Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
good omni mic?
I'd like to acquire a pair of omnis for use with a Jecklin disk. As usual,
my limited budget (much of which has gone to the Apogee Mini-Me) prevents exploration of the "really really good but expensive" category. Since this is to be for distance miking, air absorption at high frequencies becomes an issue. Examination of the Studio Concepts C4, http://www.studioprojects.com/c4.html reveals some negative comments: http://www.harmony-central.com/Recor...ects/C4-1.html (defects, excessive noise floor, rolloff) that suggest that the upper end may not be as flat as advertised: http://www.studioprojectsusa.com/pdf/c4.pdf It would seem (please hold the flames) that these issues are significant in distant miking with the Jecklin, even if these mics will perform well for overhead drum. Another contender is the MXL 604, http://www.mxlmics.com/condenser_mic...ser_index.html, which I would guess may use the same capsule. The frequency response curve actually resembles the reports of the C4 more than the curve advertised for the C4. Or, I could stick with the MXL 603s, http://www.mxlmics.com/condenser_mic...ser_index.html, which, while not omnis, manage to carry out to 20 kHz, albeit with a significant bump in the 8 - 16 kHz region. Probably also the same capsule. Another option would be my pair of Behringer electret measurement mics, http://www.behringer.com/ECM8000/index.cfm?lang=ENG which charmingly resemble the physical appearance of the Earthworks at only 2% the price. By far the most even frequency and polar response, but these are far too noisy, right? Any other options I should consider? Tia, Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Powerful Argument in Favor of Agnosticism and Athetism | Audio Opinions | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |