Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
QSC amps
As I said before, viewpoints are for people who don't know what the facts
are. Anyone who doesn't appreciate the quality of QSC amps is an ass, plain and simple. This is fact, not opinion. As for the high priced spread, maybe it's time for somebody like McCarthy to issue a general RIPOFF ALERT, as well as a warning about the people of bad character who keep pushing the stuff. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... As I said before, viewpoints are for people who don't know what the facts are. Anyone who doesn't appreciate the quality of QSC amps is an ass, plain and simple. This is fact, not opinion. As for the high priced spread, maybe it's time for somebody like McCarthy to issue a general RIPOFF ALERT, as well as a warning about the people of bad character who keep pushing the stuff. **Points: * McCarthy was a US Senator who did enormous damage to US society. Of course, the gutless wimps who capitulated to him weren't much better. * McCarty is food server and has no credibility. * QSC amps and every other amp I've listened to, which uses 'rail shifting' sound like crap. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I would appreciate it if you would not respond to the forger, or at
least address him as such. Now for the $64,000.00 question: Have you done any blind comparisons of the QSC amps, or any other rail shifting amps? IIRC the QSC amp that Arny recomends is one they no longer manufacture, from the USA line. It has no fan. Perhaps Mr. Krueger would be kind enough to inform us on it's use of rail shifting. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... As I said before, viewpoints are for people who don't know what the facts are. Anyone who doesn't appreciate the quality of QSC amps is an ass, plain and simple. This is fact, not opinion. As for the high priced spread, maybe it's time for somebody like McCarthy to issue a general RIPOFF ALERT, as well as a warning about the people of bad character who keep pushing the stuff. **Points: * McCarthy was a US Senator who did enormous damage to US society. Of course, the gutless wimps who capitulated to him weren't much better. * McCarty is food server and has no credibility. * QSC amps and every other amp I've listened to, which uses 'rail shifting' sound like crap. They do sound like crap. Rail shifting may not be the direct cause, but merely a sign of an "anything goes" design philosophy, which is why they sound like crap. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Scientist wrote:
"They do sound like crap. Rail shifting may not be the direct cause, but merely a sign of an "anything goes" design philosophy, which is why they sound like crap." Have you done any blind comparisons of them to other amps you like? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Bad Scientist wrote: "They do sound like crap. Rail shifting may not be the direct cause, but merely a sign of an "anything goes" design philosophy, which is why they sound like crap." Have you done any blind comparisons of them to other amps you like? For that matter, have you done any blind comparisons of them to amps you don't like? "BAD SCIENTIST", indeed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein wrote:
"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... * QSC amps and every other amp I've listened to, which uses 'rail shifting' sound like crap. Show's the writers ignorance. Many QSC amps lack rail-shifting. They do sound like crap. Shows the writer's desire to say hateful things, regardless of his ignorance or the true facts. Rail shifting may not be the direct cause, Given that many QSC models, all of which the writer is damning don't use rail shifting... but merely a sign of an "anything goes" design philosophy, which is why they sound like crap. Shows the writer's ignorance. High performance highly robust amplifiers don't come from an "anything goes" deisgn philosophy. QSC obtains robust performance the same basic way that Krell does - their amps are vastly overbuilt compared to the minimum that it would take to get the job done. In terms of low impedance load driving capabilties, they are overbuilt even compared to most Hafler amps. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Robert Morein wrote: "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... * QSC amps and every other amp I've listened to, which uses 'rail shifting' sound like crap. Show's the writers ignorance. Many QSC amps lack rail-shifting. They do sound like crap. Shows the writer's desire to say hateful things, regardless of his ignorance or the true facts. However, any sexual innuendo and insults based on one's sex and sexual preference are remarkably absent. That's a lot more than one can say about you. It is also very informative about Bob's life vs. your torturous existence. And you're whining that someone hates your AMPS! Jeez.... BTW, the QSC amps really suck! The Crown Macro Reference is the way to go with pro amps. Cheers, Margaret |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Margaret von B." wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Robert Morein wrote: "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... * QSC amps and every other amp I've listened to, which uses 'rail shifting' sound like crap. Show's the writers ignorance. Many QSC amps lack rail-shifting. They do sound like crap. Shows the writer's desire to say hateful things, regardless of his ignorance or the true facts. However, any sexual innuendo and insults based on one's sex and sexual preference are remarkably absent. That's a lot more than one can say about you. It is also very informative about Bob's life vs. your torturous existence. And you're whining that someone hates your AMPS! Jeez.... BTW, the QSC amps really suck! The Crown Macro Reference is the way to go with pro amps. **Agreed. The Macro Reference is an excellent amplifier. It beats the pants off a goodly number of 'real hi fi' amps. All the QSC amps, I've heard, used rail shifting and sounded like crap. I have not heard/measured the non-rail shifters. It seems they may have learned their lesson, like NAD did and dispensed with that horrible technology. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Signal said: I note that QSC amps have failed to set the world alight. That's true, and yet very surprising, considering they bear the 'Borg Stamp of Approval. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... Bad Scientist wrote: "They do sound like crap. Rail shifting may not be the direct cause, but merely a sign of an "anything goes" design philosophy, which is why they sound like crap." Have you done any blind comparisons of them to other amps you like? For that matter, have you done any blind comparisons of them to amps you don't like? "BAD SCIENTIST", indeed. No, but I haven't done any deaf comparisons either. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Signal" wrote in message ... "George M. Middius" emitted : I note that QSC amps have failed to set the world alight. That's true, and yet very surprising, considering they bear the 'Borg Stamp of Approval. Yes, very surprising. Borg approved gear is generally world cl'arse. Some people claim they can hear better than other people. Scientific research on the nature of hearing confirms that any differences between QSC amps and allegedly better amps are totally inaudible. More expensive amps are just RIPOFFS (ALERT!). These people are fools and charlatans, and this group would be better off without them. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... "Signal" wrote in message ... "George M. Middius" emitted : I note that QSC amps have failed to set the world alight. That's true, and yet very surprising, considering they bear the 'Borg Stamp of Approval. Yes, very surprising. Borg approved gear is generally world cl'arse. Some people claim they can hear better than other people. Scientific research on the nature of hearing confirms that any differences between QSC amps and allegedly better amps are totally inaudible. **Really. Please cite this "scientific research", the people and equipment used and under what conditions. I'll wait. More expensive amps are just RIPOFFS (ALERT!). **Really? Prove it. These people are fools and charlatans, and this group would be better off without them. **Really? Prove it. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Trevor Wilson" wrote
Some people claim they can hear better than other people. Scientific research on the nature of hearing confirms that any differences between QSC amps and allegedly better amps are totally inaudible. **Really. Please cite this "scientific research", the people and equipment used and under what conditions. I'll wait. More expensive amps are just RIPOFFS (ALERT!). **Really? Prove it. These people are fools and charlatans, and this group would be better off without them. **Really? Prove it. Bwian doesn't have to prove anything. Bwian is hit-and-run )just like his new buddy Richard Malesweski - better known as torrie****s.) They rarely respond to questions or comments on their posts. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Progess on finding amp for RS IIIbs | Vacuum Tubes | |||
KISS 122 by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
KISS amp.Andre Jute.Stewart Pinkerton | Vacuum Tubes | |||
James Randi gets clarified on audio biz | High End Audio |