Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 1. BACKGROUND
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
1. BACKGROUND Stewart Pinkerton, an employee in the postroom of a bank, claims to be a qualified engineer. He waves his certificate to excuse his constant and insistent destructive invasions of other people's hobbies or professions on the pretext of protecting them against their own ignorance. As a result Pinkerton is banned from several professional, moderated conferences, but of course the unmoderated newsgroups are easy prey to his invasions. When he is gainsaid he instantly turns nasty. Here is Pinkerton abusing Glenn Richards in the first thread I open, concurrently on uk.rec.audio: "I don't worry about ****ing off stupid, lying, ******s like you. Clear enough for you?" The cause is a mild disagreement about audio cables. Such continuous abuse, and Pinkerton's constant appeals to authority (his own of course) rather than reason, raises questions about Pinkerton's motives, knowledge and honesty. This series of articles on the unreliability of Stewart Pinkerton continues with three examples I have personal knowledge of, with a conclusion in the final article. Andre Jute Part of a series of articles: WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE 1. BACKGROUND 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE 3. PINKERTON'S IGNORANCE OF THE BASICS 4. PINKERTON LIES ON PROFESSIONAL MATTERS FOR PERSONAL REASONS 5. CONCLUSION |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 1. BACKGROUND
God help us all...
Mr. McCoy has lost it entirely. Five (5) new threads. I expected only 2, maybe 3. This is the mark of a rational, calm, human being writing from full confidence in his position? Or a that of a totally fixated psychopath off his medication? Doesn't matter whom he might be writing about, there is no sanity here. As Mr. T might say: Pity the poor fool. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 1. BACKGROUND
"Andre Jute" wrote in message oups.com... WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE 1. BACKGROUND Stewart Pinkerton, an employee in the postroom of a bank, claims to be a qualified engineer. Translation: Stewart Pinkerton is an engineer who regularly exposes Jute's incompetence. He waves his certificate to excuse his constant and insistent destructive invasions of other people's hobbies or professions on the pretext of protecting them against their own ignorance. Tranlation: Jute is caught again trying to pretend he did something he didn't and Steart has let peole know about it on a public newsgroup where anyone is free to comment. As a result Pinkerton is banned from several professional, moderated conferences, but of course the unmoderated newsgroups are easy prey to his invasions. Translation: Jute has not been able to keep Stewart off his back, and Steart won't let Jute's Munchausen syndrome go unnoticed. When he is gainsaid he instantly turns nasty. Tranlation: Jute is a nastly little bugger who uses personal attacks and name calling against anyone who exposes Jute's lies and incompetence. Here is Pinkerton abusing Glenn Richards in the first thread I open, concurrently on uk.rec.audio: "I don't worry about ****ing off stupid, lying, ******s like you. Clear enough for you?" The cause is a mild disagreement about audio cables. Translation: Somebody claimed the impossible about cables and then argued with Stewart about it. Such continuous abuse, and Pinkerton's constant appeals to authority (his own of course) rather than reason, raises questions about Pinkerton's motives, knowledge and honesty. Translation: Jute doesn't like it when Stewart exposes Jute or any other person who claims that the impossible is possible. This series of articles on the unreliability of Stewart Pinkerton continues with three examples I have personal knowledge of, with a conclusion in the final article. Andre Jute Part of a series of articles: WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE 1. BACKGROUND 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE 3. PINKERTON'S IGNORANCE OF THE BASICS 4. PINKERTON LIES ON PROFESSIONAL MATTERS FOR PERSONAL REASONS 5. CONCLUSION Translation: Jute is on another of his crybaby jags because Stewart won't let Jute's lies and attacks go unpunished, so Jute thinks he can hound Steart off the newsgroups and thereby save his sorry ass from further embarassment. This of course demonstrates what a complete idiot Jute is. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Tube-craft alive and well
"phatty mo" wrote in message ... Translation: Anybody who bothers with this BS is incompetent! Get a life guys,Give it up,and go BUILD A TUBE AMP for ****s sake. (snip) Now stop wasting bandwidth on this pitiful ****,and build something! I have three tube projects on the go at the moment. A mu follower pre-amp, a cathode follower pre-amp and a 50W power amp. I am also looking into the Potato Amp project, if I can find John's article in Glass Audio 2000 (I moved house about that time) Don't be disheartened, Fatimo, there's actually a lot going on within RAT. Despite the chimp fights, there are still plenty of good threads, with many knowledgeable people willing to give a hand and share their expertise. Tube-craft is alive and well:-)) Iain |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Tube-craft alive and well
Iain Churches wrote: "phatty mo" wrote in message ... Translation: Anybody who bothers with this BS is incompetent! Get a life guys,Give it up,and go BUILD A TUBE AMP for ****s sake. (snip) Now stop wasting bandwidth on this pitiful ****,and build something! I have three tube projects on the go at the moment. A mu follower pre-amp, a cathode follower pre-amp and a 50W power amp. I am also looking into the Potato Amp project, if I can find John's article in Glass Audio 2000 (I moved house about that time) Don't be disheartened, Fatimo, there's actually a lot going on within RAT. Despite the chimp fights, there are still plenty of good threads, with many knowledgeable people willing to give a hand and share their expertise. Tube-craft is alive and well:-)) Its not as healthy as it was. There are a very small number of ppl actually willing to share their tube crafting experiences here mainly because of the bickering factor, and invasive tube haters such as Stufart Oinkerton, etc. The other reason less obvious is that pet theories that don't stand up to rigourous analysis will be demolished by the more knowledgeable ppl lurking here. The pet theory prosletizers mostly give up and run away because they can't stand criticism. r.a.t is about posting what you know but it may well be challenged. Many other little moderated discussion groups exist because guys like the cosy club atmosphere that rarely warms beyond tepid with challenges. Frankly, I find such groups quite boring... I have never bothered posting to other groups than rat because these others seldom have any depth to that is said, and the lack of expertise shows up straightaway when one tries to take part because the formatting of the group isn't as simple to use as the bulletin board set out as at r.a.t etc. I like to post where I am most likely to be challenged. Pity help the challenger who isn't rational though.... And I am currently re-typing my whole website to extend the detail of tubecraft that I know to back up my position. Thus there will be less stupid questions, since answers are to be found in the schematics of amplifiers I have built and sold, and which sound well and which are reliable, easily serviced, and reproducible by people around the world who are really interested in tube craft. Meanwhile, the sites by Douglas Self and others indicate what can be achieved with silicon. AFAIK, Stufart Oinkerton has not got a website giving any useful information about anything. Patrick Turner. Iain |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pinkerton Lie No 317 reprised: A sociopath commits deja vu | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Challenging the so-called "engineer" Stewart "Zero Proof" Pinkerton on his own ground | Audio Opinions | |||
The Pinkerton Pathology, part 2: the awesome certainty of his psychosis | Audio Opinions | |||
Stewart Pinkerton is a tube hating fool. | Vacuum Tubes |