Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
"TheBIessedDead" wrote in message
... trust me Mark plenty of people can't understand what you say but are scared to say something because you and other jump all over them. I sorry Mark but my writing skills are not great but they're worlds better than yours. There are definetely times that I don't understand what Mark is saying, but that has absolutely nothing to do with his grammar. His electrical knowledge is far beyond me sometimes. As far as Ghee claiming that his writing skills are superior to ANYONE..... all I can do is laugh. Nick that was my whole point, not his knowledge that was never in question just his grammar. you have just shown you comprehension is low I never said they were superior just not great. do I need to type it again so you can READ is again?? |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
"Soundfreak03" wrote in message
... I sorry Mark but my writing skills are not great but they're worlds better than yours. Ghee, maybe in your mind you writing skills are good but TRUST ME they are not. But hey I don't fault you for it because it would seem that English is not your first langauge. Right? Les Les I don't need to say anything, CH already got you. do you understand that?? |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
If you say so.
Or, translated into "gheeish": i u say, so if you don't believe me just look at your old post and run them near a spell checker and it'll choke. but its cool. Oh, you're referring to typos. I understand now. I, on the other hand, was referring to your inability to form properly constructed sentences. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
that was my whole point, not his knowledge that was never in question just
his grammar. you have just shown you comprehension is low I never said they were superior just not great. do I need to type it again so you can READ is again?? I just counted 15 errors above. Do you really think you're in any position to criticize? |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
that was my whole point, not his knowledge that was never in question just
his grammar. you have just shown you comprehension is low I never said they were superior just not great. do I need to type it again so you can READ is again?? Um.... Are you confused? Did I use too many big words or something. If you sound out every word that I wrote, and read each sentence by itself, you might notice that I said I didn't understand Mark sometimes was because of his knowledge, NOT his grammar. I am disputing your claim that Mark has bad grammar, and I would have assumed that you would have figured that out on your own. That being said, I dare you to find a quote from Mark where he is using bad grammar.Not a typo, or anything like that, but actual bad grammar. Although I know good and well that you cannot supply me with such a quote, but I'd really be interested in seeing you try. I know you can't find one because for one, Mark does not have bad grammar at all. In fact, even when talking serious electronics, something I don't know much about, the only reason I AM ever able to understand is because he has such GOOD grammar. Second, I know you will not find a quote of him using bad grammar because I have the feeling that you have absolutely no idea what good grammar looks like at all. Someone who cannot figure out the use of a comma really has no business at all complaining about other's grammar. Nick |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
Hey Lester, you're one to talk.
You again? I type quickly and rarely proofread before I post, it is the usenet after all. So sure, I have typos. But my posts are always understandable, and my grammar does not impede the point I am trying to make. If you have found that to be an issue then please ask me to clarify. I can always dumb it down to your level Howdy doody. Les |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
Les I don't need to say anything, CH already got you. do you understand
that?? Your grammar is horrible. Most of the time I do not even bother responding to you because I really do not understand what in the blue hell you are talking about. You have serious communication issues when your are posting. I assume that is because English is not your first language, your grammatical errors are typical of that. Am I right or wrong? If English is your first language then you really need to work on your written communication skills. Les |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
I just find it funny that a dumb **** such as yourself would knock someone about their posts. In article , othanks (Soundfreak03) wrote: Hey Lester, you're one to talk. You again? I type quickly and rarely proofread before I post, it is the usenet after all. So sure, I have typos. But my posts are always understandable, and my grammar does not impede the point I am trying to make. If you have found that to be an issue then please ask me to clarify. I can always dumb it down to your level Howdy doody. Les |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
There you go again. lol
What? Were you not able to understand what I wrote? Would you like me to rephrase it using smaller words? Howdy, are you that desperate for someone to agree with you that you would actually defend Ghee's grammar over mine or anyone else's? That is pathetic, but I have come to expect that out of you. Les |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
I just find it funny that a dumb **** such as yourself would knock someone
about their posts. Sure. Why don't you give me an example? You can search for a quote in google. What I find funny is that you are so desperate to try and "get me" that you would actually agree with Ghee about grammar! But at least you are not as dumb as your counterpart Pugsly. By the way, in case you forgot, the website is www.google.com. You can quote and show how much of a dumb **** I am. Les Anyone think he actually knows how to use google? Nah, me either. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
Yes, rephrase everything using smaller words that you can spell, that might be
easier for you. I'm not defending anyone. I just find it a little sickening when someone flames someone over the very something they do themselves. Now that is pathetic....... In article , othanks (Soundfreak03) wrote: There you go again. lol What? Were you not able to understand what I wrote? Would you like me to rephrase it using smaller words? Howdy, are you that desperate for someone to agree with you that you would actually defend Ghee's grammar over mine or anyone else's? That is pathetic, but I have come to expect that out of you. Les |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
Yes, rephrase everything using smaller words that you can spell, that might
be easier for you. I'm not defending anyone. I just find it a little sickening when someone flames someone over the very something they do themselves. I am not flaming him because of spelling errors. He brought the whole thing up himself. Do you deny that at least 1/3 of his posts are difficult to read due to bad use of sentence structure and grammar? You really are a dumbass. I admitted to making mistakes in my posting. I rarely proofread, it is only the usenet. But my posts are always clear and understandable. Les |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
Lester,
Funny ting is dat I hav nut sean eny irrorz in yur postz latele, y is dat? LOL I am not flaming him because of spelling errors. He brought the whole thing up himself. Do you deny that at least 1/3 of his posts are difficult to read due to bad use of sentence structure and grammar? You really are a dumbass. I admitted to making mistakes in my posting. I rarely proofread, it is only the usenet. But my posts are always clear and understandable. Les |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
Lester,
Funny ting is dat I hav nut sean eny irrorz in yur postz latele, y is dat? LOL Funny thing is you refuse to answer my questions. Why is that? Les |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
"Mark Zarella" wrote in message
... that was my whole point, not his knowledge that was never in question just his grammar. you have just shown you comprehension is low I never said they were superior just not great. do I need to type it again so you can READ is again?? I just counted 15 errors above. Do you really think you're in any position to criticize? what 15 errors, there aren't even 15 words. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
"TheBIessedDead" wrote in message
... that was my whole point, not his knowledge that was never in question just own. That being said, I dare you to find a quote from Mark where he is using bad grammar.Not a typo, or anything like that, but actual bad grammar. Although I know good and well that you cannot supply me with such a quote, but I'd really be interested in seeing you try. I know you can't find one because for one, Mark does not have bad grammar at all. In fact, even when talking serious electronics, something I don't know much about, the only reason I AM ever able to understand is because he has such GOOD grammar. Second, I know you will not find a quote of him using bad grammar because I have the feeling that you have absolutely no idea what good grammar looks like at all. Someone who cannot figure out the use of a comma really has no business at all complaining about other's grammar. Nick I really don't care that much to go behind and look at all of MZ post and to suggest that is stupid. just look at what he writes and the way he structures it and you have your answers. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
"Mark Zarella" wrote in message
... If you say so. Or, translated into "gheeish": i u say, so if you don't believe me just look at your old post and run them near a spell checker and it'll choke. but its cool. Oh, you're referring to typos. I understand now. I, on the other hand, was referring to your inability to form properly constructed sentences. no your terrible spelling and bad/improper grammar. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
"Soundfreak03" wrote in message
... Les I don't need to say anything, CH already got you. do you understand that?? Your grammar is horrible. Most of the time I do not even bother responding to you because I really do not understand what in the blue hell you are talking about. You have serious communication issues when your are posting. I assume that is because English is not your first language, your grammatical errors are typical of that. Am I right or wrong? If English is your first language then you really need to work on your written communication skills. Les no English is my first language, but I speak and read others. it's funny you seem to be the only one that has a problem. so it the writer or the reader. I think it's the latter. |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
"Soundfreak03" wrote in message
... Yes, rephrase everything using smaller words that you can spell, that might be easier for you. I'm not defending anyone. I just find it a little sickening when someone flames someone over the very something they do themselves. I am not flaming him because of spelling errors. He brought the whole thing up himself. Do you deny that at least 1/3 of his posts are difficult to read due to bad use of sentence structure and grammar? You really are a dumbass. I admitted to making mistakes in my posting. I rarely proofread, it is only the usenet. But my posts are always clear and understandable. Les no one can say always but fools we all make errors. no less than 1/3. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
that was my whole point, not his knowledge that was never in question
just his grammar. you have just shown you comprehension is low I never said they were superior just not great. do I need to type it again so you can READ is again?? I just counted 15 errors above. Do you really think you're in any position to criticize? what 15 errors, there aren't even 15 words. In order: 1) "that" - capitalization 2) first comma should be a period 3) should be period after "knowledge" 4) "that" - capitalization 5) should be period after "question" 6) "just" should therefore be capitalized 7) "you" should be capitalized 8) second "you" in the second sentence should be "your" 9) should be period after "low" 10) should be semicolon or period after "superior" 11) therefore, "just" should be capitalized 12) "do" should be capitalized 13) "is" should be "it" in last line I can't find the other two errors. Don't blame me. You asked. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
I, on the other hand, was referring to your inability to form properly
constructed sentences. no your terrible spelling and bad/improper grammar. Give me just one example of "bad/improper grammar." |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
no English is my first language, but I speak and read others. it's funny you seem to be the only one that has a problem. so it the writer or the reader. I think it's the latter. Well, Ghee, your high school English teacher needs to be fired. I know I do not have perfect grammar and spelling, but my posts are understandable. Your's on the other hand are horrible. I am not the only one who has trouble reading your posts. Although, I can usually decipher them in the end. Your posts are the only ones that I have to read multiple times to understand, usually do to your lack of commas, periods, and word swaps i.e. "it" for "is". Les |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Cold temperatures vs. sub surround
no your terrible spelling and bad/improper grammar.
Post some proof of his terrible grammar or get off it already. Nick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Surround & Throughout House? | General | |||
How to Achieve Best Surround Sound Results without a Processor | General | |||
How to go Surround Sound?? | Car Audio | |||
Surround glue?? | Car Audio | |||
Punch XLC 8"...broken surround...HELP! | Car Audio |