Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits.
In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On Mar 30, 2:10*pm, Don wrote:
I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don Read my power amp pages about 5050, 8585 amps and all will be revealed. http://www.turneraudio.com.au/8585-a...ober-2006.html http://www.turneraudio.com.au/Integrated5050.htm Patrick Turner. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:16:39 -0500, flipper wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:10:17 -0400, Don wrote: I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don Could be that a lot of people don't consider fault conditions but the plain ole wiper tap is simple and linear. Consider that in a simple 'traditional' configuration the bias pot is last in a series of resistors beginning with a plain ole RC filter. Wiper tied to one end makes it a 'variable resistor', as opposed to a tap, so, depending on how everything else is arranged, it isn't linear and impedance changes with position, which can bias shift more than just the one being adjusted. That's not likely though, is it? The grid is a highZ input, so the bias chain isn't loaded all that much (ok, I'm leaving out class AB1 etc). Suitable values, with the variable resistor at the earthy end of the chain, should give a reasonable bias adjustment. A pot would suffer from the same linearity problem anyway. Just use lower values. A bad wiper connection will just bias the valve to cut-off then. -- Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!) Web: http://www.nascom.info Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On 03/29/11 20:10, Don so witilly quipped:
I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don inexpensive solution. Use a high reliability potentiometer and there shouldn't be a problem. Cheap carbon 'open to the air' ones are noisy anyway, so hi-fi equipment will probably use decent quality wirewound pots that are sealed against the elements. Such a device is likely to last indefinitely, longer than the tubes or transformers, even if it's never adjusted again. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On 03/30/11 01:47, Patrick Turner so witilly quipped:
On Mar 30, 2:10 pm, wrote: I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don Read my power amp pages about 5050, 8585 amps and all will be revealed. http://www.turneraudio.com.au/8585-a...ober-2006.html http://www.turneraudio.com.au/Integrated5050.htm Patrick Turner. interesting use of constant current sources via transistors, even in the plate circuits of the triodes, and the P-P 6BQ5 driver setup with constant (combined) current on the 2 6BQ5 cathodes. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On Mar 31, 5:37*am, mick wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:16:39 -0500, flipper wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:10:17 -0400, Don wrote: I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don Could be that a lot of people don't consider fault conditions but the plain ole wiper tap is simple and linear. Consider that in a simple 'traditional' configuration the bias pot is last in a series of resistors beginning with a plain ole RC filter. Wiper tied to one end makes it a 'variable resistor', as opposed to a tap, so, depending on how everything else is arranged, it isn't linear and impedance changes with position, which can bias shift more than just the one being adjusted. That's not likely though, is it? The grid is a highZ input, so the bias chain isn't loaded all that much (ok, I'm leaving out class AB1 etc). Suitable values, with the variable resistor at the earthy end of the chain, should give a reasonable bias adjustment. A pot would suffer from the same linearity problem anyway. Just use lower values. A bad wiper connection will just bias the valve to cut-off then. -- Mick * * * * * * * * * * *(Working in a M$-free zone!) Web:http://www.nascom.info Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam. * *- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bias circuits are prone to ageing and failure. I like to use 25mm dia "heavy duty" 10k wire wound pots rated for 2 watts for the bias pot. Bean counters don't, and use the cheapest small crap junk they can find. I like to always place a bypassing resistance of say 470k from a wiper to the -bias supply or - end of the pot wherever the bias comes from a wiper on a pot. If wiper goes open, tube gets an extra -Vdc bias so tube cuts off, THD increases, owner detects something is wrong, but smoke is avoided - unless a coupling cap has failed to become a low resistance. Patrick Turner. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On Mar 31, 7:04*am, Don wrote:
In article e753972e-1a9b-4e3f-9d52- , says.... On Mar 30, 2:10*pm, Don wrote: I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don Read my power amp pages about 5050, 8585 amps and all will be revealed. http://www.turneraudio.com.au/8585-a...ober-2006.html http://www.turneraudio.com.au/Integrated5050.htm Patrick Turner. It seems to me that in your 8585 amp, the pot wiper is connected to the grid, and if failure occurs, zero bias is on the grid. But your protection circuitry for the power tubes will sense the problem, and cut off the amp. So, Robert's your mother's brother, or things are a-ok. The 50-50 amp seems to have "fixed" fixed bias, that's to say, the bias is set with resistors, and is not adjustable. The bias can be balanced, so that each tube has equal current. The pot wiper that does the balancing goes to ground. If the wiper were to fail, the output tubes would still have a *neg. voltage bias on the grids. Do I understand correctly? -Don- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Indeed you understand me correctly. I have lost count ofthe number of times my protection circuits have stopped smoke production because of the use of NOS tubes someone has bought in good faith. Maybe they were 50 years old and never been used. But after sitting on a shelf for 50 years a tube's glass-pin joint may have fatigued and the tube goes gassy, causing bias failure. ( If you could preserve a new bride for 50 years before leading her gently by the hand to the bedroom to consumate the marriage you would have to expect some difficulties, including equipment failure, and once in the kitchen a NOS bride might have even more serious problems ). COWPAT = 1/N squared, where COWPAT means Chance Of Working Perfectly Any Time, N is the number of things which could dissallow functionality, or things you didn't consider properly, or the mistakes you made, unknown un-knowables, and perhaps a spanner which was dropped into a crank case which you didn't know was there until you pressed the 'start' button, or some old tube which awas destined to fail 1 month after a 50 year delay to "use consummation", or some inadvertent circuit fault. There is often a 100% chance of a circuit failing to work even with one one un-considered thing. Even things that were carefully considered can be wrong, and you'll find outabout when you flick the on switch, or measure the circuit. Perfect working = maximally optimised working and many things need to be got right. I never like to assume anything is true until I proove it to myself, and then I ask who else will believe me? So I have to proove I can proove to others its right, not just to me. The only way I stop **** happening is to be my own hardest critic. Patrick Turner. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On Mar 31, 10:11*am, Big Bad Bob BigBadBob-at-mrp3-
wrote: On 03/30/11 01:47, Patrick Turner so witilly quipped: On Mar 30, 2:10 pm, *wrote: I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don Read my power amp pages about 5050, 8585 amps and all will be revealed. *http://www.turneraudio.com.au/8585-a...ober-2006.html http://www.turneraudio.com.au/Integrated5050.htm Patrick Turner. interesting use of constant current sources via transistors, even in the plate circuits of the triodes, and the P-P 6BQ5 driver setup with constant (combined) current on the 2 6BQ5 cathodes.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Some may find my circuitry rather queer, and sneer at my use of transistors which I maintain act as complicit slaves to every tiny whim of current supply to the kingly tubes who rule masterfully over the task of voltage amplification. The transistor is often seen as an ugly ungracious troglodyte whose attempts to amplify do poison all music; but when asked to work as a constant current slave they excel. But next time you build an amp, remember you always could do worse than try my ideas. If you do try something I posted, have a THD meter standing by, make the tests, then have a listen, and the THD meters will smile with nice numbers and your ears will be delighted. Patrick Turner. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#11
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On Apr 1, 3:52*am, John L Stewart John.L.Stewart.
wrote: Patrick Turner;928708 Wrote: On Mar 31, 7:04*am, Don wrote:- In article e753972e-1a9b-4e3f-9d52- , says.... - On Mar 30, 2:10*pm, Don wrote:- I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last-- method -- seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method-- be-- used? -Don-- - Read my power amp pages about 5050, 8585 amps and all will be revealed.- - http://www.turneraudio.com.au/8585-a...ober-2006.html http://www.turneraudio.com.au/Integrated5050.htm- - Patrick Turner.- It seems to me that in your 8585 amp, the pot wiper is connected to the grid, and if failure occurs, zero bias is on the grid. But your protection circuitry for the power tubes will sense the problem, and cut off the amp. So, Robert's your mother's brother, or things are a-ok. The 50-50 amp seems to have "fixed" fixed bias, that's to say, the bias is set with resistors, and is not adjustable. The bias can be balanced, so that each tube has equal current. The pot wiper that does the balancing goes to ground. If the wiper were to fail, the output tubes would still have a *neg. voltage bias on the grids. Do I understand correctly? -Don- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Indeed you understand me correctly. I have lost count ofthe number of times my protection circuits have stopped smoke production because of the use of NOS tubes someone has bought in good faith. Maybe they were 50 years old and never been used. But after sitting on a shelf for 50 years a tube's glass-pin joint may have fatigued and the tube goes gassy, causing bias failure. ( If you could preserve a new bride for 50 years *before leading her gently by the hand to the bedroom to consumate the marriage you would have to expect some difficulties, including equipment failure, and once in the kitchen a NOS bride might have even more serious problems ). COWPAT = 1/N squared, where COWPAT means Chance Of Working Perfectly Any Time, N is the number of things which could dissallow functionality, or things you didn't consider properly, or the mistakes you made, unknown un-knowables, and perhaps a spanner which was dropped into a crank case which you didn't know was there until you pressed the 'start' button, or some old tube which awas destined to fail 1 month after a 50 year delay to "use consummation", or some inadvertent circuit fault. There is often a 100% chance of a circuit failing *to work even with one one un-considered thing. Even things that were carefully considered can be wrong, and you'll find outabout when you flick the on switch, or measure the circuit. Perfect working = maximally optimised working and many things need to be got right. I never like to assume anything is true until I proove it to myself, and then I ask who else will believe me? So I have to proove I can proove to others its right, not just to me. The only way I stop **** happening is to be my own hardest critic. Patrick Turner. The lower silicon rectifier in the 5050 negative supply is shown wrong way around. * *Regards, John Its all fixed up now, I re-drawed the schematic. I must re-draw the others soon while I go though all pages. Patrick Turner. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On 03/31/11 00:29, Patrick Turner so wittily quipped:
On Mar 31, 5:37 am, wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:16:39 -0500, flipper wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:10:17 -0400, wrote: I have seen two methods of using a pot in fixed bias circuits. In one method, the wiper carries the voltage to the grid, and if the wiper were to fail, the bias voltage goes to zero, The other method has the wiper connected to another terminal of the pot. If the wiper fails, the bias goes up to a high negative voltage. This last method seems best to me. Am I missing something here? Why would the first method be used? -Don Could be that a lot of people don't consider fault conditions but the plain ole wiper tap is simple and linear. Consider that in a simple 'traditional' configuration the bias pot is last in a series of resistors beginning with a plain ole RC filter. Wiper tied to one end makes it a 'variable resistor', as opposed to a tap, so, depending on how everything else is arranged, it isn't linear and impedance changes with position, which can bias shift more than just the one being adjusted. That's not likely though, is it? The grid is a highZ input, so the bias chain isn't loaded all that much (ok, I'm leaving out class AB1 etc). Suitable values, with the variable resistor at the earthy end of the chain, should give a reasonable bias adjustment. A pot would suffer from the same linearity problem anyway. Just use lower values. A bad wiper connection will just bias the valve to cut-off then. -- Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!) Web:http://www.nascom.info Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bias circuits are prone to ageing and failure. I like to use 25mm dia "heavy duty" 10k wire wound pots rated for 2 watts for the bias pot. Bean counters don't, and use the cheapest small crap junk they can find. I like to always place a bypassing resistance of say 470k from a wiper to the -bias supply or - end of the pot wherever the bias comes from a wiper on a pot. If wiper goes open, tube gets an extra -Vdc bias so tube cuts off, THD increases, owner detects something is wrong, but smoke is avoided - unless a coupling cap has failed to become a low resistance. would a fast-blow fuse soldered between B+ and the output transformer be more effective? The idea is that if it's a soldered-in fuse, a decent tech would ask "why did this fuse blow" and investigate before just replacing it. You hope. In any case fuses are cheap, and possibly more justifiable to bean counters, if you call it a safety feature and a form of liability insurance against smoking/flaming components. |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
fixed bias circuits and pot wipers
On 03/31/11 01:06, Patrick Turner so wittily quipped:
interesting use of constant current sources via transistors, even in the plate circuits of the triodes, and the P-P 6BQ5 driver setup with constant (combined) current on the 2 6BQ5 cathodes. Some may find my circuitry rather queer, and sneer at my use of transistors which I maintain act as complicit slaves to every tiny whim of current supply to the kingly tubes who rule masterfully over the task of voltage amplification. sounds good to me. The thing that does the amplifying is the tube, and the bias circuitry simply helps it work better. Complaining about a transistor used as a constant current source is like complaining about a resistor, since the transistor should not be adding any [detectable] distortion or noise in that capacity. The transistor is often seen as an ugly ungracious troglodyte whose attempts to amplify do poison all music; but when asked to work as a constant current slave they excel. absolutely - it works around the problems associated with cascode tube circuits. But next time you build an amp, remember you always could do worse than try my ideas. If you do try something I posted, have a THD meter standing by, make the tests, then have a listen, and the THD meters will smile with nice numbers and your ears will be delighted. No doubt. You're applying modern technology to old-school designs and getting the best of both worlds [or at least that appears to be your goal]. I'm not above using combined solid state and tubes where it makes sense. If what you want is the benefit of tube preamps, but the output stage doesn't matter, then a few triodes with a solid state output would give you what you want. Several guitar amplifiers do things like that. If THD is way below audible in the power stage, it can be transistors OR tubes and it wouldn't make a difference in the sound. Having the tubes in the preamp would give you the 'tube preamp' sound, and that has its own characteristic distortion quality [like a Marshall amp]. In other cases tube output with tube rectifier may be a component of the sound, where the voltage drop on the tube rectifier actually creates a kind of 'attack/sustain' effect on the sound [in this case distortion is in the output stage, not the preamp], like an old Fender amp that only puts out 15W but sounds GREAT when you overdrive it. So you 'turn everything up to 11' [ok 10 it's a Fender, not a Marshall] to get the full effect. Anyway, for that sound the 'tube everything' is necessary. So yeah, depending on what you want to do, use tubes, or solid state, whatever makes sense. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fixed Bias question | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Fixed Bias question | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Pots for Fixed Bias | Vacuum Tubes | |||
fixed bias EL84 | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Servo-controlled fixed bias | Vacuum Tubes |