Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#601
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Is Not Listening.
"John Atkinson" wrote
in message ups.com Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: But since you don't have access to the JAES, its all futile - you're just ranting and raving like this because ranting and raving is what you do. LOL! You should note that according to postings Arny Krueger made a couple of years back (in connection with criticisms he expressed over an AES paper authored by Francis Rumsey that it transpired he had never read), neither does _he_ have access to the JAES. This is because a) he is not a member and b) he does not have a nearby library that keeps it on its shelves. All true. Of course I had an opportunity to correct the situation, and did. Note that this is yet another example of Atkinson reaching into the past to press his little vendetta against me. Does anybody care, except for the bad things it says about Atkinson's character? I'll check out the references he gave for mentions of his name. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile AES Member for more than 25 years with a complete collection of Journals going back to 1980 I just took a look at an article that was in Vol 1 Number 1, dated January 1953. |
#602
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Is Not Listening.
wrote in message
ups.com I'm afraid Mr . Atkinson that wily Mr. Krueger is again derailing the discussion into insubstantial nit- picking, Ludo, you should be more worried about your really big problem - your inability to think clearly. Yes, Prof Lipschitz very likely did use ABXing in some of his acoustic research projects. Not only that, Luip****z came up with a kind of an ABX comparator of his own, in the same general time that we came up with ours. Yes, ABX may or may not be useful in narrowly defined acoustic research projects such as phase or frequency changes recognition etc. The JAES article says that it is geneally useful for audio testing. But this is not what rec.audio.opinion is or should be about. It is also not what an audio consumer is interested in. Not true. We live in a world where some audio manufacturers and some audio magazines often make claims that contradict the results of what Ludo quaintly and erroneusly calls "acoustic research projects". The ABX website is marketing. a "comparator" for testing (or "test proceduring" in the latest Krueger-speak) the musical reproduction characteristics of audio components to differentiate them. The ABX website has no tangible products for sale. It's all about knowlege. If someone tried to buy an ABX comparator from the ABX website today, they would be informed of other alternatives. And as ABX backer Clark says in the website, differentiating is the next step to preferring (ie choosing.) Right, and audio research says that a lot of audiophile hardware can't be differentiated by its sonics. This "test" (or "test procedure") to have any meaning needs experimental validation. Without experimental backing it just someone' daydreaming. It is not "science" and it is not "objective" Wrong, and debunked many times. Krueger can not quote such experimental work FOR THIS PURPOSE good enough to be acceptable to the voice of his profession the JAES. But he wriggles and Krueggles quite amusingly. Wrong, and debunked many times. I for one enjoy waiting for what he'll come up next with in this theater of the absurd all his own. I need come up with nothing more than I already have. |
#603
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Is Not Listening.
Arny Krueger wrote: I just took a look at an article that was in Vol 1 Number 1, dated January 1953. I know you now have a set of the papers and preprints CD, Mr. Krueger, as you recently said so. What you don't have is the journals themselves, which include the articles you claimed to have "authored or co-authored," which I note you now admit were _not_ refereed technical papers and thus were _not_ included on the AES CD. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#604
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Is Not Listening.
"John Atkinson" wrote You should note that according to postings Arny Krueger made a couple of years back (in connection with criticisms he expressed over an AES paper authored by Francis Rumsey that it transpired he had never read), neither does _he_ have access to the JAES. This is because a) he is not a member and b) he does not have a nearby library that keeps it on its shelves. I'll check out the references he gave for mentions of his name. Arny wrote this as to his AES access: "Silly boy - you think that one must be a member to read the JAES?... Wow, Powell never even heard of libraries or borrowing copyrighted media from friends." "b) he does not have a nearby library that keeps it on its shelves."... I don't doubt it but how do you know? |
#605
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Is Not Listening.
Powell wrote: "b) he does not have a nearby library that keeps it on its shelves."... I don't doubt it but how do you know? That was what Arny posted as his reason for not having read the Rumsey paper before he criticized it. He was subsequently sent a copy of the paper by Tom Nousaine, if I remember correctly. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#606
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Is Not Listening.
Powell said: "b) he does not have a nearby library that keeps it on its shelves."... I don't doubt it but how do you know? Because Krooger and the rest of the Baptist mob stormed the library and burned all the science books. -- Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence. |
#607
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Is Not Listening.
Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message ups.com I'm afraid Mr . Atkinson that wily Mr. Krueger is again derailing the discussion into insubstantial nit- picking, Ludo, you should be more worried about your really big problem - your inability to think clearly. Yes, Prof Lipschitz very likely did use ABXing in some of his acoustic research projects. Not only that, Luip****z came up with a kind of an ABX comparator of his own, in the same general time that we came up with ours. Yes, ABX may or may not be useful in narrowly defined acoustic research projects such as phase or frequency changes recognition etc. The JAES article says that it is geneally useful for audio testing. But this is not what rec.audio.opinion is or should be about. It is also not what an audio consumer is interested in. Not true. We live in a world where some audio manufacturers and some audio magazines often make claims that contradict the results of what Ludo quaintly and erroneusly calls "acoustic research projects". The ABX website is marketing. a "comparator" for testing (or "test proceduring" in the latest Krueger-speak) the musical reproduction characteristics of audio components to differentiate them. The ABX website has no tangible products for sale. It's all about knowlege. If someone tried to buy an ABX comparator from the ABX website today, they would be informed of other alternatives. And as ABX backer Clark says in the website, differentiating is the next step to preferring (ie choosing.) Right, and audio research says that a lot of audiophile hardware can't be differentiated by its sonics. This "test" (or "test procedure") to have any meaning needs experimental validation. Without experimental backing it just someone' daydreaming. It is not "science" and it is not "objective" Wrong, and debunked many times. Krueger can not quote such experimental work FOR THIS PURPOSE good enough to be acceptable to the voice of his profession the JAES. But he wriggles and Krueggles quite amusingly. Wrong, and debunked many times. I for one enjoy waiting for what he'll come up next with in this theater of the absurd all his own. I need come up with nothing more than I already have. =============================== Krueger has a new line. "Wrong, and debunked many times" Add it to the Kruegerspeak collection of what to say when one does not know what to say ( "Been there. done that" etc). He still can not produce ONE, SINGLE paper of HIS backing up the ABX use for differentiating the musical reproduction characteristics of audio components- in LISTENING TESTS PLAYING MUSIC. An article providing EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE that ABX wotks for that purpose. An article good enough to be acceptable to JAES- the professional voice of audio engineering. Mind you- its been 40 years only. He might yet take time from posting messages and produce. There still is time to ask me to apologise for saying that he is a con artist wasting everybody's time and marketing a "test" under false pretences. ( Sorry - not a "test". ABX was rebaptised. It is now a "test procedure" for "analysis") Ludovic Mirabel |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Where are those Wascally Weapons of Mass Destwuction??? | Audio Opinions |