[Bret L]

View From Lodi, CA Pittsburgh, PA: Obama Lies About Jobs; Will The
Democrats Pay For His Deceits In 2010?

By Joe Guzzardi

"The question that I wish I knew the answer to is what course the nation would be on if Democratic Senator John Kerry had beaten George W. Bush in 2004?

Had Kerry won, then in 2008 he would most likely have been reelected
since sitting presidents always are.

With Kerry as president, Barack Obama would have remained in the U.S.
Senate, relatively unknown nationwide.

Instead of a left of middle Democrat like Kerry, America has Obama, a
wild spending socialist who deceitfully but also successfully
campaigned on the promise to generate more jobs for a nation in
desperate need of them.

As recently as January 9, then President-elect Obama upped his
projection for new jobs from the 3 million he promised during the heat
of his barnstorming to 4 million.

Said Obama: "The jobs we create will be in businesses large and small
across a wide range of industries. They'll be the kind of jobs that
don't just put people to work in the short term, but position our
economy to lead the world in the long-term."

How wrong can one person be?

In a frightening but fascinating analysis of the economy, U.S. News
and World Report listed nine reasons why the nation’s financial
condition is more grave than its 9.5 percent unemployment rate
indicates. [Nine Reasons the Economy Is Not Getting Better, by
Mortimer Zuckerman, U.S. News and World Report, July 9 2009]

Among the most compelling reasons are the least discussed.

For example, the number of workers taking part-time jobs because of
the slack economy, a stealth underemployment, has doubled to about 9
million, or 5.8 percent of the workforce. Add those whose hours have
been cut to those who cannot find a full-time job, and the total of
unemployed and underemployed rises to 16.5 percent, putting the number
of involuntarily idle workers close to an overwhelming 25 million.

Another grim take on what the job market might look like when the
economic recovery begins, U.S. News projected that many unemployed
workers looking for jobs will discover that the "good" jobs like the
ones they lost will be impossible to find.

Layoffs during this deep recession will be permanent, not temporary.

Instead of merely shrinking operations, companies have closed whole
business units or instituted sweeping internal changes.

Automobile manufacturers have shut down dealerships, eliminated model
lines while financial giants like Citi Group and Bank of America cut
tens of thousands of jobs that it will never again fill.

U.S. News concludes that by 2010 America could face an small upswing
of new low paying jobs while at the same time facing a higher
joblessness level at the high end. Job losses may last well into 2010
bringing the unemployment rate to 11 percent.

What’s interesting is to compare Obama’s evaluation of his job-
delivery promise versus the cold, hard facts generated by the Bureau
of Labor Statistics.

On April 30, Obama said: "We have already saved or created 150,000
jobs."

In June, however, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its latest
data showing that 2.2 million jobs have been lost since Obama took
office.

Translated that means that Obama erred by a staggering 5 million jobs—
the three million he promised added to the two million lost.

Adding to what should be Obama’s considerable embarrassment is the
recent confession by his two top economic advisors that the stimulus
bill allowed for "considerable uncertainty"

Again reading between the lines, I interpret that to mean that Obama
and his Democratic Congress authorized and spent more than $800
billion with no clear plan for how that money would help unemployed
Americans.

How much Obama’s failed economic strategy will hurt the Democrats in
2010 remains to be seen. A poll released earlier this week indicated a
16 percent increase among Americans who are "dissatisfied" with his
job performance. [Polls Can Affect a President’s Hold on Party, by
Susan Page, USA Today, July 20 2009]

Assuming Obama slides further in the polls, the Democrats are in for a
rough ride."

http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/090724_vfl.htm

[Trevor Wilson]

"Bret L" wrote in message
...
View From Lodi, CA Pittsburgh, PA: Obama Lies About Jobs; Will The
Democrats Pay For His Deceits In 2010?


**You are a gutless worm, Brett. I am still wiating for you to respond to my
previous postsd which prove that your nonsense about glaciers should be
retracted. Be a man and admit your lies now.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[Bret L]

On Jul 27, 1:09*pm, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:
"Bret L" wrote in message

...
View From Lodi, CA Pittsburgh, PA: Obama Lies About Jobs; Will The
Democrats Pay For His Deceits In 2010?

**You are a gutless worm, Brett. I am still wiating for you to respond to my
previous postsd which prove that your nonsense about glaciers should be
retracted. Be a man and admit your lies now.

I am not a professional meteorologist or climatologist and can not
speak with authority on this subject. I am convinced that AGW is
almost certainly horse****, however, out of postjudice: the people who
promote AGW anre all socialist, big government ****s. Since
everything they used to promote turned out to be false, why listen to
them now? I won't.

[Trevor Wilson]

"Bret L" wrote in message
...
On Jul 27, 1:09 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:
"Bret L" wrote in message

...
View From Lodi, CA Pittsburgh, PA: Obama Lies About Jobs; Will The
Democrats Pay For His Deceits In 2010?

**You are a gutless worm, Brett. I am still wiating for you to respond to
my
previous postsd which prove that your nonsense about glaciers should be
retracted. Be a man and admit your lies now.

I am not a professional meteorologist or climatologist and can not
speak with authority on this subject.

**Then admit you are a moron and that you have zero clue on the matter. One
does not need to be a professional climatologist to understand these things.
All one requires is a reasonable education and the ability to understand
statistics and science. Clealry, your education has ill-prepared you for
such things. I suggest you keep your stupidity to yourself in future and
allow those of us with a decent education and respectable intellect to
reflect on these things.


I am convinced that AGW is
almost certainly horse****,

**Then provide your proof.

however, out of postjudice: the people who
promote AGW anre all socialist, big government ****s.

**Well, no. The people who state the AGW is occuring are scientists. People
who actually understand the workings of this planet's climate.

Since
everything they used to promote turned out to be false, why listen to
them now? I won't.

**Typical ignorant ****. I accept that you are ignorant. Why do you then not
accept what those who have far more intellect than you, tell us?
Climatologists study the climate. They tell us that the climate is changing
(warming) and that excessive CO2 emissions are the culprit. Further: We have
hard evidence of many such warming events over the last 600,000 years. ALL
(every, single one) was associated with high CO2 levels.



--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au