Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sound Forge/Sony vs Cool Edit/Adobe Audition
"Arny Krueger" wrote
Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. Right, and both Goldwave and Audacity are distributed for free. Goldwave is freely distributed as mildly-limited shareware and Audacity is out-and-out freeware. It always comes down to the money for you, Arny. Except it isn't that way when the rubber hits the road. I've downloaded Audition. Went through the Help/Get Started menu and did some editing of an existing SF file. Total time expended 1hr 10 minutes. I challenge you to do the same with Sound Forge 7.0. http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.co...p1.asp?CatID=1 This seems like a reasonable request given the bandwidth you've wasted trashing Sound Forge/Sony products. Stand-and-deliver, mr. Flat Tire. I'm simply trying to encourage people who don't have the sort of confidence that I have... You've given negative advice on purchasing Sound Forge products and in regard to SF 5,6, and 7.0 you have absolutely zero empirical experiences. Your brief understanding of SF XP4.5 (W95) gives me little "confidence" in your professionalism. ... to spend money on audio products, that they can investigate these products without getting out their metaphorical wallets. You have little understanding of buyer behavior. Self-importance seems to be your primary motivational factor behind your poorly educated (lack of empirical experiences) advice. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Audition / CoolEdit NR bug - Need advice | Pro Audio | |||
Sound Forge/Sony vs Cool Edit/Adobe Audition | General | |||
Jazz Bass Pickups & their sound | Pro Audio | |||
Cool Edit sound problem | Pro Audio | |||
Loops (Adobe Audition, Cool Edit Pro) | Pro Audio |