"Pete Dimsman"




** There is a redundant "s" in the middle of your surname.






............ Phil

"mr c deckard"
"Phil Allison"

** Shame that most of it is utter bull**** - especially from Rivers
and Dorsey.


the thing is this:


** The thing is that YOU have no grasp of technology at all - so no idea
who is talking crap here and who is not.

The other thing is that you are " non compis mentis".



** The rudeness was all from the resident ****wits.

in our exchange i was nothing but polite


** You are never polite - you are just another know nothing, posturing
ass.




at any rate, i'm with you. wd-40 might work, (there's evidently
accounts of it working) but there's accounts of it not working,


** One only blatantly fake story.


but phil, and i'm being honest here


** You have not got the mental capacity for honesty.



whom am i to believe,


** By all means don't *believe* me. Instead, try a few drops of WD-40 in
a noisy pot or switch and see for yourself - if that is not too taxing for
your tiny brain.


Meanwhile keep up your subscriptions to all those fat chick porn sites.





............. Phil

Scott Dorsey
Phil Allison

It turns out I have a customer who actually had him do some work.
Phil owns a neighbourhood TV repair shop in Sydney, if it's the
same Phil.


** It aint.

that explains a lot of this.


** So you cannot read at all now ??

Your brain must be shrinking by the day - down to pea size soon.



HEy Phil, figured out any more about control of generators yet?


** Time for your ADHD medication - Richard.





........... Phil

"Michael R. Kesti" wrote in message ...

This is exactly what a troll (And make no mistake, Phil Allison is a
troll of the first order!) lives for. When given attention, regardless
of whether that attention is derogatory, he is rewarded and will continue
his attention-getting ways. The only way to deal with a troll is to
completely ignore him. I am absolutely certain that Phil would stop


the problem, michael, is that phil posts some rather challenging posts
(incidently, phil isn't the only one on this list who gets nasty when
challenged), which makes it difficult to simply dismiss him. after
trying to consider his points, only to have the thread devolve into
insult, yes, i am rather convinced he's a troll; but it wasn't
immediately apparent.

fwiw, i'm pretty much done with him (i join michael in urging others
to be as well), as he pretty much shot any credibility he could
possibly have.

cheers,
chris "trollkiller" deckard
saint louis mo

"mr c deckard" ...
"Michael R. Kesti"

This is exactly what a troll (And make no mistake, Phil Allison is a
troll of the first order!) lives for. When given attention, regardless
of whether that attention is derogatory, he is rewarded and will
continue
his attention-getting ways. The only way to deal with a troll is to
completely ignore him. I am absolutely certain that Phil would stop


the problem, michael, is that phil posts some rather challenging posts
(incidently, phil isn't the only one on this list who gets nasty when
challenged), which makes it difficult to simply dismiss him. after
trying to consider his points, only to have the thread devolve into
insult, yes, i am rather convinced he's a troll; but it wasn't
immediately apparent.

fwiw, i'm pretty much done with him (i join michael in urging others
to be as well), as he pretty much shot any credibility he could
possibly have.



** You are a congenital liar - Dickhard.





............. Phil

"mr c deckard" wrote in message
om

the problem, michael, is that phil posts some rather challenging posts
(incidently, phil isn't the only one on this list who gets nasty when
challenged), which makes it difficult to simply dismiss him. after
trying to consider his points, only to have the thread devolve into
insult, yes, i am rather convinced he's a troll; but it wasn't
immediately apparent.

I think Phil is just highly intolerant of facts and opinions that he doesn't
agree with. Some of his priorities are questionable, but many are just
fine.

That leads to behavior patterns that may be hard to distinguish from simple
trolling.

But Phil clearly knows lots of good stuff, which distinguishes him from a
simple troll.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
But Phil clearly knows lots of good stuff, which distinguishes him from a
simple troll.

The big problem is that Phil NEVER admits when he's wrong, so beware if you
can't tell the facts from the BS.

TonyP.

"TonyP"

"Arny Krueger"

But Phil clearly knows lots of good stuff, which distinguishes him from
a
simple troll.


The big problem is that Phil NEVER admits when he's wrong,


** So says a pseudo - technical, know nothing, self obsessed ****** who
cannot even publicly admit what his real name is - let alone figure who is
right and wrong on any matter.

TonyP, Trevor, roverT or whatever this pig ignorant fake calls himself is
a notorious usenet menace and a waste of space.


I bet he is even worse in real life.





............ Phil

"TonyP" wrote in message
u

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

But Phil clearly knows lots of good stuff, which distinguishes him
from a simple troll.

The big problem is that Phil NEVER admits when he's wrong, so beware
if you can't tell the facts from the BS.

I don't recall Phil admitting an error, or even a missed shading of meaning,
but that doesn't mean that somewhere, sometime... ;-)

I am probably more tolerant of Phil because I probably am able to separate
the noise from the signal better than the average bear. The problem I see is
that there is almost always so much smoke and fire that real meanings and
good lessons often get lost.

Every once in a while I pick up a gem from Phil's bulldozer runs.

However other than stylistic issues, Phil doesn't make a lot of mistakes.
OTOH, the people he discusses things with don't make nearly as many mistakes
has he seems to perceive. Nor are such mistakes as do occur in his
opponents, as important as Phil often seems to perceive them.

In sort, a lot more chill wouldn't hurt.

"Arny Krueger"

Every once in a while I pick up a gem from Phil's bulldozer runs.



** That is more a comment on your ability to perceive my "gems" than my
rate of posting them - Arny.


Note that my recent notoriety here has all derived from the controversy
aroused by my posting 6 *undeniable facts*.


1. The Vox AC30 guitar amplifier operates essentially in class A mode.

2. The *twisting* of the two wires in a balanced line is what eliminates
magnetically induced hum.

3. The CMRR of a pre-amp is *NOT* what eliminates RF interference.

4. That varying magnetic fields induce a voltage ( or emf ) in a wire loop.

5. That a squirt of WD-40 is a perfectly satisfactory treatment for noisy
pots and switches.

6. That a variable pattern mic has no proximity effect when switched to
omni.


As I remarked already - " rec.audio.pro " is yet another totally
corrupt newsgroup where posting technical facts is not tolerated by the self
appointed ruling elite ( aka Rivers and Dorsey ).

Newsgroups could be a valuable information resource - but, while ever
the vast majority of them are not moderated they are doomed to be ruled by
egomanics instead of folk with genuine expertise.




........... Phil

"Phil Allison" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger"

Every once in a while I pick up a gem from Phil's bulldozer runs.

** That is more a comment on your ability to perceive my "gems"
than my rate of posting them - Arny.

Actually, it is depends most on my patience for sifting a little signal out
of a lot of noise.

Note that my recent notoriety here has all derived from the
controversy aroused by my posting 6 *undeniable facts*.

1. The Vox AC30 guitar amplifier operates essentially in class A
mode.

I have no idea, but you would probably know, Phil.

2. The *twisting* of the two wires in a balanced line is what
eliminates magnetically induced hum.

Well, that and how the line is driven and terminated.

3. The CMRR of a pre-amp is *NOT* what eliminates RF interference.

I'd need more facts to decide. RFI can easily be common-mode. Modern SS
stuff can have significant CMRR at 100 KHz and above. I'd call that RF.

4. That varying magnetic fields induce a voltage ( or emf ) in a
wire loop.

In the end, that's what happens.

5. That a squirt of WD-40 is a perfectly satisfactory treatment for
noisy pots and switches.

I wouldn't know about the perfect part, and I see all these anecdotes about
pots being ruined with WD40. Sue me, I use regular electrical contact
cleaner. Not that I lack WD40. But I use it on cars and other robust
mechanical thingies.

6. That a variable pattern mic has no proximity effect when switched to
omni.

I don't have broad enough experience to generalize.

As I remarked already - " rec.audio.pro " is yet another totally
corrupt newsgroup where posting technical facts is not tolerated by
the self appointed ruling elite ( aka Rivers and Dorsey ).

I'll stick by my former comments Phil - neither Rivers nor Dorsey are the
total idiots you'd like to make them out to be. Both have posted many, many
helpful things. RAP is too large and too active of a forum to have a ruling
elite.

Newsgroups could be a valuable information resource -

Agreed.

but, while ever the vast majority of them are not moderated they are doomed
to
be ruled by egomaniacs instead of folk with genuine expertise.

Time seems to wound all heels. Even the ruling elite at RAO has largely
collapsed.

RAP would be a pretty neat place if the only concerns were the flames in
on-topic posts. However, the OT threads seem to be obliterating the on-topic
threads. I get on, read the on-topic stuff and more than half of the new
posts are unread. Any fool can bellyache endlessly about politics. It takes
an audio person to write an on-topic post on RAP.

"Arny Krueger"
"Phil Allison"

Every once in a while I pick up a gem from Phil's bulldozer runs.

** That is more a comment on your ability to perceive my "gems"
than my rate of posting them - Arny.

Actually, it is depends most on my patience for sifting a little signal
out
of a lot of noise.


** All you are doing with silly remarks like that is posting abuse -
Arny.

Any complaint that does not specify what it is about is simply - ** ABUSE
** !!



Note that my recent notoriety here has all derived from the
controversy aroused by my posting 6 *undeniable facts*.

1. The Vox AC30 guitar amplifier operates essentially in class A
mode.

I have no idea, but you would probably know, Phil.


** There was no need to post that insult.

Rivers ( who lays false claim to being an electronics engineer)
persistently and rudely tried to say the opposite without having the
faintest idea what he was on about.

But because he knew he ruled the roost here he knew his ignorance would
NEVER matter.



2. The *twisting* of the two wires in a balanced line is what
eliminates magnetically induced hum.

Well, that and how the line is driven and terminated.


** You must explain that mysterious remark to us all someday.



3. The CMRR of a pre-amp is *NOT* what eliminates RF interference.

I'd need more facts to decide. RFI can easily be common-mode. Modern SS
stuff can have significant CMRR at 100 KHz and above. I'd call that RF.


** You are way out of your depth - Arny.



4. That varying magnetic fields induce a voltage ( or emf ) in a
wire loop.

In the end, that's what happens.


** You must explain what the in-between part is to us all sometime.



5. That a squirt of WD-40 is a perfectly satisfactory treatment for
noisy pots and switches.

I wouldn't know about the perfect part,


** Don't pull words out of context so you can complain about them - Arny.

Only debating cheats do that.

And then use their ignorance as if it were information.



and I see all these anecdotes about pots being ruined with WD40.


** Go try it for yourself - it is hardly rational to believe weird
anecdotes.

What would all the hi-fi snake oil merchants say if they knew " Arny the
Sceptic " was prepared to believe anonymous anecdotes ???


Sue me, I use regular electrical contact cleaner.


** Whatever that is - you are most welcome to use it.

But you have no grounds to infer anything against WD-40 or those who use it
for the same purpose.



6. That a variable pattern mic has no proximity effect when switched
to
omni.

I don't have broad enough experience to generalize.


** If you do not know that a proposition is false - best say nothing.

You would not want to be guilty of pouring scorn on the truth now would you
???



As I remarked already - " rec.audio.pro " is yet another totally
corrupt newsgroup where posting technical facts is not tolerated by
the self appointed ruling elite ( aka Rivers and Dorsey ).


I'll stick by my former comments Phil - neither Rivers nor Dorsey are the
total idiots you'd like to make them out to be.


** There are a great number of posts here from both of them that contradict
that assertion.

But since you are operating in "emotional mode" at the moment, Arny, there
is nothing to debate.


Both have posted many, many helpful things. RAP is too large and too
active of a forum to have a ruling
elite.


** Oh but it does.

Rivers and Dorsey constantly act like they own the damn NG. Both
constantly use every debating cheat in the book to confound issues and avoid
facts.



Newsgroups could be a valuable information resource - but, while ever
the
vast majority of them are not moderated they are doomed to be ruled by
egomaniacs
instead of folk with genuine expertise.

Time seems to wound all heels. Even the ruling elite at RAO has largely
collapsed.


** " Meet the new boss - same as the old boss.... "

Your replies are rather low quality today - Arny.


RAP would be a pretty neat place if the only concerns were the flames in
on-topic posts.


** That is a very strange remark.


However, the OT threads seem to be obliterating the on-topic
threads.


** The OT threads are easily avoided. But the level of mindless flaming
that is going on in the on-topic threads is proof enough that this NG is
completely *stuffed* as an information resource.



It takes an audio person to write an on-topic post on RAP.


** However, it takes also a * cast iron hide * to *dare* to point out that
either of the the resident * EMPERORS* are wearing tatty clothes.





............ Phil

Phil Allison wrote:


As I remarked already - " rec.audio.pro " is yet another totally
corrupt newsgroup where posting technical facts is not tolerated by the self
appointed ruling elite ( aka Rivers and Dorsey ).


I haven't found one single post the supports your contention that Rivers
or Dorsey have appointed themselves the ruling elite. Please direct me
to a post that would support such a notion.

Arny Krueger wrote:


Any fool can bellyache endlessly about politics. It takes
an audio person to write an on-topic post on RAP.

Hypocrite. You have been doing plenty of political bellyaching yourself
lately, no?

Pete Dimsman wrote:

Man how it must suck to be you, Phil. Why don't you just slit your
wrists?

That requires self-control; he's safe.

--
ha

Phil Allison wrote:
"TonyP"

The big problem is that Phil NEVER admits when he's wrong,

** So says a pseudo - technical, know nothing, self obsessed ****** who
cannot even publicly admit what his real name is - let alone figure who is
right and wrong on any matter.

Well, I know who he is. But I don't know who you are. Who _are_ you?
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Phil Allison wrote:

Note that my recent notoriety here has all derived from the controversy
aroused by my posting 6 *undeniable facts*.

No, your recent notoriety here has to do with your posting these statements
in a screaming fashion and insulting everyone around you rather than actually
justifying them.

This is a group for discussion, not a group for incoherent personal attacks.
Just like the rest of the world, it isn't enough just to be correct.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


Any fool can bellyache endlessly about politics. It takes
an audio person to write an on-topic post on RAP.

Hypocrite. You have been doing plenty of political bellyaching
yourself lately, no?

Well Pete I gave you the chance to compare on-topic post counts with me, and
now I see why you are now putting up a smoke screen about it.

Pete, how dare you try to obfuscate the fact that you've made only 1 (one)
audio-related post here this month? How dare you try compare that to me by
means of deception? How dare you try to pervert the meaning of the word
hypocrite in this way?

fwiw, i'm pretty much done with him (i join michael in urging others
to be as well), as he pretty much shot any credibility he could
possibly have.



** You are a congenital liar - Dickhard.



did you really just say that? "dickhard"?!?!? lmao!

i'm afraid that's automatic checkmate.


better luck next time,
chris deckard
saint louis mo

Arny Krueger wrote:

Well Pete I gave you the chance to compare on-topic post counts with me, and
now I see why you are now putting up a smoke screen about it.

Pete, how dare you try to obfuscate the fact that you've made only 1 (one)
audio-related post here this month? How dare you try compare that to me by
means of deception? How dare you try to pervert the meaning of the word
hypocrite in this way?


No deception, moron. You would appear to be the king of obfuscation. We
weren't talking about me, we were talking about you. You were the one
going on about off topic political posting, not me. Then when I called
you on it, you claim it is ok for you because your great audio posts
(which is quite debatable in itself) outnumber your off topic political
dribble.

I didn't know it was a count on/off topic contest. Talk about smoke
screens.

In article writes:

The big problem is that Phil NEVER admits when he's wrong, so beware if you
can't tell the facts from the BS.

That's because you can never prove him wrong. Can anyone prove that
I'm really NOT an idiot? It's all just opinion.



--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1090492701k@trad...

In article
writes:
The big problem is that Phil NEVER admits when he's wrong, so beware if
you
can't tell the facts from the BS.
That's because you can never prove him wrong. Can anyone prove that
I'm really NOT an idiot? It's all just opinion.

You seem to have a mental age above 3 years old. That
should be proof enough:

id·i·ot (d-t)
n.
A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three
years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against
common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use
and is now considered offensive.

Sorry about the .gifs, happened in the paste...

Lines: 33
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-Info: Please forward a copy of all headers for proper handling
X-Trace: ofjmidbaofeaohdodbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbocl fehnijhffhhabemodoldmkocifcjbkldblnebolocjhmiemoph ifjekicemflbkijhhagfkjbgilpafdfpbnhffhfdlcmejodgdl ogbjcoaklo
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:01:26 EDT
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:01:26 GMT
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.pro:1086648


On 2004-07-06 said:
Oh, I forgot. You are Phil. You have spoken so whatever you say
must be true.
The real question that continues to come up is "how would YOU know".
You know, I have little signs up in my studio like "If you see
exposed wiring don't touch it" and "Idoicy rates right up there
with stupidity. If this applies to you, inform the management".
Funny thing is, I was apparently thinking of you and I didn't even
know it at the time..................................
Get out of my backyard dude. You have no clue and I can say that
because between all of us we've solved more problems in real life
situations that you have had situations by your talk. You want to
talk the talk, but you simply don't walk the walk.
Mike is unreproachable. Doesn't mean he's always right, but you'd
never know that would you?
I know this about Phil. THey must have moved the sheep again so he's
once again sexually frustrated. THat's what happens when you sepnd
all of your time in a little room and only have the sheep for company.
He's a prime example.

I've the utmost respect for MIke Rivers and I've never talked with the
man via telephone or met him in person, but I've learned a thing or
three from him over the years and that's more than I can say for
mister Phil.
sTill waiting for Phil's big lawsuit

Rotflmao!!!
plunk


Artificial Intelligence is no match for natural stupidity

Lines: 38
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-Info: Please forward a copy of all headers for proper handling
X-Trace: pcpocbcnbdmdhgfgdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbofo ejaiijhfbefmpjpeiphjjefhhdbmabnmgclbfhfcebcmholmee flhkkoahbjomkijhhagfkjbgilpahighinogeecfdiifckapai baobfmmfhn
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:43:22 EDT
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:43:22 GMT
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.pro:1090535


On 2004-07-19 (ThePaulThomas) said:
Clearly he won't shut up until his mental illness has been
cured or stronger medication is prescribed. Instead, why doesn't
everyone just ignore him and not reply to any of his posts?

Because some don't. THis guy's been like this for a few years now,
google alt.audio.pro.live-sound for proof of this.

HIs socialization stopped somewhere when he was about seven I'm
guessing. Wonder if his mother had any children that lived.

THe trouble is that in one of about nine hundred posts Phil actually
says something relevant which ads to a technical discussion. tHe rest
of the time ... you get the idea.
btw still waiting on being served with the papers on this supposed
lawsuit he threatened me with. rotflmao!!!

I see he did have to change service providers, or so it appears from
his header info these days. Hmmm wonder why that happened but then
again, not really.
Phil can turn a disagreement over technique or theory into a series of
low blows and stupidity, hurling insults at the party with whom he
disagrees via his keyboard knowing full well that usenet is almost an
anarchy in the first place. HOwever when it's turned back on him Phil
threatens lawsuits. IN so doing it appears that some folks have
gotten his service cut and he had to go somewhere else for net access.
HE knows that if he used the same style of communicating face to face
he'd probably be a dead fool by now. YEt from the safety of his hole
halfway around the world from those he insults and attacks the worst
that can be done is get his access cut, and somebody else will always
take his money to get him a connection. Phil thinks he's a real man
because the sheep get real nervous whenever he's around.



Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their
level then beat you with experience.

Lines: 23
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-Info: Please forward a copy of all headers for proper handling
X-Trace: ldjgbllpbapjglppdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbogn akcgkkjncacfondekajmggfglicjiieioedjefkbmjgkijmlhg hlakmlallgjfkijhhagfkjbgilpaddgdbjmlejadmonfdefeae afhahilndp
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:00:51 EDT
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:00:51 GMT
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.pro:1091496


On 2004-07-22 said:
It turns out I have a customer who actually had him do some work.
Phil owns a neighbourhood TV repair shop in Sydney, if it's the
same Phil. ** It aint.
that explains a lot of this. **** for brains has been rendered
obsolete and irrelevant because they're designed to just throw away.

HEy Phil, figured out any more about control of generators yet?

wHen are you going to file that lawsuit PHil?

Did your head full of excrement figure out who this is yet?

Rotflmao!!!

SInce you're obsolete and irrelevant just put a gun in your mouth and
blow your head off.


......... Phil

Everyone has the right to be stupid; some just abuse the privelege.