Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
BretLudwig BretLudwig is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 696
Default "Racist" Western Pennsylvania Not Roiled By Immigration Wave€”Yet

((If we were still even half sane we'd boot those God-damned mestizos
right
in the ass and over the Rio Grande. Bret.))




"Racist" Western Pennsylvania Not Roiled By Immigration Wave€”Yet

By Joe Guzzardi

"Im filing my post-election analysis from right here in the heart of

"racist" western Pennsylvania where we "bitter" voters desperately "cling
to guns or religion or antipathy" to people who "arent like" us, along
with our notorious "anti-immigrant, anti-trade sentiment."

U.S. Representative John Murtha made the "racist" accusation.
President-elect Barack Obama told a group of well-heeled liberal San
Francisco donors how we cling to God and guns. (Listen to his speech
here.)

Over the months, many charges have been leveled against Obama, ranging
from the relatively tame accusation that hes "inexperienced" to the
more serious one that he tolerates radicalism.

To those allegations, we in Pittsburgh add "coward."

When Obama has something to say about us, it would be nice if he said it
to our face, not in front of his adoring rich friends two thousand miles
away.

Murtha and Obama are cheap shot artists. They can spout off whatever they
please about us.

Our true character surfaced Tuesday night. Pennsylvanians can take it;
were thick-skinned.

Even though Obama holds us in low regard, we voted for him in such
overwhelming numbers that merely sixty seconds after the polls closed, he
was declared the winner of our 21 pivotal electoral votes. (Or at least
the urban areas did. Pennsylvania whites voted for McCain 51%-48%, but
that wasnt enough to win).

As for Murtha, a poster boy for term limits, all was forgiven. He too was
comfortably re-elected.

What Congressional candidate in this day and age calls his constituents
the most explosive word in the American vocabulary€”"racist"€”but is so
quickly absolved?

As regular VDARE.COM readers know, my western Pennsylvania status is
tenuous, at best. Ive only lived in Pittsburgh for four months.

But I went to school here. I have family and lots of friends who have
lived here for years. Murtha and Obama offended everyone with their
remarks.

Were not racist, bitter or "anti-immigrant".

But we are pro-American€”and theres a world of difference.

One reason western Pennsylvania sticks to its traditional party
allegiances: there is relatively little immigration. (Note: the data
cited
throughout the rest of my column is taken from Pittsburgh Today. org and
refers to the Pittsburgh Metropolitan Statistical Area, that is,
Pittsburgh and its surrounding area.)

Only 0.9 percent of Pittsburghs population is foreign-born and has
arrived within the last decade. Compare that to Los Angeles where, as of
2005, nearly 35 percent of residents were born outside of the U.S.

In California, as well as the rest of the country, Mexicans represent the
largest foreign-born group. They arrive in a completely uncontrolled
fashion, accounting for 44 percent of the states non-U.S.-born.

Mexican migrants who in previous decades might have identified California
as their destination now also head toward Nevada, Colorado, Georgia and
North Carolina.

But few come to Pennsylvania. The state ranks fifteenth on the list of
fifty with only 4.4 percent foreign-born. (See Center for Immigration
Studies, Immigrants at Mid-Decade, by Steven Camarota.)

Specifically, they arent coming to Pittsburgh. As of 2000, the
Hispanic
population was only 0.7 percent, the lowest of any major US city.

By national and benchmark norms, Pittsburghs Hispanic population and
its overall rate of in-migration is infinitesimal.

I repeat, however, that this does not make us "anti-immigrant."

What it does prove, however, is the theory to which I have long
subscribed: immigration begets immigration.

Analyzing Pittsburghs immigration data going back for decades, it
looks
essentially the same as it is shown in Census 2000€”that is, immigrants
represent less than 1 percent of the total population.

But people are confused as to why Pittsburgh has so little immigration.

Here are the reasons they incorrectly point to:

* Lack of jobs

In fact, the job market is relatively strong. In the year from September
2007 to September 2008, Pittsburgh jobs increased in four of five key
sectors: non-farm, private, service and education and health care.

* Low Wages

As with jobs, Pittsburgh wages are strong compared to the national
average. Pittsburgh had a 5 percent increase in annual wages between 2005
and 2006 and outpaced the U.S. average. Between 2006 and 2007, annual
wages in Pittsburgh rose another 3.8 percent. The numbers for average
weekly wages, which are tabulated separately, continued positive in the
first quarter of 2008. (To download the complete wage dataset, click
here.)

* Living Cost

Wrong again. Pittsburghs cost of living index was lower than both the
national and benchmark regional averages in both 2007 and the first two
quarters of 2008.

* Too far from the Mexico/U.S. border.

Naturally, it is easier to get from Mexico to California or Arizona. But
while Pittsburgh is approximately 2,100 miles from the border, New
Brunswick, New Jersey that has a 13 percent Hispanic population and a
Mexican consulate, is three hundred miles further.

Since Pittsburgh has few immigrants, Americans hold our jobs, most
schools
dont offer English as a Second Language, sanctuary city status is not
under consideration, we dont "press 1", we have no bilingual signs in
our supermarkets and no one knows what chain migration is.

In summary, since Pittsburgh has virtually no immigrants and therefore no
services that cater to them, were protected against having much more
immigration in the near future.

Now, to be sure, evil lurks.

Some local academics argue for more immigration, claiming that Pittsburgh
could never have been the steel center it was without the workers who
came
here from across the globe to keep the factories running.

Nevertheless, little grassroots support exists for more immigration.

Since my Pittsburgh arrival, Ive assumed a new role: prophet.

To my friends and neighbors, I say: "Enjoy the Americana around you.
Protect it."

Then I add a cautionary note: "Things can change faster than you could
ever imagine."

After all, I grew up California€”then totally unspoiled. "



Joe [email him] is a California native who recently fled the state
because
of over-immigration, over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality
of
life. He has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the
growth
rate stable. A long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School,
Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently
appears
in the Lodi News-Sentinel.

If you want to email or print out, format by clicking on this permanent
URL:
http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/081107_racist.htm


--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lancing the Pennsylvania Boil: "In the worst days of the Magnequest Scum..." Andre Jute Vacuum Tubes 27 November 19th 06 04:39 PM
"AKAI", "KURZWEIL", "ROLAND", DVDs and CDs [email protected] Audio Opinions 0 January 31st 06 10:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"