chung wrote in message ...
Harry Lavo wrote:



Isn't it interesting that we "subjectivists" here are always whipsawed by
the "objectivists" for thinking that extended frequency response is a
benefit "because it can't be heard". Then, in defense of DVD-A, the
increased noise in the ultrasonic range is bandied about as making DSD/SACD
"inferior".


Actually it's interesting that subjectivists said that they need the
ultrasonic bandwidth to fully perceive music, and yet they like SACD's
despite the much higher (by orders of magnitude) ultrasonic noise
inherent in the SACD format.


I often see ultrasonic noise mentioned as a problem for SACD players.
If ultrasonic noise were really a problem, it could be easily
eliminated with a small, active lowpass filter.

Why wouldn't the manfactures of "high end" SACD players, just filter
it out?

Bob Stanton