Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp?
In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. How do you choose? |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE in the circuit the fuse is going to go. Incoming AC supply ? HT line before or after filter caps ? Output tube cathodes ? ...... Phil |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:46:12 -0700, Paul D. Spiegel wrote:
What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. How do you choose? You need to look at what the fuse is going to protect, and remember that the fuse rating is, nominally, the maximum that the fuse will carry continuously without blowing. Fuses blow because of heat, they have a reverse time characteristic. As the current increases they blow faster. That affects how you use them. It's no use putting a quick blow fuse in part of the circuit that is going to see large surge currents, likewise a slow blow fuse in the cathode of an output valve would never protect it. To find out the actual blowing point of the fuse you need to get it's fusing characteristics graph. That plots current against time, with a tolerance included. From that, and knowing the load that you want to protect, you can pick the correct fuse. Or you can measure the load and make an intelligent guess ... :-) -- Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!) Web: http://www.nascom.info Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On May 31, 6:59*am, "Phil Allison" wrote:
"Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. *How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE *in the circuit the fuse is going to go. very much so Incoming AC supply ? It also depends in this case on the supply voltage. Eg for 240v, for a general purpose audio amp, 2A fuses tend not to last so well, 3A do. On 110v you're likely not looking at a slightly fragile low current value like 2A. HT line before or after filter caps ? which also depends on the resistance/impedance in teh circuit, since that determines the power up surge. And reservoir cap size determines its duration - eg a prewar amp with 4uF main resevoir cap will see way less i squared r at startup than a later amp with maybe 100uF. Also the type of rectifier: a valve rec will pretty much eliminate power up surge, but silicon diodes wont. Output tube cathodes ? ..... *Phil NT |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On May 31, 3:46*pm, "Paul D. Spiegel" wrote:
What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? * In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. *How do you choose? Fuses are a primitive way to stop a peice of gear smoking, and perhaps burning your house down. Sometimes several fuses for an amp are wise to stop parts from becoming damaged, such as OPTs, tubes etc. Chosing the value is a bit tricky, but my rule of thumb is to use the lowest possible fuse value which may indeed blow after say 200 hours of normal use because of the heat from turn on cycles in the fuse will fatigue the wire. So for example, one estimates mains input current and selects a fuse rated for slightly more and you try it. If it blows immediately on turn on, try a slow blow type if you have not already, and maybe you need bigger current value - repeat this until you find it lasts beyond a few weeks. It will usually be a fuse value much smaller than that supplied by a manufacturer who gets bad press if fuses blow too easily. But I have had to rewire amps which have burnt to a crisp because the mains fuse value was too high and the power tranny fried, windings must have glowed red hot, sent flames and smoke out to the rest of the amp. Slow blow types give less "nuisance blows" because they'll tolerate a brief high current, but will still fail if the current stays at the rated value for more than say a few seconds. So 200mA fuses in the cathode to 0V circuit of each output tube should be slow blow types. I sometimes put fuses in series with all sec windings on a PT and on the primary. Patrick Turner. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Patrick Turner" Fuses are a primitive way to stop a peice of gear smoking, and perhaps burning your house down. ** Fuses do not stop electronic gear from smoking and catching fire - the number of fires from TV sets and CRT monitors is proof of that. Fires do not take hundreds of watts to start and where the cabinetry is of flammable plastic - watch out !! So for example, one estimates mains input current ... ** Huh ?? Might be an idea to MEASURE it with a * true rms * AC current meter - allow for the worst case operating conditions and then add say 20%. Slow blow fuses are essential for AC supply fuses used with anything that has an internal DC supply. BTW: A user replaceable fuse is no protection against ANYTHING !!! ..... Phil |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
Phil Allison wrote:
"Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE in the circuit the fuse is going to go. Incoming AC supply ? HT line before or after filter caps ? Output tube cathodes ? ..... Phil Right. I should have been more precise. I am referring to the incoming AC. This particular amp draws about 0.5a at idle so I would normally choose a 1a fuse. I was curious how other RATS choose a fuse rating. - Paul |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
Tabby wrote:
On May 31, 6:59?am, "Phil Allison" wrote: "Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. ?How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE ?in the circuit the fuse is going to go. It also depends in this case on the supply voltage. Eg for 240v, for a general purpose audio amp, 2A fuses tend not to last so well, 3A do. On 110v you're likely not looking at a slightly fragile low current value like 2A. HT line before or after filter caps ? which also depends on the resistance/impedance in teh circuit, since that determines the power up surge. And reservoir cap size determines its duration - eg a prewar amp with 4uF main resevoir cap will see way less i squared r at startup than a later amp with maybe 100uF. Also the type of rectifier: a valve rec will pretty much eliminate power up surge, but silicon diodes wont. Interesting point, NT. In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, but it is something I should consider when using SS diodes and a large filter cap first. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Paul D. Spiegel" "Phil Allison" "Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. ?How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE ?in the circuit the fuse is going to go. In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. .... Phil |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On Jun 1, 1:33*pm, "Phil Allison" wrote:
"Patrick Turner" Fuses are a primitive way to stop a peice of gear smoking, and perhaps burning your house down. ** Fuses do not stop electronic gear from smoking and catching fire - *the number of fires from TV sets and CRT monitors is proof of that. I have had hundreds of items pass over my workbench for a repair. Some had evidence of small fires, and one EAR509 amp had suffered a mans tranny which had spewed flames and smoke, damaging the rest of the amp. But I don't get to see the melted mess which may result from a TV or PC monitor fire. I did mention that the fuse current value should usually be lower than what the manufacturer provides. It may not stop ALL fires, but it will stop many more than if the fuse value is too high. Many old radio chassis in tinder dry wooden cabinets are a worry, so I always add a mains fuse during service work because very few old radios had a fuse. Fires do not take hundreds of watts to start and where the cabinetry is of flammable plastic - watch out *!! Indeed. So for example, one estimates mains input current ... ** Huh ?? I beleive I was talking to someone not very technically qualified, and he may not own a meter, and like so many, could not use a meter to do anything at all. A significant number of people have SFA idea about volts, amps, watts, ohms, or electrons etc. So, by saying one estimates input current, I should have said * I * might estimate current, add up the HT x Iadc, heater powerr, add 20% for losses, get a total in VA, divide by 240, and you have input current, which will not be a pure sine wave. OK, then you try some slow blow fuses until you find a value that will last a few weeks at least. But in all my amps and re-engieered amp I put in active circuits to detect excessive Idc in output tubes which is the main cause of serious amp troubles, ie bias failures. Many have thanked me for it because the problem turns off the amp, and they bring it to me for a fix which is easy and usually done in 30 mins, often one output tube has lost its ability to stay biased and Iadc escalates. Might be an idea to MEASURE it with a * true rms * AC current meter - allow for the worst case operating conditions and then add say 20%. Indeed. Slow blow fuses are essential for AC supply fuses used with anything that has an internal DC supply. BTW: A user replaceable fuse is no protection against ANYTHING !!! Some of my amps have 6 fuses, all mounted in a row in screw down holders and accessable by an owner. And beside each is a red LED that turns on to tell you which fuse is blown. They are in series with every transformer winding used in the amp. In addition, there is an active circuit which turns the amp off at the mains if any one or more of many OP tubes is in bias trouble. I don't like getting sued. I don't want to have to rewind any OPTs. So there is protection for about anything i can think of. Patrick Turner. .... *Phil |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 05/31/11 23:43, Phil Allison so wittily quipped:
In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. NO, it will not be that high, though there is likely to be SOME surge for _MAYBE_ 1 cycle (depending on where the current starts flowing. Once again, you're an idiot. I only use the ad-hominem attack because you seem to want to elevate yourself at others' expense, and that's most likely due to your lack of real understanding. Obviously you failed trigonometry, at the very least, or you would understand the effect of a sine wave AC voltage on an inductor. However, transformers aren't pure inductors, though an inductive component is likely to be there. In any case, it's a transformer, not a DC electromagnet or a motor. You don't have to 'magnetize' it. There is no 'magnetic inrush surge'. That's just ridiculous. There is only the effective inductance and the reflected impedence of the load. Now as for surge currents, they DO exist (obvious to the most casual observer with any reasonable common sense level of understanding of electronics and electricity) but not for the reasons you stated. It's more like charging up capacitors and low resistance on cold tube filaments. Go back to school and learn what you're talking about BEFORE you call someone 'fool'. Fool. /me ignoring whatever reply you give - it won't be worth responding to. just the usual ad-hominem attacks due to lack of real substance, attempting to elevate yourself above the rest of us through typical Jr. High bullying, yotta yotta yotta boring as hell. This tirade has been for the benefit of those you insult, not you. Saying this to you is a waste of time, of course, if it were intended for YOUR benefit. The classic 'pearls before swine' example applyies. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On Jun 1, 4:43*pm, "Phil Allison" wrote:
"Paul D. Spiegel" *"Phil Allison" "Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. ?How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE ?in the circuit the fuse is going to go. *In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). *The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. * *10 to 50 times the running current. * *Fool. *.... *Phil Here we go again Phil. This topic of inrush current to magnetize the core has been discussed before at length. But if working RMS current is 0.5Arms, I've never seen a 5 amp peak let alone a 25A peak which *might* require a fuse rated for such currents. Typical mains fuse for Quad-II with completely revised PSU using input filter of 470uF-150r-470uF and 4 x 3A 1N5408 diodes can be 1A. No evidence of needing any more, although Quad used 2A for 240V. The main prolonged inrush current is during the first 2 seconds to charge up all that capacitance, But I limit charge currents with series R between ends of HT winding and diodes. With such R and the high PT winding resistance in Quad-II PT, charge currents are limited. Even in amps with 200,000 uF and +/-70V rails, and very low resistance windings, the magnetic input current seems less of a problem than that of charging up the caps. So I add an R in series with mains, and when B +, B- get up to 0.75 full value, the R is shunted via a relay and delay circuit powered by the turn on management and protection auxilliray supply. The initial peak is limited, and the second peak is usually less than the first, and usually the mains fuse may be halved in value compared to what is needed without the inrush current limiter. Patrick Turner |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 05/30/11 22:46, Paul D. Spiegel so wittily quipped:
What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. How do you choose? doubling idle current is probably not big enough. I typically pick a fuse size that is small enough that it won't blow under max load conditions, but WILL blow if something fries, _before_ other things get permanent damage (or catch on fire). Input fuses are likely to be slow blow, and fast blow for DC power supply fuses (if you are able to limit surge current on capacitor charging). For the AC input, I'd use a slow blow fuse and pick a value that's twice 'maximum expected current + starting surge' as a good starting point and adjust as needed (the lower you can get away with, the better). It should also blow fast enough so that if you get a short, it prevents fires and electrocution. anyway you can google on how fuses are rated for more info. |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Patrick Turneroid the Bricklayer " Fuses are a primitive way to stop a peice of gear smoking, and perhaps burning your house down. ** Fuses do not stop electronic gear from smoking and catching fire - the number of fires from TV sets and CRT monitors is proof of that. ( snip usual Turneroid absurd off-topic DRIVEL ) Fires do not take hundreds of watts to start and where the cabinetry is of flammable plastic - watch out !! So for example, one estimates mains input current ... ** Huh ?? Might be an idea to MEASURE it with a * true rms * AC current meter - allow for the worst case operating conditions and then add say 20%. Indeed. Slow blow fuses are essential for AC supply fuses used with anything that has an internal DC supply. BTW: A user replaceable fuse is no protection against ANYTHING !!! Some of my amps have 6 fuses, ** Some of you feet have six toes. ...... Phil |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Patrick Turneroid the Bricklayer " ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. Here we go again Phil. ** **** off - you know nothing RDH4 freakoid. This topic of inrush current to magnetize the core has been discussed before at length. ** Then how come YOU never learned anything then ?? Head too far stuck up your puny arse ?? But if working RMS current is 0.5Arms, I've never seen a 5 amp peak let alone a 25A peak which *might* require a fuse rated for such currents. ** Fraid that is how it is all the time. Slow blow fuses are all rated to withstand surges of 10 to 20 times I nominal for that reason. You illiterate ****head. ..... Phil |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/01/11 03:51, flipper so wittily quipped:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:19:46 -0700, Big Bad Bob wrote: On 05/31/11 23:43, Phil Allison so wittily quipped: In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. NO, it will not be that high, though there is likely to be SOME surge for _MAYBE_ 1 cycle (depending on where the current starts flowing. Once again, you're an idiot. I only use the ad-hominem attack because you seem to want to elevate yourself at others' expense, and that's most likely due to your lack of real understanding. Obviously you failed trigonometry, at the very least, or you would understand the effect of a sine wave AC voltage on an inductor. However, transformers aren't pure inductors, though an inductive component is likely to be there. Likely? In any case, it's a transformer, not a DC electromagnet or a motor. You don't have to 'magnetize' it. There is no 'magnetic inrush surge'. That's just ridiculous. There is only the effective inductance and the reflected impedence of the load. Not so. http://www.opamp-electronics.com/tut...nt_2_09_12.htm uh, that's not the same thing. I already mentioned this kind of thing, actually. That 'surge' typically happens within 1/2 a cycle, and is significanly less than 1 cycle. But any current spike would be so small as to be insignificant when compared to actual LOAD CURRENT. Sure it might show up on an o-scope, but events that are less than one cycle in length aren't going to blow fuses. In fact, it would be HEAVILY damped by the inductance of the transformer. Remember, an inductor starts conducting with ~ahem~ MINIMUM current (highest counter-EMF) which then drops as the inductor 'charges', as it's behavior is effectively the opposite of a capacitor. But it's not likely to exceed its steady-state reactive current, if at all. That is also minimal when compared to the actual load current. To test you could connect an o-scope to a CT then plug something in that's already switched on, and see what the surge looks like. Might be fun to actually do it, eh? A 1H inductor increases its current at 1A per sec when 1V is applied (it's a linear increase). For 120V, that's 160A/sec (worst case, starting at the peak). 1/60th of a sec means no more than 3A (worst case, unlikely though, due to Z). Impedence at 60Hz would be around 400 ohms (2piFL), so peak reactive current is going to be around 0.3A (much smaller than the 3A potential surge). We know that once current stabilizes it will asymptotically approach its maximum, lagging the voltage by 90 degrees. And of course a transformer primary is very likely to be more than 1H. Suffice it to say that surge current due to the transformer itself is very, very, very insignificant. Now with a resistive load on the secondary that draws 10 times the current (tube heaters) I can believe there will be a surge. But that's not from the transformer. That's the reflected load at ~10 times normal. |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Bob" ** This ****ing **** needs a bullet in his head. |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/01/11 02:22, Patrick Turner so wittily quipped:
Here we go again Phil. This topic of inrush current to magnetize the core has been discussed before at length. only because there appear to be some definitions for it that don't include audio amplifier power supply transformers. In some cases, capacitive loads exist, and in other cases, very high current cores. Undoubtedly the 'inrush' is pale by comparison to the typical LOAD CURRENT. And that's my point. it's effectly non-existent except for special cases, in which the current surge is dampened by the inductance of the transformer, and DOES NOT EXCEED a fraction of the load-carrying capacity of the device. But if working RMS current is 0.5Arms, I've never seen a 5 amp peak let alone a 25A peak which *might* require a fuse rated for such currents. Your observations are correct. To say there is a surge of 50 times normal operating current is just, plain, ignorant (not counting what may happen within the 1st cycle of closing the switch). That of course does not count if significant arcing happens, internally or otherwise. If your transformer turns into an AC arc welder, all bets are off. That's a much different scenario. But I limit charge currents with series R between ends of HT winding and diodes. With such R and the high PT winding resistance in Quad-II PT, charge currents are limited. yes (good design). our 'expert' should re-read the pages for the links he posted. Alternate design would use an LC for the same reason, and better filtering. L also provides some series R for charge damping, and nice inductive action to make the current waveform a bit more sinusoidal. ever measure startup current with an o-scope across a small R or with a CT? just curious. |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
YOU retarded pile of sub human dung !!!
"Big Bad Boob = TOTAL ****HEAD " FFS see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current YOU vile, retarded pile of ****ing sub human dung. ..... Phil |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/01/11 02:05, Patrick Turner so wittily quipped:
Some of my amps have 6 fuses, all mounted in a row in screw down holders and accessable by an owner. And beside each is a red LED that turns on to tell you which fuse is blown. Ne bulbs (for HV circuits) work well also, but probably cost more. A lot of fuse holders the US Navy uses are equipped with Ne bulbs and resistors across the fuse as 'blown fuse' indicators. Helps troubleshoot problems quickly. "Hey, there's a blown fuse" extra protection helps prevent costly repairs later on when someone throws a ball for the dog and it bounces off his nose and breaks one of the output tubes while the unit is running at power. Or when someone hits a golf ball through your window and into your amp. oops. (never happens, right?) so it's nice to see you put that kind of defensive design into these things. |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Paul D. Spiegel" wrote in message ... Right. I should have been more precise. I am referring to the incoming AC. This particular amp draws about 0.5a at idle so I would normally choose a 1a fuse. I was curious how other RATS choose a fuse rating. - Paul Like others said, it depends, you must know (measure the current) instantaneous current behaviour the first seconds after power on. I've placed an example I-t curves .pdf on A.B.S.E. that gives an idea of current stress behaviour of (particular/0.5A) fuses. Data originates from Little-Fuse, the curves are NOT generic. Gio |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"flipper" But any current spike would be so small as to be insignificant when compared to actual LOAD CURRENT. It would seem you didn't read the page. With an 'ideal transformer', which none are, ** An ideal transformer does not suffer from saturation at all. So the issue of " inrush surge " simply does not exist. Wot absurd, ****ing sophistry. .... Phil |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"flipper the ****head " ** An ideal transformer does not suffer from saturation at all. So the issue of " inrush surge " simply does not exist. Yes it does, at twice operating current. ** What is the " operating current " of an unloaded, ideal transformer that by definition does not have any magnetising current or ever saturate ?? Answer: Nothing. The term "inrush surge " only applies to REAL transformers that DO saturate. You ****ing, stupid, autistic ****head. ..... Phil |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
flipper the ****ing ****head " ** An ideal transformer does not suffer from saturation at all. So the issue of " inrush surge " simply does not exist. Yes it does, at twice operating current. ** What is the " operating current " of an unloaded, ideal transformer that by definition does not have any magnetising current or ever saturate ?? Answer: Nothing. The term "inrush surge " only applies to REAL transformers that DO saturate. You ****ing, stupid, autistic ****head. That stupid link was 100% WRONG. ..... Phil |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/02/11 05:52, flipper so wittily quipped:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:44:27 -0700, Big Bad Bob wrote: On 06/01/11 03:51, flipper so wittily quipped: On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:19:46 -0700, Big Bad Bob wrote: On 05/31/11 23:43, Phil Allison so wittily quipped: In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. NO, it will not be that high, though there is likely to be SOME surge for _MAYBE_ 1 cycle (depending on where the current starts flowing. Once again, you're an idiot. I only use the ad-hominem attack because you seem to want to elevate yourself at others' expense, and that's most likely due to your lack of real understanding. Obviously you failed trigonometry, at the very least, or you would understand the effect of a sine wave AC voltage on an inductor. However, transformers aren't pure inductors, though an inductive component is likely to be there. Likely? In any case, it's a transformer, not a DC electromagnet or a motor. You don't have to 'magnetize' it. There is no 'magnetic inrush surge'. That's just ridiculous. There is only the effective inductance and the reflected impedence of the load. Not so. http://www.opamp-electronics.com/tut...nt_2_09_12.htm uh, that's not the same thing. Not 'the same thing' as WHAT? The surge is due to the magnetic flux so calling that a 'magnetic inrush surge' is appropriate. It would seem you didn't read the page. your "sort of right", I actually 'skimmed' the page, saw what it was saying (and the basis of it), didn't waste time on details reading EVERY GODDAMNED WORD ON IT that I didn't see as being important. It was obvious what they were saying, and I agree with the general concept, but do not draw the same conclusions from it. (saying I did not read something when I simply disagree is pointless). I'll explain it differently now. You get a slight 'surge' when you snap the switch at a particular 'non-ideal' point in the incoming voltage's AC cycle [already mentioned]. Magnetic hysteresis is NOT that large for a normal power transformer (typically don't use "bar iron" for that right?), so the transformer will behave MOSTLY as an inductor (at the beginning). You could (in theory) construct a device that DOES have 'surges' but why would you want to? The 'surge' will disappear within 1 cycle, and won't be larger than the normal current carrying capacity of the device. Remember, the 'magnetization' process creates COUNTER EMF (repeat COUNTER EMF) which is how inductance works. This magnetization constantly switches polarity for AC, so even if the 'last magnetic state' is in opposition to the current state (worst case) the surge still won't be that large because of (drum roll please) the COUNTER EMF generated by the magnetization reversal! It's the same magnetic field changes that induce current in the secondary. While the transformer is allegedly 'surging' the induced current in the secondary won't be quite as much as it is while it's 'running'. But, again, less than 1 cycle. 1/60th of a second is too short of a time to overload even a FAST BLOW fuse. Fuse blow times are significantly longer than 1 cycle unless current is extremely high (like a dead short) because you need to heat the conductor before it melts. You would get more of a surge from charging capacitors with a silicon rectifier power supply than from the transformer 'building a magnetic field' (which COMPLETELY reverses 120 times per second for 60hz AC, FYI). Remember how motors and generators work. A changing magnetic field in a wire creates EMF. Although hysteresis affects the amount of current needed to change the magnetic field, hysteresis in transformers (by design, unless they're CRAPPY) is VERY VERY LOW. Otherwise, it would overheat in normal operation, and we don't want THAT. And of course, I'm not talking about 'ideal transformers' (which would have NO surge). With an 'ideal transformer', which none are, the inrush current due to the magnetic flux would be exactly *twice* the operating current.peak which, even alone, is not 'insignificant'. No, it would NOT be 'twice the operating current peak'. That's silly. "idle current" peak I would accept (with the transformer unloaded) for the reasons I mentioned above. But transformer idle current is extremely small, or else the transformer would (again) overheat. Last time I checked a transformer that had been energized with no load on it for a significant period of time, there was no significant heat coming from it. However, same transformer with a load, nice and toasty. Conclusion: current losses in the transformer increase under load, suggesting that total primary winding current is insignificant when unloaded, significant when loaded. I think that's nice logical common sense, and "not ideal" as well as "not pure theory". I suspect you're using pure theory in your analysis. But you might be misinterpreting it a bit. I suggest a simple experiment, measuring the actual current spike. I'll trust your results, so I don't have to do it myself. And I won't accuse you or anything if you decide NOT to do it, rather than having accusations tossed at me for allegedly "not reading". Now I've been known to throw that sort of thing back into the face of people that (typically?) throw it at me, but I'm trying NOT to 'go there' today. It's more interesting to figure out what's really happening when you power up a transformer and not get into a ****ing contest (I'll reserve that sort of thing for the 1 or 2 trolls that are addictively compelled to invent new profanities every day to describe me). anyway I'd put a slow blow fuse on the input because of capacitor charging and heater warmup, NOT transformer magnetization. |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/02/11 09:07, flipper so wittily quipped:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:30:54 +1000, "Phil wrote: flipper the ****ing ****head " ** An ideal transformer does not suffer from saturation at all. So the issue of " inrush surge " simply does not exist. Yes it does, at twice operating current. ** What is the " operating current " of an unloaded, ideal transformer that by definition does not have any magnetising current or ever saturate ?? Answer: Nothing. The term "inrush surge " only applies to REAL transformers that DO saturate. You ****ing, stupid, autistic ****head. That stupid link was 100% WRONG. Now you're a babbling fool asshole. he's trolling you. You _could_ troll him back, and point out that he'd argue with a math teacher that tells him that 1 + 1 = 2, just because he argues with everyone and calls them '****head'. Actually, if he's going to insult someone, I think "vacuous toffee-nosed malodorous pervert" works better than "****ing stupid autistic ****head" simply because the former is eloquent and funny as hell (especially when spoken by Graham Chapman), and the latter only requires a room temperature IQ (measured in Celcius). |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/02/11 06:15, flipper so wittily quipped:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:22:19 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Turner wrote: On Jun 1, 4:43 pm, "Phil wrote: "Paul D. Spiegel" "Phil Allison" "Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. ?How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE ?in the circuit the fuse is going to go. In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. .... Phil Here we go again Phil. This topic of inrush current to magnetize the core has been discussed before at length. But if working RMS current is 0.5Arms, I've never seen a 5 amp peak let alone a 25A peak You most likely wouldn't under casual observation because it only occurs if AC is applied during, or close to, zero crossing and the odds of you just randomly hitting it with the power switch are low. Sooner or later it will happen, though. which *might* require a fuse rated for such currents. Called 'slo-blo'. Minimum blow time for a 1A slo-blo at 40 amp surge is 10mS. heh, half a cycle at 50Hz. Lucky us that won't happen without a serious short somewhere. I think 'slo-blo' was a registered trademark (several sites say Littlefuse Inc owns it, didn't research further, see link). It's probably like calling facial tissues "kleenex" or super-sticky utility tape "duck tape", becoming an accepted 'standard' term. trademark reference http://trade.mar.cx/US72009368 |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/02/11 12:45, flipper so wittily quipped:
With an 'ideal transformer', which none are, the inrush current due to the magnetic flux would be exactly *twice* the operating current.peak which, even alone, is not 'insignificant'. No, it would NOT be 'twice the operating current peak'. Yes, it will. Read the damn page. no. my mind will not be changed without an experiment first. |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/02/11 12:51, flipper so wittily quipped:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:36:44 -0700, Big Bad Bob wrote: On 06/02/11 06:15, flipper so wittily quipped: On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:22:19 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Turner wrote: On Jun 1, 4:43 pm, "Phil wrote: "Paul D. Spiegel" "Phil Allison" "Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. ?How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE ?in the circuit the fuse is going to go. In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. .... Phil Here we go again Phil. This topic of inrush current to magnetize the core has been discussed before at length. But if working RMS current is 0.5Arms, I've never seen a 5 amp peak let alone a 25A peak You most likely wouldn't under casual observation because it only occurs if AC is applied during, or close to, zero crossing and the odds of you just randomly hitting it with the power switch are low. Sooner or later it will happen, though. which *might* require a fuse rated for such currents. Called 'slo-blo'. Minimum blow time for a 1A slo-blo at 40 amp surge is 10mS. heh, half a cycle at 50Hz. Lucky us that won't happen without a serious short somewhere. You'll certainly never know because you never bother reading what's written. I can't believe you'd actually say something like that, especially when you (hypocritically) failed to actually do the EXPERIMENT I mentioned. Some people, and their arrogance. I thought you were ABOVE that. I guess not. |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/02/11 13:51, flipper so wittily quipped:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:47:53 -0700, Big Bad Bob wrote: On 06/02/11 12:45, flipper so wittily quipped: With an 'ideal transformer', which none are, the inrush current due to the magnetic flux would be exactly *twice* the operating current.peak which, even alone, is not 'insignificant'. No, it would NOT be 'twice the operating current peak'. Yes, it will. Read the damn page. no. my mind will not be changed without an experiment first. Plenty of people have done it and it's common knowledge in the power industry so there's no reason for me to waste my time recreating the wheel. Especially when it's no skin off my nose. http://www.aedie.org/9CHLIE-paper-send/273_manana.pdf http://www.apqi.org/file/attachment/2009424/162650.pdf But you probably won't read that either. true, it's getting boring now and I have other things to do. And you completely missed my point ('disagreeing' is not the same thing as 'not reading'). Or, just because someone on the intarweb writes something down, it does not imply that it's either ACCURATE or repeatable through experimentation. Real science questions every theory and repeats experiments all of the time. 'Re-inventing the wheel' happens every year in Detroit and in the video game industry, out of necessity I might add, and it's never a BAD thing to discover better ways of making wheels [or anything else]. That's sometimes called ENGINEERING. In any case, I'm sure you're arguing details that I consider unimportant, so I'll stop now. I'm sure it's pointless to continue, since you're not going to change my mind, and I doubt I'll change yours. There are people out there who really hate it when someone disagrees with them. Too bad. I'll stop now, it's obviously pointless to continue. |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Bob" wrote in message m... On 06/02/11 13:51, flipper so wittily quipped: snip true, it's getting boring now and I have other things to do. And you completely missed my point ('disagreeing' is not the same thing as 'not reading'). Or, just because someone on the intarweb writes something down, it does not imply that it's either ACCURATE or repeatable through experimentation. Real science questions every theory and repeats experiments all of the time. 'Re-inventing the wheel' happens every year in Detroit and in the video game industry, out of necessity I might add, and it's never a BAD thing to discover better ways of making wheels [or anything else]. That's sometimes called ENGINEERING. In any case, I'm sure you're arguing details that I consider unimportant, so I'll stop now. I'm sure it's pointless to continue, since you're not going to change my mind, and I doubt I'll change yours. Dude! The huge current surge in a power xfmr when power is applied at the zero-crossing voltage point isn't a matter of opinion, it's a well known phenomenon that has been well known for as long as they've been winding transformers! You'd know that if you read the literature, but you, well, don't. Get yourself a cheap zero-crossing solid state relay from All Electronics and find out for yourself if you won't read or refuse to believe any of the engineering texts out there. Fred There are people out there who really hate it when someone disagrees with them. Too bad. I'll stop now, it's obviously pointless to continue. |
#32
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On 06/02/11 23:15, flipper so wittily quipped:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:19:09 -0700, Big Bad Bob wrote: On 06/02/11 12:51, flipper so wittily quipped: On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:36:44 -0700, Big Bad Bob wrote: On 06/02/11 06:15, flipper so wittily quipped: On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:22:19 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Turner wrote: On Jun 1, 4:43 pm, "Phil wrote: "Paul D. Spiegel" "Phil Allison" "Paul D. Spiegel" What do RATS use as a "rule of thumb" to select a fuse for a power amp? In the past I've doubled the idle current, but honestly, that was just a guess. ?How do you choose? ** Kinda depends a lot a WHERE ?in the circuit the fuse is going to go. In this case the line voltage is 120 (I forgot to mention in my previous reply). The PS for this amp is a tube rectifier with a choke input, so start-up current is minimized, ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. Fool. .... Phil Here we go again Phil. This topic of inrush current to magnetize the core has been discussed before at length. But if working RMS current is 0.5Arms, I've never seen a 5 amp peak let alone a 25A peak You most likely wouldn't under casual observation because it only occurs if AC is applied during, or close to, zero crossing and the odds of you just randomly hitting it with the power switch are low. Sooner or later it will happen, though. which *might* require a fuse rated for such currents. Called 'slo-blo'. Minimum blow time for a 1A slo-blo at 40 amp surge is 10mS. heh, half a cycle at 50Hz. Lucky us that won't happen without a serious short somewhere. You'll certainly never know because you never bother reading what's written. I can't believe you'd actually say something like that, Why? Because it's true? no, it is not. you appear to have a lot of misconceptions and bad assumptions. OK I ran the experiment myself. Test circuit used 120VAC to 24VCT transformer (rated at 2A) with 10 ohm resistor in series with the primary. I could have used a scope and captured the actual waveform, but instead I decided to focus on a specific point, that is the peak surge current on power-up, so I put a diode and capacitor across it so I could easily measure the peak (cap is 3.3uF 50V). After power cycling dozens of times, the MAXIMUM value I ever read was 15V. I will assume that is the worst case peak. I achieved similar voltages (let's say 12V) several times, but the 15V value only once. This suggests that the peak 'inrush' current was 1.5A. Since the transformer is rated at around 50VA we can assume that the actual 'inrush' current (in the worst case measured case) was about 4 times the peak rating of the transformer. the likelihodd (had I bothered to hook up a scope, I'll let someone ELSE do that one, hah) is that it was less than 1/2 a cycle. Putting a resistive load on the secondary did not appear to affect any spikes. Also, I had no way of determining whether any arcing took place within the switch during the measurement (which would have greatly affected the test, causing the reading to be significantly higher). So in retrospect, the instantaneous (measured) current flow was 1.5A in the worst case, with ~400ma expected at full load. Assuming it's less than 1 cycle in length (less than 10 msecs) no fast-blow fuse rated at 0.5A would have blown due to 'current inrush'. Further, it wasn't the 10 to 50 times the rated current as claimed by some. It was barely 4 times, and only for one measurement. An o-scope would give you a better perspective on how long the surge lasts and the overall curve shape, but like I said I didn't bother hooking one up (I'll let one of you guys do it). And of course I never said it wouldn't be there, I said it would be SMALL, particularly WAY LESS than the 'claimed' value. Most of the measurements did not exceed 500ma. I didn't bother writing them down, I simply watched the meter. But if it turns out that arcing was THE primary cause for the occasional LARGE readings, then none of what anyone ELSE said about these things will matter, because arcing throws the measurements off. (I would have used a 1 ohm resistor but I only had a 10 ohm high wattage resistor handy). let anyone else refute my experimental data and I will gladly accept the results. But argue about theory and accuse me of "not reading" simply because I disagree? Only repeatable experimental data is meaningful in science. Everything else is theory, debatable, and since anyone can say anything at all and claim it to be true, absolute bull**** until proven experimentally. |
#33
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
On Jun 3, 4:01*am, "Phil Allison" wrote:
"Tabby" *"Phil Allison" ** The AC tranny has a huge magnetic inrush surge. 10 to 50 times the running current. 50x run current would seem to suggest a transformer regulation of 2 or 3%. ** Only true is the "running current " is such that is consumes the entire VA rating of the tranny. Cant say I've seen many of those in domestic valve amps. How do you get the 50x figure? ** Say the tranny is a 300VA toroidal and the AC supply is 230 volts. The worst case, half cycle peak surge is equal to the AC peak voltage divided by the primary resistance - *which is typically 4.5 ohms. That gives 72 amps peak, worst case. The running current can be no more than 1.3 amps rms ( gives 300VA) and is more likely under 1 amp. BTW: If the first half cycle of magnetic surge current is positive, then all subsequent half cycles are also positive decaying exponentially for 5 to 20 cycles until the core de-saturates. Amazingly, the peaks of these half waves coincide closely with AC supply zero crossings. Any surge current due to the filter caps in the PSU charging add on top of the magnetic surge and are of both polarities - the peaks in this case coincide with AC supply voltage peaks. The combined current wave is a treat to study and it is easy to see why slow blow fuses are essential and larger transformers require a soft start system in the AC supply feed. .... *Phil Interesting. If this is the case, presumably the same problem occurs with inductors. I don't ever recall considering that in design, I'm not big on inductors though, there are often better ways to do things. NT |
#34
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Bob" OK I ran the experiment myself. Test circuit used 120VAC to 24VCT transformer (rated at 2A) with 10 ohm resistor in series with the primary. ** Change that resistor to 1 ohm and try again. Cos you went and put a resistor in series with the primary of similar value to the primary's own resistance - which has the effect of dramatically reducing the peak current of a worst case surge. Folk regularly use NTC thermistors for that exact purpose !!!!! Then try more transformers - particularly those of a few hundred VA and toroidal types. You will need a resistor about 0.1 to 0.5 ohms with plenty of power rating. ****head. ..... Phil |
#35
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Boob" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current Pink graph, bottom right hand of page. 22 amp peak surge in the first half cycle. I posted this SAME link to YOU three days ago. Standard 100VA toroidals for 120 VAC power have a 6 ohm primary resistance. You stupid ****head !! |
#36
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Boob" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current Pink graph, bottom right hand of page. 22 amp peak surge in the first half cycle. I posted this SAME link to YOU three days ago. Standard 100VA toroidals for 120 VAC power have a 6 ohm primary resistance. You stupid ****head !! |
#37
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Boob" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current Pink graph, bottom right hand of page. 22 amp peak surge in the first half cycle. I posted this SAME link to YOU three days ago. Standard 100VA toroidals for 120 VAC power have a 6 ohm primary resistance. You stupid ****head !! |
#38
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Boob" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current Pink graph, bottom right hand of page. 22 amp peak surge in the first half cycle. I posted this SAME link to YOU three days ago. Standard 100VA toroidals for 120 VAC power have a 6 ohm primary resistance. You stupid ****head !! |
#39
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Boob" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current Pink graph, bottom right hand of page. 22 amp peak surge in the first half cycle. I posted this SAME link to YOU three days ago. Standard 100VA toroidals for 120 VAC power have a 6 ohm primary resistance. You stupid ****head !! |
#40
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a fuse
"Big Bad Boob" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current Pink graph, bottom right hand of page. 22 amp peak surge in the first half cycle. I posted this SAME link to YOU three days ago. Standard 100VA toroidals for 120 VAC power have a 6 ohm primary resistance. You stupid ****head !! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need a Fuse | Tech | |||
To fuse or not to fuse | Car Audio | |||
Fuse | Car Audio | |||
15 amp fuse with 20 w fuse for wire? | Car Audio | |||
100 amp fuse | Car Audio |