Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.pro,comp.dsp
Mr.T Mr.T is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,108
Default dBFS


"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
In order to become commonplace, the technology has to become very cheap to
make and to use, and that is currently becoming the case with the new

digital
3D systems. It certainly wasn't the case back in the fifties.


Right, and also requires people to want to bother. I'm not saying it will
never happen of course, but it's still a while off IMO.


People will never opt for a better quality presentation or format over a
less expensive one. Why do you think DVD-A and DSD failed?


Because there was NO improvement at all for the consumer, just added
expense.


And Elcaset, and half-track 1/4" for home use?


Well I at least used 4 track 1/4" R-R for MANY years. That was a huge
improvement over cassette at least. Unfortunately Elcaset was too big, and
too expensive for the masses (and provided little benefit for those of us
with R-R) But more importantly was far too late, and the digital age killed
it stone dead.

MrT.


 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
manipulate 24 bit audio to increment amplitude by 1 dBFS genlock Tech 14 April 4th 05 04:20 PM
Line Input Level for 0 dBFS? Len Moskowitz Pro Audio 12 December 5th 04 02:41 PM
dBfs scales, EBU r68 or DIN ? Jakeman Pro Audio 2 November 21st 04 09:00 PM
dBfs scales, EBU r68 or DIN ? Jakeman Pro Audio 0 November 21st 04 06:18 PM
Classical program ff = ?dbFS WillStG Pro Audio 21 November 15th 03 11:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"