| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Observation.
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. |
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Once again you are wrong McKelvy. Phillips is sure he is right... as sure as he thinks he is intelligent. How to explain you that ?... Perhaps you will better understand the military vocabulary, Phillips is an "aspirant", an ass-licker, a chrysalis. ;O) The pot calling the kettle black. |
|
#123
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. An imaginary conversation. Call him up and ask him. Simple enough. Phillips, if you ever really dealt with the police you'd know that they don't discuss conversations of the kind you claim to have had, with either the general public or the purported object of the so-called investigation. Bottom line Phillips, it's quite clear that you are bluffing again. First you accuse me of reporting you to the local authorities, which implies that SOMEONE did. No, Phillips, I accused you of bragging about doing that, which of course the google record shows that you did. (Actually, at least three did that I know about.) Prove it. Then you said I lied about it. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Then I showed you a copy of the correspondence, and you **** a brick. No Phillips, you haven't shown any such thing. Then you denied I sent the letter at all. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Now you're saying I'm bluffing. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". It's a simple thing, Arny. Call Det. Fowler and ask him. But we all know why you won't. I'm sure the two of you are already acquainted, and all of this bluster of yours is for show. AFAIK, there is no such person as Detective Fowler. It's your life, your reputation. Why should I care from one day to the next what you think about your situation in your community? Prove that you aren't bluffing, Phillips. Okay...contact Detective Fowler, and don't lie about the results. That should "prove" everything to you, not that you'd be forthcoming here about it. Phillips, since you're such good friends with this Detective Fowler, have him call me. You have my number. LOL! |
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Marc Phillips a écrit :
Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. An imaginary conversation. Call him up and ask him. Simple enough. Phillips, if you ever really dealt with the police you'd know that they don't discuss conversations of the kind you claim to have had, with either the general public or the purported object of the so-called investigation. Bottom line Phillips, it's quite clear that you are bluffing again. First you accuse me of reporting you to the local authorities, which implies that SOMEONE did. No, Phillips, I accused you of bragging about doing that, which of course the google record shows that you did. (Actually, at least three did that I know about.) Prove it. Then you said I lied about it. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Then I showed you a copy of the correspondence, and you **** a brick. No Phillips, you haven't shown any such thing. Then you denied I sent the letter at all. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Now you're saying I'm bluffing. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". It's a simple thing, Arny. Call Det. Fowler and ask him. But we all know why you won't. I'm sure the two of you are already acquainted, and all of this bluster of yours is for show. AFAIK, there is no such person as Detective Fowler. It's your life, your reputation. Why should I care from one day to the next what you think about your situation in your community? Prove that you aren't bluffing, Phillips. Okay...contact Detective Fowler, and don't lie about the results. That should "prove" everything to you, not that you'd be forthcoming here about it. You see McKelvy I was right, Phillips sincerely believe in his phantasms. He is now mature for Dr. Richman's consultations.  ) |
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
"Michael McKelvy" said:
Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. That's the problem with the ****ty US NTSC system. You know what that acronym stands for, don't you? -- Sander deWaal Vacuum Audio Consultancy |
|
#126
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
On Sat, 29 May 2004 05:48:10 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote: Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. No, you're using peoplepc. I guess the little kid in the ads got to you. |
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Arny said:
Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. An imaginary conversation. Call him up and ask him. Simple enough. Phillips, if you ever really dealt with the police you'd know that they don't discuss conversations of the kind you claim to have had, with either the general public or the purported object of the so-called investigation. Bottom line Phillips, it's quite clear that you are bluffing again. First you accuse me of reporting you to the local authorities, which implies that SOMEONE did. No, Phillips, I accused you of bragging about doing that, which of course the google record shows that you did. (Actually, at least three did that I know about.) Prove it. Then you said I lied about it. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Then I showed you a copy of the correspondence, and you **** a brick. No Phillips, you haven't shown any such thing. Then you denied I sent the letter at all. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Now you're saying I'm bluffing. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". It's a simple thing, Arny. Call Det. Fowler and ask him. But we all know why you won't. I'm sure the two of you are already acquainted, and all of this bluster of yours is for show. AFAIK, there is no such person as Detective Fowler. It's your life, your reputation. Why should I care from one day to the next what you think about your situation in your community? Prove that you aren't bluffing, Phillips. Okay...contact Detective Fowler, and don't lie about the results. That should "prove" everything to you, not that you'd be forthcoming here about it. Phillips, since you're such good friends with this Detective Fowler, have him call me. You have my number. LOL! Watching you stall like this is pretty LOL, if you ask me. Boon |
|
#128
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Lionel said:
Marc Phillips a écrit : Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. An imaginary conversation. Call him up and ask him. Simple enough. Phillips, if you ever really dealt with the police you'd know that they don't discuss conversations of the kind you claim to have had, with either the general public or the purported object of the so-called investigation. Bottom line Phillips, it's quite clear that you are bluffing again. First you accuse me of reporting you to the local authorities, which implies that SOMEONE did. No, Phillips, I accused you of bragging about doing that, which of course the google record shows that you did. (Actually, at least three did that I know about.) Prove it. Then you said I lied about it. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Then I showed you a copy of the correspondence, and you **** a brick. No Phillips, you haven't shown any such thing. Then you denied I sent the letter at all. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Now you're saying I'm bluffing. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". It's a simple thing, Arny. Call Det. Fowler and ask him. But we all know why you won't. I'm sure the two of you are already acquainted, and all of this bluster of yours is for show. AFAIK, there is no such person as Detective Fowler. It's your life, your reputation. Why should I care from one day to the next what you think about your situation in your community? Prove that you aren't bluffing, Phillips. Okay...contact Detective Fowler, and don't lie about the results. That should "prove" everything to you, not that you'd be forthcoming here about it. You see McKelvy I was right, Phillips sincerely believe in his phantasms. He is now mature for Dr. Richman's consultations. )Jesus, Lionel, I really don't know anymore how to respond to your posts. It's like hearing a dog bark and then asking it to repeat itself. Boon |
|
#129
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
McKelvy said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. I knew the inner Internet geek in you would soon come out. Boon |
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Marc Phillips a écrit :
Lionel said: Marc Phillips a écrit : Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. An imaginary conversation. Call him up and ask him. Simple enough. Phillips, if you ever really dealt with the police you'd know that they don't discuss conversations of the kind you claim to have had, with either the general public or the purported object of the so-called investigation. Bottom line Phillips, it's quite clear that you are bluffing again. First you accuse me of reporting you to the local authorities, which implies that SOMEONE did. No, Phillips, I accused you of bragging about doing that, which of course the google record shows that you did. (Actually, at least three did that I know about.) Prove it. Then you said I lied about it. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Then I showed you a copy of the correspondence, and you **** a brick. No Phillips, you haven't shown any such thing. Then you denied I sent the letter at all. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Now you're saying I'm bluffing. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". It's a simple thing, Arny. Call Det. Fowler and ask him. But we all know why you won't. I'm sure the two of you are already acquainted, and all of this bluster of yours is for show. AFAIK, there is no such person as Detective Fowler. It's your life, your reputation. Why should I care from one day to the next what you think about your situation in your community? Prove that you aren't bluffing, Phillips. Okay...contact Detective Fowler, and don't lie about the results. That should "prove" everything to you, not that you'd be forthcoming here about it. You see McKelvy I was right, Phillips sincerely believe in his phantasms. He is now mature for Dr. Richman's consultations. )Jesus, Lionel, I really don't know anymore how to respond to your posts. It's like hearing a dog bark and then asking it to repeat itself. Jesus, Boon, at least *I* have the excuse of my limited vocabulary. LOL. |
|
#131
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Lionel said:
Marc Phillips a écrit : Lionel said: Marc Phillips a écrit : Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. An imaginary conversation. Call him up and ask him. Simple enough. Phillips, if you ever really dealt with the police you'd know that they don't discuss conversations of the kind you claim to have had, with either the general public or the purported object of the so-called investigation. Bottom line Phillips, it's quite clear that you are bluffing again. First you accuse me of reporting you to the local authorities, which implies that SOMEONE did. No, Phillips, I accused you of bragging about doing that, which of course the google record shows that you did. (Actually, at least three did that I know about.) Prove it. Then you said I lied about it. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Then I showed you a copy of the correspondence, and you **** a brick. No Phillips, you haven't shown any such thing. Then you denied I sent the letter at all. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Now you're saying I'm bluffing. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". It's a simple thing, Arny. Call Det. Fowler and ask him. But we all know why you won't. I'm sure the two of you are already acquainted, and all of this bluster of yours is for show. AFAIK, there is no such person as Detective Fowler. It's your life, your reputation. Why should I care from one day to the next what you think about your situation in your community? Prove that you aren't bluffing, Phillips. Okay...contact Detective Fowler, and don't lie about the results. That should "prove" everything to you, not that you'd be forthcoming here about it. You see McKelvy I was right, Phillips sincerely believe in his phantasms. He is now mature for Dr. Richman's consultations. )Jesus, Lionel, I really don't know anymore how to respond to your posts. It's like hearing a dog bark and then asking it to repeat itself. Jesus, Boon, at least *I* have the excuse of my limited vocabulary. LOL. Are you apologizing for having that go over your head, too? Boon |
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Marc Phillips a écrit :
Lionel said: Marc Phillips a écrit : Lionel said: Marc Phillips a écrit : Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: Arny said: Marc Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. An imaginary conversation. Call him up and ask him. Simple enough. Phillips, if you ever really dealt with the police you'd know that they don't discuss conversations of the kind you claim to have had, with either the general public or the purported object of the so-called investigation. Bottom line Phillips, it's quite clear that you are bluffing again. First you accuse me of reporting you to the local authorities, which implies that SOMEONE did. No, Phillips, I accused you of bragging about doing that, which of course the google record shows that you did. (Actually, at least three did that I know about.) Prove it. Then you said I lied about it. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Then I showed you a copy of the correspondence, and you **** a brick. No Phillips, you haven't shown any such thing. Then you denied I sent the letter at all. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". Now you're saying I'm bluffing. That would be a possible interpretation of the word "bluffing". It's a simple thing, Arny. Call Det. Fowler and ask him. But we all know why you won't. I'm sure the two of you are already acquainted, and all of this bluster of yours is for show. AFAIK, there is no such person as Detective Fowler. It's your life, your reputation. Why should I care from one day to the next what you think about your situation in your community? Prove that you aren't bluffing, Phillips. Okay...contact Detective Fowler, and don't lie about the results. That should "prove" everything to you, not that you'd be forthcoming here about it. You see McKelvy I was right, Phillips sincerely believe in his phantasms. He is now mature for Dr. Richman's consultations. )Jesus, Lionel, I really don't know anymore how to respond to your posts. It's like hearing a dog bark and then asking it to repeat itself. Jesus, Boon, at least *I* have the excuse of my limited vocabulary. LOL. Are you apologizing for having that go over your head, too? Boon you should never forget that I'm laughing *at* you and not *with* you. I know that you will understand, this is your prefered one... LOL! |
|
#133
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Lionel said:
Are you apologizing for having that go over your head, too? Boon you should never forget that I'm laughing *at* you and not *with* you. Since you can't understand what I'm saying, why does it make any difference? I know that you will understand, this is your prefered one... LOL! Again, this makes no sense. But keep wasting your life trying. Summer's coming, the end is near. Boon |
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Marc Phillips a écrit :
Lionel said: Are you apologizing for having that go over your head, too? Boon you should never forget that I'm laughing *at* you and not *with* you. Since you can't understand what I'm saying, why does it make any difference? I know that you will understand, this is your prefered one... LOL! Again, this makes no sense. But keep wasting your life trying. And keep wasting your life answering, idiot. Summer's coming, the end is near. "Lost in a Roman...wilderness of pain And all the children are insane All the children are insane Waiting for the summer rain, yeah ...... This is the end Beautiful friend This is the end My only friend, the end" |
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Lionel said:
Marc Phillips a écrit : Lionel said: Are you apologizing for having that go over your head, too? Boon you should never forget that I'm laughing *at* you and not *with* you. Since you can't understand what I'm saying, why does it make any difference? I know that you will understand, this is your prefered one... LOL! Again, this makes no sense. But keep wasting your life trying. And keep wasting your life answering, idiot. Summer's coming, the end is near. "Lost in a Roman...wilderness of pain And all the children are insane All the children are insane Waiting for the summer rain, yeah ..... This is the end Beautiful friend This is the end My only friend, the end" So did we manage to figure out the exact boiling point of the average Frenchman? Is it 98 degrees Fahrenheit? 99? Boon |
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Lionel said:
Marc Phillips wrote: Lionel said: Marc Phillips a écrit : Lionel said: Are you apologizing for having that go over your head, too? Boon you should never forget that I'm laughing *at* you and not *with* you. Since you can't understand what I'm saying, why does it make any difference? I know that you will understand, this is your prefered one... LOL! Again, this makes no sense. But keep wasting your life trying. And keep wasting your life answering, idiot. Summer's coming, the end is near. "Lost in a Roman...wilderness of pain And all the children are insane All the children are insane Waiting for the summer rain, yeah ..... This is the end Beautiful friend This is the end My only friend, the end" So did we manage to figure out the exact boiling point of the average Frenchman? Is it 98 degrees Fahrenheit? 99? Ask you mother-in-law she knows now. ;-) Actually, she was Cuban and the hotter it was, the happier she was. She only turned on her AC when it became hot enough to destroy the entire French population. Boon |
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
Lionel said:
Actually, she was Cuban and the hotter it was, the happier she was. She only turned on her AC when it became hot enough to destroy the entire French population. LOL ! Does it mean that you hope she is roasting in hell now ? :O) Hell would be heaven to her. Boon |
|
#138
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
|
|
#139
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
"dave weil" wrote in message news On Sat, 29 May 2004 05:48:10 GMT, "Michael McKelvy" wrote: Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. No, you're using peoplepc. I guess the little kid in the ads got to you. No, they sent me the software and it did what I needed for a lower price. |
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... dave weil said: Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. No, you're using peoplepc. I guess the little kid in the ads got to you. Mickey used to use AOL. He might have been sold on people because they offer something AOL doesn't -- a "smart dialer". God knows he needs it. They also include spam removal,virus protection, web mail, and a good price, |
|
#141
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. I knew the inner Internet geek in you would soon come out. I'll take that badge over your slander crown any day. |
|
#142
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
McKelvy said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. I knew the inner Internet geek in you would soon come out. I'll take that badge over your slander crown any day. I'm still waiting for that proof. Any day now, I'm sure. Boon |
|
#143
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. I knew the inner Internet geek in you would soon come out. I'll take that badge over your slander crown any day. I'm still waiting for that proof. Any day now, I'm sure. Lack of self awareness noted. |
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
McKelvy said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. I knew the inner Internet geek in you would soon come out. I'll take that badge over your slander crown any day. I'm still waiting for that proof. Any day now, I'm sure. Lack of self awareness noted. Whatever. Have the last word. People will now like you and think you're really, really smart! Boon |
|
#145
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observation.
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Prove me wrong. I feel very confident that if he had been charged or convicted, you'd be trumpeting it loudly. I'm sure we would. I think, however, that the truth of the matter is that the local police are watching Arny very carefully. Bull****. In fact, I've been told as much by Det. Fowler of the Grosse Pointe Woods PD. More bull****. The fact is he's a free man and no charges were filed. You have no proof. You're a liar. Everything is black and white to you, huh? Yes. Well, then that explains why you are such a magnificent dumbass. I'm not the one using AOL. I knew the inner Internet geek in you would soon come out. I'll take that badge over your slander crown any day. I'm still waiting for that proof. Any day now, I'm sure. Lack of self awareness noted. Whatever. Have the last word. People will now like you and think you're really, really smart! LOL! I was ever so worried about what people on RAO think. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| An Observation about the Krooborg | Audio Opinions | |||
| observation for RAO | Audio Opinions | |||
Linear Mode
