Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
Fourteen Words
Posted by Bob on March 4, 2010 at 6:26 am "Why is information produced? The Fourteen Words are now famous. Every documentary I see on Evil Racism includes them. I was trying to remember exactly those fourteen words are and got “Fourteen Words to Racism” and such, but the words themselves were hard to find. The words are, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.” That is GENIUS! It is all we ask! Why on earth would THEY push that? This is inexplicable if THEY are a Conspiracy of Evil Geniuses. The reason that THEY concentrate on the fourteen words is because THEY want to show how reasonable us naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews can sound. They want people to give them money because we are dangerous because we can sound so reasonable. If I understand correctly, the man who formulated these fourteen words is now in prison for violence. The point is that THEY are not at all interested in the fact that a huge part of the audience reading the fourteen words will think they make sense. Unlike the hook-nosed Conspirator Geniuses who are dedicated to Evil the way Satan is, this THEY is only interested in its own CONTRIBUTORS. That’s a world of difference. Brian Lamb of C-Span had the general reputation that no one could TELL which side he was on. I don’t know, either. But once he was talking to someone who was denouncing Hate Sites on the Internet, and the example that person produced of Hate was a picture of a couple with a baby with the words, “It is a privilege to be white.” Brian Lamb, champion neutral of neutrals, said, “But you wouldn’t mind if they were blacks and the words were about being black?” His interviewee responded, “Oh, no.” It was not a partisan comment. It was an obvious, neutral question. It was also a question no respectable conservative and no one on our side would have asked. Pitiful! No group of Geniuses Who Rule the World would allow the fourteen words to be repeated, much less put them front and center. Now for the very, very few people who have an operative frontal lobe and who can understand Brian Lamb’s question, the reason THEY repeat the fourteen words is simple: THEY want contributors to realize that, no matter how reasonable WE sound, we are anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. From the point of view of the International Genius Conspiracy, the fourteen words is a threat to what they are trying to achieve. Meanwhile on Planet Earth, they are a group which makes its living on contributions from frightened old Jews and limousine liberals. THEY use the me tactic we do to make us look HUGE. You will never see the audience at a racist meeting in a documentary and you will never see the audience in one of our films. Both we and THEY have the same goal: to make us look HUGE. In our films and in their films you see only the speaker and hear the audience reaction. I have never heard anyone MENTION this similarity, much less THINK about it, ANALYZE it. Both sides are fighting on a front that does not exist Each side is raising money. That means DRAMA. How much MONEY can one raise pushing the Mantra? Well, I devoted my life to the Mantra AFTER I retired comfortably from decades of fighting Communism and being barely within the limits of respectability. I have told you that over forty years ago it was taken for granted that I could take down the anti-whites at the University of Virginia in a matter of minutes. Everybody knew I could breach their lines in short order. But no one followed me, and I knew why. Information is a product. It is there to raise money or to get published. The Mantra is not sexy. The Devil’s Conspiracy is sexy. For BOTH sides. Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, I am fighting for the existence of people who look like me, which is all nature is interested in. " http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2...ourteen-words/ |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
In article
, Bret L wrote: nothing of real interest. "White genocide" lol |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 4, 12:19*pm, Bret L wrote:
Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, I am fighting for the existence of people who look like me, which is all nature is interested in. Perfect! Since all humans have two eyes, two ears and walk upright, perhaps now you can join the Human Race. And wouldn't that be nice for you after dwelling in a sewer your whole life just like a rat or a floating turd? |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 6, 12:02*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Mar 4, 12:19*pm, Bret L wrote: Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, I am fighting for the existence of people who look like me, which is all nature is interested in. Perfect! Since all humans have two eyes, two ears and walk upright, perhaps now you can join the Human Race. And wouldn't that be nice for you after dwelling in a sewer your whole life just like a rat or a floating turd? Think about how stupid that last statement is, the one about what "nature is interested in." Nature is interested in doing exactly what it is doing. From an evolutionary standpoint, races are become more and more mixed simply because humans are considerably more mobile than they were a few years ago. Therefore, physical characteristics such as dark skin and brown eyes (to protect against the sun near the Equator), epicantic folds (to reduce glare) and other traits become more and more meaningless. In other words, the only way to preserve a set of human traits is to make your entire race stay put and not go anywhere for hundreds of years. The whole race preservation argument is so fundamentally dumb. To say that nature is interested in preserving one set of traits over another is a benchmark in stupidity. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
Buffoon bumbled:
From an evolutionary standpoint, races are [sic] become more And yet another thought-process error from the synaptically-challenged one. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 4, 7:17*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Bret L wrote: nothing of real interest. *"White genocide" lol somebody needs to lend Bratzi the clue that his necrophelian relationship with MM isn't exactly advancing his "cause". |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 4, 7:17*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Bret L wrote: nothing of real interest. *"White genocide" lol another suggestion for Bratzi, regarding funding for his "cause", i suggest he open up a chain of "whiting salons". |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 6, 1:02*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, I am fighting for the existence of people who look like me, which is all nature is interested in. Perfect! Since all humans have two eyes, two ears and walk upright, perhaps now you can join the Human Race. Chimps can walk upright also. Has Brattie ever spouted off on Darwinism? And wouldn't that be nice for you after dwelling in a sewer your whole life just like a rat or a floating turd? And there's the starting bell for the Disgusting Imagery Stakes! |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 6, 11:42*am, Boon wrote:
Think about how stupid that last statement is, the one about what "nature is interested in." Nature is interested in doing exactly what it is doing. From an evolutionary standpoint, races are become more and more mixed simply because humans are considerably more mobile than they were a few years ago. I don't know why Brattie isn't picking up your challenge, so allow me to step in for our little nazi friend: Why do you hate yourself for being white? |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 7, 12:40*pm, Glanbrok wrote:
On Mar 6, 11:42*am, Boon wrote: Think about how stupid that last statement is, the one about what "nature is interested in." Nature is interested in doing exactly what it is doing. From an evolutionary standpoint, races are become more and more mixed simply because humans are considerably more mobile than they were a few years ago. I don't know why Brattie isn't picking up your challenge, so allow me to step in for our little nazi friend: Why do you hate yourself for being white? I don't really think about being white that often. I'm only reminded of it when I see idiots like Bratzi spouting nonsense about race. |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 7, 12:38*pm, Glanbrok wrote:
On Mar 6, 1:02*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" Perfect! Since all humans have two eyes, two ears and walk upright, perhaps now you can join the Human Race. Chimps can walk upright also. Has Brattie ever spouted off on Darwinism? I'd have to bother looking but I think he has in regard to the Superiority of the White Race. His "as nature intended it" comment has a strong Darwinian implication. And wouldn't that be nice for you after dwelling in a sewer your whole life just like a rat or a floating turd? And there's the starting bell for the Disgusting Imagery Stakes! Bratzi inspires things like that. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
Think about how stupid that last statement is, the one about what "nature is interested in." Nature is interested in doing exactly what it is doing. From an evolutionary standpoint, races are become more and more mixed simply because humans are considerably more mobile than they were a few years ago. Therefore, physical characteristics such as dark skin and brown eyes (to protect against the sun near the Equator), epicantic folds (to reduce glare) and other traits become more and more meaningless. In other words, the only way to preserve a set of human traits is to make your entire race stay put and not go anywhere for hundreds of years. The whole race preservation argument is so fundamentally dumb. To say that nature is interested in preserving one set of traits over another is a benchmark in stupidity. You are quite correct that "nature" does not care whether any individual or any group lives or dies. If the individual is to survive as an individual, it must care a great deal as to whether it does, and if a group is to survive the individuals that comprise it must care even more that the group survives. And yes, differing racial traits did evolve for very necessary reasons at the time the race evolved. The question of whether it's possible for one race to be "superior" to another has to be answered in the context of what one considers superior, and why. I do not want my race to survive and be improved, weeded, make progress, because it is "superior". It IS superior in some ways and markedly inferior in others. Which ones and why they are important are pretty much subjective, aside from fitness for the particular environment-and I would concede that climactically only a small portion of North America doesn't favor other races inasmuch as it's so hot, so cold, or so sun-bleached for so much of the time from a pure physical standpoint. Rather, I want my race to succeed, to survive, because it is mine. And I expect members of other races to feel likewise about theirs. I have no problem with that. Why do Jews want Jews to continue to survive as a people-why do they bar (bat) mitzvah their kids, circumcise the boys, teach them Hebrew, invest a great amount of time and energy into political and educational and media rejiggering of society to make the world more suitable for Jewish interests? Is it because G_d tells them to? Most Jews are atheists, even-maybe especially-most rabbis. No, it's because they see themselves as a distinct people, and have evolved that way. |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 9, 10:58*am, Bret L wrote:
*Rather, I want my race to succeed, to survive, because it is mine. And I expect members of other races to feel likewise about theirs. I have no problem with that. Why do Jews want Jews to continue to survive as a people-why do they bar (bat) mitzvah their kids, circumcise the boys, teach them Hebrew, invest a great amount of time and energy into political and educational and media rejiggering of society to make the world more suitable for Jewish interests? Is it because G_d tells them to? Most Jews are atheists, even-maybe especially-most rabbis. No, it's because they see themselves as a distinct people, and have evolved that way. LOL! This is one of the absolutely dumbest things that Bratzi has ever posted. We're potentially seeing a #1 out of tens of thousands here. |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Fourteen Words
On Mar 9, 10:58*am, Bret L wrote:
Think about how stupid that last statement is, the one about what "nature is interested in." Nature is interested in doing exactly what it is doing. From an evolutionary standpoint, races are become more and more mixed simply because humans are considerably more mobile than they were a few years ago. Therefore, physical characteristics such as dark skin and brown eyes (to protect against the sun near the Equator), epicantic folds (to reduce glare) and other traits become more and more meaningless. In other words, the only way to preserve a set of human traits is to make your entire race stay put and not go anywhere for hundreds of years. The whole race preservation argument is so fundamentally dumb. To say that nature is interested in preserving one set of traits over another is a benchmark in stupidity. *You are quite correct that "nature" does not care whether any individual or any group lives or dies. If the individual is to survive as an individual, it must care a great deal as to whether it does, and if a group is to survive the individuals that comprise it must care even more that the group survives. *And yes, differing racial traits did evolve for very necessary reasons at the time the race evolved. *The question of whether it's possible for one race to be "superior" to another has to be answered in the context of what one considers superior, and why. I do not want my race to survive and be improved, weeded, make progress, because it is "superior". It IS superior in some ways and markedly inferior in others. Which ones and why they are important are pretty much subjective, aside from fitness for the particular environment-and I would concede that climactically only a small portion of North America doesn't favor other races inasmuch as it's so hot, so cold, or so sun-bleached for so much of the time from a pure physical standpoint. *Rather, I want my race to succeed, to survive, because it is mine. And I expect members of other races to feel likewise about theirs. I have no problem with that. Why do Jews want Jews to continue to survive as a people-why do they bar (bat) mitzvah their kids, circumcise the boys, teach them Hebrew, invest a great amount of time and energy into political and educational and media rejiggering of society to make the world more suitable for Jewish interests? Is it because G_d tells them to? Most Jews are atheists, even-maybe especially-most rabbis. No, it's because they see themselves as a distinct people, and have evolved that way. I'll say it again, but it's no wonder why angry white men like you are being fazed out by nature. Do you even have any children? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A must see. In his own words! | Pro Audio | |||
A must see. In his own words! | Pro Audio | |||
A must see. In his own words! | Pro Audio | |||
A must see. In his own words! | Pro Audio | |||
A must see. In his own words! | Vacuum Tubes |