Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Harry Lavo wrote:
"Robert C. Lang" wrote in message ... This raises an issue I have sought clarification on. Someone was trying to sell me on the merits of Yamaha's new receiver, the RX-Z9, that he touts as a state of the art processor. At the moment, it is the only Yamaha model with a I-link connection. Yamaha DSP-Z9 (european model) http://yamaha-hifi.de/index.php?lang=e&idcat1=1 http://www.yamaha-audio.co.uk/homeci...ifiers/dsp-z9/ http://www.yamaha-audio.co.uk/pdfs/manuals/DSPZ9.pdf I suspect (hope) that the future Yamahas RX-V1500 and RX-V2500 (or whatever the replacements of the current RX-V1400 and RX-V2400 will be called) might also have I-link (firewire), but that is just a guess. The Pioneers VSA-AX10Ai-S or VSX-AX5i-S also have I-link and the VSX-AX5i-S is considerably cheaper (1500 euros) than the Yamaha RX-Z9 (~5000 euros). I have never considered a multi-channel DSP processor because I thought (perhaps wrongly) that the multi-channelplayer that I purchased would handle every processing duty I would need. The player usually has less features. I think all the modes that create surround channels from a 2 channel input (even something so trivial as "6-channel stereo") are absent. Also, the newer modes which create 7 or 9 (!) channels from the 5 channels in a multichannel record don't exist in players either. It seems that such a processor coupled with these decks would result in a lot of redundant or overlapping capabilities? Yes (bass management, distance compensation, for instance), but - those capabilities are more complete on the receiver than on the player; - probably the receiver is no more expensive than a 5 or more channels power amplifier with volume control (if someone makes one). If you already have the amplifier, this doesn't mean much to you. But a lot of audiophiles seemingly are putting the two together. Question: What does a multi-channel DSP processor do for multi-channel SACD or DVD-A play back (at this point movies playing will not be part of my system)that, for example, a Esoteric DV50S, Sony SCDXA9000ES, Mccormack udp-1, etc., coupled with a basic multi-channel line stage could not do on its own? For DVD-A and SACD, absolutely nothing. They must use multichannel analog inputs to convey true high rez info, otherwise that high-rez is automatically downconverted to 44 or 48khz (in a few cases, 96khz). I _think_ that doesn't apply to I-link, only to optical/coaxial digital, when mosts discs forbid the player from outputing anything digital, anyway. With I-link the player sends digital to the receiver at whatever rate is present on the disc. -- http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/ ..pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young'-Menander (342-292 BC) Europe | Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Universal player with bass management | Audio Opinions | |||
Sony Digital Amps (and SACD) vs. Sony Analog Amps | High End Audio | |||
Is the war over yet? DVD-audio vs SACD | High End Audio | |||
FS: SOUNDSTREAM CLOSEOUTS AND MORE!! | Car Audio | |||
Pioneer DV563A - SACD ? | Audio Opinions |