Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
MM versus MC
Hi all
What is the diference between MM and MC phono cartrdige from the preamp pont of view ? Thanks ec |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
MM versus MC
MM cartridge has a higher inductance than a MC ( appox. 600mH compared to 15mH ).Also
when designing a tube phono preamp the miller capacitance takes a major role in dictating the high frequency response as the XL changes in the phono cartridge across frequencies. "ec" wrote: Hi all What is the diference between MM and MC phono cartrdige from the preamp pont of view ? Thanks ec |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
MM versus MC
On Feb 26, 3:46 pm, "ec" wrote:
Hi all What is the diference between MM and MC phono cartrdige from the preamp pont of view ? Thanks ec MM = Moving Magnet: Output is in millevolts and it will require a phono-pre-amp stage ahead of the standard line-level pre-amp. The stylus is attached to a magnet that vibrates between two (if stereo) coils causing AC current by induction. Naturally, the magnet is of (relatively) high mass in order to generate sufficient current. Relative to what? Read on: MC = Moving Coil: Output is in microvolts, and requires (misnomered) a "head amp" (active) or specialized transformer (passive) to match that Phono pre-amp noted above also ahead of the standard line-level pre- amp. The coil (2 if stereo) moves within a large(er) magnet causing induced currents within the coils. Because the coils are so tiny, current is much less _and_ the coils are also hard-wired. With these cartridges, stylus replacement cannot be done by the user as the entirety is a single assembly. And, the coils are of much less mass than the magnets in the MM cartridge, so greater compliance is possible... not always achieved. There are advantages to both, but the typical MC cartridge requires additional hardware, is not user-friendly (stylus replacement), is mechanically more sensitive to damage or accident and so forth. As far as the records are concerned, there is no significant difference, as tracking forces are, all things being equal, about the same given the designs. Had I not tripped over a life-time supply of Ortophon MC cartridges and their various head-amp options years ago, I would not have considered that option. Opinions differ. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
MM versus MC
ec wrote: Hi all What is the diference between MM and MC phono cartrdige from the preamp pont of view ? Thanks ec MC has low rated output, usually below 1mV, MM has high rated output usually above 2mV. This means that for a typical MC cart with say 0.4mV output you need more amplifier gain and a much better signal to noise ratio than for an MM cart. Patrick Turner. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
MM versus MC
John MM cartridge has a higher inductance than a MC ( appox. 600mH compared to 15mH ). ** Wanna try *15 uH * instead?? Equates to about 2 ohms reactance at 20 kHz. ........ Phil |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
MM versus MC
"ec" wrote in message ... Hi all What is the diference between MM and MC phono cartrdige from the preamp pont of view ? **In theory, nothing. In practice, things are USUALLY quite different. The reason being, of course, is that there have been high output MC carts and low output MM carts. These not the usual state of things, however. Other than all that, Peter Wieck has provided a reasonably comprehensive answer. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Diamond Cut DC6 versus Adobe Audition versus GoldWave | Tech | |||
Basic Gain Staging and +4 versus -10 | Pro Audio | |||
ARC SP-11 preamp versus SP-15 | Audio Opinions | |||
Behringer EP-1500 & 2500 versus QSC RMX controversy | Tech | |||
A comparative versus evaluative, double-blind vs. sighted control test | High End Audio |