Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Sean B Sean B is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Hello,

Do different types of (let's narrow it down to small-signal devices) BJTs sound significantly different in anyone's experience, in various types of audio circuits? They all have that exponential relationship between base-emitter voltage and collector current. I'm wondering what could account for differences in sound, assuming those differences exist.

I recently built a BJT emitter follower with a another BJT as a current source feeding it, and even though it measures very well (junk down about 105 dB from the fundamental test tone) it added a noticeable brightness to audio passing through it. It just confounds me that this could be audible.



Thanks,

Sean B
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Don Pearce[_3_] Don Pearce[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,417
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 23:37:27 -0700 (PDT), Sean B
wrote:

Hello,

Do different types of (let's narrow it down to small-signal devices) BJTs sound significantly different in anyone's experience, in various types of audio circuits? They all have that exponential relationship between base-emitter voltage and collector current. I'm wondering what could account for differences in sound, assuming those differences exist.

I recently built a BJT emitter follower with a another BJT as a current source feeding it, and even though it measures very well (junk down about 105 dB from the fundamental test tone) it added a noticeable brightness to audio passing through it. It just confounds me that this could be audible.



Thanks,

Sean B


Much more likely (if there genuinely is a brightening, which I somehow
doubt), that the reduced output impedance is flattening the top end of
a subsequent capacitive load - maybe the result of some cable.

I'd suggest you make an objective frequency response measurement to
see if there actually is an effect.

Your figure of junk at -105dB surprises me somewhat. Emitter followers
are just not that linear - the internal emitter resistance is roughly
26/Ic(mA) so a signal is always modulating the output voltage,
resulting in even + odd order harmonics.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Sean B wrote:
Do different types of (let's narrow it down to small-signal devices) BJTs s=
ound significantly different in anyone's experience, in various types of au=
dio circuits? They all have that exponential relationship between base-emi=
tter voltage and collector current. I'm wondering what could account for d=
ifferences in sound, assuming those differences exist.


Yes, nonlinearities differ between transistors, but if you look at the plots
most of the real differences are at low levels. So much of the secret is in
setting the bias up high enough so that you're never working down there.

The rest of the secret is in negative feedback, which can totally eliminate
part to part differences if you're careful enough.

I recently built a BJT emitter follower with a another BJT as a current sou=
rce feeding it, and even though it measures very well (junk down about 105 =
dB from the fundamental test tone) it added a noticeable brightness to audi=
o passing through it. It just confounds me that this could be audible.


1. Likely you have second harmonic distortion at low levels. Measure it
and see.

2. Likely the distortion is much worse at low levels than at maximum level
and you may have measured it at maximum level (because that's what people
do).

3. It's possible that the lower output impedance affected whatever you were
driving, also, and it's not the circuit causing the difference but the
interface.

A simple follower has 100% feedback and should have very very low distortion
as you note. So start changing things. Replace that current source with a
resistor. Change the source impedance using a shunt resistor. Pull the
transistor out and stick a TIP50 in (a personal favorite trick since a TIP50
has just awful linearity).
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Don Pearce[_3_] Don Pearce[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,417
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On 14 Oct 2017 09:54:25 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 08:27:00 -0400,
(Scott Dorsey) wrote:

A simple follower has 100% feedback and should have very very low distortion
as you note. So start changing things. Replace that current source with a
resistor. Change the source impedance using a shunt resistor. Pull the
transistor out and stick a TIP50 in (a personal favorite trick since a TIP50
has just awful linearity).


A simple follower does have 100% feedback, but unfortunately not from
the right point. The current-dependent emitter resistance fall outside
the loop, in series with the output, so it will add distortion which
gets worse as the load resistance decreases. It is this resistance
that prevents emitter followers from achieving unity gain - they are
always a bit below.


Yes, this is true. And you can reduce the emitter resistance to make
it better into a lower load impedance, but then you can't swing as much
voltage on the output.

But, if this is the issue, you can tell because the distortion character
will change with the load impedance. You can see it on a scope and you
can hear it change as you add shunt resistances to your load.
--scott


Yep. More current makes this better. But better yet is some gain in
front and an external feedback loop that comes from the emitter pin.
Op-amp anybody?

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
[email protected] jjaj1998@netscape.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 331
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 10:33:23 AM UTC-4, Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 09:54:25 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 08:27:00 -0400,
(Scott Dorsey) wrote:

A simple follower has 100% feedback and should have very very low distortion
as you note. So start changing things. Replace that current source with a
resistor. Change the source impedance using a shunt resistor. Pull the
transistor out and stick a TIP50 in (a personal favorite trick since a TIP50
has just awful linearity).

A simple follower does have 100% feedback, but unfortunately not from
the right point. The current-dependent emitter resistance fall outside
the loop, in series with the output, so it will add distortion which
gets worse as the load resistance decreases. It is this resistance
that prevents emitter followers from achieving unity gain - they are
always a bit below.


Yes, this is true. And you can reduce the emitter resistance to make
it better into a lower load impedance, but then you can't swing as much
voltage on the output.

But, if this is the issue, you can tell because the distortion character
will change with the load impedance. You can see it on a scope and you
can hear it change as you add shunt resistances to your load.
--scott


Yep. More current makes this better. But better yet is some gain in
front and an external feedback loop that comes from the emitter pin.
Op-amp anybody?


The phono cartridge preamp I made used (2) Op-Amps per channel, via Walter Jung's design. Even published in (defunct) High Fidelity Magazine. Impressive.

Jack


d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Sean B Sean B is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Thanks for the ideas!

The follower was biased at 9mA, driving about 7 volts peak-to-peak into a lightish 4.7k load. I'm measuring with an m-audio sound card which has second harmonic about 120 dB down at an output around 3V rms @ 1 kHz (sine).

One other thing I wonder about: a lot of components made today have iron in their lead wires, can this cause noticeable distortion compared to all copper?

S
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Sean B wrote:
Thanks for the ideas!

The follower was biased at 9mA, driving about 7 volts peak-to-peak into a lightish 4.7k load. I'm measuring with an m-audio sound card which has second harmonic about 120 dB down at an output around 3V rms @ 1 kHz (sine).


Do you really trust that card that much? I might, if I'd measured it with
accurate enough references, but I wouldn't until I'd done that.

One other thing I wonder about: a lot of components made today have iron in their lead wires, can this cause noticeable distortion compared to all copper?


It can cause measurable distortion if there is considerable change in current
with respect to time. This is an issue for things like power amplifier stages.
There is some discussion of it and some examples with measurements in Doug
Self's book. I am inclined to think this is mostly not an issue but you can
get yourself into situations where it might be.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On 15/10/2017 6:50 AM, wrote:


The phono cartridge preamp I made used (2) Op-Amps per channel, via Walter Jung's design. Even published in (defunct) High Fidelity Magazine. Impressive.

Jack


The 741 Cookbook ? Yum.

geopff
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Sean B wrote:

----------------


I recently built a BJT emitter follower with a another BJT as a current source feeding it, and even though it measures very well (junk down about 105 dB from the fundamental test tone) it added a noticeable brightness to audio passing through it. It just confounds me that this could be audible.



** You post explains nothing.

How about a proper description of what the set up is and how you came to your conclusion.



...... Phil



  #15   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
gray_wolf gray_wolf is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 38
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On 10/14/2017 6:50 PM, geoff wrote:
On 15/10/2017 6:50 AM, wrote:


The phono cartridge preamp I made used (2) Op-Amps per channel, via Walter
Jung's design. Even published in (defunct) High Fidelity Magazine. Impressive.

Jack


The 741 Cookbook ?Â* Yum.

geopff


Jung's work was later than the 741. I was using the LF365 and such in some my
projects back then.



  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Sean B wrote:

---------------
One other thing I wonder about: a lot of components made today have
iron in their lead wires, can this cause noticeable distortion compared
to all copper?



** So you are an audiophool and a looney - right ?

Plenty of forums exist that cater for people with your mental disability.

Not here though.


..... Phil

  #18   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 17:11:10 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 09:54:25 -0400,
(Scott Dorsey) wrote:

But, if this is the issue, you can tell because the distortion character
will change with the load impedance. You can see it on a scope and you
can hear it change as you add shunt resistances to your load.

Yep. More current makes this better. But better yet is some gain in
front and an external feedback loop that comes from the emitter pin.
Op-amp anybody?


No need to go that far, the simple Ring of Three circuit family can be found
in all sorts of applications like that. Gain is cheap in the solid state
world, so it's frequently to your advantage to trade it for linearity.


Not go that far? One op-amp is far easier - and cheaper - than a ring
of three transistors.


The minimal op-amp is at least four transistors, maybe five if you want
decent output current drive. Two for the differential input, one for the
intermediate gain stage, then one (or two if you want to make it push-pull)
for the output stage. Add a couple constant current sources, a compensated
reference on the output pair, and the number of components climbs pretty fast.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Don Pearce[_3_] Don Pearce[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,417
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On 14 Oct 2017 23:47:58 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 17:11:10 -0400,
(Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 09:54:25 -0400,
(Scott Dorsey) wrote:

But, if this is the issue, you can tell because the distortion character
will change with the load impedance. You can see it on a scope and you
can hear it change as you add shunt resistances to your load.

Yep. More current makes this better. But better yet is some gain in
front and an external feedback loop that comes from the emitter pin.
Op-amp anybody?

No need to go that far, the simple Ring of Three circuit family can be found
in all sorts of applications like that. Gain is cheap in the solid state
world, so it's frequently to your advantage to trade it for linearity.


Not go that far? One op-amp is far easier - and cheaper - than a ring
of three transistors.


The minimal op-amp is at least four transistors, maybe five if you want
decent output current drive. Two for the differential input, one for the
intermediate gain stage, then one (or two if you want to make it push-pull)
for the output stage. Add a couple constant current sources, a compensated
reference on the output pair, and the number of components climbs pretty fast.
--scott


Unless you use an integrated op amp. 5532 is probably my favourite
do-everything op amp. The count becomes one op amp and two resistors.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

  #25   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Don Pearce[_3_] Don Pearce[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,417
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:48:52 +0100, John Williamson
wrote:

On 15/10/2017 08:40, Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 23:47:58 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:


The minimal op-amp is at least four transistors, maybe five if you want
decent output current drive. Two for the differential input, one for the
intermediate gain stage, then one (or two if you want to make it push-pull)
for the output stage. Add a couple constant current sources, a compensated
reference on the output pair, and the number of components climbs pretty fast.
--scott


Unless you use an integrated op amp. 5532 is probably my favourite
do-everything op amp. The count becomes one op amp and two resistors.

I think that Scott is making the point that inside the black box of the
op amp IC, there are many, many active components, all of which have a
potential effect on noise and linearity.


I know that - but in terms of effort and cost I need to expend to use
it, the op amp wins. And it is the complexity of the op amp that makes
it work so much better than discrete transistors. Almost everywhere
the normal circuit puts a resistor, the op amp has a current source.
That and a hundred other refinements that only come from an unlimited
component count make the op amp work better than the discrete circuit.

It is only really in ultimately low noise circuits like a mic preamp
that I will add several discrete transistors at the input. They will
be reasonably high power transistors (for low internal resistances),
with several placed in parallel until the combined voltage and current
noise hits a minimum at the source impedance of the microphone.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



  #26   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

John Williamson wrote:
On 15/10/2017 08:40, Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 23:47:58 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:


The minimal op-amp is at least four transistors, maybe five if you want
decent output current drive. Two for the differential input, one for the
intermediate gain stage, then one (or two if you want to make it push-pull)
for the output stage. Add a couple constant current sources, a compensated
reference on the output pair, and the number of components climbs pretty fast.


Unless you use an integrated op amp. 5532 is probably my favourite
do-everything op amp. The count becomes one op amp and two resistors.

I think that Scott is making the point that inside the black box of the
op amp IC, there are many, many active components, all of which have a
potential effect on noise and linearity.


Yes, and the bad news is that the designers are severely constrained in the
components they can use and don't get much thermal isolation between them.
On the other hand they also get great matching and great thermal coupling
between them.

On the third hand, they're designed by Jim Williams and Bob Pease who
likely have put a lot of very smart work into them so you don't have to.
On the fourth hand sometimes they are designed by people who aren't as
smart as they needed to be but the datasheet was written by marketing people
who were smarter, such as in the case of some recent "audiophile" monolithic
op-amps.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #27   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Don Pearce[_3_] Don Pearce[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,417
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

On 15 Oct 2017 08:20:46 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

John Williamson wrote:
On 15/10/2017 08:40, Don Pearce wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017 23:47:58 -0400,
(Scott Dorsey) wrote:

The minimal op-amp is at least four transistors, maybe five if you want
decent output current drive. Two for the differential input, one for the
intermediate gain stage, then one (or two if you want to make it push-pull)
for the output stage. Add a couple constant current sources, a compensated
reference on the output pair, and the number of components climbs pretty fast.

Unless you use an integrated op amp. 5532 is probably my favourite
do-everything op amp. The count becomes one op amp and two resistors.

I think that Scott is making the point that inside the black box of the
op amp IC, there are many, many active components, all of which have a
potential effect on noise and linearity.


Yes, and the bad news is that the designers are severely constrained in the
components they can use and don't get much thermal isolation between them.
On the other hand they also get great matching and great thermal coupling
between them.

On the third hand, they're designed by Jim Williams and Bob Pease who
likely have put a lot of very smart work into them so you don't have to.
On the fourth hand sometimes they are designed by people who aren't as
smart as they needed to be but the datasheet was written by marketing people
who were smarter, such as in the case of some recent "audiophile" monolithic
op-amps.
--scott


I met Bob Pease years ago. A bottomless well of knowledge about
op-amps and all the gotchas you have to be aware of. Shame he's gone.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

  #28   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Don Pearce wrote:

I met Bob Pease years ago. A bottomless well of knowledge about
op-amps and all the gotchas you have to be aware of. Shame he's gone.


He's gone, but he left the 5532 behind, and you can take advantage of
a lot of that knowledge that he put into it. He is missed, but he will
never truly be gone until people stop using his designs.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #29   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
PStamler PStamler is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 882
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Don wrote:

"Unless you use an integrated op amp. 5532 is probably my favourite do-everything op amp. The count becomes one op amp and two resistors. "

If you want maximum performance and stability from the 5532, you'll probably need a bit more than two resistors, though not a *lot* more. An additional 100R resistor in series with the output helps keep the circuit isolated from capacitative loads; rolling off the response at about 100kHz by putting a capacitor in parallel with the feedback resistor also helps stability, and decoupling the opamp's power pins with stacked film or NP0 capacitors is usually necessary for stability if you use more than one package on a board. It may be necessary to add some electrolytic caps at the input and output for coupling; the 5532 is a remarkably good opsmp for audio, but its DC performance is often not so good.

The component count can still be pretty low (say three resistors, three small caps and maybe two or three electrolytics -- maybe also electrolytics on the supply rails). That's a lot fewer parts than a discrete circuit.

And yes, you can make a quite-good phono pramp from the two halves of a 5532. Put an RIAA circuit in (either passive or active) and Bob's your uncle. Make the RIAA switchable if you want the option of flat playback (some scratch-reduction software, including iZotope's Rx, works better on flat transfers; if you have Adobe Audition you can add the RIAA compensation easily in software after descratching.)

Peace,
Paul
  #31   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Scott Dorsey wrote:
--------------------



I met Bob Pease years ago. A bottomless well of knowledge about
op-amps and all the gotchas you have to be aware of. Shame he's gone.



He's gone, but he left the 5532 behind,



** Don't think Bob Pease was the designer.

The original single op-amp version was the TDA1034 by Philips, soon badged the NE5534 after they acquired Signetics in 1975. The NE5532 is a the dual version.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid...ns-5534-a.html

OTOH Bob Pease first started work at National Semiconductor in 1976, having left Teledyne Philbrick.



..... Phil




  #35   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

gray_wolf wrote:

ca 1972 RCA had a thick film hybrid HC2000 that was rated at 100 Watt out=
put=20
into 4 Ohm load. My parts rep got me a couple of engineering samples to p=
lay=20
with. Neat idea but wasn't quite what I needed.


Does that count? I'd call that the precursor to the STK modules, but not
really an IC since it's not monolithic.

The first monolithic I remember was the CA3020, also from RCA around then, but
I wouldn't be surprised if there were some before it.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."


  #36   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sound Of Bipolar Junction Transistors

Phil Allison wrote:
The original single op-amp version was the TDA1034 by Philips, soon badged the NE5534 after they acquired Signetics in 1975. The NE5532 is a the dual version.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid...ns-5534-a.html

OTOH Bob Pease first started work at National Semiconductor in 1976, having left Teledyne Philbrick.


You're right! All these years I've been thinking of the 5532 as being
originally an NS design.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bipolar Transistors for Audio George M. Middius Vacuum Tubes 12 February 8th 08 12:08 AM
Bipolar Transistors for Audio George M. Middius Vacuum Tubes 0 February 7th 08 11:26 PM
BBC - Spaghetti Junction Conor Car Audio 0 December 25th 07 11:46 PM
BiPolar vs. MOSFET Designs? Seadweller High End Audio 6 May 31st 05 04:11 AM
Bipolar Caps Jack Pro Audio 121 December 11th 04 03:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"