Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
Marc Phillips wrote :
"Dude, no one here knows what the **** you are talking about. I bet French people don't even know what the **** you are talking about. I noticed today that you responded to a post with the scintillating admission that you actually had no response. I have a theory that the more a person talks, the stupider they are. You, my friend, are one dumb mofo." I answered : Questions please. In the sentence : "I have a theory that the more a person talks, the stupider they are" "*a* person talk" is singular OK ? "the stupider *they* are" is plural OK ? My questions are : - Is it correct ? - Is it a freudian slip ? - Are you a cretin ? ---------------------------------------------- Do you miss this one boonie-boy ? ---------------------------------------------- Arnold ? Oily ? Is someone can help me concerning this matter ? I read here that this man has already written something (LOL). It is very important for me to know the true of it. Thank, Lionel PS : if I get correct answers I promise to stop posts for 2 days. ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
In article ,
Lionel Chapuis lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote: Marc Phillips wrote : "Dude, no one here knows what the **** you are talking about. I bet French people don't even know what the **** you are talking about. I noticed today that you responded to a post with the scintillating admission that you actually had no response. I have a theory that the more a person talks, the stupider they are. You, my friend, are one dumb mofo." I answered : Questions please. In the sentence : "I have a theory that the more a person talks, the stupider they are" "*a* person talk" is singular OK ? "the stupider *they* are" is plural OK ? My questions are : - Is it correct ? - Is it a freudian slip ? - Are you a cretin ? ---------------------------------------------- Do you miss this one boonie-boy ? ---------------------------------------------- Arnold ? Oily ? Is someone can help me concerning this matter ? I read here that this man has already written something (LOL). It is very important for me to know the true of it. Thank, Lionel PS : if I get correct answers I promise to stop posts for 2 days. ;-) It's tolerated in informal speech because it avoids use of a gendered singular pronoun. It's not Freudian nor a slip. He is not a Cretin: he is an inhabitant of California. See you in two days. Stephen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
"Lionel Chapuis" (LOL! LOt"S!) said: PS : if I get correct answers I promise to stop posts for 2 days. ;-) The correct answer is: You are a witless nincompoop. Bye. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
MiNE 109 a écrit :
It's tolerated in informal speech because it avoids use of a gendered singular pronoun. It's not Freudian nor a slip. He is not a Cretin: he is an inhabitant of California. See you in two days. Stephen I'm afraid that your language poetry is more and more diluted with easiness. I was showing regards for you because you are the RAO's linguist, Stephen and now you are treating with my enemies. You are on a dangerous way Stephen, I tell you that, dangerous way... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How poorly they paint their walls
"Lionel Chapuis" (LOL! LOt"S!) said: Stephen and now you are treating with my enemies. Isn't that cute? The insane sockpuppet creature already has "enemies". Krooger must be so proud. ;-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
In article ,
Lionel Chapuis lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote: MiNE 109 a écrit : It's tolerated in informal speech because it avoids use of a gendered singular pronoun. It's not Freudian nor a slip. He is not a Cretin: he is an inhabitant of California. See you in two days. Stephen I'm afraid that your language poetry is more and more diluted with easiness. I was showing regards for you because you are the RAO's linguist, Stephen and now you are treating with my enemies. You are on a dangerous way Stephen, I tell you that, dangerous way... You asked a question and invited anyone to reply. I did so. You promised to take a two day break. You haven't. I hope you choose your lovers more carefully than you choose your enemies. Stephen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
In article ,
dave weil wrote: On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:16:45 GMT, MiNE 109 wrote: In article , Lionel Chapuis lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote: MiNE 109 a écrit : It's tolerated in informal speech because it avoids use of a gendered singular pronoun. It's not Freudian nor a slip. He is not a Cretin: he is an inhabitant of California. See you in two days. Stephen I'm afraid that your language poetry is more and more diluted with easiness. I was showing regards for you because you are the RAO's linguist, Stephen and now you are treating with my enemies. You are on a dangerous way Stephen, I tell you that, dangerous way... You asked a question and invited anyone to reply. I did so. You promised to take a two day break. You haven't. I hope you choose your lovers more carefully than you choose your enemies. Sorry Stephen, that's not the way the French do it. Eet eez ze zame ting, no? Stephen |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
Hmmmm, interesting. This is of course my new posting address and I
notice that Bellsouth also scrambles the X-trace, as Comcast did. I note that this seems to be the default, mainly for Mr. Krueger's benefit when he tries to claim that I'm "covering my tracks". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Marc Phillips
MiNE 109 a écrit :
In article , dave weil wrote: On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:16:45 GMT, MiNE 109 wrote: In article , Lionel Chapuis lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote: MiNE 109 a écrit : It's tolerated in informal speech because it avoids use of a gendered singular pronoun. It's not Freudian nor a slip. He is not a Cretin: he is an inhabitant of California. See you in two days. Stephen I'm afraid that your language poetry is more and more diluted with easiness. I was showing regards for you because you are the RAO's linguist, Stephen and now you are treating with my enemies. You are on a dangerous way Stephen, I tell you that, dangerous way... You asked a question and invited anyone to reply. I did so. You promised to take a two day break. You haven't. I hope you choose your lovers more carefully than you choose your enemies. Sorry Stephen, that's not the way the French do it. Eet eez ze zame ting, no? Stephen Not really ! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How poorly they paint their walls
George M. Middius a écrit :
"Lionel Chapuis" (LOL! LOt"S!) said: Stephen and now you are treating with my enemies. Isn't that cute? The insane sockpuppet creature already has "enemies". Krooger must be so proud. ;-) Middious, You oblige me to use subterfuges. You are so coward that you are afraid to discuss directly with me. You've done that yesterday with Phillips, Morein, message and today with Stephen. Middious tell me, who are you ? what is your real life ? what are you doing on RAO ? I have posted something to Morein yesterday, sincerely I think you are a much more interesting case than Krueger. Courage ! Middious explain me ! Sorry Stephen, it was the only way. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Marc Phillips is a coward | Audio Opinions | |||
Marc Phillips is a liar | Audio Opinions | |||
Marc Phillips Euthanasia apologist | Audio Opinions | |||
Marc Phillips is so stupid. | Audio Opinions | |||
Marc Phillips tries to have his membership in the human race taken away from him diue to his bad behavi | Audio Opinions |