Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Graham hijacks physics again
I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. All kinds of
mountebanks have done this over the ages. First he attempted to explain that the "cream...works by quantum mechanics", which is actually not an explanation. He now makes the same fallacious association with respect to "morphic fields." I don't have any particular problem with references to "morphic fields." The problem here is a form of false advertising. "Quantum mechanics" used here like a movie star endorsement, as in, "Ooooooh, qmech, it must be real." It is an associational form of false advertising, not unlike "as seen on TV". Whether or not morphic fields exist, there is currently no logical association with quantum mechanics, except the desire of a promoter to associate one mystery with another. Read below. wrote in message oups.com... [snip] They are capable of influencing matter, and can incorporate numerous systems, including biological forms and crystals. If you don't fully understand a science or theory, then don't pretend you're an expert on it and that you're going to "educate" everyone on it. Please stop puking your ignorance all over this group, Powell. Arny has more than his share of ignorance, and there's more than enough to go around when he finally keels over and dies from atheriosclerosis. A Quantum Explanation of Sheldrake's Morphic Resonance: http://www.swcp.com/~hswift/swc/Essays/Sheldrake.html This is not a quantum explanation. It might qualify as quantum philosophy. It is frequently not understood that quantum mechanics, unlike physics, is a closed axiomatic system, just as Euclidean geometry is a closed axiomatic system. The axioms may be viewed at http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/aerts/publ...nmagIndigo.pdf The implications of the axiomatic system called quantum mechanics are puzzling and paradoxical when mapped into the physical world, except for the "correspondence principle", which states that in the mean of large numbers of particles, the behavior of a quantum system is identical to that prescribed by classical mechanics, another closed axiomatic system. Many people use the mystery of this mapping in attempts to justify speculative theories such as Sheldrake's. Unfortunately, this is pointless. Because quantum mechanics is so mysterious, many people have attempted to associate mysteries of their particular interest with it. "Quantum mechanics" is simply a set of axioms. Simply referring to the name of the axiom set without using it for mathematical proofs is not a valid form of reasoning. The above discussion does not contradict the possibility that Sheldrake's musings may have some validity. However, it is important to understand that merely wrapping a mystery in another mystery is not an explantion. Another example of this abuse is the search for the source of consciousness and free will. Many people have speculated that the source lies buried in the "apparent" randomness of quantum behavior. But Henry Stapp, physicist at Lawrence Livermore, who is the most active theorist in this area, believes this is not correct. His explanation is, in fact, far more radical, but capable of integrating the paradoxes of the Solvay Conference. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Graham hijacks physics again
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. All kinds of mountebanks have done this over the ages. First he attempted to explain that the "cream...works by quantum mechanics", which is actually not an explanation. He now makes the same fallacious association with respect to "morphic fields." Your problem Robert is demonstrating the practical problems with these ludicrous so-called tweaks without resorting to the much-hated bias-controlled listening tests. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Graham hijacks physics again
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote in message I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. All kinds of mountebanks have done this over the ages. First he attempted to explain that the "cream...works by quantum mechanics", which is actually not an explanation. He now makes the same fallacious association with respect to "morphic fields." Your problem Robert is demonstrating the practical problems with these ludicrous so-called tweaks without resorting to the much-hated bias-controlled listening tests. Arny, I don't hate them. I told you that if I were fortunate enough to have one of your ABX boxes, I would treat it as a valuable testing tool, unless it was obviously flawed. ABX is not a black-and-white issue. It has uses. While IMHO it is neither practical nor necessary for the experienced listener to do ABX for every piece of equipment under consideration, the current scenario is very much different. Here we have an individual who is not merely expressing a personal opinion, but has the messianic goal of changing how people relate to stereo. But there are potential invalidations in blind protocols as well. A blind test would have to accomodate the best efforts of the tweaker without invalidation of the test protocol. Nothing can be assumed about the test apparatus or the protocol. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Graham hijacks physics again
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote in message I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. All kinds of mountebanks have done this over the ages. First he attempted to explain that the "cream...works by quantum mechanics", which is actually not an explanation. He now makes the same fallacious association with respect to "morphic fields." Your problem Robert is demonstrating the practical problems with these ludicrous so-called tweaks without resorting to the much-hated bias-controlled listening tests. Arny, I don't hate them. Ignorance might be more like it. I told you that if I were fortunate enough to have one of your ABX boxes, I would treat it as a valuable testing tool, unless it was obviously flawed. Whatever that means. ABX is not a black-and-white issue. It has uses. Miniscule compared to the issued related to sighted testing. While IMHO it is neither practical nor necessary for the experienced listener to do ABX for every piece of equipment under consideration, the current scenario is very much different. Here we have an individual who is not merely expressing a personal opinion, but has the messianic goal of changing how people relate to stereo. He's pulling a lot of strings, that's all. The people with the most to fear from him are the subjectivists. Any reasonable so-called objectivist will simply dismiss him. Also, its clear that he is better known to some here than others - obviously those closest to him are more likely to be in on the joke. Invalidations in blind protocols as well. In English? A blind test would have to accomodate the best efforts of the tweaker without invalidation of the test protocol. Many have, still giving tweakers no quarter. Nothing can be assumed about the test apparatus or the protocol. Whatver that means. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Threatened By An Audio Revolution! Brain Still Missing.
Robert Morein, with great stress and nervousness, wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote in message Arny, I don't hate them. I told you that if I were fortunate enough to have one of your ABX boxes, I would treat it as a valuable testing tool, unless it was obviously flawed. It is obviously flawed, as flawed as your diseased mind, Robert. But how would it help you even if it wasn't? In email, you explained to me that you are not able to reliably detect differences even under sighted conditions, because of your neuroses? Since an ABX comparator does still require subjective listening to determine objective results, an ABX comparator would be as useless to you as say, a pill that didn't alter your mind or mood. ABX is not a black-and-white issue. It has uses. I agree. Doorstop. Table support. Paperweight. All kinds of valuable uses. While IMHO it is neither practical nor necessary for the experienced listener to do ABX for any piece of equipment under consideration, the current scenario is very much different. I agree. Here we have an individual who is not merely expressing a personal opinion, but has the messianic goal of changing how people relate to stereo. Threatens the HELL out of you, doesn't it? :-) LOL! Yup, Robert's entire IEEE-brainwashed world is fraying at the edges now, that 3 people on this group have already proven his entire understanding of audio to be WRONG. And it isn't just "my personal opinion" or that of the others here who've heard that alternative audio concepts are very much real and very much beneficial to our perception of sound. It's also the thousands of PWB customers who've tried and continue to purchase Belt products, that have proved that everything you thought you knew about audio was WRONG. Scares the hell out of you, doesn't it? ROTFL! Now THAT'S what I like to see! Engineers and wanna-be engineers running around like chicken little, declaring the sky is going to fall if you try to think outside the box of conventional audio theory! |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Alients Have Hijacked Robert Morein's Brain & Replaced It With An Eggplant!
wrote in message ups.com... Robert Morein, the Pope of RAO, polishes up his strawman and attempts to refute his own fallacious arguments about claims that were never made: I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. Robert Morein's egomaniacal pseudo-scientific strawman arguments snipped Richard Graham's rant snipped Inability to respond to the challenge, noted. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. I told you that if I were fortunate enough to have one of your ABX boxes, I would treat it as a valuable testing tool, unless it was obviously flawed. Whatever that means. It means the box or methodology is flawed Arny. I know how hard a concept that is to get past the bricks in your thick head. But the fact remains, you've experienced flawed ABX comparators in the past, and you've had your methodlogy proven flawed many times in the past as well. ABX is not a black-and-white issue. It has uses. Miniscule compared to the issued related to sighted testing. ABX is irrelevant to the practice of purchasing consumer audio, since it brings upon it conditions that are not present when the consumer is making use of the products in question under normal circumstances. Stereo systems have to be evaluated in the manner in which they will be used. While IMHO it is neither practical nor necessary for the experienced listener to do ABX for every piece of equipment under consideration, the current scenario is very much different. Here we have an individual who is not merely expressing a personal opinion, but has the messianic goal of changing how people relate to stereo. He's pulling a lot of strings, that's all. That theory has since proven to be false, when two members tried the tweaks and found them valid. You however, are still afraid to try them, and you will be until the day your sorry ass is planted 6 feet into the ground. Even though it takes about 30 seconds to find out if I'm pulling strings. The people with the most to fear from him are the subjectivists. Interesting that you and others (ie, Paul Packer) bring up the concept of "fear" a lot, in your discussions of audio ideologies. It really shows how much fear that you, so-called "objectivists", have of new ideas and new thinking in audio. You say the most to fear are the subjectivists, but the only two who were NOT afraid to try the ideas were subjectivists. However, you and Robert, Steven and Scott and many others here responded with cries of outrage at the idea that these subjectivists were going against their religious beliefs about audio. So the proof here is, the people who show they fear me the most are the objectivists, like you and Morein. If it weren't the case, you wouldn't even be writing post after post condeming me, my theories, my tweaks, and the people who've tried my tweaks. It appears that I have rattled your religious cages. Which pleases me to no end! Any reasonable so-called objectivist will simply dismiss him. There is no such thing as a "reasonable" objectivist. In fact, there's no such thing as an "objectivist" on this group. What you are calling "objectivists" are merely dogmatic polemicists like you, with an agenda to administer. Nothing objective about that, or about the ABX & DBT tests you religiously preach. Secondly, it is not "reasonable" to dismiss someone's ideas or theories without ever being able to provide sufficent, valid, verifiable, incontrovertible evidence that the ideas don't work or the theories are incorrect. So far, not you or anyone else has even attempted to disprove my tweaks. Dismissing them without experimenting with them or disproving them therefore, is an act of great ARROGANT BIGOTRY. Nothing less, nothing more. That does not fall under the heading "reasonable". That is quite irrational and unscientific. Which makes you, Robert, Sullivan and others here arrogant bigots, unscientific and irrrational nutcases. Unlike your so-called "objectivists" here, I have provided far more evidence to the group that my tweaks are valid, from the empirical evidence gathered, and my own DBTs. Also, its clear that he is better known to some here than others Are you saying that Richard Graham has had allies that are regulars on this group? Where's your evidence? As non-existent as your evidence against my tweaks I suppose? - obviously those closest to him are more likely to be in on the joke. Those closest to you are likely to be in on the joke of your ABX test. ie. Your sockpuppet Nyob..... A blind test would have to accomodate the best efforts of the tweaker without invalidation of the test protocol. Many have, still giving tweakers no quarter. Your dumb, flawed, outdated ABX tests invalidates practically everything in audio under tests of music. Conclusion: If we lived life according to what ABX comparators tell us, we'd still be living in caves, smashing rocks to try to create fire. That's ABX's progress to the audio industry. Nothing can be assumed about the test apparatus or the protocol. Whatver that means. That mental block is really in tight there, isn't it? It means, fool, that you can't assume your apparatus or protocol is not flawed. Otherwise so are your results and conclusions. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Alients Have Hijacked Robert Morein's Brain & Replaced It With An Eggplant!
Robert Morein notes that he is a deluded egomaniac: wrote in message ups.com... Robert Morein, the Pope of RAO, polishes up his strawman and attempts to refute his own fallacious arguments about claims that were never made: I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. Robert Morein's egomaniacal pseudo-scientific strawman arguments snipped Richard Graham's rant snipped Inability to respond to the challenge, noted. Robert Morein's delusional rant snipped Inability to respond to the question, noted. Inability to recognize fiction from reality, and Richard Graham from soundhaspriority, also noted. Inability to remain sane and rational without the use of psychotropic drugs, also noted. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. Richard, let's get back to the question. You constantly claim that "quantum mechanics" is responsible for your tweaks, yet quantum mechanics is nothing more than an axiomatic system. I don't hear you claiming that plane geometry is responsible, yet all that cutting and snipping makes it all the more relevant. If I were like you, I would say something preemptorily judgemental. Please address my challenge in an informative fashion. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Graham hijacks physics again
Arny Krueger wrote: "Robert Morein" wrote in message I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. All kinds of mountebanks have done this over the ages. First he attempted to explain that the "cream...works by quantum mechanics", which is actually not an explanation. He now makes the same fallacious association with respect to "morphic fields." Your problem Robert is demonstrating the practical problems with these ludicrous so-called tweaks without resorting to the much-hated bias-controlled listening tests. Geez, never mind bias-controlled tests, the egomaniac has never even done SIGHTED listening tests on any of these tweaks, to gain any empirical evidence of them whatsoever. And he's about as much an expert on morphogenetic fields as you are, Arny. |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Alients Have Hijacked Robert Morein's Brain & Replaced It With An Eggplant!
wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein notes that he is a deluded egomaniac: wrote in message ups.com... Robert Morein, the Pope of RAO, polishes up his strawman and attempts to refute his own fallacious arguments about claims that were never made: I'm a bit concerned about Graham's hijacking of physics. Robert Morein's egomaniacal pseudo-scientific strawman arguments snipped Richard Graham's rant snipped Inability to respond to the challenge, noted. Robert Morein's delusional rant snipped Richard, you are evasive. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blahEggplant!
|
#13
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
Walt, doing his impression of Count Blah, kooked out another fabulous
kook rant: wrote: Inability to respond to the question, noted. Inability to recognize fiction from reality, and Richard Graham from soundhaspriority, also noted. Inability to remain sane and rational without the use of psychotropic drugs, also noted. Inability to remain sane and rational without the use of psychotropic drugs, also noted. Inability to blah from spewing a blah blah noted. Really, Blah, how much blah did you blah over the blah checking blah every blah blah to blah if blah had blah blah you? How many blah did you blah blah blah multi page blah blah in blah ? There is a blah line between blah -blah and being a blah oneself. The blah is blah when you can't blah away. And you can't. You're blah ; you can't blah . Talk to you in a few blah , maybe a few blah blah. Meanwhile, I'll go blah blah discussing blah , and otherwise enjoying a blah called "a blah ". If you had one of those blah might not be so easily blah. ///Walt Blah. Q. What the hell are you blabbering about?? |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.arts.movies.production,alt.acting,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
Robert Morein forgot his medication again and fell into another
delusional fit: wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. Richard, let's get back to the question. You constantly claim that "quantum mechanics" is responsible for your tweaks, yet quantum mechanics is nothing more than an axiomatic system. I don't hear you claiming that plane geometry is responsible, yet all that cutting and snipping makes it all the more relevant. If I were like you, I would say something preemptorily judgemental. Please address my challenge in an informative fashion. Who's "Richard"? |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
wrote in message oups.com... Walt, doing his impression of Count Blah, kooked out another fabulous kook rant: wrote: Inability to respond to the question, noted. Inability to recognize fiction from reality, and Richard Graham from soundhaspriority, also noted. Inability to remain sane and rational without the use of psychotropic drugs, also noted. Inability to remain sane and rational without the use of psychotropic drugs, also noted. Inability to blah from spewing a blah blah noted. Really, Blah, how much blah did you blah over the blah checking blah every blah blah to blah if blah had blah blah you? How many blah did you blah blah blah multi page blah blah in blah ? There is a blah line between blah -blah and being a blah oneself. The blah is blah when you can't blah away. And you can't. You're blah ; you can't blah . Talk to you in a few blah , maybe a few blah blah. Meanwhile, I'll go blah blah discussing blah , and otherwise enjoying a blah called "a blah ". If you had one of those blah might not be so easily blah. ///Walt Blah. Q. What the hell are you blabbering about?? You. |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein forgot his medication again and fell into another delusional fit: wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. Richard, let's get back to the question. You constantly claim that "quantum mechanics" is responsible for your tweaks, yet quantum mechanics is nothing more than an axiomatic system. I don't hear you claiming that plane geometry is responsible, yet all that cutting and snipping makes it all the more relevant. If I were like you, I would say something preemptorily judgemental. Please address my challenge in an informative fashion. Who's "Richard"? Get back to the question, Richard. It's not about your own identity. |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.arts.movies.production,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
Robert Morein, in the throes of another manic depression, very much
unhappy, deluded and insecure, wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein forgot his medication again and fell into another delusional fit: wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. Richard, let's get back to the question. You constantly claim that "quantum mechanics" is responsible for your tweaks, yet quantum mechanics is nothing more than an axiomatic system. I don't hear you claiming that plane geometry is responsible, yet all that cutting and snipping makes it all the more relevant. If I were like you, I would say something preemptorily judgemental. Please address my challenge in an informative fashion. Who's "Richard"? Get back to the question, Richard. It's not about your own identity. Who's "Richard"? |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein, in the throes of another manic depression, very much unhappy, deluded and insecure, wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein forgot his medication again and fell into another delusional fit: wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. Richard, let's get back to the question. You constantly claim that "quantum mechanics" is responsible for your tweaks, yet quantum mechanics is nothing more than an axiomatic system. I don't hear you claiming that plane geometry is responsible, yet all that cutting and snipping makes it all the more relevant. If I were like you, I would say something preemptorily judgemental. Please address my challenge in an informative fashion. Who's "Richard"? Get back to the question, Richard. It's not about your own identity. Who's "Richard"? You don't want to talk about the "theory" of the tweaks, do you, Richard? |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
Robert Morein wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein, in the throes of another manic depression, very much unhappy, deluded and insecure, wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein forgot his medication again and fell into another delusional fit: wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. Richard, let's get back to the question. You constantly claim that "quantum mechanics" is responsible for your tweaks, yet quantum mechanics is nothing more than an axiomatic system. I don't hear you claiming that plane geometry is responsible, yet all that cutting and snipping makes it all the more relevant. If I were like you, I would say something preemptorily judgemental. Please address my challenge in an informative fashion. Who's "Richard"? Get back to the question, Richard. It's not about your own identity. Who's "Richard"? You don't want to talk about the "theory" of the tweaks, do you, Richard? Oh yes, sure I do. But who's "Richard"? For that matter, who do you think you are? "Robert Morein" or me? You post under both names, you know that. |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
From:
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 2:16 pm Email: Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein Prays To The IEEE For HELP Against The Tweaker Sinners!
wrote in message ups.com... Robert Morein wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein, in the throes of another manic depression, very much unhappy, deluded and insecure, wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Robert Morein forgot his medication again and fell into another delusional fit: wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: Ignorance might be more like it. You would know a lot about ignorance Arny, wouldn't you? Much of your tiny blinkered understanding of audio and the world is based on that fact. Richard, let's get back to the question. You constantly claim that "quantum mechanics" is responsible for your tweaks, yet quantum mechanics is nothing more than an axiomatic system. I don't hear you claiming that plane geometry is responsible, yet all that cutting and snipping makes it all the more relevant. If I were like you, I would say something preemptorily judgemental. Please address my challenge in an informative fashion. Who's "Richard"? Get back to the question, Richard. It's not about your own identity. Who's "Richard"? You don't want to talk about the "theory" of the tweaks, do you, Richard? Oh yes, sure I do. But who's "Richard"? For that matter, who do you think you are? "Robert Morein" or me? You post under both names, you know that. We're joined at the hip, bro. |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
On 10 Apr 2006 14:59:31 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: From: Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 2:16 pm Email: Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. Is that what he does at work? |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
From: paul packer
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:11 pm Email: (paul packer) Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. Is that what he does at work? Who knows? Maybe he has an autoresponder that just throws out random drivel. You know, kind of like if you give a million monkeys typewriters... |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ups.com... From: paul packer Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:11 pm Email: (paul packer) Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. Is that what he does at work? Who knows? Maybe he has an autoresponder that just throws out random drivel. You know, kind of like if you give a million monkeys typewriters... Beware. I cannot control my evil twin. |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
soundhaspriority wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ups.com... From: paul packer Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:11 pm Email: (paul packer) Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. Is that what he does at work? Who knows? Maybe he has an autoresponder that just throws out random drivel. You know, kind of like if you give a million monkeys typewriters... Beware. I cannot control my evil twin. Twins, clones, cloned twins? Morphagenetics run amok I say. |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
wrote in message oups.com... soundhaspriority wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ups.com... From: paul packer Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:11 pm Email: (paul packer) Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. Is that what he does at work? Who knows? Maybe he has an autoresponder that just throws out random drivel. You know, kind of like if you give a million monkeys typewriters... Beware. I cannot control my evil twin. Twins, clones, cloned twins? Morphagenetics run amok I say. You sniff the plan. My evil twin will deal with you. |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
soundhaspriority wrote: wrote in message oups.com... soundhaspriority wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ups.com... From: paul packer Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:11 pm Email: (paul packer) Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. Is that what he does at work? Who knows? Maybe he has an autoresponder that just throws out random drivel. You know, kind of like if you give a million monkeys typewriters... Beware. I cannot control my evil twin. Twins, clones, cloned twins? Morphagenetics run amok I say. You sniff the plan. My evil twin will deal with you. Westpase-he_ac is out of the office. Please forward messages to Omicron Persie 8 Regional Headquarters. All messages will be handled in the order they are received. |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
blah blah Aliens blah blah Robert Morein's Brain blah blah blah Eggplant!
wrote in message ups.com... soundhaspriority wrote: wrote in message oups.com... soundhaspriority wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ups.com... From: paul packer Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:11 pm Email: (paul packer) Q. What the hell am I blabbering about?? Good question, SHP. If you don't know, how are we supposed to? I thought you had to go back to work and ****. Is that what he does at work? Who knows? Maybe he has an autoresponder that just throws out random drivel. You know, kind of like if you give a million monkeys typewriters... Beware. I cannot control my evil twin. Twins, clones, cloned twins? Morphagenetics run amok I say. You sniff the plan. My evil twin will deal with you. Westpase-he_ac is out of the office. Please forward messages to Omicron Persie 8 Regional Headquarters. All messages will be handled in the order they are received. Bro, warm up the particle accelerator backpacks. This is a job for MIB (Men in Bull****). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The evil of richard graham. RICHARD GRAHAM - EVIL | Audio Opinions | |||
The Deceptive Logic of Robert Moron (and RAO). | Audio Opinions | |||
The Richard Graham Paradox | Audio Opinions | |||
Inquiry re "Soundhaspriority" | Audio Opinions | |||
Att: Richard Graham re McCarty forgery | Audio Opinions |