Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Genisyde
 
Posts: n/a
Default mp3 quality

which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
anyone know which is the best????
  #2   Report Post  
Eberhard Sengpiel
 
Posts: n/a
Default mp3 quality

Genisyde Wrote:
which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and
320kbps) because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the
best qulaities. Does anyone know which is the best?



Read he
http://www.nut-n-but.net/CCPCUG/Tech...es/TB0105.html
http://www.hitsquad.com/smm/programs...sages/611.html
http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/mp3...st/005041.html
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/6/ub...5&m=2160954422

Cheers

Eberhard Sengpiel


  #3   Report Post  
ReEfErMaDnEsS
 
Posts: n/a
Default mp3 quality

192 is considered by most to be CD quality, however the ripper and the
encoder is the true measure of quality......if space isn't a big deal and
quality is checkout EAC ripper and LAME as the encoder at at least 256.


"Genisyde" wrote in message
om...
which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
anyone know which is the best????



  #4   Report Post  
Codifus
 
Posts: n/a
Default mp3 quality

ReEfErMaDnEsS wrote:
192 is considered by most to be CD quality, however the ripper and the
encoder is the true measure of quality......if space isn't a big deal and
quality is checkout EAC ripper and LAME as the encoder at at least 256.


"Genisyde" wrote in message
om...

which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
anyone know which is the best????




Ummm, no way is 192 considered to be anywhere near CD quality. 192 is
just the most acceptable trade-off between quality and space
conservation. 320 approaches CD quality much better.

CD
  #5   Report Post  
ReEfErMaDnEsS
 
Posts: n/a
Default mp3 quality

I said considered by most....sort of the popular sentiment in the last few
years regarding MP3.....not my belief and certainly not yours

"Codifus" wrote in message
et...
ReEfErMaDnEsS wrote:
192 is considered by most to be CD quality, however the ripper and the
encoder is the true measure of quality......if space isn't a big deal

and
quality is checkout EAC ripper and LAME as the encoder at at least 256.


"Genisyde" wrote in message
om...

which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
anyone know which is the best????




Ummm, no way is 192 considered to be anywhere near CD quality. 192 is
just the most acceptable trade-off between quality and space
conservation. 320 approaches CD quality much better.

CD



 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bose 901 Review William Sommerwerck General 149 January 8th 05 04:49 PM
Stereo Microphone, Record live sound with amazing depth! Techyhed General 0 January 31st 04 04:23 AM
Stereo Microphone, Record live sound with amazing depth! Techyhed General 0 January 31st 04 03:55 AM
Why Are All Cheap Mic preamps Tubes? TheKeith General 29 December 23rd 03 04:18 PM
MP3 players that record MS General 18 December 5th 03 05:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"