Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
HI All
I recently bought myself a new PC (1.7 GHz Celeron) with the intention of copying (?archiving) some of my old vinyl and cassette tape to CD. I'm not looking for the ultimate in sound quality - most of my listening is on the cd player in the car - but reasonably undistorted (!) sound without too many clicks and hums would be good g The problem I'm getting is that the PC's on-board audio chips don't seem up to the recording job - they are identified by Windows as Avance AC97 - but the same tape heard via headphones through the PC is very poor in comparison to listening to it via 'phones and a conventional (cheapo) IC audio amp. Before I go down a long and expensive route involvng trial & error - can anybody recommend a sound card that will give me better recording quality without costing a fortune ? Many thanks in advance Adrian Suffolk UK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be
up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. You might want to try experimentally recording some WAV files recorded from an album to a CD, then play that CD on your main system and see what you think. Wouldn't hurt to practice the process anyway - there's several skills to master here. http://www.a-reny.com/iexplorer/restauration.html Is an excellent resource for info on this. Mark Z. -- Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam have rendered my regular e-mail address useless. "Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message ... HI All I recently bought myself a new PC (1.7 GHz Celeron) with the intention of copying (?archiving) some of my old vinyl and cassette tape to CD. I'm not looking for the ultimate in sound quality - most of my listening is on the cd player in the car - but reasonably undistorted (!) sound without too many clicks and hums would be good g The problem I'm getting is that the PC's on-board audio chips don't seem up to the recording job - they are identified by Windows as Avance AC97 - but the same tape heard via headphones through the PC is very poor in comparison to listening to it via 'phones and a conventional (cheapo) IC audio amp. Before I go down a long and expensive route involvng trial & error - can anybody recommend a sound card that will give me better recording quality without costing a fortune ? Many thanks in advance Adrian Suffolk UK |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be
up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. You might want to try experimentally recording some WAV files recorded from an album to a CD, then play that CD on your main system and see what you think. Wouldn't hurt to practice the process anyway - there's several skills to master here. http://www.a-reny.com/iexplorer/restauration.html Is an excellent resource for info on this. Mark Z. -- Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam have rendered my regular e-mail address useless. "Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message ... HI All I recently bought myself a new PC (1.7 GHz Celeron) with the intention of copying (?archiving) some of my old vinyl and cassette tape to CD. I'm not looking for the ultimate in sound quality - most of my listening is on the cd player in the car - but reasonably undistorted (!) sound without too many clicks and hums would be good g The problem I'm getting is that the PC's on-board audio chips don't seem up to the recording job - they are identified by Windows as Avance AC97 - but the same tape heard via headphones through the PC is very poor in comparison to listening to it via 'phones and a conventional (cheapo) IC audio amp. Before I go down a long and expensive route involvng trial & error - can anybody recommend a sound card that will give me better recording quality without costing a fortune ? Many thanks in advance Adrian Suffolk UK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be
up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. You might want to try experimentally recording some WAV files recorded from an album to a CD, then play that CD on your main system and see what you think. Wouldn't hurt to practice the process anyway - there's several skills to master here. http://www.a-reny.com/iexplorer/restauration.html Is an excellent resource for info on this. Mark Z. -- Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam have rendered my regular e-mail address useless. "Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message ... HI All I recently bought myself a new PC (1.7 GHz Celeron) with the intention of copying (?archiving) some of my old vinyl and cassette tape to CD. I'm not looking for the ultimate in sound quality - most of my listening is on the cd player in the car - but reasonably undistorted (!) sound without too many clicks and hums would be good g The problem I'm getting is that the PC's on-board audio chips don't seem up to the recording job - they are identified by Windows as Avance AC97 - but the same tape heard via headphones through the PC is very poor in comparison to listening to it via 'phones and a conventional (cheapo) IC audio amp. Before I go down a long and expensive route involvng trial & error - can anybody recommend a sound card that will give me better recording quality without costing a fortune ? Many thanks in advance Adrian Suffolk UK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:59:10 -0500, "Mark D. Zacharias"
wrote: Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. Here's someone who disagrees. Many on-board sound chips are woefully poor. True, there are some that are reasonably good, but it's a bit hit-and-miss whether any particular motherboard does the job. You might want to try experimentally recording some WAV files recorded from an album to a CD, then play that CD on your main system and see what you think. Agreed. Nothing to lose but your time. Try and get decent recording levels: too high and you'll get clipping distortion; too low and the noise floor of the soundcard might encroach. If having tried this you conclude that the onboard sound doesn't cut it, then take a look at soundcards such as (in increasing order of sound quality): Creative Audigy; Turtle Beach Santa Cruz (if you can still find one); M-Audio Audiophile 2496. The M-Audio card costs about $150, and IMHO is more than capable of making completely transparent recordings from a domestic source. http://www.a-reny.com/iexplorer/restauration.html Is an excellent resource for info on this. Certainly is. May I also put in a brief plug for my own notes at http://www.delback.co.uk/lp-cdr.htm ? -- Clive Backham Note: As a spam avoidance measure, the email address in the header is just a free one and doesn't get checked very often. If you want to email me, my real address can be found at: www [dot] delback [dot] co [dot] uk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:59:10 -0500, "Mark D. Zacharias"
wrote: Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. Here's someone who disagrees. Many on-board sound chips are woefully poor. True, there are some that are reasonably good, but it's a bit hit-and-miss whether any particular motherboard does the job. You might want to try experimentally recording some WAV files recorded from an album to a CD, then play that CD on your main system and see what you think. Agreed. Nothing to lose but your time. Try and get decent recording levels: too high and you'll get clipping distortion; too low and the noise floor of the soundcard might encroach. If having tried this you conclude that the onboard sound doesn't cut it, then take a look at soundcards such as (in increasing order of sound quality): Creative Audigy; Turtle Beach Santa Cruz (if you can still find one); M-Audio Audiophile 2496. The M-Audio card costs about $150, and IMHO is more than capable of making completely transparent recordings from a domestic source. http://www.a-reny.com/iexplorer/restauration.html Is an excellent resource for info on this. Certainly is. May I also put in a brief plug for my own notes at http://www.delback.co.uk/lp-cdr.htm ? -- Clive Backham Note: As a spam avoidance measure, the email address in the header is just a free one and doesn't get checked very often. If you want to email me, my real address can be found at: www [dot] delback [dot] co [dot] uk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:59:10 -0500, "Mark D. Zacharias"
wrote: Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. Here's someone who disagrees. Many on-board sound chips are woefully poor. True, there are some that are reasonably good, but it's a bit hit-and-miss whether any particular motherboard does the job. You might want to try experimentally recording some WAV files recorded from an album to a CD, then play that CD on your main system and see what you think. Agreed. Nothing to lose but your time. Try and get decent recording levels: too high and you'll get clipping distortion; too low and the noise floor of the soundcard might encroach. If having tried this you conclude that the onboard sound doesn't cut it, then take a look at soundcards such as (in increasing order of sound quality): Creative Audigy; Turtle Beach Santa Cruz (if you can still find one); M-Audio Audiophile 2496. The M-Audio card costs about $150, and IMHO is more than capable of making completely transparent recordings from a domestic source. http://www.a-reny.com/iexplorer/restauration.html Is an excellent resource for info on this. Certainly is. May I also put in a brief plug for my own notes at http://www.delback.co.uk/lp-cdr.htm ? -- Clive Backham Note: As a spam avoidance measure, the email address in the header is just a free one and doesn't get checked very often. If you want to email me, my real address can be found at: www [dot] delback [dot] co [dot] uk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Clive Backham wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:59:10 -0500, "Mark D. Zacharias" wrote: Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. Here's someone who disagrees. Many on-board sound chips are woefully poor. True, there are some that are reasonably good, but it's a bit hit-and-miss whether any particular motherboard does the job. No doubt. If your on-board sound chip is labelled ADI 1985 or SoundMax, you have a really strange bird, as these measurements show: http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/soundmaxcadenza/ OTOH if you have a Realtek on-board sound chip, then the performance is at least average: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/Images/Hu...tek%20AC97.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Clive Backham wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:59:10 -0500, "Mark D. Zacharias" wrote: Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. Here's someone who disagrees. Many on-board sound chips are woefully poor. True, there are some that are reasonably good, but it's a bit hit-and-miss whether any particular motherboard does the job. No doubt. If your on-board sound chip is labelled ADI 1985 or SoundMax, you have a really strange bird, as these measurements show: http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/soundmaxcadenza/ OTOH if you have a Realtek on-board sound chip, then the performance is at least average: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/Images/Hu...tek%20AC97.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Clive Backham wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:59:10 -0500, "Mark D. Zacharias" wrote: Others may disagree, but I think the on-board sound chips should easily be up to the task of recording your LP's to CD. Here's someone who disagrees. Many on-board sound chips are woefully poor. True, there are some that are reasonably good, but it's a bit hit-and-miss whether any particular motherboard does the job. No doubt. If your on-board sound chip is labelled ADI 1985 or SoundMax, you have a really strange bird, as these measurements show: http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/soundmaxcadenza/ OTOH if you have a Realtek on-board sound chip, then the performance is at least average: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/Images/Hu...tek%20AC97.htm |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:57:33 +0100, Adrian Brentnall
wrote: HI All I recently bought myself a new PC (1.7 GHz Celeron) with the intention of copying (?archiving) some of my old vinyl and cassette tape to CD. I'm not looking for the ultimate in sound quality - most of my listening is on the cd player in the car - but reasonably undistorted (!) sound without too many clicks and hums would be good g The problem I'm getting is that the PC's on-board audio chips don't seem up to the recording job - they are identified by Windows as Avance AC97 - but the same tape heard via headphones through the PC is very poor in comparison to listening to it via 'phones and a conventional (cheapo) IC audio amp. Before I go down a long and expensive route involvng trial & error - can anybody recommend a sound card that will give me better recording quality without costing a fortune ? Many thanks in advance Adrian Suffolk UK Onboard sound on today's computers is often very adequate for simple recording and playback. An AC97 system has limitations, particularly for musicians who attempt multitrack recording. But you only need basic functions. How are you getting the sound into the PC? Forget about the mic input - it's matched to nasty cheap microphones, and even with these is crap quality. You need to use the Line In port, fed by a line level source. This will typically be a Tape Out or Aux Out from your hi-fi amplifier. This amplifier can then take care of providing the special input required by a record player. Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) Maybe it's an older system. And I'm afraid on-board sound on el-cheapo systems and older machines CAN be pretty bad :-( If this is the case, the good news is you only need to replace it with the cheapest SoundBlaster Live card. Now discontinued I think, but plenty still around. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:57:33 +0100, Adrian Brentnall
wrote: HI All I recently bought myself a new PC (1.7 GHz Celeron) with the intention of copying (?archiving) some of my old vinyl and cassette tape to CD. I'm not looking for the ultimate in sound quality - most of my listening is on the cd player in the car - but reasonably undistorted (!) sound without too many clicks and hums would be good g The problem I'm getting is that the PC's on-board audio chips don't seem up to the recording job - they are identified by Windows as Avance AC97 - but the same tape heard via headphones through the PC is very poor in comparison to listening to it via 'phones and a conventional (cheapo) IC audio amp. Before I go down a long and expensive route involvng trial & error - can anybody recommend a sound card that will give me better recording quality without costing a fortune ? Many thanks in advance Adrian Suffolk UK Onboard sound on today's computers is often very adequate for simple recording and playback. An AC97 system has limitations, particularly for musicians who attempt multitrack recording. But you only need basic functions. How are you getting the sound into the PC? Forget about the mic input - it's matched to nasty cheap microphones, and even with these is crap quality. You need to use the Line In port, fed by a line level source. This will typically be a Tape Out or Aux Out from your hi-fi amplifier. This amplifier can then take care of providing the special input required by a record player. Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) Maybe it's an older system. And I'm afraid on-board sound on el-cheapo systems and older machines CAN be pretty bad :-( If this is the case, the good news is you only need to replace it with the cheapest SoundBlaster Live card. Now discontinued I think, but plenty still around. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:57:33 +0100, Adrian Brentnall
wrote: HI All I recently bought myself a new PC (1.7 GHz Celeron) with the intention of copying (?archiving) some of my old vinyl and cassette tape to CD. I'm not looking for the ultimate in sound quality - most of my listening is on the cd player in the car - but reasonably undistorted (!) sound without too many clicks and hums would be good g The problem I'm getting is that the PC's on-board audio chips don't seem up to the recording job - they are identified by Windows as Avance AC97 - but the same tape heard via headphones through the PC is very poor in comparison to listening to it via 'phones and a conventional (cheapo) IC audio amp. Before I go down a long and expensive route involvng trial & error - can anybody recommend a sound card that will give me better recording quality without costing a fortune ? Many thanks in advance Adrian Suffolk UK Onboard sound on today's computers is often very adequate for simple recording and playback. An AC97 system has limitations, particularly for musicians who attempt multitrack recording. But you only need basic functions. How are you getting the sound into the PC? Forget about the mic input - it's matched to nasty cheap microphones, and even with these is crap quality. You need to use the Line In port, fed by a line level source. This will typically be a Tape Out or Aux Out from your hi-fi amplifier. This amplifier can then take care of providing the special input required by a record player. Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) Maybe it's an older system. And I'm afraid on-board sound on el-cheapo systems and older machines CAN be pretty bad :-( If this is the case, the good news is you only need to replace it with the cheapest SoundBlaster Live card. Now discontinued I think, but plenty still around. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi Lawrence
Onboard sound on today's computers is often very adequate for simple recording and playback. An AC97 system has limitations, particularly for musicians who attempt multitrack recording. But you only need basic functions. Yes - I'm not looking to do anything particularly 'fancy' - just copy disk / tape to cd... How are you getting the sound into the PC? Forget about the mic input - it's matched to nasty cheap microphones, and even with these is crap quality. You need to use the Line In port, fed by a line level source. This will typically be a Tape Out or Aux Out from your hi-fi amplifier. This amplifier can then take care of providing the special input required by a record player. I've been trying things with the tape so far - using a half-reasonable 'modular hi-fi' cassette deck, with the line output going to the soundcard's line in. Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Maybe it's an older system. Quite possibly - but it was within my budget...... It's branded I-friend (supplied by CPC in the UK) And I'm afraid on-board sound on el-cheapo systems and older machines CAN be pretty bad :-( If this is the case, the good news is you only need to replace it with the cheapest SoundBlaster Live card. Now discontinued I think, but plenty still around. That's a thought - thanks. I'll give it another try with the cassette deck - it's possible that the less-than-wonderful results I'm getting are down to the poor playback on this machine - I'll try burning a couple of tracks to cd and playing them on a 'real' cd machine. I did try initially with the old P500 system - but I was getting 'dropouts' (short missing 'chunks' of music) on the finished CD. Hopefully this new pc should have enough 'horsepower' to keep up with the recording process. I'm using Audacity to make the recordings. One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do a test recording to confirm. Thanks everybody for their comments so far.... Adrian Suffolk UK |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi Lawrence
Onboard sound on today's computers is often very adequate for simple recording and playback. An AC97 system has limitations, particularly for musicians who attempt multitrack recording. But you only need basic functions. Yes - I'm not looking to do anything particularly 'fancy' - just copy disk / tape to cd... How are you getting the sound into the PC? Forget about the mic input - it's matched to nasty cheap microphones, and even with these is crap quality. You need to use the Line In port, fed by a line level source. This will typically be a Tape Out or Aux Out from your hi-fi amplifier. This amplifier can then take care of providing the special input required by a record player. I've been trying things with the tape so far - using a half-reasonable 'modular hi-fi' cassette deck, with the line output going to the soundcard's line in. Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Maybe it's an older system. Quite possibly - but it was within my budget...... It's branded I-friend (supplied by CPC in the UK) And I'm afraid on-board sound on el-cheapo systems and older machines CAN be pretty bad :-( If this is the case, the good news is you only need to replace it with the cheapest SoundBlaster Live card. Now discontinued I think, but plenty still around. That's a thought - thanks. I'll give it another try with the cassette deck - it's possible that the less-than-wonderful results I'm getting are down to the poor playback on this machine - I'll try burning a couple of tracks to cd and playing them on a 'real' cd machine. I did try initially with the old P500 system - but I was getting 'dropouts' (short missing 'chunks' of music) on the finished CD. Hopefully this new pc should have enough 'horsepower' to keep up with the recording process. I'm using Audacity to make the recordings. One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do a test recording to confirm. Thanks everybody for their comments so far.... Adrian Suffolk UK |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi Lawrence
Onboard sound on today's computers is often very adequate for simple recording and playback. An AC97 system has limitations, particularly for musicians who attempt multitrack recording. But you only need basic functions. Yes - I'm not looking to do anything particularly 'fancy' - just copy disk / tape to cd... How are you getting the sound into the PC? Forget about the mic input - it's matched to nasty cheap microphones, and even with these is crap quality. You need to use the Line In port, fed by a line level source. This will typically be a Tape Out or Aux Out from your hi-fi amplifier. This amplifier can then take care of providing the special input required by a record player. I've been trying things with the tape so far - using a half-reasonable 'modular hi-fi' cassette deck, with the line output going to the soundcard's line in. Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Maybe it's an older system. Quite possibly - but it was within my budget...... It's branded I-friend (supplied by CPC in the UK) And I'm afraid on-board sound on el-cheapo systems and older machines CAN be pretty bad :-( If this is the case, the good news is you only need to replace it with the cheapest SoundBlaster Live card. Now discontinued I think, but plenty still around. That's a thought - thanks. I'll give it another try with the cassette deck - it's possible that the less-than-wonderful results I'm getting are down to the poor playback on this machine - I'll try burning a couple of tracks to cd and playing them on a 'real' cd machine. I did try initially with the old P500 system - but I was getting 'dropouts' (short missing 'chunks' of music) on the finished CD. Hopefully this new pc should have enough 'horsepower' to keep up with the recording process. I'm using Audacity to make the recordings. One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do a test recording to confirm. Thanks everybody for their comments so far.... Adrian Suffolk UK |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:45:59 +0100, Adrian Brentnall
wrote: Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Actually, A P500 is also more than adequate for simple recording and burning a CD. It's only a few years ago that one was the centrepiece of my music recording system. And before that a P200 was doing sterling work :-) The trick with audio is to (a) get an adequate sound card and (b) make sure the system can concentrate on the job with no distractions. This means stopping any inessential background processes and programs, and not trying to do anything else when the machine is trying to record music or burn a CD. Pull the plug on your Internet connection for instance. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:45:59 +0100, Adrian Brentnall
wrote: Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Actually, A P500 is also more than adequate for simple recording and burning a CD. It's only a few years ago that one was the centrepiece of my music recording system. And before that a P200 was doing sterling work :-) The trick with audio is to (a) get an adequate sound card and (b) make sure the system can concentrate on the job with no distractions. This means stopping any inessential background processes and programs, and not trying to do anything else when the machine is trying to record music or burn a CD. Pull the plug on your Internet connection for instance. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:45:59 +0100, Adrian Brentnall
wrote: Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Actually, A P500 is also more than adequate for simple recording and burning a CD. It's only a few years ago that one was the centrepiece of my music recording system. And before that a P200 was doing sterling work :-) The trick with audio is to (a) get an adequate sound card and (b) make sure the system can concentrate on the job with no distractions. This means stopping any inessential background processes and programs, and not trying to do anything else when the machine is trying to record music or burn a CD. Pull the plug on your Internet connection for instance. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Adrian Brentnall wrote, inter alia:
: One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound : from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I : don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do : a test recording to confirm. From my own extremely elementary forays into this sort of thing so far - your soundcard may be sharing interrupts with something - maybe the mouse port. With built-in sound and presumably a mouse port, this may be slightly tricky to resolve, if my guess is correct, but not impossible. Look in Device Manager at the Computer Properties and see what interrupt it is on, and what else is. One PC I had set up to play music seemed fine, until I tried to play files over a network - the soundcard was on the same interrupt as the network card! That was solved by removing it and adding back to a different PCI slot. You might have to research reserving resources, or plug&play options etc. Just a guess, mind you! Doesn't sound satisfactory as described though... -- RdM |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Adrian Brentnall wrote, inter alia:
: One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound : from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I : don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do : a test recording to confirm. From my own extremely elementary forays into this sort of thing so far - your soundcard may be sharing interrupts with something - maybe the mouse port. With built-in sound and presumably a mouse port, this may be slightly tricky to resolve, if my guess is correct, but not impossible. Look in Device Manager at the Computer Properties and see what interrupt it is on, and what else is. One PC I had set up to play music seemed fine, until I tried to play files over a network - the soundcard was on the same interrupt as the network card! That was solved by removing it and adding back to a different PCI slot. You might have to research reserving resources, or plug&play options etc. Just a guess, mind you! Doesn't sound satisfactory as described though... -- RdM |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Adrian Brentnall wrote, inter alia:
: One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound : from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I : don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do : a test recording to confirm. From my own extremely elementary forays into this sort of thing so far - your soundcard may be sharing interrupts with something - maybe the mouse port. With built-in sound and presumably a mouse port, this may be slightly tricky to resolve, if my guess is correct, but not impossible. Look in Device Manager at the Computer Properties and see what interrupt it is on, and what else is. One PC I had set up to play music seemed fine, until I tried to play files over a network - the soundcard was on the same interrupt as the network card! That was solved by removing it and adding back to a different PCI slot. You might have to research reserving resources, or plug&play options etc. Just a guess, mind you! Doesn't sound satisfactory as described though... -- RdM |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi Lawrence
Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Actually, A P500 is also more than adequate for simple recording and burning a CD. It's only a few years ago that one was the centrepiece of my music recording system. And before that a P200 was doing sterling work :-) Oh - that's interesting. I did spend a happy evening (!) with the aid of a couple of websites that sounded as if they knew what they were up to, going round the old P500 and turning off 'unnecessary' bits. Amazing how much 'clutter' there is in a 'standard' win98 SE install. But, just after I'd done that, my wife's P350 expired - so she ended up with the P500...... Might be worth seeing if the P350 can be resurrected - it seems to me that having a dedicated machine (stand-alone) for the audio digitising would be a good plan - then it could get on with what it was meant to do without any interruptions.... The trick with audio is to (a) get an adequate sound card and (b) make sure the system can concentrate on the job with no distractions. This means stopping any inessential background processes and programs, and not trying to do anything else when the machine is trying to record music or burn a CD. Pull the plug on your Internet connection for instance. I think I'll look out for a decent soundcard - and see exactly 'why' the P350 died. I've got enough bits & pieces sitting around here - it shouldn't be impossible to put a working system together. Don't suppose anybody ever does sound recording under DOS - I know it wouldn't be very pretty - but at least there could be fewer distractions for the processor .......? Thanks for the thoughts Adrian Suffolk UK |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi Lawrence
Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Actually, A P500 is also more than adequate for simple recording and burning a CD. It's only a few years ago that one was the centrepiece of my music recording system. And before that a P200 was doing sterling work :-) Oh - that's interesting. I did spend a happy evening (!) with the aid of a couple of websites that sounded as if they knew what they were up to, going round the old P500 and turning off 'unnecessary' bits. Amazing how much 'clutter' there is in a 'standard' win98 SE install. But, just after I'd done that, my wife's P350 expired - so she ended up with the P500...... Might be worth seeing if the P350 can be resurrected - it seems to me that having a dedicated machine (stand-alone) for the audio digitising would be a good plan - then it could get on with what it was meant to do without any interruptions.... The trick with audio is to (a) get an adequate sound card and (b) make sure the system can concentrate on the job with no distractions. This means stopping any inessential background processes and programs, and not trying to do anything else when the machine is trying to record music or burn a CD. Pull the plug on your Internet connection for instance. I think I'll look out for a decent soundcard - and see exactly 'why' the P350 died. I've got enough bits & pieces sitting around here - it shouldn't be impossible to put a working system together. Don't suppose anybody ever does sound recording under DOS - I know it wouldn't be very pretty - but at least there could be fewer distractions for the processor .......? Thanks for the thoughts Adrian Suffolk UK |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi Lawrence
Tell us how you're setting things up when recording. Also, tell us what computer you have. A 1.7MHz Celeron, while more than adequate for your purposes, isn't exactly cutting-edge :-) No - but it's a step up from the P500 that I had been running g Actually, A P500 is also more than adequate for simple recording and burning a CD. It's only a few years ago that one was the centrepiece of my music recording system. And before that a P200 was doing sterling work :-) Oh - that's interesting. I did spend a happy evening (!) with the aid of a couple of websites that sounded as if they knew what they were up to, going round the old P500 and turning off 'unnecessary' bits. Amazing how much 'clutter' there is in a 'standard' win98 SE install. But, just after I'd done that, my wife's P350 expired - so she ended up with the P500...... Might be worth seeing if the P350 can be resurrected - it seems to me that having a dedicated machine (stand-alone) for the audio digitising would be a good plan - then it could get on with what it was meant to do without any interruptions.... The trick with audio is to (a) get an adequate sound card and (b) make sure the system can concentrate on the job with no distractions. This means stopping any inessential background processes and programs, and not trying to do anything else when the machine is trying to record music or burn a CD. Pull the plug on your Internet connection for instance. I think I'll look out for a decent soundcard - and see exactly 'why' the P350 died. I've got enough bits & pieces sitting around here - it shouldn't be impossible to put a working system together. Don't suppose anybody ever does sound recording under DOS - I know it wouldn't be very pretty - but at least there could be fewer distractions for the processor .......? Thanks for the thoughts Adrian Suffolk UK |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi
: One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound : from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I : don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do : a test recording to confirm. From my own extremely elementary forays into this sort of thing so far - your soundcard may be sharing interrupts with something - maybe the mouse port. I did check that - they seem to be on different interrupts...... I did have the PC exchanged for a replacement after complaining about the noise - didn't make any difference at all g With built-in sound and presumably a mouse port, this may be slightly tricky to resolve, if my guess is correct, but not impossible. Look in Device Manager at the Computer Properties and see what interrupt it is on, and what else is. One PC I had set up to play music seemed fine, until I tried to play files over a network - the soundcard was on the same interrupt as the network card! That was solved by removing it and adding back to a different PCI slot. You might have to research reserving resources, or plug&play options etc. Just a guess, mind you! Doesn't sound satisfactory as described though... No.... true! I think I'll look out for a decent soundcard - I could probably cobble together a 'spare' pc for the audio recording project - and then use the decent soundcard in this box later on to get rid of the 'burble'..... Off to Ebay! Thanks Adrian Suffolk UK |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi
: One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound : from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I : don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do : a test recording to confirm. From my own extremely elementary forays into this sort of thing so far - your soundcard may be sharing interrupts with something - maybe the mouse port. I did check that - they seem to be on different interrupts...... I did have the PC exchanged for a replacement after complaining about the noise - didn't make any difference at all g With built-in sound and presumably a mouse port, this may be slightly tricky to resolve, if my guess is correct, but not impossible. Look in Device Manager at the Computer Properties and see what interrupt it is on, and what else is. One PC I had set up to play music seemed fine, until I tried to play files over a network - the soundcard was on the same interrupt as the network card! That was solved by removing it and adding back to a different PCI slot. You might have to research reserving resources, or plug&play options etc. Just a guess, mind you! Doesn't sound satisfactory as described though... No.... true! I think I'll look out for a decent soundcard - I could probably cobble together a 'spare' pc for the audio recording project - and then use the decent soundcard in this box later on to get rid of the 'burble'..... Off to Ebay! Thanks Adrian Suffolk UK |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Hi
: One annoying thing about the PC is that there's a 'burbling' sound : from the onboard audio - also noise when the mouse is moved - but I : don't know if this is coming out over the recorded audio - need to do : a test recording to confirm. From my own extremely elementary forays into this sort of thing so far - your soundcard may be sharing interrupts with something - maybe the mouse port. I did check that - they seem to be on different interrupts...... I did have the PC exchanged for a replacement after complaining about the noise - didn't make any difference at all g With built-in sound and presumably a mouse port, this may be slightly tricky to resolve, if my guess is correct, but not impossible. Look in Device Manager at the Computer Properties and see what interrupt it is on, and what else is. One PC I had set up to play music seemed fine, until I tried to play files over a network - the soundcard was on the same interrupt as the network card! That was solved by removing it and adding back to a different PCI slot. You might have to research reserving resources, or plug&play options etc. Just a guess, mind you! Doesn't sound satisfactory as described though... No.... true! I think I'll look out for a decent soundcard - I could probably cobble together a 'spare' pc for the audio recording project - and then use the decent soundcard in this box later on to get rid of the 'burble'..... Off to Ebay! Thanks Adrian Suffolk UK |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
HI all
Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitised audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This noice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalisation and dolby. I'm currently recording with the dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electonic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Adrian Suffolk UK |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
HI all
Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitised audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This noice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalisation and dolby. I'm currently recording with the dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electonic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Adrian Suffolk UK |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
HI all
Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitised audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This noice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalisation and dolby. I'm currently recording with the dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electonic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Adrian Suffolk UK |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
"Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message
Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitized audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. A Santa Cruz has about 30 dB more dynamic range than cassette tapes. The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Lucky you. Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This novice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? The noise is in the source? 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalization and Dolby. I'm currently recording with the Dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the Dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the Dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? If the tape was made with Dolby, you should probably play it back with Dolby. 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electronic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... The head gaps in a tape head for each channel are tightly connected to each other - They are molded into solid block of metal and plastic. Therefore, the alignment of one channel should match the other channel within a pretty tight tolerance. Practically speaking, you can't do much about it! If you don't have a known calibration tape, you don't know if the tapes you are transcribing were originally made out of balance or what. If you want to work with internal adjustments, you should get a service manual or other clear description of what the adjustments do, the test conditions for adjusting them, and the necessary test equipment. Your audio interface could be part of the equation, because with appropriate software it can be a good relative voltmeter and frequency response measuring facility. If the only difference is a level difference, you can use an audio editor to match the channels in the digital domain. Audacity and Goldwave are software that can do this, and you can download either for free. Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Good idea! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
"Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message
Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitized audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. A Santa Cruz has about 30 dB more dynamic range than cassette tapes. The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Lucky you. Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This novice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? The noise is in the source? 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalization and Dolby. I'm currently recording with the Dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the Dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the Dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? If the tape was made with Dolby, you should probably play it back with Dolby. 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electronic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... The head gaps in a tape head for each channel are tightly connected to each other - They are molded into solid block of metal and plastic. Therefore, the alignment of one channel should match the other channel within a pretty tight tolerance. Practically speaking, you can't do much about it! If you don't have a known calibration tape, you don't know if the tapes you are transcribing were originally made out of balance or what. If you want to work with internal adjustments, you should get a service manual or other clear description of what the adjustments do, the test conditions for adjusting them, and the necessary test equipment. Your audio interface could be part of the equation, because with appropriate software it can be a good relative voltmeter and frequency response measuring facility. If the only difference is a level difference, you can use an audio editor to match the channels in the digital domain. Audacity and Goldwave are software that can do this, and you can download either for free. Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Good idea! |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
"Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message
Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitized audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. A Santa Cruz has about 30 dB more dynamic range than cassette tapes. The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Lucky you. Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This novice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? The noise is in the source? 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalization and Dolby. I'm currently recording with the Dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the Dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the Dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? If the tape was made with Dolby, you should probably play it back with Dolby. 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electronic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... The head gaps in a tape head for each channel are tightly connected to each other - They are molded into solid block of metal and plastic. Therefore, the alignment of one channel should match the other channel within a pretty tight tolerance. Practically speaking, you can't do much about it! If you don't have a known calibration tape, you don't know if the tapes you are transcribing were originally made out of balance or what. If you want to work with internal adjustments, you should get a service manual or other clear description of what the adjustments do, the test conditions for adjusting them, and the necessary test equipment. Your audio interface could be part of the equation, because with appropriate software it can be a good relative voltmeter and frequency response measuring facility. If the only difference is a level difference, you can use an audio editor to match the channels in the digital domain. Audacity and Goldwave are software that can do this, and you can download either for free. Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Good idea! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
HI Amy
Thanks for the comments... I've replied inline... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:49:11 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitized audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. A Santa Cruz has about 30 dB more dynamic range than cassette tapes. Sounds good g - great difference between the Santa Cruz and the on-board audio... The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Lucky you. Yes - I was surprised that it seems to work without dropouts in the recorded audio Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This novice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? The noise is in the source? Nope - the noise is present when the tape source is 'off' - also present when all mixer inputs are muted. Seems to be a constant (now)low-level burble - but additional noise occurs when the mouse is moved. Done all the 'usual' stuff about checking for conflicting interupts - but can't seem to get rid of it. 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalization and Dolby. I'm currently recording with the Dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the Dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the Dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? If the tape was made with Dolby, you should probably play it back with Dolby. The website I saw suggested that it was better to run the tape output without dolby and then use software on the PC to clear up any tape noise - but don't know why that should me any better than applying dolby during replay at the tape deck...? On a 'listening test', applying dolby to the replay cuts a fair amount of 'top' - would you expect that ? 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electronic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... The head gaps in a tape head for each channel are tightly connected to each other - They are molded into solid block of metal and plastic. Therefore, the alignment of one channel should match the other channel within a pretty tight tolerance. Practically speaking, you can't do much about it! Yes - I guess you're right.... If you don't have a known calibration tape, you don't know if the tapes you are transcribing were originally made out of balance or what. 'Spose that's true If you want to work with internal adjustments, you should get a service manual or other clear description of what the adjustments do, the test conditions for adjusting them, and the necessary test equipment. Your audio interface could be part of the equation, because with appropriate software it can be a good relative voltmeter and frequency response measuring facility. If the only difference is a level difference, you can use an audio editor to match the channels in the digital domain. Audacity and Goldwave are software that can do this, and you can download either for free. I'm using Audacity at the moment.... Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Good idea! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
HI Amy
Thanks for the comments... I've replied inline... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:49:11 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitized audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. A Santa Cruz has about 30 dB more dynamic range than cassette tapes. Sounds good g - great difference between the Santa Cruz and the on-board audio... The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Lucky you. Yes - I was surprised that it seems to work without dropouts in the recorded audio Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This novice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? The noise is in the source? Nope - the noise is present when the tape source is 'off' - also present when all mixer inputs are muted. Seems to be a constant (now)low-level burble - but additional noise occurs when the mouse is moved. Done all the 'usual' stuff about checking for conflicting interupts - but can't seem to get rid of it. 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalization and Dolby. I'm currently recording with the Dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the Dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the Dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? If the tape was made with Dolby, you should probably play it back with Dolby. The website I saw suggested that it was better to run the tape output without dolby and then use software on the PC to clear up any tape noise - but don't know why that should me any better than applying dolby during replay at the tape deck...? On a 'listening test', applying dolby to the replay cuts a fair amount of 'top' - would you expect that ? 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electronic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... The head gaps in a tape head for each channel are tightly connected to each other - They are molded into solid block of metal and plastic. Therefore, the alignment of one channel should match the other channel within a pretty tight tolerance. Practically speaking, you can't do much about it! Yes - I guess you're right.... If you don't have a known calibration tape, you don't know if the tapes you are transcribing were originally made out of balance or what. 'Spose that's true If you want to work with internal adjustments, you should get a service manual or other clear description of what the adjustments do, the test conditions for adjusting them, and the necessary test equipment. Your audio interface could be part of the equation, because with appropriate software it can be a good relative voltmeter and frequency response measuring facility. If the only difference is a level difference, you can use an audio editor to match the channels in the digital domain. Audacity and Goldwave are software that can do this, and you can download either for free. I'm using Audacity at the moment.... Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Good idea! |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
HI Amy
Thanks for the comments... I've replied inline... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:49:11 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Adrian Brentnall" wrote in message Just a follow-up to my original message - partly to feedback the successful outcome and also to say a big 'thank you' to all who responded. I obtained a second-hand Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (ebay - where else !g) - and installed it in the 1.7gig Celeron. Only made one tape-to-cd recording so far - but there were no 'dropouts' in the digitized audio, and background noise was reasonable - certainly no worse than the original cassette. A Santa Cruz has about 30 dB more dynamic range than cassette tapes. Sounds good g - great difference between the Santa Cruz and the on-board audio... The other 'positive' is that the PC seemed able to handle the 'recording' process without needing any special configuration (as in disabling all the other little jobs that WinXP does in its spare time). Lucky you. Yes - I was surprised that it seems to work without dropouts in the recorded audio Just a couple more questions, if you don't mind.... 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This novice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? The noise is in the source? Nope - the noise is present when the tape source is 'off' - also present when all mixer inputs are muted. Seems to be a constant (now)low-level burble - but additional noise occurs when the mouse is moved. Done all the 'usual' stuff about checking for conflicting interupts - but can't seem to get rid of it. 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalization and Dolby. I'm currently recording with the Dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the Dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the Dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? If the tape was made with Dolby, you should probably play it back with Dolby. The website I saw suggested that it was better to run the tape output without dolby and then use software on the PC to clear up any tape noise - but don't know why that should me any better than applying dolby during replay at the tape deck...? On a 'listening test', applying dolby to the replay cuts a fair amount of 'top' - would you expect that ? 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electronic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. If it's the heads I'm guessing that I need a 'test / setup tape' to set the head alignment correctly... The head gaps in a tape head for each channel are tightly connected to each other - They are molded into solid block of metal and plastic. Therefore, the alignment of one channel should match the other channel within a pretty tight tolerance. Practically speaking, you can't do much about it! Yes - I guess you're right.... If you don't have a known calibration tape, you don't know if the tapes you are transcribing were originally made out of balance or what. 'Spose that's true If you want to work with internal adjustments, you should get a service manual or other clear description of what the adjustments do, the test conditions for adjusting them, and the necessary test equipment. Your audio interface could be part of the equation, because with appropriate software it can be a good relative voltmeter and frequency response measuring facility. If the only difference is a level difference, you can use an audio editor to match the channels in the digital domain. Audacity and Goldwave are software that can do this, and you can download either for free. I'm using Audacity at the moment.... Many thanks for the help so far - we're 90% of the way there - but, as I want to archive my tape (and, eventually, vinyl, collections to CD then I'm trying to get it right before I start on the long process of doing each tape. Good idea! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Adrian Brentnall wrote in message . ..
(snip) 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This noice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? Be sure to use good screened cable from the tapedeck to the PC and keep away from mains cable etc. This way you avoid picking up RF interference and 50hz mains interference. However if you are only getting this noise thru the PC speakers while monitoring your input then switch all the other inputs on windows Volume control to off - especially MIC. You may also consider reinstalling the audio drivers. I had to do this once. And check your PC speakers - they could be picking up interference. especially if it is not affecting recording. 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalisation and dolby. I'm currently recording with the dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? Often, it comes down to having a bright but hissy signal with dolby off to a less hissy but duller sound with it on. Depends on the quality of the machine and tape used in recording. Were your tapes recorded in Dolby? often, I compromise - example -a normal bias tape recorded in Dolby but sounds a bit dull when played back in dolby -so keep dolby off but play it back with CrO2 setting to roll off the high end a bit. Personally I find tape transfers like this a nigthmare - beg, borrow or buy the music on cd or get on a P2P internet connection like e-Mule and try to find the original music this way for better quality. 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electonic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. The only sure way is to play the cassette you want to transfer in the sansui deck, with dolby off, and align the tapehead by gently turning the screw on its left with a non magnetic jewelers screwdriver till you get the clearest, sharpest sound. When you obtain optimal alignment, dub the tape to PC. It is painstaking but its the only way to get top results in reporduction, ie.. by matching the original alignment used in recording that tape. good luck, Ben |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Adrian Brentnall wrote in message . ..
(snip) 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This noice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? Be sure to use good screened cable from the tapedeck to the PC and keep away from mains cable etc. This way you avoid picking up RF interference and 50hz mains interference. However if you are only getting this noise thru the PC speakers while monitoring your input then switch all the other inputs on windows Volume control to off - especially MIC. You may also consider reinstalling the audio drivers. I had to do this once. And check your PC speakers - they could be picking up interference. especially if it is not affecting recording. 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalisation and dolby. I'm currently recording with the dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? Often, it comes down to having a bright but hissy signal with dolby off to a less hissy but duller sound with it on. Depends on the quality of the machine and tape used in recording. Were your tapes recorded in Dolby? often, I compromise - example -a normal bias tape recorded in Dolby but sounds a bit dull when played back in dolby -so keep dolby off but play it back with CrO2 setting to roll off the high end a bit. Personally I find tape transfers like this a nigthmare - beg, borrow or buy the music on cd or get on a P2P internet connection like e-Mule and try to find the original music this way for better quality. 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electonic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. The only sure way is to play the cassette you want to transfer in the sansui deck, with dolby off, and align the tapehead by gently turning the screw on its left with a non magnetic jewelers screwdriver till you get the clearest, sharpest sound. When you obtain optimal alignment, dub the tape to PC. It is painstaking but its the only way to get top results in reporduction, ie.. by matching the original alignment used in recording that tape. good luck, Ben |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
recording disk / tape to cd via PC
Adrian Brentnall wrote in message . ..
(snip) 1) There's still the original background noise on audio playback on this PC - but it doesn't appear on the final CD, so it's not a big worry. This noice was present with the original naff on-board sound - so I'm wondering how both sound systems can show the same problem...? Be sure to use good screened cable from the tapedeck to the PC and keep away from mains cable etc. This way you avoid picking up RF interference and 50hz mains interference. However if you are only getting this noise thru the PC speakers while monitoring your input then switch all the other inputs on windows Volume control to off - especially MIC. You may also consider reinstalling the audio drivers. I had to do this once. And check your PC speakers - they could be picking up interference. especially if it is not affecting recording. 2) The (reasonably good Sansui D-90) cassette deck that I'm using to record from has buttons for bias equalisation and dolby. I'm currently recording with the dolby switched 'off'. Presumably with the dolby 'on' I'd hear a reduction in background hiss. One website I was advised against using the dolby NR in this situation - any comments / ideas ? Often, it comes down to having a bright but hissy signal with dolby off to a less hissy but duller sound with it on. Depends on the quality of the machine and tape used in recording. Were your tapes recorded in Dolby? often, I compromise - example -a normal bias tape recorded in Dolby but sounds a bit dull when played back in dolby -so keep dolby off but play it back with CrO2 setting to roll off the high end a bit. Personally I find tape transfers like this a nigthmare - beg, borrow or buy the music on cd or get on a P2P internet connection like e-Mule and try to find the original music this way for better quality. 3) The sound levels as shown on the decks own VU meters and the record level meters on the PC software show that the left channel is about 3db lower (on average) than the right channel. I don't have a calibrated set-up tape. When this deck came my way the heads were badly 'gunged' - and it took a couple of applications of head cleaner to clear them. Is this 'imbalance' more likely to be as a result of mechanical misalignment of the tape head - or of an electonic 'out-of-adjustment' inside the deck. The only sure way is to play the cassette you want to transfer in the sansui deck, with dolby off, and align the tapehead by gently turning the screw on its left with a non magnetic jewelers screwdriver till you get the clearest, sharpest sound. When you obtain optimal alignment, dub the tape to PC. It is painstaking but its the only way to get top results in reporduction, ie.. by matching the original alignment used in recording that tape. good luck, Ben |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
High quality audio cassette to cd recording | Pro Audio | |||
Why all the bad recordings | High End Audio | |||
replacement of DAT machine ? | Pro Audio | |||
Tape Recording thru Ceiling | Tech | |||
Cassette tape Player Recording Heads | Marketplace |