Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Linux is free...Nobody is using Linux...Why?
So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good?
Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Johann Frick wrote:
So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... Reporting is wrong. 3/4ths of the earth's population uses Linux. The 1/4 that you read; doesn't tell you the truth. Because Bill has to sell those Stock Options before the MSFT market CRASHES. -- W '04 : Open |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Johann Frick wrote:
So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... It is an uncontrolled(able) mess of volunteer developers (geeks) who write things the way they like them (looking geeky). Due to its open source nature and the slight variations it is difficult to ensure that everything will work smoothly for everyone. If you do not posses detailed technical skills, and why should you, you will often run into problems you will be unable to resolve. I personally do not think that linux deserves half the stars and sprkles its been getting lately, it is a feeble attempt to imitate a truly great OS. Remember Linux is not UNIX. Today Unix and Linux run the world behind the scenes, sure nearly all the desktop PCs are Windows based, but they wouldnt be far if it isnt for the infrastructure and development in technology provided by Unix bades Computers. If you are looking for a free alternative to Linux I would suggest and of the BSD branch of UNIX (not Linux, there is a difference). They have a more conservative approach on development, support the same graphical environments as Linux are FULLY POSIX compliant and have support for easily executing linux binaries, and most Linux software developers offer native BSD versions. I personally am surprised at how little awareness there is for BSD, my personal choice is FreeBSD. I have encountered very few people who have been dissapointed by it, perhaps its lesser popularity does not have every second moron trying it for a day and then bash how crappy it is in a Windows newsgroup (as is the case wiht Linux). Perhaps the one indicator that a Unix environment is a viable desktop solution is Apple's MacOS X, which is in reality FreeBSD wiht apple's proprietary interface (and some other technologies). My point is that most OS X users do not need to use the console at all (If they are even aware it exits), The interface is beautifully user-task centered, and the features indicate the technological marvels i have come to expect from Apple. However in contrast wiht their engineering, Apple's marketing department are imbaculs.... I am yet to determine why on earth they never developed an x86 verison of their OS, they could have killed DOS, they could have killed Windows 3.1, 95, 98, Me, not sure about 2000 (at that point apple was a little behind), and could easily destroy Windows XP. Linux runs on Macs as well.... see if you Find anyone who is idiot enough to replace their MacOS wiht anything else... The problem is that it is unavailable to the majority of the market since Apple wants to sell their PCs (quite costly too) not the OS. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
India, which is approx 20% of the world's population is going 100% Linux.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Johann Frick" wrote in message
m... So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... Enjoy this situation while it last. It won't last long. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Johann Frick wrote:
snip Something is wrong here..... You are right, flatfish, something is wrong here Lets see: Flatfish poting as someone else Posting through google IP a link in Egypt, where you find: Microsoft Ip is an open proxy Yes, something is wrong here -- Warning: You have moved the mouse. Windows will reboot now to make the change permanent |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You might want to clarify your post. It sounds like you're trying to imply
that every single person in India has a computer and that computer is running Linux or will be shortly. -- Rob Windsor [MVP-VB] G6 Consulting Toronto, Canada "Martik" wrote in message news:cNioc.1318$0e6.917@clgrps13... India, which is approx 20% of the world's population is going 100% Linux. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Johann Frick wrote:
So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? A lot of people is using Linux now a days. Linux has been traditionally employed as a server system (web or file server, fiwewall and proxy duties etc). Ref. http://news.netcraft.com/archives/we...er_survey.html Most of them run Apache on Linux or BSD unix. Now Linux is conquering to the desktop market ! *Schools* in Norway are migrating from Windows to Linux.. Microsoft Windows was too costly and difficult to manage. Windows platforms had constantly severe crashes and many security and virus/worm incidents ! So moving to Linux was the only viable choice. Ref. http://www.skolelinux.no/index.php.en Linux is free? Yes it is, if you WANT. You can even participate in development if you CAN ? Migrate to Linux you too. Download it from http://www.linuxiso.org http://www.futuredesktop.org/how2burn.html#mirrors - OpenOfffice is free? Yes ? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Between 5 - 7 % of desktops and over 50 % of web servers run Linux. // moma http://www.futuredesktop.org :: newbie links at the top. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On 11 May 2004 21:08:32 -0700 in alt.os.linux,
Johann Frick spake unto us, saying: So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Corporations tend to standardize on commercial products, and home users are driven by preloads and the ability to buy software in stores. Linux is not as strong as Windows in that area. Linux is free? It can be (if you're talking about price). OpenOfffice is free? Again, it can be. So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? 1 percent of 500 million is 5 million users. Not bad for something which doesn't have a cohesive marketing department. Something is wrong here..... I'd say so. You've been flippantly dismissing a 5-million-strong customer base. :-) -- -Rich Steiner --- http://www.visi.com/~rsteiner --- Eden Prairie, MN OS/2 + eCS + Linux + Win95 + DOS + PC/GEOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven! Applications analyst/designer/developer (14 yrs) seeking employment. See web site above for resume/CV and background. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Martik wrote: India, which is approx 20% of the world's population is going 100% Linux. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! and this is funny because....? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Keyser Soze wrote: "Kadaitcha Man" wrote in message news:2cyVF4fXDdaiBCB5BEF91435EB8E4HNNH1GsXQLh@kada itcha.cx Richard Steiner wrote: On 11 May 2004 21:08:32 -0700 in alt.os.linux, Johann Frick spake unto us, saying: So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Corporations tend to standardize on commercial products, and home users are driven by preloads and the ability to buy software in stores. Linux is not as strong as Windows in that area. Linux is free? It can be (if you're talking about price). OpenOfffice is free? Again, it can be. So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? 1 percent of 500 million is 5 million users. Not bad for something which doesn't have a cohesive marketing department. Something is wrong here..... I'd say so. You've been flippantly dismissing a 5-million-strong customer base. :-) And just what is wrong wth dissing 5 million ****wits? You can cut that down by a third, most lusers have three test machines. notice he said users, not machines. - -- Fred Emmott -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAoghDima0zti2BQgRAq6DAKCcX8/Q1jRrk6dL1Pegc/Wndvk/7gCghMYg OaLWOuesvC3P+bJbXBn+Tr0= =Lq7s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Quizzical" wrote in message m... "Johann Frick" wrote in message m... So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... Enjoy this situation while it last. It won't last long. Down to 0% pretty soon, yes. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Johann Frick wrote: So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux Audio is maturing and is almost plug-and-play, but it's not quite there yet. ALSA and Jack have laid the foundation for some truly impressive audio applications (e.g., Ardour, Lilypond and others). The 2.6 kernel includes ALSA support so almost all common Linux distributions now (or will soon) offer plug-and-play audio. We developed an ALSA driver for our PDAudio-CF and will soon publish an account our experiences. -- Len Moskowitz PDAudio, Binaural Mics, Cables, DPA, M-Audio Core Sound http://www.stealthmicrophones.com Teaneck, New Jersey USA http://www.core-sound.com Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Len Moskowitz wrote:
Johann Frick wrote: So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux Audio is maturing and is almost plug-and-play, but it's not quite there yet. That's true for all things linux. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Richard Steiner wrote: I'd say so. You've been flippantly dismissing a 5-million-strong customer base. :-) And just what is wrong wth dissing 5 million ****wits? It's off topic for rec.audio.pro for one thing. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark W" s@o wrote in message ... "Quizzical" wrote in message m... "Johann Frick" wrote in message m... So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... Enjoy this situation while it last. It won't last long. Down to 0% pretty soon, yes. Oh I don't know I have three copies of linux that I've bought or downloaded sitting in a draw. So I'm probably counted three times as a linux user, maybe more. Jim M |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
G wrote:
Diogenes wrote: You're a typical linux****. Your a typical misinformed win****... There's no such thing... do you mean linux****? Linux makes you stupid. Linux sets you free! I guess you mean free from work since you can't be productive and use linux. All linux users (lusers) are gay. So what if they are? whats your problem? Lusers are also referred to as linuxfags... for obvious (see above) reasons. Just stick to windows pal, its where you belong! Hit a nerve, huh. Yes, it's hard for you to admit those things, but they are all true and have been proved over and over. Google for them. You're a typical linux****. Linux makes you stupid. All linux users (lusers) are gay. HTH & HAND -- Diogenes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
JBM wrote:
Oh I don't know I have three copies of linux that I've bought or downloaded sitting in a draw. So I'm probably counted three times as a linux user, maybe more. They don't estimate usage numbers from downloads, dumbo. -- Take your giant, abusive corporation and shove it! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Johann Frick wrote:
So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... There isn't much being spent on marketing it. Joe User thinks he has to buy MS Office, because he probably doesn't even know openoffice exists. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Water is all but free at workplaces, or in public places (drinking
fountains, etc.) but yuppies are willing to spend $1/bottle of Evian (Naive spelled backwards). Packet radio and shortwave is free, but people are willing to spend $40/month for a cellphone. You bet something is wrong. There's probably a large number of people willing to buy bottled sunlight if it was marketed correctly and someone had a monopoly on it. Johann Frick wrote: So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Stephen J. Rush wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2004 12:55:01 +0100, Mark W wrote: Enjoy this situation while it last. It won't last long. Down to 0% pretty soon, yes. What, is Bill gonna buy the Supreme Court and have Linux declared contraband? Good idea. And, I like the idea of a death penalty for linux users (lusers). -- Diogenes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Quizzical" wrote in message . com... JBM wrote: Oh I don't know I have three copies of linux that I've bought or downloaded sitting in a draw. So I'm probably counted three times as a linux user, maybe more. They don't estimate usage numbers from downloads, dumbo. -- Take your giant, abusive corporation and shove it! I know, estimating too hard for the typical luser, so they just make up a number. Jim M |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Keyser Soze wrote:
"Diogenes" wrote in message s.com Stephen J. Rush wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004 12:55:01 +0100, Mark W wrote: Enjoy this situation while it last. It won't last long. Down to 0% pretty soon, yes. What, is Bill gonna buy the Supreme Court and have Linux declared contraband? Good idea. And, I like the idea of a death penalty for linux users (lusers). Ey, ey Capt'n! Well, they /ARE/ terrorists! -- Diogenes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
JBM wrote:
I know, estimating too hard for the typical luser, so they just make up a number. First you say Linux users are all technogeeks and geniuses. Now you say they are unable to estimate things. When will you (and people like you) make up your minds, Dim Jim? -- Take your giant, abusive corporation and shove it! |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Keyser Soze wrote:
"Glen" wrote in message Babblings of a paedophile moron snipped Oh look, nothing left. Oh look, its back again! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- You failed math, didn't you. Probably most everything else too. You're a typical linux****. Your a typical misinformed win****... Linux makes you stupid. Linux sets you free! All linux users (lusers) are gay. So what if they are? whats your problem? Just stick to windows pal, its where you belong! -- People in killfile: New Scotland Yard, Relic, Keyser Soze, Lord Gazwad of Grantham, ur_droll, Daeron, Kadaitcha Man, Diogenes, Kushma Pergrouhi. .. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
G wrote:
Diogenes wrote: G wrote: Diogenes wrote: You're a typical linux****. Your a typical misinformed win****... There's no such thing... do you mean linux****? there's no such thing... do you mean win****? No second prizes, or chances. -- Diogenes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Diogenes wrote:
G wrote: Diogenes wrote: You're a typical linux****. Your a typical misinformed win****... There's no such thing... do you mean linux****? there's no such thing... do you mean win****? Linux makes you stupid. Linux sets you free! I guess you mean free from work since you can't be productive and use linux. Free from lock-ins, force feed media plyers, force feed Browser! All linux users (lusers) are gay. So what if they are? whats your problem? Lusers are also referred to as linuxfags... for obvious (see above) reasons. by whom? Just stick to windows pal, its where you belong! Hit a nerve, huh. Yes, it's hard for you to admit those things, but they are all true and have been proved over and over. Google for them. lol, like i give a **** what you think, if you don't like linux dont use it, stay with windows, where you belong! You're a typical linux****. Your a typical misinformed win****... Linux makes you stupid. Linux Sets you free All linux users (lusers) are gay. Just stick to windows pal, its where you belong! HTH & HAND |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Keyser Soze shared these words of wisdom: "Fred Emmott" wrote in message -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Keyser Soze wrote: "Kadaitcha Man" wrote in message news:2cyVF4fXDdaiBCB5BEF91435EB8E4HNNH1GsXQLh@kada itcha.cx Richard Steiner wrote: On 11 May 2004 21:08:32 -0700 in alt.os.linux, Johann Frick spake unto us, saying: So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Corporations tend to standardize on commercial products, and home users are driven by preloads and the ability to buy software in stores. Linux is not as strong as Windows in that area. Linux is free? It can be (if you're talking about price). OpenOfffice is free? Again, it can be. So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? 1 percent of 500 million is 5 million users. Not bad for something which doesn't have a cohesive marketing department. Something is wrong here..... I'd say so. You've been flippantly dismissing a 5-million-strong customer base. :-) And just what is wrong wth dissing 5 million ****wits? You can cut that down by a third, most lusers have three test machines. notice he said users, not machines. Maybe, but that's not what he meant. It is well known that the figures portraying, for example "X-strong customer base" is in direct relation to the number of machines with lunix, but where you are correct is that the figure of lusers is then further reduced, significantly minimising the number of ****wits. You're a lunix luser from rec.audio.pro aren't you? No, but i am a linux user, and a musician (in case you think i was merely correcting your spelling/grammar, i am not subscribed to rec.audio.pro, have never read any posts to their apart from cross-posts to linux groups and i have never posted there). BTW - why lunix? are the i and the u keys swapped on your keyboard or something? "lusers" is also not a word - all it is is a command for showing the amount of people currently connected to an IRC server. "X-strong customer base" *obviously* is indicating the number of customers - this is mainly derived from number of box sets sold and download statistics, as any survey would be biased, depending on the audience. Therefore, the *real* number of "lusers" (sic) is likely to be much higher - - disks are copied, and given to friends freely. - -- Fred Emmott -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAolP0ima0zti2BQgRAvtUAJ4xuq0WT3B6hqiYZ6F/G1DCs0ssYwCeOe5r aoKM0ophF5CoFItHmtzHsXA= =slYN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Keyser Soze shared these words of wisdom: "G" wrote in message snip You're still struggling to master the simple task of poasting. Give it another go, dimbulb. You're still struggling to master the simple task of spelling, and using words that actually exist. - -- Fred Emmott -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAolR5ima0zti2BQgRAnKRAKCUR6BXqt8EP+ObGAJVkk LBHwK5GwCfWOKz cXt4bg9BdwTLSJv2erhswBc= =xWuz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Diogenes shared these words of wisdom: [snip] All linux users (lusers) are gay. [snip] Lusers are also referred to as linuxfags... for obvious (see above) reasons. [snip] All linux users (lusers) are gay. Outside of usenet/IRC, I haven't heard anyone over the age of 11 use homosexuality as an insult. - -- Fred Emmott -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAolT4ima0zti2BQgRAm2xAKCJo6/pOxsqxjS1YJzQz/myKz1gNQCfRsky dKadH0BFFmoz+CBHmAeajJk= =6uRp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Paul Bramscher shared these words of wisdom: [snip] There's probably a large number of people willing to buy bottled sunlight if it was marketed correctly and someone had a monopoly on it. [snip] Ever heard of "Natural Light" light bulbs? - -- Fred Emmott -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAolXsima0zti2BQgRAuBQAJ4kQgUpjUAiOfc6Jb07TS zfw17ECQCfckEg pGyKt784TtRfwB0H6d1u8bI= =owkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Fred Emmott wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Diogenes shared these words of wisdom: [snip] All linux users (lusers) are gay. [snip] Lusers are also referred to as linuxfags... for obvious (see above) reasons. [snip] All linux users (lusers) are gay. *Outside of usenet/IRC* , I haven't heard anyone over the age of 11 use homosexuality as an insult. So, you don't even know where you are... linux makes you stupid, and gay. -- Diogenes |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Keyser Soze wrote: "Diogenes" wrote in message s.com Stephen J. Rush wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004 12:55:01 +0100, Mark W wrote: Enjoy this situation while it last. It won't last long. Down to 0% pretty soon, yes. What, is Bill gonna buy the Supreme Court and have Linux declared contraband? Good idea. And, I like the idea of a death penalty for linux users (lusers). Ey, ey Capt'n! And I like to be put to death by none other than Karpet Muncher. Right up the ol' choclate whizway. It'll feel so good as I good down to meet that red guy with the pitch fork. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 - -Cryogenic-© shared these words of wisdom: [snip] You're still struggling to master the simple task of spelling, and using words that actually exist. Such as, you ****flap? Where? The GPG signature is not meant to be English *duh*. I don't see any words in the post your post referred to which are spelt incorrectly, or don't exist (UK english). - -- Fred Emmott -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAolyaima0zti2BQgRAkPsAKCDNqxT0AVNfsD0/RZlOeNm4hNoTQCgkwJh GVbxA1j0AgHaJegThQNCp/E= =ayib -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
-Cryogenic-© wrote:
"Fred Emmott" wrote in message Check your firewall. -- Too bad you can't buy a voodoo globe so that you could make the earth spin real fast and freak everybody out. Gee, I hope Fred's not smart enough to figure out the headers! I am so smart! S-M-R-T!!!!! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
-Cryogenic-© shared these words of wisdom:
Check your firewall. [snip] Are you referring to my firewall, or to the firewall of my ISP? If you are referring to the firewall of 194.238.50.13 - that is my internal IP - the IP address that can be used to access my computer from the internet is on a different subnet. -- Fred Emmott |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Diogenes wrote:
G wrote: Diogenes wrote: G wrote: Diogenes wrote: You're a typical linux****. Your a typical misinformed win****... There's no such thing... do you mean linux****? there's no such thing... do you mean win****? No second prizes, or chances. ahhhh, shame |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 12 May 2004 14:02:07 +0000, Diogenes wrote:
Len Moskowitz wrote: Johann Frick wrote: So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux Audio is maturing and is almost plug-and-play, but it's not quite there yet. That's true for all things linux. No, it's not. It's true for *some* things Linux. But all things? No more so than saying it's true for other "mature" OSes such as Mac OSX or WinXP. -- Jeffrey D. Silverman | jeffrey AT jhu DOT edu Website | http://www.wse.jhu.edu/newtnotes/ |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Quizzical" wrote in message . com... JBM wrote: I know, estimating too hard for the typical luser, so they just make up a number. First you say Linux users are all technogeeks and geniuses. Now you say they are unable to estimate things. When will you (and people like you) make up your minds, Dim Jim? -- Take your giant, abusive corporation and shove it! When did I say any linux users were technogeeks and geniuses? Jim M |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
(Johann Frick) wrote in message om...
So why is virtually nobody using Linux if it is so damm good? Linux is free? OpenOfffice is free? So why is Linux's market share still less than 1 percent? Something is wrong here..... Which survey are you using? What were the criteria for counting? How were the "Other" catagories scored? For example - the Google Zeitgeist survey http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html This is a survey which counted browser identifying their operating systems as declared by the browser. Windows versions including Windows 9x, XP, 2000, and NT were of course properly identified because Microsoft requires this in their contracts. Even if you use Netscape or Mozilla, you must identify your box as Windows along with the correct version. The same is true of Mac, which also uses contracts to make sure they are properly identified. Linux browsers however, can be compiled to run under any flavor of UNIX, or any flavor of Linux.. The default is for the browser to identify the operating system as UNIX or UNIX/X11. This means you really need to treat the "Other" catagory as Linux - which puts Linux at roughly 5% according to the Zeitgeist survey. But keep in mind that this count is also a bit inflated, since AOL and MSN who cater almost exclusively to Windows users, use publicly exposed DHCP addresses, which are assigned round robin as users dial in. There are roughly 16 million IP addresses, most of which are hidden behind Network Address Translation (NAT) firewalls, nearly 90% of the PUBLIC TCP/IP addresses are assigned to AOL and MSN. By simply cycling through all of the available addresses - a single machine could be counted 30 times simply because the dial-up user dialed in every day and got a new DHCP address. On the flip side Linux users usually use "Linux Friendly" ISPs, which generally means that they connect to the web via a NAT firewall. This means that hundreds of Linux users in a particular area code could appear as a single IP address. Let's go back to those Windows machine for a minute, shall we? Windows 9x applications can be run under WINE - especially with DLL enhancements such as crossover, Lindows, and of course WINE implementations running licensed versions of Windows 98 DLLs. In addition, Linux browsers such as Konquerer can "Spoof" - pretend to be IE on Windows in order to prevent rejection by sites that check the signature and refuse to talk to you unless you are running Windows and IE (shouldn't such checks be considered illegal under the DOJ ruling?). So now we have to reexamin the Windows 98 numbers. Is that really 22% Windows 98, or is it 5% Linux and 17% Windows 9x? There is a way to find out how many of which are which. Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google all have the ability to place and track persistent cookies, and have very detailed breakdowns on operating system "Signatures". Often, there are subtle variations in the Windows signatures that show that a Windows machine is really a Linux machine. Finally, are you sure there isn't a Linux box in there somewhere? Keep in mind that it's quite easy these days to have the full capabilities of Linux yet access the machine remotely via VNC or X-Terminals. In addition, it's quite easy to use VNC to access a Windows workstation. Finally, many people have multiple systems, multiple virtual machines within a single machine (using VMWare, Bochs, or Connectix, or Microsoft's Virtual machine). And finally, you can run Linux apps on Windows using cygwin. When you start to look into those numbers, you suddenly begin to realize that Linux is a much bigger competitor - especiall for control of the Application Programmer Interfaces (API) used to create new applications. Many newer applications are being implemented under Cygwin with a proprietary GUI or a GUI written in Java, Python, or TCL. This eliminates royalties and nondisclosure agreements to Microsoft, enables multiple platform support including support for Solaris, AIX, SCO Unix, Linux, and numerous flavors of BSD UNIX. This as opposed to .NET and MSDN APIs which require numerous NDAs, royalty payments on shipped products, and a market limited exclusively to the newest version of Windows. The real problem is that those who have accurate information aren't talking, and those who are publishing - especially for free, don't really have accurate information. Given the various factors above, Linux could have anywhere from 5% to 25% of the client platform market share, when measuring all MACHINES in use by end-users (as opposed to servers). Linux has the opportunity to punch through a big hole created by Microsoft as well. With Longhorn being delayed, possibly another 2 years, and IT departments making new buying decisions now, most IT buyers are at least looking to make sure that new machines are "Linux Compatible". This may include doing a standard installation of Linux on the machine to make sure that it installs correctly with all of the drivers being available. Many companies who are using Linux clients, either as primary or secondary client environments, are finding that they have better security, better control over system configuration, and better resistance to viruses and other "mischief". Many companies are now using Linux servers as "clients", similar to the old "NetStation" concept proposed by Sun's Java organization several years ago. Users install a VNC client on their Windows machine, and access Linux server "Client environments" via a high speed network. Since Linux can support multiple users of this type concurrently, it's fairly cost-effective to run a few of these "On Demand" desktop servers, rather than put Linux machines on every desktop to the exclusion of Windows. Linux has shown itself to have outstanding security (no successful attacks on Linux workstations or on the core Linux server systems). Most of the securyt leaks that have been announced are theoretical, and have never been successfully exploited. The handful of successful attacks typically only effect systems which have been deliberately reconfigured - making them more vulnerable in spite warnings to avoid such modifications (set /etc/rhosts to *). Linux has had 64 bit capability since the mid 1990s, and the AMD chip is certainly ready to run Linux. OEMs who want to move to 64 bit computing will be faced with the risks of waiting 2+ years for LongHorn, or a potentially explosive market in 64 bit Linux machines. At this point OEMs are looking at each other, and watching the "White Box" market very carefully, hoping to enter with 64 bit Linux at the first sign of a breakthrough shift in the market. At this point, "White Boxes" usually configured to run Linux, now represent the largest segment of the market, more than any other single OEM. Also, the prices on XP boxes are dropping, with no end in sight. The faster processors buy you very little since Windows XP is still very disk intensive. The Linux box has the potential to capture the hearts of those looking for some heavy power, especially those who do not reboot their machines every day. Finally, Cygwin may be the "worm that ate windows". It's becoming very popular, especially among those who want to stay competitent in the *nix environment, but don't want to give up their Windows systems and applications. It's also becoming essential for things like SSH (OpenSSH), as well as quick and dirty ad-hoc solutions typical of PERL, AWK, and SED. Cygwin has also become a very popular prototyping tool for those wanting to write applications eventually headed to Linux or UNIX, especially AIX, Solaris, or HP_UX, all of whom have addopted Linux API, Tools, and applications compatibility. You might not see "Linux" being broadcast by the browser, but these days nearly everyone has at least one, sometimes 2-3 Linux boxes in their home/office. Those cable modems and DSL modems - run Linux. Those recording boxes like TIVO, run Linux. The WiFi hub runs Linux. Your cell phone, digital camera, and even your car, may be running Linux. You didn't know or care, because you just needed that simple web interface to get everything configured. But you also noticed that once you got it configured, you didn't have to think about it much after that. Let's go back to that mythical user again shall we? It's quite likely that about 87% use Windows in some form or another (including WINE). But it's also quite likely that about 70% are using Linux in some form or another - - and don't even know it. Of course, when you consider the entire computing experience, everything a user does from surfing the web, to printing the document he wrote on Word, 100% of all users use UNIX/Linux at for at least 1/2 the work they accomplish. Rex Ballard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
O.T. Grocery clerks strike | Audio Opinions | |||
Free PS Audio Power Port | Marketplace | |||
FS: 3000 watt amp $179!! 900 watt woofers $36!! new- free shipping | General |