Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
Paul wrote:
(Bruce J. Richman) wrote: Notice how forthcoming Middius is with his eBay ID. Why are you not forthcoming with your mug shots? They are all coated in smegma? Could it ber that they've been used for the same purpose that he uses $ 100.00 bills? LOL! Nice one Bruce, I almost choked on my fag :-) -- S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t I think you should perhaps use a different choice of words, Paul..The phrase "choke on my fag" could be interpreted as another reference to Krueger's alleged criminal activities. Bruce J. Richman |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"Max Holubitsky" wrote in message
. ca I generally test the tubes in my amps once every several months, and replace them every year or two. I've tested my amps for power output and distortion with really worn out used tubes, just to see the difference, and power output drops in half. The key is to replace them before the performance really starts to degrade, and before the amp really starts to diverge from spec. I'm not talking about testing tubes, I'm talking about testing amps. Tubes are just one of several sources of distortion in tubed amps. Fair enough, but assuming the other components in the amp are fairly new, the tubes are the only thing that will degrade with use. That would be what we expect, but exceptions are not uncommong. Speaking of updating to "modern technology", I am currently constructing an amplifier based on National Semiconductor literature, which may replace my tube amps for day to day use, once it's completed, depending on how I like the sound. If you want, check out http://www.national.com/an/AN/AN-1192.pdf and look at the 200W amp. I know it's op amp based, but the specs look pretty incredible, and I figured it might be fun building a high powered SS amp, with excellent specs. It will definitely exceed the frequency response and dynamic range capabilities of my speakers. I haven't got a dummy load big enough to test it with, but I think clipping it would blow my speakers, anyhow! The LM3886 seems to be the IC that *everybody* likes. Search google on LM3886, gaincard and gainclone... The 200 watt amp is basically limited to 8 ohm loads which I see as a possible issue. Too many "8 ohm" speakers that dive down to 4 ohms. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"Lived EHT" wrote in message
n.net On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 17:45:01 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Notice how forthcoming Middius is with his eBay ID. Why are you not forthcoming with your mug shots? It seems unfair for you to demand that I provide evidence to support your delusions. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 00:56:20 +0100, Thee Signal
wrote: LOL! Nice one Bruce, I almost choked on my fag :-) You're taking the ****. And Arnii will think you're trying to eat, albeit indigestibly, a homosexual. -- Thine |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 03:31:06 +0100, Thee Signal
wrote: I'm not convinced Kruegers son existed. What proof have we got? Beyond a few dents in a baseball bat, who knows? -- tHINE |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:22:48 -0400, George M. Middius
wrote: Max Holubitsky said to ****-for-Brains: BTW, my last transaction was somewhat over $200, and was for audio gear as have been virtually all of my transactions. My goodness, that's impressive - what is that, over 20,000 pennies? You think that's desperate? Another time, Turdy tried to pay somebody with a beat-up old turntable he claimed was worth $300. Well, it was a lie anyway. His last transaction was a purchase for $86 plus shipment. Well, it was more than my refigerator magnet, that's fer sure. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
Fair enough, but assuming the other components in the amp are fairly
new, the tubes are the only thing that will degrade with use. That would be what we expect, but exceptions are not uncommong. Caps deteriorate over time and resistors drift, but if you use modern 1% metal film resistors, good quality Sprague or Mallory electrolytics, and plastic film coupling caps, there really should be no problems. Passive components have come a **long** way since the days of your EICO or Dynaco, and tube electronics gain as much from modern passive components as SS electronics do. Obviously, if you are speaking about 10% carbon composition resistors, cheap generic electrolytics, and old paper coupling caps, it's a different story. **** The LM3886 seems to be the IC that *everybody* likes. Search google on LM3886, gaincard and gainclone... That's why I'm building it. A couple years ago, I rebuilt an old Yamaha receiver with LM3886's because I didn't want to bother troubleshooting an old amp with no circuit diagram. I was pleasently suprised by the results, and it's currently used as a home theatre left and right amp. The chips are even free, as engineering samples. The 200 watt amp is basically limited to 8 ohm loads which I see as a possible issue. Too many "8 ohm" speakers that dive down to 4 ohms. I think it's the 100W BTL amp that is limited to 8 ohms, the 200W amp will do 4 ohm just fine, as it used 4 ICs in series parallel. I've got the power supply assembled already, and am just finishing the PCB design for the amp. I got a huge torrid power transformer for it, a robust rectifier, and lots of filter capacitance. My Tannoy Saturn S6's are rated at 6 ohms, and 90dB at one meter - I can't possibly see ever getting near to clipping this amp, in practice. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
Arny "CLK" Krueger exhibits his ignorance re. his neologistic use of strange
language: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:22:48 -0400, George M. Middius wrote: Max Holubitsky said to ****-for-Brains: BTW, my last transaction was somewhat over $200, and was for audio gear as have been virtually all of my transactions. My goodness, that's impressive - what is that, over 20,000 pennies? You think that's desperate? Another time, Turdy tried to pay somebody with a beat-up old turntable he claimed was worth $300. Just when I thought I'd seen the ultimate in delusional claims from the Middiot. Well, it was a lie anyway. His last transaction was a purchase for $86 plus shipment. Weil, I've thoroughly debunked this claim but yet you persist in it. Why is that Weil? Need more public ridicule? Does anybody understand what C-L-K is referring to? One just can't get enough of that ridicule! Let's see if I can explain it to you at a level that you can understand, Richman. deletion of Krueger's simplistic attempt to deny taking responsibility fo his moronic spelling error IOW, you refuse, as usual to acknowledge that you make spelling errors on a regular basis on RAO. The only reason I even condescended to call you on it is because you do so to others. Thanks for once again demonstrating your hypocrisy. Now, I'll let you get back to your compulsive fabrications. Just keep trying to tell everybody about redicule. Maybe you can make up some more incoherent words to go with this one. LOL! Bruce J. Richman |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 01:21:58 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:22:48 -0400, George M. Middius wrote: Max Holubitsky said to ****-for-Brains: BTW, my last transaction was somewhat over $200, and was for audio gear as have been virtually all of my transactions. My goodness, that's impressive - what is that, over 20,000 pennies? You think that's desperate? Another time, Turdy tried to pay somebody with a beat-up old turntable he claimed was worth $300. Just when I thought I'd seen the ultimate in delusional claims from the Middiot. Well, it was a lie anyway. His last transaction was a purchase for $86 plus shipment. Weil, I've thoroughly debunked this claim but yet you persist in it. Why is that Weil? Need more public ridicule? Does anybody understand what C-L-K is referring to? One just can't get enough of that ridicule! Let's see if I can explain it to you at a level that you can understand, Richman. Dave Weil went up the hill. Dave Weil shouted: Arny, your last eBay transaction was $86 and you're a liar to say otherwise. Arny went up the hill. Arny proved conclusively that his last eBay transaction was actually $232.50. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tegory=15 058 Actually, I think this is the first time that you actually posted a link to the item. You were previously afraid to post it. But, of course, I conceded the point without even going there anyway. I *did* point out as well that you don't seem to be a very good eBay citizen because you don't seem to be very adept at posting feedback either. Arny pushed on Weil, and Weil tumbled down the hill and hurt his head (again). From the bottom of the hill, Weil again said Arny, your last eBay transaction was $86 and you're a liar to say otherwise. Arny stood on the top of the hill and laughed. Everybody laughed because it is obvious that there is something wrong with Weil's head. See Weil's head bleed. See Weil's head bleed some more. Bleed Weil, Bleed! Boy, that was funny. Yes, I admitted that I was wrong about that. However, I don't see *you* admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that I was the first to mention your eBay ID on the group, when I showed that you posted a link to your closed transaction with your turntable, a link that *clearly* showed your eBay ID. Are you going to be man enough to admit that you were wrong, or is your "head going to bleed"? Just curious. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"Thee Signal" wrote in message ... "Trevor Wilson" wrote: **Smart move. These things are absolute crap. It reached a point where the Australian distributor was supplying entire modules, because none of the warranty agents wanted to desolder the damned tubes, or fault find the output stages. There's a bunch of solid state stuff, associated with each tube, you know. It fails, when the tubes fail. There are better, more reliable tube amps to be had, if that is your preference. They're a whole bunch easier to repair too. In the final analysis, you should ask yourself this: "Why are these things so common in the second hand market-place?" So why do they solder them? Is it to tie the buyer to AMC for future repairs? **You would need to ask the morons who built them. The tubes are arranged horizontally. Perhaps it has something to do with that. Whatever it is, if you plan on installing tube sockets, you'll be in for a rude shock. The job would be a complete nightmare, if it is do-able at all. In fact, you do what I have suggested to more than one owner of these shtiboxes: Go buy a nice, second hand Rotel RA971. It should cost about the same money and will deliver fabulous reliability, ease of service (if ever required), adequate power, excellent load tolerance and stunning sound quality (far, far better than any AMC). -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
* There is no technical impediment to building SS amps, which use lots of local NFB and minimal Global NFB. Some specialist amplifier manufacturers do just that. Guess what? They offer some of the benefits commonly attributable to tube amps and most of the benefits attributable to SS amps. Best of both worlds, if you ask me. One little problem. AFAIK tube amps have zero benefits as compared to SS amps. Tell me just one! |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"dave weil" wrote in message
news However, I don't see *you* admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that I was the first to mention your eBay ID on the group, when I showed that you posted a link to your closed transaction with your turntable, a link that *clearly* showed your eBay ID. I didn't say you were the first to mention it, Weil. I never denied that I posted the information that led to the discovery of my eBay id on RAO. Indeed I said as much last night. Are you going to be man enough to admit that you were wrong, or is your "head going to bleed"? I make a policy of not honoring straw man arguments. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 06:37:50 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:
"dave weil" wrote in message news However, I don't see *you* admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that I was the first to mention your eBay ID on the group, when I showed that you posted a link to your closed transaction with your turntable, a link that *clearly* showed your eBay ID. I didn't say you were the first to mention it, Weil. You claimed that I mentioned it and you didn't. Isn't that the same thing? "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction. That's how I found out your ebay ID, Weil. In short, you've been caught in hypocrisy again, Weil. Weil is again to be a hypocrite twice on this very issue Weil is a hypocrite once since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs are a bad idea but he did it essentially the same way I did - by discussing something he won in the recent past. Weil is a hypocrite twice since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs is a bad idea but he revealed mine." You say that you didn't reveal your ID on RAO (which isn't true, because you *did* do just that, by posting a link to the closed auction). Then you say that I revealed yours. Unless you can find someone else who "revealed your ID", then I must have been the first to mention your ID on the group, including you, according to your statement. So, I'd like to see a retraction of your false statements. First, I you *did* reveal your ID on the group, and second, that I "revealed" your ID on the group. I didn't "reveal" it, because you already had. I'm not expecting you to be the man that I was though. I never denied that I posted the information that led to the discovery of my eBay id on RAO. Indeed I said as much last night. "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction". You didn't "merely mention" that you recently won something in an auction. You posted the link. And, as you have pointed out in the past, posting a link to something communicates the information. Are you going to be man enough to admit that you were wrong, or is your "head going to bleed"? I make a policy of not honoring straw man arguments. Yep, just as I thought. You don't have the courage to admit that you're wrong. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"dave weil" wrote in message
news On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 06:37:50 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message news However, I don't see *you* admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that I was the first to mention your eBay ID on the group, when I showed that you posted a link to your closed transaction with your turntable, a link that *clearly* showed your eBay ID. I didn't say you were the first to mention it, Weil. You claimed that I mentioned it and you didn't. Isn't that the same thing? Not at all, since we were talking about two different things, i.e., your eBay id versus mine. "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction. That's how I found out your ebay ID, Weil. In short, you've been caught in hypocrisy again, Weil. Weil is again to be a hypocrite twice on this very issue Weil is a hypocrite once since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs are a bad idea but he did it essentially the same way I did - by discussing something he won in the recent past. Weil is a hypocrite twice since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs is a bad idea but he revealed mine." You say that you didn't reveal your ID on RAO (which isn't true, because you *did* do just that, by posting a link to the closed auction). I properly explained my claim that I didn't reveal my id on RAO, so there was no lie. Then you say that I revealed yours. With great flourish Weil, I might add. The objective was to embarrass and humiliate me, but unfortunately you made yourself look pretty silly. Unless you can find someone else who "revealed your ID", then I must have been the first to mention your ID on the group, including you, according to your statement. That would be your claim Weil, not mine. So, I'd like to see a retraction of your false statements. The alleged false statement is a creation of your twisted mind, Weil. However, I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to the group for the humiliating behavior of Dave Weil. First, I you *did* reveal your ID on the group, and second, that I "revealed" your ID on the group. I didn't "reveal" it, because you already had. "First, I you did..."???? In English, please! I'm not expecting you to be the man that I was though. I decline to sexually mutilate myself to be like you, Weil. I never denied that I posted the information that led to the discovery of my eBay id on RAO. Indeed I said as much last night. "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction". That's true. You didn't "merely mention" that you recently won something in an auction. You posted the link. And posting a link to a closed auction isn't mentioning it? LOL! And, as you have pointed out in the past, posting a link to something communicates the information. Not exactly, it provides a link to that communication. The information is not communicated until the link is followed. In this case the link takes the reader off of RAO, so the information in question was not posted on RAO. Are you going to be man enough to admit that you were wrong, or is your "head going to bleed"? I make a policy of not honoring straw man arguments. Yep, just as I thought. You don't have the courage to admit that you're wrong. There's a key element here that you're missing Weil. You have to show where I was wrong. You ain't done that. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
**You would need to ask the morons who built them. The tubes are arranged horizontally. Perhaps it has something to do with that. Whatever it is, if you plan on installing tube sockets, you'll be in for a rude shock. The job would be a complete nightmare, if it is do-able at all. In fact, you do what I have suggested to more than one owner of these shtiboxes: Go buy a nice, second hand Rotel RA971. It should cost about the same money and will deliver fabulous reliability, ease of service (if ever required), adequate power, excellent load tolerance and stunning sound quality (far, far better than any AMC). Wow - who would have thought? I never did get why someone would actually solder in the output tubes. I noticed that on their website, all the new products have tube sockets - this is not much of a suprise! |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:36:49 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message news On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 06:37:50 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message news However, I don't see *you* admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that I was the first to mention your eBay ID on the group, when I showed that you posted a link to your closed transaction with your turntable, a link that *clearly* showed your eBay ID. I didn't say you were the first to mention it, Weil. You claimed that I mentioned it and you didn't. Isn't that the same thing? Not at all, since we were talking about two different things, i.e., your eBay id versus mine. "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction. That's how I found out your ebay ID, Weil. In short, you've been caught in hypocrisy again, Weil. Weil is again to be a hypocrite twice on this very issue Weil is a hypocrite once since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs are a bad idea but he did it essentially the same way I did - by discussing something he won in the recent past. Weil is a hypocrite twice since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs is a bad idea but he revealed mine." You say that you didn't reveal your ID on RAO (which isn't true, because you *did* do just that, by posting a link to the closed auction). I properly explained my claim that I didn't reveal my id on RAO, so there was no lie. But you *did* reveal your id on RAO by posting the link to the closed auction that you won. Then you say that I revealed yours. With great flourish Weil, I might add. The objective was to embarrass and humiliate me, but unfortunately you made yourself look pretty silly. Nope. I didn't reveal it because you had already done that yourself. You can only reveal it once. And you did it. Unless you can find someone else who "revealed your ID", then I must have been the first to mention your ID on the group, including you, according to your statement. That would be your claim Weil, not mine. So, I'd like to see a retraction of your false statements. The alleged false statement is a creation of your twisted mind, Weil. However, I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to the group for the humiliating behavior of Dave Weil. I see. YOu can't admit your mistake. Thank you for showing the group. I love it when you spin like this. It really shows the group your true colors. First, I you *did* reveal your ID on the group, and second, that I "revealed" your ID on the group. I didn't "reveal" it, because you already had. "First, I you did..."???? In English, please! First, you *did*... I'm not expecting you to be the man that I was though. I decline to sexually mutilate myself to be like you, Weil. Oh, you don't want to grow a set, eh? I never denied that I posted the information that led to the discovery of my eBay id on RAO. Indeed I said as much last night. "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction". That's true. It's *NOT* true. You posted a link to eBay that revealed your ID. Is this true or not? Be a man and answer this direct question. You didn't "merely mention" that you recently won something in an auction. You posted the link. And posting a link to a closed auction isn't mentioning it? Nope, not when you're talking about revealing your ID. Does posting the link allow everyone on the group to see your ID or not? LOL! And, as you have pointed out in the past, posting a link to something communicates the information. Not exactly, it provides a link to that communication. The information is not communicated until the link is followed. In this case the link takes the reader off of RAO, so the information in question was not posted on RAO. You once claimed that posting a link on your site that referred to other information revealed that information. Now you're claiming that it isn't true. Spin little man, spin. Are you going to be man enough to admit that you were wrong, or is your "head going to bleed"? I make a policy of not honoring straw man arguments. Yep, just as I thought. You don't have the courage to admit that you're wrong. There's a key element here that you're missing Weil. You have to show where I was wrong. You ain't done that. I have indeed shown that you were wrong. You revealed the name arnyk as your ID by posting the link that showed arnyk as the winner of the auction that you claimed you had won. You lose. Again. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Kroofulness is never in season
dave weil said to ****-for-Brains: "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction". That's true. It's *NOT* true. You posted a link to eBay that revealed your ID. Is this true or not? Be a man and answer this direct question. In case anybody has forgotten, a certain RAOer of long ago posted an offer of a substantial cash award ($10,000) for anybody who can get Mr. **** to answer a question he has previously ducked. Good luck, dave. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message * There is no technical impediment to building SS amps, which use lots of local NFB and minimal Global NFB. Some specialist amplifier manufacturers do just that. Guess what? They offer some of the benefits commonly attributable to tube amps and most of the benefits attributable to SS amps. Best of both worlds, if you ask me. One little problem. AFAIK tube amps have zero benefits as compared to SS amps. Tell me just one! **Tube amps, per se, have none. SOME tube amps have SOME advantages, over SOME SS amps. Depends on the implementation. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
"dave weil" wrote in message
You revealed the name arnyk as your ID by posting the link that showed arnyk as the winner of the auction that you claimed you had won. Weil, tou reveled your ID by bragging that you just won an AR turntable, I believe for a certain price.. Since the link to eBay is well known, and searching closed auctions is well-understood, it was as good as a link to the closed auction. I determined your ID in a few seconds. Note this all happened months ago, and the evidence mentioned has scrolled off eBay. Therefore, what I just did is not the same as revealing Dave's ID Note that Dave has again played the hypocrite, because he thinks that safeguarding eBay IDs is important, but he went out of his way to again reveal mine. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 06:45:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message You revealed the name arnyk as your ID by posting the link that showed arnyk as the winner of the auction that you claimed you had won. Weil, tou reveled your ID by bragging that you just won an AR turntable, I believe for a certain price.. Since the link to eBay is well known, and searching closed auctions is well-understood, it was as good as a link to the closed auction. I determined your ID in a few seconds. And yet, that's not the same thing as posting a direct link. After all, you had no proof that that ID was me. It didn't bother me to confirm it by talking positively about certain recent purchases. But, until I did that, I could have denied that the ID was mine and you wouldn't have been able to prove that it was me, short of purchasing something from me. Note this all happened months ago, and the evidence mentioned has scrolled off eBay. Therefore, what I just did is not the same as revealing Dave's ID Actually, you haven't revealed my ID. If you do, then you are doing a wrong thing because I haven't authorized you to do it. Note that Dave has again played the hypocrite, because he thinks that safeguarding eBay IDs is important, but he went out of his way to again reveal mine. I think that safeguarding ones ID is important if someone thinks it's important, which you obviously didn't because you posted a direct link to it (like you don't think it's important to safeguard your wife's work phone number). I, on the other hand, have never done that. You could have never confirmed my ID without my assent during this exchange and I only did that *because* you haven't revealed the ID. I find it funny that you would go through the trouble of stalking me on eBay, but I guess that goes with the territory. |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
AMC CVT2030 STEREO TUBE AMPLIFIER
dave weil wrote in message : On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 06:37:50 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message news However, I don't see *you* admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that I was the first to mention your eBay ID on the group, when I showed that you posted a link to your closed transaction with your turntable, a link that *clearly* showed your eBay ID. I didn't say you were the first to mention it, Weil. You claimed that I mentioned it and you didn't. Isn't that the same thing? "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction. That's how I found out your ebay ID, Weil. In short, you've been caught in hypocrisy again, Weil. Weil is again to be a hypocrite twice on this very issue Weil is a hypocrite once since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs are a bad idea but he did it essentially the same way I did - by discussing something he won in the recent past. Weil is a hypocrite twice since he thinks that revealing eBay IDs is a bad idea but he revealed mine." You say that you didn't reveal your ID on RAO (which isn't true, because you *did* do just that, by posting a link to the closed auction). Then you say that I revealed yours. Unless you can find someone else who "revealed your ID", then I must have been the first to mention your ID on the group, including you, according to your statement. So, I'd like to see a retraction of your false statements. First, I you *did* reveal your ID on the group, and second, that I "revealed" your ID on the group. I didn't "reveal" it, because you already had. I'm not expecting you to be the man that I was though. I never denied that I posted the information that led to the discovery of my eBay id on RAO. Indeed I said as much last night. "So I didn't reveal my ID on RAO. I merely mentioned that I had recently won something in an auction". You didn't "merely mention" that you recently won something in an auction. You posted the link. And, as you have pointed out in the past, posting a link to something communicates the information. Are you going to be man enough to admit that you were wrong, or is your "head going to bleed"? I make a policy of not honoring straw man arguments. Yep, just as I thought. You don't have the courage to admit that you're wrong. Why should Arny admit anything to you when he just proved you're a pedophile, you ****ing drug addict? Go ahead and deny what we all know, it makes good theatre. Stop picking on Arny Krueger! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: ALPINE CAR STEREO AMPLIFIER IN MA | Car Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 2/5) | Car Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) | Car Audio | |||
Story of the poor car stereo | Car Audio | |||
Revisited: Alphasonik A-255 Stereo Power Amplifier | Car Audio |