the $500.00 range. Any pros or cons that you know of? Any prefernces? Since you didn't tell us what your priorities are, we'll have to guess. My guess is you want one that gets hot enough to cook some bugs quickly. For that feature, Pioneer is the best. It throws out lots of heat. Just wrap your bugs in foil and put them on top of the box. Shouldn't take more than 3 or 4 minutes to crisp them up nicely. How lucky you are, 99% of bugs are biggers than Middius' balls. Bon appétit... ;-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"ScottW" wrote in message oups.com... George Middius wrote: Mickey dances around a subject he's embarrassed to broach. All are in the $500.00 range. Any pros or cons that you know of? Any prefernces? Since you didn't tell us what your priorities are, we'll have to guess. My guess is you want one that gets hot enough to cook some bugs quickly. For that feature, Pioneer is the best. It throws out lots of heat. Just wrap your bugs in foil and put them on top of the box. Shouldn't take more than 3 or 4 minutes to crisp them up nicely. I've got a 100 watt 5 channel Pioneer. Doesn't get hot at all. George is wrong again. But he's right on the priorities. On these low/mid range receivers... its all about features... actually that even applies on the high end surround. Anyway after going through them at great length and deciding I didn't want to pay extra for any of the bs...my receiver cost me $150 and works fine. Setup was pretty easy and the thing isn't a foot and a half high. I've seen a few that now allow individual channel eq settings and thought that might be cool to better integrate mixmatched speakers but other than that.. I haven't felt I wanted anything more. Mostly he wants as much power as he get for the money and something that will handle all the decoding duties. Personally, I like the Yamaha's due to reputation and the EQ feature. The RXV's seem to have the most features and at least 100wpc X 7. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
NYOB123 wrote I'm helping a friend in choosing a Home Theatre receiver and would like any input from those who know more about them then I do, since I haven't considered them in 15 years or so. We've narrowed it down to Mostly Yamaha units and a couple JVC and Kenwood models My pick would probably be the Yaman HTR 5890 or RXV1500. Also in consideration are the JVC RX-D201S, and Kenwood VR9070. Why don't you ask your friend to do a DBT on those. Get a billy club handy as you sit behind him in his house trying to differentiate any perceptible differences between each pair. Then strike him on the back of his head each time he claim to hear perceivable differences between the two. Continue whacking him on the head in ascending level of perplexity until such point as he tell you that he can no longer distinguish any appreciable differences between each pair. Repeat the procedure on the other brands above. Then advice him to set aside all the money he save and buy more cd records. All are in the $500.00 range. What difference does it makes ? Any pros or cons that you know of? None that he needs to know. Tell him that DBT will tell him the truth and will prove that all the above sound the same. Any prefernces? Well, just tell him that DBT will prove that any preferences he may have does not exist because, like you, he's delusional who prefers his bugs extra-crispy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
nyob123 wrote Mostly he wants as much power as he get for the money and something that will handle all the decoding duties. Personally, I like the Yamaha's due to reputation and the EQ feature. The RXV's seem to have the most features and at least 100wpc X 7. Forget about these so-called reputation and preferences over features on these brands etc... etc.. Tell your friend DBT is the way to go. **** brands. Tell your friend that all the above are similar in value and were, in fact, assembled by the same orang-utang on the loose somewhere in the city of Pyong-Yang. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"EddieM" wrote in message m... nyob123 wrote Mostly he wants as much power as he get for the money and something that will handle all the decoding duties. Personally, I like the Yamaha's due to reputation and the EQ feature. The RXV's seem to have the most features and at least 100wpc X 7. Forget about these so-called reputation and preferences over features on these brands etc... etc.. Tell your friend DBT is the way to go. **** brands. Tell your friend that all the above are similar in value and were, in fact, assembled by the same orang-utang on the loose somewhere in the city of Pyong-Yang. Thank you for that revealing bit of your family history. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"EddieM" wrote in message ... NYOB123 wrote I'm helping a friend in choosing a Home Theatre receiver and would like any input from those who know more about them then I do, since I haven't considered them in 15 years or so. We've narrowed it down to Mostly Yamaha units and a couple JVC and Kenwood models My pick would probably be the Yaman HTR 5890 or RXV1500. Also in consideration are the JVC RX-D201S, and Kenwood VR9070. Why don't you ask your friend to do a DBT on those. Why? As long as they aren't clipping they should sound the same, right? Get a billy club handy as you sit behind him in his house trying to differentiate any perceptible differences between each pair. Damn, your DBT's are way tougher than regular ones. Then strike him on the back of his head each time he claim to hear perceivable differences between the two. That would be silly, since the idea is to TRY and find differences. Continue whacking him on the head in ascending level of perplexity until such point as he tell you that he can no longer distinguish any appreciable differences between each pair. Repeat the procedure on the other brands above. Then advice him to set aside all the money he save and buy more cd records. So, you think it's wrong to save money if something costs less but sounds the same as something more expensive? You really are an idiot. All are in the $500.00 range. What difference does it makes ? There are differences in features. Any pros or cons that you know of? None that he needs to know. Tell him that DBT will tell him the truth and will prove that all the above sound the same. Very likely. Any prefernces? Well, just tell him that DBT will prove that any preferences he may have does not exist because, like you, he's delusional who prefers his bugs extra-crispy. Of course preferences exist, they just don't have that much to do with actual performance. He finally decided on a Pioneer VSX-1015TXK. Less than $ 425.00 including shipping. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
High end receivers | Audio Opinions | |||
Marantz Walnut Cabinet, fits most receivers, Minty! | Marketplace | |||
DIY: Servicing vintage receivers | High End Audio | |||
DIY: Servicing vintage receivers | Audio Opinions | |||
Forgotten giant stereo receivers of the 1970s | General |