wrote in message
k.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
news

wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
nk.net...

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
net wrote in message
...


2500 lines of posturing, fer chrissakes. Shut up, Mikey.



What the **** are doing wasting time counting the number of lines,
get a hobby already.


2,560 exactly, and I didn't ahve to count them.
Having trouble reading usenet specs, Mikey??
Just don't care. Is there some reason I should?


Yes indeed, you were mouthing off about them,
without knowing anything about them.

And?

Your incompetence was showing.
i just wanted to give you a chance to zip up your fly.
I'm sorry, does this mean I can't join the usenet geeks club and compare
how many lines in each post?


Not yet, you still need more teknikal egspurtize.

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:28:21 -0500, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:



I didn't ahve to

Interesting word, Art. I fear you're setting a bad example for Mike
when I'm trying to train him.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:53:28 GMT, wrote:


We all know what you are Ludo.

**** off.

Mike, may I ask a sensible question: what do you have to gain by
proving that ABX is a useful tool in comparing hi-fi products? I mean,
all these posts, thousands of words and so much passion--what's it all
about? I don't think even Arnie has written as much as you in defence
of ABX. I'm mystified.

Please speak in english or spanglish in this channel..

paulie said:

Mike, may I ask a sensible question: what do you have to gain by
proving that ABX is a useful tool in comparing hi-fi products? I mean,
all these posts, thousands of words and so much passion--what's it all
about? I don't think even Arnie has written as much as you in defence
of ABX. I'm mystified.

For Mikey, yammering about aBxism is the only alternative to curl up and die.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:53:28 GMT, wrote:

You won't have to worry, since you are completely dishonest on thesubject of
ABX and DBT, there's no reaosn to talk to you about it anymore.

Praise the lord!

Clyde Slick said:

I'm sorry, does this mean I can't join the usenet geeks club and compare
how many lines in each post?

Where is the Krooglebeast when we need to identify a Schopenhauer dodge?

Here's the sequence that took place:

1. I made a post commenting on the inordinate number of lines in Mickey's
ridiculous quote from some source he worships.

2. Mickey was so embarassed that all he could do is blare his ignorance as to
how I knew how many lines his post had.

3. Three people then showed Mickey how stupid he was to whine about it because
it's a trivial matter to get the line count if you have a reasonably functional
news client.

4. Where a Normal person would be chastened at having made a fool of himself,
Mickey then belligerently stuck out his lower lip and whined that he was bored.
Notwithstanding, of course, that it was Mickey his own dumb self who opened the
subject for discussion.


Not yet, you still need more teknikal egspurtize.

Apparently he's getting better at compulsive lying. Maybe that's where he found
Arnii Kroo****'s leadership to be valuable.



..
..

"George Middius" wrote in message
...


Clyde Slick said:

I'm sorry, does this mean I can't join the usenet geeks club and compare
how many lines in each post?

Where is the Krooglebeast when we need to identify a Schopenhauer dodge?

Here's the sequence that took place:

1. I made a post commenting on the inordinate number of lines in Mickey's
ridiculous quote from some source he worships.

Which was your way of doding the information contained therein and how it
dem,olished yet another of Ludo's idiot statements.

2. Mickey was so embarassed that all he could do is blare his ignorance as
to
how I knew how many lines his post had.

I simply wondered at the fact that such information was provided, since
being relativblely normal, I don't pay attention to such things.

3. Three people then showed Mickey how stupid he was to whine about it
because
it's a trivial matter to get the line count if you have a reasonably
functional
news client.

Again ignoring the fact that the reaosn for the length was to demolish
another of Ludo's ignorant statements.


4. Where a Normal person would be chastened at having made a fool of
himself,
Mickey then belligerently stuck out his lower lip and whined that he was
bored.
Notwithstanding, of course, that it was Mickey his own dumb self who
opened the
subject for discussion.

Thank for admitting the BBC used ABX to choose their Dynaudio speakers.

Not yet, you still need more teknikal egspurtize.

Apparently he's getting better at compulsive lying. Maybe that's where he
found
Arnii Kroo****'s leadership to be valuable.

If I were, it would only be from learning at the feet of such accomplished
lying assholes as you George.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:53:28 GMT, wrote:


We all know what you are Ludo.

**** off.

Mike, may I ask a sensible question: what do you have to gain by
proving that ABX is a useful tool in comparing hi-fi products?

I'm not proving it, tat was done long ago, by others.

I mean,
all these posts, thousands of words and so much passion--what's it all
about? I don't think even Arnie has written as much as you in defence
of ABX. I'm mystified.


That's at least part of the problem. The simnple fact is ABX is a valid
protocol, not the only protocol for discovering sublte differnces. Sighted
comaprisons are worthless.

I'm not proving it, I wondering why and how anyone could stupid enough to
not understand that it is what it is, or how stupid you have to be to think
that sighted comparisons for subtle difference could be anything other than
foolish.

I fell like I'm asking why anyone could reject 1+1 being 2. I'm fascinated
by the dance of the idiots as they try to deny reality.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


paulie said:

Mike, may I ask a sensible question: what do you have to gain by
proving that ABX is a useful tool in comparing hi-fi products? I mean,
all these posts, thousands of words and so much passion--what's it all
about? I don't think even Arnie has written as much as you in defence
of ABX. I'm mystified.

For Mikey, yammering about aBxism is the only alternative to curl up and
die.



Yammering against ABX is your only alternative to eating your own ****.

Lester Mosley wrote:
Please speak in english or spanglish in this channel..

ok

I bought my first ever rap album, and in perfect complement to my life
, my first rap album is by a white boy. My life
never changes!
I couldn't stand it anymore, especially after hearing, and seeing the
video, for Eminem's latest song. His voice is addictive, as is,
obviously, his lyricism. I NEVER thought I would EVER have any
appreciation for that genre. Jeez. But, in the same trip I also
bought
Chicago and Mary J Blige. I'd seen a thing on her over the summer,
discovered how real she is, and she's been thru hell, and that settled
that. And I've been having a "thing" for Chicago and Earth wind And
Fire
lately, so I bought the Chicago.
I'm so glad I bought the Eminiem (The Eminem Show, not his newest ).
Great crap.

mk5000

"oh wow. WOw. Jason just railed again, after 20 minutes of being at
baseline"--kirk klawson

wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
I hope this e-mail address of yours works because I just sent some .pdf
files that were sent to by Sean Olive that clearly indicate that B&O,
NASA,
and Nokia all use ABX.




wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message


2500 lines of posturing, fer chrissakes. Shut up, Mikey.

Thanks for showing once again that you can't tell the
difference between audio knowlege and posturing, Middius.

Nice to hear from you, Arny. I've been looking for your contribution
to
the "The case for ABX..." thread. I thought you might be unwell or
on
leave but I see that you let your flock take the grapeshot. Well an
ArchPriest has to save his irreplaceable self.
Your answer to Middius allows two interpretations: 1) you do not
understand that "posturing" refers to Nyob's appropriating a serious
article 2) You're up to your debating trickery which I continue to
think is not worthy of you.
As for Ludovic needing lessons from fatuous NYOB in the value of
double-blind testing{ For the umpteenth time:1) I was doing DBT
medical
research before any of you heard the name. Medical DBT research can
be
validated by objective data (psyche is an exception) 2) DBT is
DBT,
ABX is ABX 3)

ABX is a double blind protocol used by people doing audio research
from
the
BBC to Nokia, to Bang&Olafson, to Harman, to hearing aid companies,
and
on
and on.


I use blind technique sometimes myself when I listen to a
new component. Not yours but mine Left-Right method.4) But when it
comes to invalidable preferences in musical reproduction I'll take
eg.
Holt's opinion sighted any time over NYOBs nth power seventy times
blind.

Take whatever you want you still haven't a clue about ABX for audio.

5) Research is another matter entirely: double blind provides
uniformity. I need no convincing from NYOB.

You mean you've finally accepted that ABX is a valid protocol used to
test
for subtle audio differences?

But I would like him to
stop conflating DBT and ABX - assuming that he is capable of
understanding the difference.
Ludovic Mirabel

I know that ABX is a form of DBT, something you don't seem to get.
It is also a widely used and valid protocol, something else you don't
seem
to get.
__________________________________________________ _________

ABX is a double blind protocol used by people doing audio research
from the
BBC to Nokia, to Bang&Olafson, to Harman, to hearing aid companies,
and
on
and on.

BBC-- no. Quote documentation and show me for a liar or you for a
...what?
B&O- no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Nokia that famous audio company uses it for comparing cellphones or
what? Documantation?
Harman -no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Have you got the distinction between DBT and ABX clear in your head
yet?
NYOB, NYOB, you make my day.
Ludovic Mirabel

__________________________________________________ _______

.
This was the exchange on Nov 16th in this thread. There were two
postings by NYOB
The first one can be looked up in that thread just above this one.
NYOB:
ABX is a double blind protocol used by people doing audio research
from the
BBC to Nokia, to Bang&Olafson, to Harman, to hearing aid companies,
and
on
and on.
I answered:
BBC-- no. Quote documentation and show me for a liar or you for a
...what?
B&O- no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Nokia that famous audio company uses it for comparing cellphones or
what? Documantation?
Harman -no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Have you got the distinction between DBT and ABX clear in your head
yet?
NYOB, NYOB, you make my day.
Ludovic Mirabel
In response I got 2 postings . The first one can be read entire in the
thread. Even with "hiddeb text" it would make this too long for one
posting. Below is my response to the two.

You are my one and only, inimitable, incredible, fatuous,
transsubstantial NYOB.
With a wave of your wand you transport me to the "Alice in Wonderland"
country. Whuite Rabbits, Mad Hatters all over the place.
So far you produced some 60 phony references to the good, old
Humpty-Dumpty ABX.
This is the latest one- 7 meters long.. Ther was nothing about ABX in
most of those , except for a few of them with a negative, "no
diference" component comparisons.There is not one word about ABX in
this one. The closest it gets is an incomplete DBT. Quote.:
" It was not possible to carry out the tests entirely 'double-blind.
Inevitably, the project team would know which loudspeakers were
being
assessed. However, only one member of the project team remained
in the
room to supervise the tests - to ensure that the test subjects did not
confer or try to look behind the screen to identify the loudspeakers.
That
person was often actually unaware of the loudspeaker manufacturer
because code
letters were used to identify the loudspeakers. In any case, under the
pressure of physically moving the loudspeakers and setting the levels,
the members
of the project team had little time (or inclination) to take note of
the
identity. The supervisor was also under strict instruction not to
exhibit any reactions."
End of quote.
In the 2nd posting wrote:
I hope this e-mail address of yours works because I just sent some .pdf
files that were sent to by Sean Olive that clearly indicate that B&O,
NASA,
and Nokia all use ABX.

I got by email 3 Acrobat attachments about a research project. I
didn't read it in detail but it seemed to have nothing to do with
ABX-as usual.

Thanks for admitting you don't try to find the pertinent references.

Who cares what it "indicates" to NYOB? All we need is
just one paragraph: "We used ABX as testing method with this
result:..."

All of those attachments had something to do with ABX.

NYOB- I get enough unasked for garbage by email as it is. You're
welcome to wish me a Merry Xmas but if you have a contribution to a
forum discussion publish it in the forum. Having to cope with offers of
Cialis, penis enlargement and young women pining to entertain me I get
enough tempting spam as it is.
Secondly: If you found something about ABX (or whatever interested you)
publish the quote with a reference not the whole bloody paper to waste
time on for no benefit.

You won't have to worry, since you are completely dishonest on thesubject of
ABX and DBT, there's no reaosn to talk to you about it anymore. Yo already
know that it's used by nearly everyone sho does any kind of audio research,
denying it doesn't change that.

You could e-mail Sean Olive and find out far more than I can tell, you, but
you won't

If you had ever tried to publish a scientific
paper you wouldn't get very far if you snowed the editor under with
your complete copies to wade through Soon you'll be copying books in
the forum.

Instead of talking about papers I'm not going to write, you'd be better of
reading some that have to with the subject you claim to have some interest
in.


It is difficult to fathom what motivates you.

I like to show fools that they arn't fooling anybody.

I doubt if you're
sophisticated enough to be just an ordinary liar. I'm considering
several hypotheses: You have problems with simple verbal comprehension-
you fall asleep before you get to the end of it- you think I'll fall
asleep- which is it?
No further response to further pointless mailings. Go in the corner and
mouth: "I'm not a liar. Ludovic is a liar if he says I'm a liar.
Ludovic Mirabel

We all know what you are Ludo.

**** off.
__________________________________________________ _

When his claims are shown second time in a row to be rather transparent
liesl NYOB gets angry:
"We all know what you are Ludo. **** off."
If you think that diving in to swim in your natural element, the
gutter, will give you licence to rechant for the third time- (give it
a week or two for people to forget ) - your wet dreams about BBC, B&O
etc. chanting your ABX spells you have another think coming.
Bad as the smell is you'll be watched from above. Don't even try
it.
Ludovic Mirabel

marika wrote:
Lester Mosley wrote:
Please speak in english or spanglish in this channel..

ok

I bought my first ever rap album, and in perfect complement to my life
, my first rap album is by a white boy. My life
never changes!
I couldn't stand it anymore, especially after hearing, and seeing the
video, for Eminem's latest song. His voice is addictive, as is,
obviously, his lyricism. I NEVER thought I would EVER have any
appreciation for that genre. Jeez. But, in the same trip I also
bought
Chicago and Mary J Blige. I'd seen a thing on her over the summer,
discovered how real she is, and she's been thru hell, and that settled
that. And I've been having a "thing" for Chicago and Earth wind And
Fire
lately, so I bought the Chicago.
I'm so glad I bought the Eminiem (The Eminem Show, not his newest ).
Great crap.



Crap can be good, but crap is still crap. You can shine it up, you can
spray perfume on it. But it is still crap. You can even mold it into
animals, dry it and sell it for $19.95, but it is still crap. You can
even shape it into the thing from thirs encounters of the third kind
and have lucas etch his name into it... But it is still crap... If the
pop doesnt flush, you still have floating crap, and it may even be holy
crap. If Holly takes a crap, it is just crap. So please don't rate this
poo.

Shall we have some oysters?

wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
I hope this e-mail address of yours works because I just sent some
.pdf
files that were sent to by Sean Olive that clearly indicate that B&O,
NASA,
and Nokia all use ABX.




wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message


2500 lines of posturing, fer chrissakes. Shut up, Mikey.

Thanks for showing once again that you can't tell the
difference between audio knowlege and posturing, Middius.

Nice to hear from you, Arny. I've been looking for your
contribution
to
the "The case for ABX..." thread. I thought you might be unwell
or
on
leave but I see that you let your flock take the grapeshot. Well
an
ArchPriest has to save his irreplaceable self.
Your answer to Middius allows two interpretations: 1) you do not
understand that "posturing" refers to Nyob's appropriating a
serious
article 2) You're up to your debating trickery which I continue
to
think is not worthy of you.
As for Ludovic needing lessons from fatuous NYOB in the value of
double-blind testing{ For the umpteenth time:1) I was doing DBT
medical
research before any of you heard the name. Medical DBT research
can
be
validated by objective data (psyche is an exception) 2) DBT is
DBT,
ABX is ABX 3)

ABX is a double blind protocol used by people doing audio research
from
the
BBC to Nokia, to Bang&Olafson, to Harman, to hearing aid companies,
and
on
and on.


I use blind technique sometimes myself when I listen to a
new component. Not yours but mine Left-Right method.4) But when
it
comes to invalidable preferences in musical reproduction I'll
take
eg.
Holt's opinion sighted any time over NYOBs nth power seventy
times
blind.

Take whatever you want you still haven't a clue about ABX for
audio.

5) Research is another matter entirely: double blind provides
uniformity. I need no convincing from NYOB.

You mean you've finally accepted that ABX is a valid protocol used
to
test
for subtle audio differences?

But I would like him to
stop conflating DBT and ABX - assuming that he is capable of
understanding the difference.
Ludovic Mirabel

I know that ABX is a form of DBT, something you don't seem to get.
It is also a widely used and valid protocol, something else you
don't
seem
to get.
__________________________________________________ _________

ABX is a double blind protocol used by people doing audio research
from the
BBC to Nokia, to Bang&Olafson, to Harman, to hearing aid companies,
and
on
and on.

BBC-- no. Quote documentation and show me for a liar or you for a
...what?
B&O- no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Nokia that famous audio company uses it for comparing cellphones or
what? Documantation?
Harman -no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Have you got the distinction between DBT and ABX clear in your head
yet?
NYOB, NYOB, you make my day.
Ludovic Mirabel

__________________________________________________ _______

.
This was the exchange on Nov 16th in this thread. There were two
postings by NYOB
The first one can be looked up in that thread just above this one.
NYOB:
ABX is a double blind protocol used by people doing audio research
from the
BBC to Nokia, to Bang&Olafson, to Harman, to hearing aid companies,
and
on
and on.
I answered:
BBC-- no. Quote documentation and show me for a liar or you for a
...what?
B&O- no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Nokia that famous audio company uses it for comparing cellphones or
what? Documantation?
Harman -no. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto
Have you got the distinction between DBT and ABX clear in your head
yet?
NYOB, NYOB, you make my day.
Ludovic Mirabel
In response I got 2 postings . The first one can be read entire in the
thread. Even with "hiddeb text" it would make this too long for one
posting. Below is my response to the two.

You are my one and only, inimitable, incredible, fatuous,
transsubstantial NYOB.
With a wave of your wand you transport me to the "Alice in Wonderland"
country. Whuite Rabbits, Mad Hatters all over the place.
So far you produced some 60 phony references to the good, old
Humpty-Dumpty ABX.
This is the latest one- 7 meters long.. Ther was nothing about ABX in
most of those , except for a few of them with a negative, "no
diference" component comparisons.There is not one word about ABX in
this one. The closest it gets is an incomplete DBT. Quote.:
" It was not possible to carry out the tests entirely 'double-blind.
Inevitably, the project team would know which loudspeakers were
being
assessed. However, only one member of the project team remained
in the
room to supervise the tests - to ensure that the test subjects did not
confer or try to look behind the screen to identify the loudspeakers.
That
person was often actually unaware of the loudspeaker manufacturer
because code
letters were used to identify the loudspeakers. In any case, under the
pressure of physically moving the loudspeakers and setting the levels,
the members
of the project team had little time (or inclination) to take note of
the
identity. The supervisor was also under strict instruction not to
exhibit any reactions."
End of quote.
In the 2nd posting wrote:
I hope this e-mail address of yours works because I just sent some
.pdf
files that were sent to by Sean Olive that clearly indicate that B&O,
NASA,
and Nokia all use ABX.

I got by email 3 Acrobat attachments about a research project. I
didn't read it in detail but it seemed to have nothing to do with
ABX-as usual.

Thanks for admitting you don't try to find the pertinent references.

Who cares what it "indicates" to NYOB? All we need is
just one paragraph: "We used ABX as testing method with this
result:..."

All of those attachments had something to do with ABX.

NYOB- I get enough unasked for garbage by email as it is. You're
welcome to wish me a Merry Xmas but if you have a contribution to a
forum discussion publish it in the forum. Having to cope with offers of
Cialis, penis enlargement and young women pining to entertain me I get
enough tempting spam as it is.
Secondly: If you found something about ABX (or whatever interested you)
publish the quote with a reference not the whole bloody paper to waste
time on for no benefit.

You won't have to worry, since you are completely dishonest on thesubject
of
ABX and DBT, there's no reaosn to talk to you about it anymore. Yo
already
know that it's used by nearly everyone sho does any kind of audio
research,
denying it doesn't change that.

You could e-mail Sean Olive and find out far more than I can tell, you,
but
you won't

If you had ever tried to publish a scientific
paper you wouldn't get very far if you snowed the editor under with
your complete copies to wade through Soon you'll be copying books in
the forum.

Instead of talking about papers I'm not going to write, you'd be better
of
reading some that have to with the subject you claim to have some
interest
in.


It is difficult to fathom what motivates you.

I like to show fools that they arn't fooling anybody.

I doubt if you're
sophisticated enough to be just an ordinary liar. I'm considering
several hypotheses: You have problems with simple verbal comprehension-
you fall asleep before you get to the end of it- you think I'll fall
asleep- which is it?
No further response to further pointless mailings. Go in the corner and
mouth: "I'm not a liar. Ludovic is a liar if he says I'm a liar.
Ludovic Mirabel

We all know what you are Ludo.

**** off.
__________________________________________________ _

When his claims are shown second time in a row to be rather transparent
liesl NYOB gets angry:

You asked for proof that the companies I mentioned used ABX, I provided it.
I can't be held responible if you are too lazy to read them. I posted the
one regarding the BBC because it was is known that they changed from in
house built speakers to Dynaudio brand speakers and their methodology was
the subject of research paper, which outlines how they used ABX to make that
decision.

"We all know what you are Ludo. **** off."
If you think that diving in to swim in your natural element, the
gutter, will give you licence to rechant for the third time- (give it
a week or two for people to forget ) - your wet dreams about BBC, B&O
etc. chanting your ABX spells you have another think coming.
Bad as the smell is you'll be watched from above. Don't even try
it.

Your still lying Ludovic or whoever you really are.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell them
apart.

duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his pimply face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)



..
..

"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his pimply
face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding
any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)



I know grade school kids that get the fact that when you do comparisons that
come up with no difference scores every time, they understand that it's
because there was no difference. It's a shame that there are grown ups
(more or less) here that don't get that simple fact.

"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his pimply
face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding
any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)

"At least" he finished.

wrote in message
k.net...

"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his pimply
face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding
any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)



I know grade school kids that get the fact that when you do comparisons
that come up with no difference scores every time, they understand that
it's because there was no difference. It's a shame that there are grown
ups (more or less) here that don't get that simple fact.


I though one had to be "at least" fourteen
to be invited down into ARny's basement.

Mikey McHurtMe reveals his secret perversions.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)

I hump grade school kids

Thanks Mr. McHurtMe for admitting the truth about your "friendship" with Arnii
"Pervborg" Krooger.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
k.net...

"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his
pimply face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding
any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell
them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)



I know grade school kids that get the fact that when you do comparisons
that come up with no difference scores every time, they understand that
it's because there was no difference. It's a shame that there are grown
ups (more or less) here that don't get that simple fact.


I though one had to be "at least" fourteen
to be invited down into ARny's basement.
When did George start using the name Arny?

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Mikey McHurtMe reveals his secret perversions.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)

I hump grade school kids

Thanks Mr. McHurtMe for admitting the truth about your "friendship" with
Arnii
"Pervborg" Krooger.



A new low even for you George.

wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his
pimply
face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding
any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell
them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)



I know grade school kids that get the fact that when you do comparisons
that
come up with no difference scores every time, they understand that it's
because there was no difference. It's a shame that there are grown ups
(more or less) here that don't get that simple fact.

Lord, grant me patience with this inept fraudster....!!!!
BBC, B&O and Harman DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
Disagree? Quote one excerpt from each to show that they did.

Already did that with the BBC you idiot.

Try to
keep a civil toungue in your mouth when talking to grown ups Mikey Boy.
Ludovic Mirabel

Try not to be such a lying sack of ****.

Lester Mosley wrote:



Crap can be good, but crap is still crap.

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE????????????

You can shine it up, you can
spray perfume on it.

1. I didn't find out about it till 12 hours later

But it is still crap. You can even mold it into
animals, dry it and sell it for $19.95, but it is still crap. You can
even shape it into the thing from thirs encounters of the third kind
and have lucas etch his name into it... But it is still crap... If the
pop doesnt flush, you still have floating crap, and it may even be holy
crap. If Holly takes a crap, it is just crap.

3. unless she couldn't go.

So please don't rate this
poo.

can y'all believe this???????????????????????


Shall we have some oysters?

2. I would have gone, just because it was free until the had a cover
charge but I had some rockefeller at H20 tonite

mk5000

"he looks awkwardly stiff in the wrists. loosen him up a bit"--peter
jackson

wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his
pimply
face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding
any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell
them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)



I know grade school kids that get the fact that when you do comparisons
that
come up with no difference scores every time, they understand that it's
because there was no difference. It's a shame that there are grown ups
(more or less) here that don't get that simple fact.

Lord, grant me patience with this inept fraudster....!!!!
BBC, B&O and Harman DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
Disagree? Quote one excerpt from each to show that they did.

Already did that with the BBC you idiot.

Try to
keep a civil toungue in your mouth when talking to grown ups Mikey Boy.
Ludovic Mirabel

Try not to be such a lying sack of ****.

_________________________________________________
An exchange of views. I said:
Lord, grant me patience with this inept fraudster....!!!!
BBC, B&O and Harman DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
Disagree? Quote one excerpt from each to show that they did.
NYOB answers:
Already did that with the BBC you idiot.

Try to
keep a civil tongue in your mouth when talking to grown ups Mikey Boy.
Ludovic Mirabel
And answers again:
Try not to be such a lying sack of ****.
I notice we're really are losing our cool.
No, dear Mad Hatter you never did. You could not because it does not
exist. The Brits in the BBC could not care less about this Yankee
fantasy.
But maybe I missed it. Just requote it here for me and your faithful
fans.
And try to grow up. This is not your schoolyard.
Your oldest Fan
Ludovic M.
i

wrote in message
k.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
k.net...

"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey tries the "debating trade" crapola and falls flat on his
pimply face.

Someday you'll get it through your head that the reason for not finding
any
positive ABX results is because so much of the audio gear tested sounds
indistinguishable from other gear, so it would be impossible to tell
them
apart.

Are you sure you're not educated, Mickey? Sounds like you have a PhD in
philosophy. ;-)



I know grade school kids that get the fact that when you do comparisons
that come up with no difference scores every time, they understand that
it's because there was no difference. It's a shame that there are grown
ups (more or less) here that don't get that simple fact.


I though one had to be "at least" fourteen
to be invited down into ARny's basement.
When did George start using the name Arny?

Thanks for proving that mentally, you are
not "at least" fourteen.