Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"TonyP" wrote in message u... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... **"Good sounding mixers" is an oxymoron. So just where did you get the records from to play on your HiFi, that had never been through a mixer? **That would be a non-sequiteur. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Trevor Wilson wrote:
"TonyP" wrote in message u... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... **"Good sounding mixers" is an oxymoron. So just where did you get the records from to play on your HiFi, that had never been through a mixer? **That would be a non-sequiteur. If they've all been through a mixer, then according to you Trevor, none of them sound any good. Sounds like a major problem! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Trevor Wilson wrote:
"TonyP" wrote in message u... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... **"Good sounding mixers" is an oxymoron. So just where did you get the records from to play on your HiFi, that had never been through a mixer? **That would be a non-sequiteur. If they've all been through a mixer, then according to you Trevor, none of them sound any good. Sounds like a major problem! |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Trevor Wilson" wrote:
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 1 May 2004 13:56:31 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Audition has 1, 1/2, and 1/3 octave graphic eqs, as well as a wide range of other kinds of eq. So it does. I always seem to forget about CoolEdit/Audition. For some reason it seems to be better established among sound engineers than among musicians. Is it a good eq? My gut reaction is to get worried when I see more than a handful of eq bands - nasty phase things start happening. But maybe it's different with software? **You're thinking in analogue terms. ALL analogue eqs are a complete waste of time. Always have been. Digital eq is fine. Digital eqs do not exhibit phase shift problems. Just digital artifacts |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Trevor Wilson" wrote:
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 1 May 2004 13:56:31 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Audition has 1, 1/2, and 1/3 octave graphic eqs, as well as a wide range of other kinds of eq. So it does. I always seem to forget about CoolEdit/Audition. For some reason it seems to be better established among sound engineers than among musicians. Is it a good eq? My gut reaction is to get worried when I see more than a handful of eq bands - nasty phase things start happening. But maybe it's different with software? **You're thinking in analogue terms. ALL analogue eqs are a complete waste of time. Always have been. Digital eq is fine. Digital eqs do not exhibit phase shift problems. Just digital artifacts |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
GMAN wrote:
In article , "Trevor Wilson" wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 May 2004 13:56:31 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Audition has 1, 1/2, and 1/3 octave graphic eqs, as well as a wide range of other kinds of eq. So it does. I always seem to forget about CoolEdit/Audition. For some reason it seems to be better established among sound engineers than among musicians. Is it a good eq? My gut reaction is to get worried when I see more than a handful of eq bands - nasty phase things start happening. But maybe it's different with software? **You're thinking in analogue terms. ALL analogue eqs are a complete waste of time. Always have been. Digital eq is fine. Digital eqs do not exhibit phase shift problems. Just digital artifacts Name those digital artifacts, if you can. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
GMAN wrote:
In article , "Trevor Wilson" wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 May 2004 13:56:31 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Audition has 1, 1/2, and 1/3 octave graphic eqs, as well as a wide range of other kinds of eq. So it does. I always seem to forget about CoolEdit/Audition. For some reason it seems to be better established among sound engineers than among musicians. Is it a good eq? My gut reaction is to get worried when I see more than a handful of eq bands - nasty phase things start happening. But maybe it's different with software? **You're thinking in analogue terms. ALL analogue eqs are a complete waste of time. Always have been. Digital eq is fine. Digital eqs do not exhibit phase shift problems. Just digital artifacts Name those digital artifacts, if you can. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 May 2004 08:43:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: Just digital artifacts Name those digital artifacts, if you can. er....George? :-) Now, you name those phase shifts. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 May 2004 08:43:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: Just digital artifacts Name those digital artifacts, if you can. er....George? :-) Now, you name those phase shifts. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: "TonyP" wrote in message u... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... **"Good sounding mixers" is an oxymoron. So just where did you get the records from to play on your HiFi, that had never been through a mixer? **That would be a non-sequiteur. If they've all been through a mixer, then according to you Trevor, none of them sound any good. Some might agree with that, but NOT because of the mixing *hardware* :-) Sounds like a major problem! Fortunately only to TW. TonyP. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: "TonyP" wrote in message u... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... **"Good sounding mixers" is an oxymoron. So just where did you get the records from to play on your HiFi, that had never been through a mixer? **That would be a non-sequiteur. If they've all been through a mixer, then according to you Trevor, none of them sound any good. Some might agree with that, but NOT because of the mixing *hardware* :-) Sounds like a major problem! Fortunately only to TW. TonyP. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
TonyP wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: "TonyP" wrote in message u... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... **"Good sounding mixers" is an oxymoron. So just where did you get the records from to play on your HiFi, that had never been through a mixer? **That would be a non-sequiteur. If they've all been through a mixer, then according to you Trevor, none of them sound any good. Some might agree with that, but NOT because of the mixing *hardware* :-) Agreed. There are good mixers, even analog mixers. Sounds like a major problem! Fortunately only to TW. It hasn't been good for him around here the last week or so. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
TonyP wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: "TonyP" wrote in message u... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... **"Good sounding mixers" is an oxymoron. So just where did you get the records from to play on your HiFi, that had never been through a mixer? **That would be a non-sequiteur. If they've all been through a mixer, then according to you Trevor, none of them sound any good. Some might agree with that, but NOT because of the mixing *hardware* :-) Agreed. There are good mixers, even analog mixers. Sounds like a major problem! Fortunately only to TW. It hasn't been good for him around here the last week or so. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Newbe question: pitch and octave frequency ratio? | Tech | |||
1/3 octave eq for windows | Tech | |||
FA: Yamaha EX-1 Electone Organ Synth GX-1 / CS-80 Cousin / ART IEQ SmartCurve 1/3 Octave Equalizers | Pro Audio | |||
Octave Systems CopyMaster CD 48/7 | Pro Audio | |||
3rd octave EQ's. | Car Audio |