Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Help... Don't Understand Headphones Specs?
I am really new to audio and am just trying to obtain a very high level
understanding of what audio specs mean. I have been trying the web and using Google Web and Group search. At this point I just feel overwhelmed. I am trying educate myself to buy two things. The first is headphones for my iPod. Could someone explain the various specs (sensitivity, impedance, response accuracy, noise reduction, etc.) at a very high level? The other thing I need to do is replace my home audio system. The speakers are still good, but I need a new receiver. Could someone explain ohms rating on the speaker and what you need to be aware of when buying a receiver (this is a home theater system). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"CurtK" writes:
I am really new to audio and am just trying to obtain a very high level understanding of what audio specs mean. I have been trying the web and using Google Web and Group search. At this point I just feel overwhelmed. I am trying educate myself to buy two things. The first is headphones for my iPod. Could someone explain the various specs (sensitivity, impedance, response accuracy, noise reduction, etc.) at a very high level? Sensitivity is a measure of how much sound out you get for a given electrical input level. To wit, if you have a wimpy mp3 player that doesn't put out a hot headphone signal (like my Creative Nomad Jukebox), you'll want headphones with more sensitivity rather than less. If however, your iPod gives you plenty of oomph regardless of what headphones you use, you don't care much about sensitivity. In most cases the loudest settings are unhealthy anyway. Impedance: basically you don't care. It's just an electrical measure of how much load the headphones lace on the headphone amplifier. Lowwer numbers mean a heavier load, but they also pull more power out of a given device, which may be helpful if you're looking to compensate for a device that's got a wimpy headphone amp in it. REsponse accuracy as its name implies is the frequency response of the system. Ideally you'd like a perfectly ruler flat response that indicates the headphones neither add or subtract any given frequency range across the range of human hearing (most often considered to be 20-20kHz though, hte older ya get the quicker that high end falls off). Noise reduction is as it implies. For noise reducing headphones, they attempt to cancel ambient/background noise. The higher the dB number they claim to reduce the noise, the better. There are expensive "active" noise canelling models, and also ones that seal into your ear that provide very reliable, effective nad inexpensive noise cancellation. If you want some quiet on a plane ride, while mowing the lawn, noise cancelling phones are a good thing. Otherwise, you have to crank your regular phones up to get over the noise, and that's not a good thing. :-) The other thing I need to do is replace my home audio system. The speakers are still good, but I need a new receiver. Could someone explain ohms rating on the speaker and what you need to be aware of when buying a receiver (this is a home theater system). All you need to know there is to verify that your receiver is rated to drive the impedance of your speakers. Remembe,r lower ohm numbers mean a heavier load to your receiver, so don't go below a given receiver's rated minimum load impedance. For instance, if a receiver claims "800W/ch RMS at 4ohms" then you'll be fine with it if your speakers are 4ohms, 6 ohms, 8ohms, etc. If the receiver says "minimum load impedance 8ohms" don't use 6ohm or 4ohm speakers with it, as it is likely to overheat the power amplifier which, if you're lucky just leads to thermal shutdown, if you're unlucky it burns up your outputs or severely shortens the life of your receiver. Best Regards, -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Todd H \ / | http://www.toddh.net/ X Promoting good netiquette | http://triplethreatband.com/ / \ http://www.toddh.net/netiquette/ | "4 lines suffice." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you... very helpful! I hope it is okay to ask some minor questions
below... "Todd H." wrote in message ... "CurtK" writes: I am really new to audio and am just trying to obtain a very high level understanding of what audio specs mean. I have been trying the web and using Google Web and Group search. At this point I just feel overwhelmed. I am trying educate myself to buy two things. The first is headphones for my iPod. Could someone explain the various specs (sensitivity, impedance, response accuracy, noise reduction, etc.) at a very high level? Sensitivity is a measure of how much sound out you get for a given electrical input level. To wit, if you have a wimpy mp3 player that doesn't put out a hot headphone signal (like my Creative Nomad Jukebox), you'll want headphones with more sensitivity rather than less. If however, your iPod gives you plenty of oomph regardless of what headphones you use, you don't care much about sensitivity. In most cases the loudest settings are unhealthy anyway. Is there any correlation of sensitvity to quality (higher the number/better the quality and sound)? Impedance: basically you don't care. It's just an electrical measure of how much load the headphones lace on the headphone amplifier. Lowwer numbers mean a heavier load, but they also pull more power out of a given device, which may be helpful if you're looking to compensate for a device that's got a wimpy headphone amp in it. So your battery will last longer if you get one with higher impedance? Will this number being higher or lower change the quality or richness of the audio you will experience? REsponse accuracy as its name implies is the frequency response of the system. Ideally you'd like a perfectly ruler flat response that indicates the headphones neither add or subtract any given frequency range across the range of human hearing (most often considered to be 20-20kHz though, hte older ya get the quicker that high end falls off). Perfect explanation... thanks. Noise reduction is as it implies. For noise reducing headphones, they attempt to cancel ambient/background noise. The higher the dB number they claim to reduce the noise, the better. There are expensive "active" noise canelling models, and also ones that seal into your ear that provide very reliable, effective nad inexpensive noise cancellation. If you want some quiet on a plane ride, while mowing the lawn, noise cancelling phones are a good thing. Otherwise, you have to crank your regular phones up to get over the noise, and that's not a good thing. :-) What are your thoughts on tradeoffs (sound, quality, richness, etc)? Which type of headphones would you go with for an MP3 player (iPod and iRiver 799) and why? The other thing I need to do is replace my home audio system. The speakers are still good, but I need a new receiver. Could someone explain ohms rating on the speaker and what you need to be aware of when buying a receiver (this is a home theater system). All you need to know there is to verify that your receiver is rated to drive the impedance of your speakers. Remembe,r lower ohm numbers mean a heavier load to your receiver, so don't go below a given receiver's rated minimum load impedance. For instance, if a receiver claims "800W/ch RMS at 4ohms" then you'll be fine with it if your speakers are 4ohms, 6 ohms, 8ohms, etc. If the receiver says "minimum load impedance 8ohms" don't use 6ohm or 4ohm speakers with it, as it is likely to overheat the power amplifier which, if you're lucky just leads to thermal shutdown, if you're unlucky it burns up your outputs or severely shortens the life of your receiver. One more curve ball... my main speakers 100W/6ohms, center 30W/8ohms and rear are 40W/16ohms... does this mean anything with a minimum load impedance not higher than 6ohms is fine? Any recomendations of brands that would be good to go with? Thanks again for all the help! Best Regards, -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Todd H \ / | http://www.toddh.net/ X Promoting good netiquette | http://triplethreatband.com/ / \ http://www.toddh.net/netiquette/ | "4 lines suffice." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you so much for all the help! I was very much appreciated and will
be put to good use |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you so much for all the help!!!
It was very appreciated and I will put it to good use Curt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"CurtK" writes:
Thank you... very helpful! I hope it is okay to ask some minor questions below... np. Is there any correlation of sensitvity to quality (higher the number/better the quality and sound)? Nope. Quality and sensitivity are orthogonal. Sensitivity however might (theoretically at least) have an impact on battery life. More sensitive phones require less current to achieve a given sound pressure level. Hence, for a given loudness, your headphone amplifier has to work less hard if you have sensitive phones. We're not in the area of theory though and I don't htink anyone's looked at this to quanitiify how much real world battery life change with actually would have if any. So your battery will last longer if you get one with higher impedance? Assuming the volume control stays int eh same place in both cases, yes. However, in reality you'll turn up the volume enough to get enough power out of the headphones to achieve the loudness you want. So, impedance is pretty much a non-starter. Ignore it completely. Will this number being higher or lower change the quality or richness of the audio you will experience? Nope. REsponse accuracy as its name implies is the frequency response of the system. Ideally you'd like a perfectly ruler flat response that indicates the headphones neither add or subtract any given frequency range across the range of human hearing (most often considered to be 20-20kHz though, hte older ya get the quicker that high end falls off). Perfect explanation... thanks. Noise reduction is as it implies. For noise reducing headphones, they attempt to cancel ambient/background noise. The higher the dB number they claim to reduce the noise, the better. There are expensive "active" noise canelling models, and also ones that seal into your ear that provide very reliable, effective nad inexpensive noise cancellation. If you want some quiet on a plane ride, while mowing the lawn, noise cancelling phones are a good thing. Otherwise, you have to crank your regular phones up to get over the noise, and that's not a good thing. :-) What are your thoughts on tradeoffs (sound, quality, richness, etc)? Which type of headphones would you go with for an MP3 player (iPod and iRiver 799) and why? Depends what I'm using it for. If noise reduction is a chief concern, I'd get a pair of Shure E2c or E1's or something like that. If I wanted to spend some bucks, I'd get Shure E5's and spend an extra $60 to go to my audiologist and have her put them in custom molds, just like my custom ear plugs: http://toddh.net/music/ear/ One more curve ball... my main speakers 100W/6ohms, center 30W/8ohms and rear are 40W/16ohms... does this mean anything with a minimum load impedance not higher than 6ohms is fine? Any recomendations of brands that would be good to go with? The receiver market changes too quickly. The most important criterion in selecting audio gear you haven't mentioned, so I'll be sure to highlight it he Ignore the specs. They can't be trusted to be right anyway. Trust your ears. What sounds best to you is what's important. What looks best on paper might give you bragging rights on a text medium such a usenet, or impress friends without a life, or whatnot, but at the end of the day, it's your ears that are gonna listen to these things, so make em happy! For headphones, take _your_ mp3 player to the store, and try everything they've got on display until your ears chose the one you like. For receivers, since they're not transducers, they dont' have that much affect on sound quality, as much as say shopping for speakers or headphones does. So, it's not terribly critical. When I shopped for my receiver, I chose a brand I was comfortable with (Denon) to some extent, but mostly I shopped to find a receiver that had the number and type of inputs I needed, and the amount of power I wanted for my room size and needs, in the budget I wanted to spent... and then I took a listen to each of them using a CD I brought along running through the speakers I owned (which luckily they had). I did hear differences among receivers--some were warmer and richer and punchier than others. It's all in how they bias those transitors, and they can sound remarkably different. But, not THAT different. Audiophiles will debate all that till the cows come home because by definition, audiophiles are extremely picky about their sound, and spend an inordinate amount of money to achieve it. But for most of us, a remarkable range of inexpensive gear will get the job done quite nicely. Best Regards, -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Todd H \ / | http://www.toddh.net/ X Promoting good netiquette | http://triplethreatband.com/ / \ http://www.toddh.net/netiquette/ | "4 lines suffice." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NEED INFO: Specs for The Advent/1 Speakers ? | Marketplace | |||
WANTED: Info or Specs for KLH model Thirty-One Speakers ? | Marketplace | |||
WANTED: Info or Specs for KLH model Thirty-One Speakers ? | Marketplace | |||
Specs for Blaupunkt ODWA1200 12" old model subs??? | Car Audio | |||
MTX Woofer Specs | Car Audio |