Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Critical v Optimal
Our meaning of critical seems to have become confused with optimal.
Critical damping has a specific meaning, where something arrives at its destination without overshoot or undershoot. Underdamping results in overshoot. Overdamping results in dawdling meanders. For most systems, critical damping is too slow. For optimal damping, you pick an acceptable degree of error, and apply sufficient damping to ensure that the system settles within that error in the shortest possible time. The desirable result is always slightly underdamped. So critical damping is hardly, if ever, optimal. Ian |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Critical v Optimal
On Apr 16, 10:42 am, "Ian Iveson"
wrote: Our meaning of critical seems to have become confused with optimal. Critical damping has a specific meaning, where something arrives at its destination without overshoot or undershoot. Underdamping results in overshoot. Overdamping results in dawdling meanders. For most systems, critical damping is too slow. For optimal damping, you pick an acceptable degree of error, and apply sufficient damping to ensure that the system settles within that error in the shortest possible time. The desirable result is always slightly underdamped. So critical damping is hardly, if ever, optimal. Ian PID... er, that should be QED. Cheers, Roger |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Critical v Optimal
Ian Iveson wrote: Our meaning of critical seems to have become confused with optimal. Critical damping has a specific meaning, where something arrives at its destination without overshoot or undershoot. Underdamping results in overshoot. Overdamping results in dawdling meanders. For most systems, critical damping is too slow. What do you mean by 'slow' ???? Graham |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Critical v Optimal
Eeyore wrote: Ian Iveson wrote: Our meaning of critical seems to have become confused with optimal. Critical damping has a specific meaning, where something arrives at its destination without overshoot or undershoot. Underdamping results in overshoot. Overdamping results in dawdling meanders. For most systems, critical damping is too slow. What do you mean by 'slow' ???? Graham Its part of "Iveson-speak", that strange language composed to look deep and meaningful, but isn't. You can read a page of Iveson-speak, and be none the wiser. Patrick Turner. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Critical v Optimal
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:57:23 GMT, Patrick Turner
wrote: You can read a page of Iveson-speak, and be none the wiser. Some can. Chris Hornbeck "Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it," - Richard Feynman. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Critical v Optimal
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:42:40 GMT, "Ian Iveson"
wrote: Our meaning of critical seems to have become confused with optimal. Critical damping has a specific meaning, where something arrives at its destination without overshoot or undershoot. Underdamping results in overshoot. Overdamping results in dawdling meanders. For most systems, critical damping is too slow. For optimal damping, you pick an acceptable degree of error, and apply sufficient damping to ensure that the system settles within that error in the shortest possible time. The desirable result is always slightly underdamped. So critical damping is hardly, if ever, optimal. Not much response to this polemic, so you're gonna have to be a lot more specific about applications. Generically, it's just shouting on a street corner. Surely you have something more interesting in mind... Much thanks, as always, Chris Hornbeck "For one swallow does not make a summer, nor does one day; And so too one day, or a short time, Or a great deed, does not make a man Blessed or happy." - Aristotle, _Nicomachaen Ethics_ |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Critical v Optimal
Chris Hornbeck wrote
Our meaning of critical seems to have become confused with optimal. Critical damping has a specific meaning, where something arrives at its destination without overshoot or undershoot. Underdamping results in overshoot. Overdamping results in dawdling meanders. For most systems, critical damping is too slow. For optimal damping, you pick an acceptable degree of error, and apply sufficient damping to ensure that the system settles within that error in the shortest possible time. The desirable result is always slightly underdamped. So critical damping is hardly, if ever, optimal. Not much response to this polemic, so you're gonna have to be a lot more specific about applications. Generically, it's just shouting on a street corner. Surely you have something more interesting in mind... Polemic? Shouting? Just a gentle warning. "Mind the step!" I didn't have a thread in mind. Should I really explain the meaning of slow? Sometimes I get tired. Swinging doors, wiggles on square waves. "The last train is now departing from platform 12" cheers, Ian "For one swallow does not make a summer, nor does one day; And so too one day, or a short time, Or a great deed, does not make a man Blessed or happy." - Aristotle, _Nicomachaen Ethics_ "N'er cast a clout 'til May is out" - colloquial Much thanks, as always, Chris Hornbeck |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Critical Damping | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Optimal recording levels. | Pro Audio | |||
Let's do some critical listening | Audio Opinions | |||
good non critical iso xformer? | Pro Audio | |||
good non critical iso xformer? | Pro Audio |