Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Blind Joni wrote: Who would Jesus wanna kill? Who would He murder for oil? You dare to call yourself a Christian? You're in it just for the spoil. Wait a minute..what spoil am I missing out on? It's in the trailer park. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
play-on wrote: Now you think it's the terrorists who are causing the economy to go into the toilet? Got any better jokes? Steven Eagle I'm glad to see you signing your name. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
play-on wrote:
(WillStG) wrote: You think letting terrorists destroy the American economy is the more moral path? Now you think it's the terrorists who are causing the economy to go into the toilet? WalMart is a terrorist organization? Got any better jokes? Economy's bad because the terrists are drinkin' a lot of the koolaid and we don't have enough. -- ha |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
play-on playonATcomcast.net
And you have no capacity to acknowledge that Bush made some grain mistakes. All you can do is go into your lame-o attack mode. There are mistakes in every war and Intelligence is not a perfect science. But as Christopher Hitchens points out, the President has a good record on non-proliferation. For while we overestimated what WMD Saddam had (which he foolishly *wanted* us to), we *underestimated* what Ghadafi had, and what Ghandafi has given up is a very advanced Nuclear Weapon Program. Taking that down and the Pakistani AQ Khan network network which was spreading Nuclear tech is a signifigant success, and a result of the American policy of doing a full court press in the War on Terror. I'm sure you could not disagree more. Will Miho NY Music & TV Audio Guy Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News "The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
WillStG wrote:
Chaney's daughter Film at eleben. -- ha |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
"WillStG" wrote in message ... "Glenn Dowdy" You didn't answer my question. Do you believe that every member of that panel had access to every single bit of information that the POTUS had? On every subject? Glenn, the UN, The French, Tony Blair, all of the European nations beleived the exact same thing because Saddam was telling his inner council that he had WMD stockpiles ready to go. That wasn't the question. Do you believe that the Senate Intelligence Committee, or anyone for that matter, has access to the same level of intel that the POTUS gets on his desk? Yes or no. Glenn D. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
hank alrich wrote: You ought to spend some time on the street in Bahgdad and get back to us with your firsthand reports. There's a good use of "four more years". |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Don Cooper wrote:
hank alrich wrote: You ought to spend some time on the street in Bahgdad and get back to us with your firsthand reports. There's a good use of "four more years". Saw a bumprsticker saying "Four More Wars". -- ha |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
"WillStG" wrote in message ... "Glenn Dowdy" That wasn't the question. Do you believe that the Senate Intelligence Committee, or anyone for that matter, has access to the same level of intel that the POTUS gets on his desk? Yes or no. The same level and same essential content, yes. While I appreciate the response, Will, I'd have to disagree. I don't believe there's any way that the Senate members get the same level of intel. Something about the efficacy of a secret being directly related to the number of people who know it. Glenn D. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
"WillStG" wrote in message ... In any event I still do not believe the polls one bit, and think that Bush will win 36 States. But we shall see. And then boths sides can quit trash-talking and transition into gloating/whinging. Glenn D. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
play-on wrote: And them Vietnam Vets Against The War had a bunch of bull**** supposed testimony from bull**** fake veterans they used as a bull**** means to promote their bull**** anti War position And that McCain had a black baby. He's a bit crazy, you know. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
I realize that wasn't yours, Al, Richard, etc. : )
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Nmm wrote: Maybe you could do a compilation of the form letters that they send out to say "your son is dead" With pics of Dubya at the funerals. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Don Cooper wrote: Nmm wrote: Maybe you could do a compilation of the form letters that they send out to say "your son is dead" With pics of Dubya at the funerals. ROTFLMFAO Good one GW actually acknowledging the kids he personally sent to thier graves not in this f*cking life time George |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Good comment. I've seen some recent ads. The tone of this election
campaign is absolutely appalling. Many ads consist entirely of negative comments about the opponent. Without a doubt, both sides will admit that negative campaigning is bad, and both sides will claim they only do it because their opponents do it. I wonder what would happen if a candidate started out his campaign pledging that he will not use negative ads no matter what his opponent does. We all applaud... but if polls show he is losing, his advisers, his party, his campaign staff will urge him to go negative, because it works. It can only work if voters don't "punish" people like that at the polls. It would be helpful if the media would be less complicit as well. Blind Joni wrote: It doesn't help to demonize one side or the other...and that is basically what I see lately. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Van Dyk wrote: I wonder what would happen if a candidate started out his campaign pledging that he will not use negative ads no matter what his opponent does. We all applaud... but if polls show he is losing, his advisers, his party, his campaign staff will urge him to go negative, because it works. The problem is, we didn't all applaud. Some believed the negative ads. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
"WillStG" wrote in message ... "Glenn Dowdy" And then boths sides can quit trash-talking and transition into gloating/whinging. Well that's why Baseball is important. Sportmanship, and learning to win or lose with grace is one of those things you learn as a kid (hopefully) and is worth remembering. Hmmm. It doesn't seem to be part of professional sports. Glenn D. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Just in case some of you have not seen this yet.
facts concerning the last Presidential election: Population of counties won by: Gore=127 million Bush=143 million Square miles of land won by: Gore=580,000 Bush=22,427,000 States won by: Gore=19 Bush=29 Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Gore=13.2 Bush=2.1 Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off government welfare..." Olson believes the U.S. is now somewhere between the "apathy" and "complacency" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy; with some 40 percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Population of counties won by:
Gore=127 million Bush=143 million BRBR I don't know what that means, since Gore won the popular vote. -R |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
tom wrote: Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off government welfare..." This is some of the lamest crap I have seen yet. Tell you what, sport, don't stop there. Lets figure out who got the highest percentage of educated areas, highest density of PHD's. How about the largest base for stock markets, corporate headquarters, and economy stength in general. Go ahead and break it down by county. The lopsidedness against your silly argument would be ridiculous. Oh, and the arts, museums, theater, concerts halls. hahahaha. The numbers for Gore would make your head spin. Sure you want to go there? Square miles of land won by: Gore=580,000 Bush=22,427,000 And Alaska's 656,425 suare miles all want to Bush, and it's 648,818 population too. And the point is? |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
tom wrote:
Just in case some of you have not seen this yet. Saw it some time ago, here http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp facts concerning the last Presidential election: Population of counties won by: Gore=127 million Bush=143 million Square miles of land won by: Gore=580,000 Bush=22,427,000 The above appear to be true. Everything else is fiction. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
(Mike Powell)
Kurt Albershardt wrote in message ... Population of counties won by: Gore=127 million Bush=143 million Square miles of land won by: Gore=580,000 Bush=22,427,000 The above appear to be true. Everything else is fiction. Actually, only the "population of counties won" numbers are close to correct. There are only about 3.5 million sq. miles of land area in the United States. The Bush number is too high by about a factor of ten. This is just one of those well-known Republican "exxxaaaguurrashuns." The correct Bush total is about 2.4 million sq. miles. Alaska isn't included in these numbers, though. In case anyone's interested, here's an updated version of the snopes.com piece discussing this Internet hoax... While we are at it, here's a link to the factcheck.org article debunking the Democrat's ad accusing Vice President Cheney regarding Halliburton; "Kerry Ad Falsely Accuses Cheney on Halliburton". http://www.factcheck.org/article261.html Main points, Dems claimed as VP Cheney received $2 Million from Halliburton and that's false. Dems implied stock prices would affect his income - untrue. While it is true he received $400k while VP it was "deferred compensation", that is money he already earned and payouts are fixed by contract. The biggest point in the article, The Vice President and Lynn Cheney signed over all the Stock options proceeds they own in the company to 3 charities including the University of Nebraska - and at today's rate that's a donation to charity of over *8 Million dollars*. So banging on the Halliburton drum is not only a bunch of BS, it overlooks a truly generous act by the Vice President and his wife, who chose to remain silent about their good deed rather than defend themselves publically by mentioning the donations in the debates. Will Miho NY Music & TV Audio Guy Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News "The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I love This Website | Audio Opinions | |||
Some OT but really funny stuff... | Pro Audio | |||
For Mike McKelvy, Bush tougher on terrorism than Clinton | Audio Opinions | |||
Bad News For Sandman And The Irrelevant Left | Audio Opinions | |||
A compendium of international news articles | Audio Opinions |