Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:09:54 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote: If irony killed, we'd all... I'm not ironic. Now that was ironic. -- td |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
"The Devil" wrote in message
newsi38ovk78v7ufqtkrhqfmeci629kouoe34@rdmzrnewst xt.nz On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:47:52 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: We How many times until you learn, paedo? I might skim-read one in twenty of your posts. Don't bother talking to me. I don't read what you write. Do you seriously think that I write replies to your posts just for you to read, Graham? Hey boys, we've got another one that just fell off the turnip truck! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
"dave weil" wrote in message
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:27:03 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 12:00:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:17:49 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "ScottW" wrote in message om Sold any speakers yet? I'm guessing you might not even have the resources to retrieve the pair you sent to Dave until your next unemployment check arrives. Note post: http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=k...%40comcast.com I asked for the UPS tracking number for the shipment from Singh to Weil. No answer. Meaningful? Yes, it means that I don't jump when you say jump. Also, you might want to keep reading. Non-performance and promise of future non-performance on a critical is point noted. I'll let people reach whatever conclusions they want to. Yes, let us. I doubt that even guys like Joe or Mike think that I didn't have the speakers in hand (or *still* have the speakers in hand for that matter). End of discussion - plenty of evidence that there were never any speakers. No evidence of the contrary of course. Just dismissal and massive obfuscation every time the issue is raised. And fixating on a "UPS tracking number from Singh to Weil" is rather stupid for two reasons. One reason is the fact, clearly stated on RAO that the speakers weren't shipped from Singh, but from someone else (in California) who had them for evaluation. Soooo, failure to read duly noted. Weil's inability to comprehend the concept of reasonable answer with explanation, duly noted. I'll leave the other reason up to the dullest knife in the drawer to figure out for himself. I've got a week or two to kill... Arnold is the only mouse that I know of who thinks he's a cat. Of course, it keeps him off the street and out of harm's way, so i suppose there's an upside to it. Continued posturing, name-calling and obfuscation duly noted. Yes, and I wish you'd stop it. Obfuscation. You can't even ask a diret question, can you? I don't know what a "diret" question might be. It's that ole debating trade technique at work. See where your dominatrix act got you, Singh? Singh ponied up the true facts and made you look like an even bigger idiot than you already had made of yourself. At least it keeps you off the streets and out of unsuspecting dentists' offices. Whatever that means. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
The Devil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:40:24 GMT, trotsky wrote: The Devil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:40:51 GMT, trotsky wrote: Not good enough. Have you or have you not been treated for alcoholism? ROTFLMAO! My God, man. So you're not going to answer the question? Have you been "on the wagon"? What were the circumstances? This is the court of public opinion, and I'm calling your credibility into question. Take as much time as you need to answer. It took a second or two. For one, it's a really stupid question that has nothing to do with either you or your speaker scam. It looks like I've hit home again. Man, the words "the court of public opinion" must've burned through your brain like a magnifying glass through an ant. (Now that's an apt analogy!) This is your big chance, Dev: clearly you want people to believe you are credible, and you refuse to expound on that. What's the problem, buddy? Is it just me, or does this make no sense at all? You mean you don't want credibility? You're certainly on the right track! |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:00:32 GMT, trotsky wrote:
dave weil wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. You and Middius must have more of a relationship than I thought. I doubt it. You actually have more of a relationship with him than I do, since money has actually changed hands between you. Arnold says jump and you say, "How high"? That's pretty submissive... |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
"dave weil" wrote in message
Arnold says jump and you say, "How high"? That's pretty submissive... Nahh, it's just that Singh finally figured out that one way to make me drop an issue is to give me a believable answer. OTOH Weil, you want to play dominatrix to the bitter end. So be it! |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:31:52 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message nk.net Arny Krueger wrote: I've got tracking no.'s: 045792273595583 045792273595590 Burbank - Nashville, natch. Burbank? Is that where the speakers are now? Dang - I live ten minutes from there. No, that's where they came from. Oh. Humm - that means I can go look at them if he starts selling them on consignment/etc - because he'll go to a local audio store or two first. It would actually be interesting to hear them. It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. They do FAR more things right than they do wrong. And that puts them ahead of many commercial designs. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:51:46 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: It's that ole debating trade technique at work. See where your dominatrix act got you, Singh? Singh ponied up the true facts and made you look like an even bigger idiot than you already had made of yourself. Terminally confused again, I see. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:47:58 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message Arnold says jump and you say, "How high"? That's pretty submissive... Nahh, it's just that Singh finally figured out that one way to make me drop an issue is to give me a believable answer. OTOH Weil, you want to play dominatrix to the bitter end. So be it! You seem fixated on sexual dominance and submission. Is this a clue to your personality? Because, submission has more than just sexual connotations, you know. Or maybe youdon't. Thanks for the window into your soul. BTW, I'm surprised that you accepted the tracking numbers of proof that speakers were sent to me. Normally, you'd whine about the fact that there doesn't seem to be a product description. Heck, he could have sent me 60 lbs of refrigerator magnets. Good boy, Arnold. Sit. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
"dave weil" wrote in message
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:31:52 GMT, Joseph Oberlander wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message nk.net Arny Krueger wrote: I've got tracking no.'s: 045792273595583 045792273595590 Burbank - Nashville, natch. Burbank? Is that where the speakers are now? Dang - I live ten minutes from there. No, that's where they came from. Oh. Humm - that means I can go look at them if he starts selling them on consignment/etc - because he'll go to a local audio store or two first. It would actually be interesting to hear them. It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. That would depend on whether one's baseline is say Klipsch Cornwalls or something a little more modern... They do FAR more things right than they do wrong. In the opinion of someone seems to who think that Klipsch Cornwalls are a SOTA speaker... And that puts them ahead of many commercial designs. I don't doubt that, there's some real crap out there. But most of it sells for less than $300 a pair. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
dave weil wrote in message . ..
If I thought that you *really* believed that there was no speaker shopped to me, I might be willing to provide the info. Trots, Were really shopping your speakers to Weil? Is this some new marketing concept? ScottW |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
dave weil wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. Now you're gonna have all the crazy's dropping by your house, Dave since Trots as good as published a link to your address. Nice unauthorized disclosure of personal info there Trots. You let Kreuger play you. What were the speakers doing in Burbank? ScottW |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:10:35 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: That would depend on whether one's baseline is say Klipsch Cornwalls or something a little more modern... You mean like the speakers that you own from the last millenium? I'm just surprised to find you bashing Klipsches, especially time-proven designs like the Cornwalls. The proof of their value is far more documented than, say, an anonymous pair of Boston Acoustics speakers that rest in one of your listening rooms. If you choose not to like horn systems, that's fine. But to see you turn on one of the true pioneers of audio is pretty out of character. It just shows how petty you can be when the onlyreason you're trashing these speakers is because *I* happen to own a pair. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:51:31 -0500, dave weil
wrote: It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre Ah, ah, now. I didn't say that. I said the drivers are pretty mediocre, which they are. I have no opinion about how the speakers sound. I cannot know that, of course, without hearing them. I may just buy the drivers and crossover from Madisound and make a pair to find out. Part of what I find interesting is how much Greg is expecting people to pay to have him put a Madisound kit together for them. All of the qualities Greg says must inhabit a speaker to meet his world-class performance benchmark . . . well? How did he design the speakers to posses those qualities? According to Greg, it was just a matter of doing a week's worth of research, settling on some relatively unknown drivers just because people won't be familiar with them (feeeel the buuuuzzzzzz), calling Madisound and asking them for a crossover schematic, getting the polarity right on the tweeters, and then fiddling around with the stuffing until he could feel some air movement around the bass port. Oh, and no neoprene gasket, natch. What a load of bull****. It's a total con. He hasn't designed anything. There is no Gregness in these speakers. I bet he doesn't even have the first idea how they work. speakers in the least. They do FAR more things right than they do wrong. And that puts them ahead of many commercial designs. Maybe. Potential customers will be glad to know they can buy all the parts from Madisound and have a decent cabinet made all for a fraction of the cost Greg is charging. It will be their own judgement call of course whether doing ten minutes soldering and sticking a few drivers in a box is worth a grand to them. -- td |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
rfgf
"The Devil" schreef in bericht news:ks18ov0joe598jgnkhe0df4gt0eim0sqhq@rdmzrnewst xt.nz... On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:40:24 GMT, trotsky wrote: The Devil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:40:51 GMT, trotsky wrote: Not good enough. Have you or have you not been treated for alcoholism? ROTFLMAO! My God, man. So you're not going to answer the question? Have you been "on the wagon"? What were the circumstances? This is the court of public opinion, and I'm calling your credibility into question. Take as much time as you need to answer. It took a second or two. For one, it's a really stupid question that has nothing to do with either you or your speaker scam. It looks like I've hit home again. Man, the words "the court of public opinion" must've burned through your brain like a magnifying glass through an ant. (Now that's an apt analogy!) This is your big chance, Dev: clearly you want people to believe you are credible, and you refuse to expound on that. What's the problem, buddy? Is it just me, or does this make no sense at all? -- td |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. That would depend on whether one's baseline is say Klipsch Cornwalls or something a little more modern... Dev, remind me: why do they call Quad ESLs "63s"? Stephen |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
MiNE 109 wrote: In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. That would depend on whether one's baseline is say Klipsch Cornwalls or something a little more modern... Dev, remind me: why do they call Quad ESLs "63s"? Stephen Development of that model started in 1963 the original one is called the 57, because it came out in 1957 Max |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
In article , Max Holubitsky
wrote: MiNE 109 wrote: In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. That would depend on whether one's baseline is say Klipsch Cornwalls or something a little more modern... Dev, remind me: why do they call Quad ESLs "63s"? Development of that model started in 1963 the original one is called the 57, because it came out in 1957 State of the art for midrange is arguably 45 years old, then. I guess modernity isn't the only standard. Stephen |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:21:36 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. That would depend on whether one's baseline is say Klipsch Cornwalls or something a little more modern... Dev, remind me: why do they call Quad ESLs "63s"? Oooh, lemme guess, lemme guess. Is it some secret measure of how good they sound? Could there be a Mother****ing 63 and a Stainless Steel 63 and an Effete 63 for girlie music? What about a Toilet Paper 63 for test tones? -- td |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
In article z,
The Devil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:21:36 GMT, MiNE 109 wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. That would depend on whether one's baseline is say Klipsch Cornwalls or something a little more modern... Dev, remind me: why do they call Quad ESLs "63s"? Oooh, lemme guess, lemme guess. Is it some secret measure of how good they sound? Could there be a Mother****ing 63 and a Stainless Steel 63 and an Effete 63 for girlie music? What about a Toilet Paper 63 for test tones? Oh, like Heinz 57 varieties, except it's 63, unless you have Quad 57s. Stephen |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:10:31 GMT, MiNe 109
wrote: Oooh, lemme guess, lemme guess. Is it some secret measure of how good they sound? Could there be a Mother****ing 63 and a Stainless Steel 63 and an Effete 63 for girlie music? What about a Toilet Paper 63 for test tones? Oh, like Heinz 57 varieties, except it's 63, unless you have Quad 57s. Any minute now we're going to be accused of being gay. Where's my dentist when I need him . . . -- td |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
In article z,
The Devil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:10:31 GMT, MiNe 109 wrote: Oooh, lemme guess, lemme guess. Is it some secret measure of how good they sound? Could there be a Mother****ing 63 and a Stainless Steel 63 and an Effete 63 for girlie music? What about a Toilet Paper 63 for test tones? Oh, like Heinz 57 varieties, except it's 63, unless you have Quad 57s. Any minute now we're going to be accused of being gay. Or being a geek: http://www.themightygeek.com/mtarchives/000130.php Where's my dentist when I need him . . . Dentist or Dentist 2? http://members.fortunecity.com/roogu...r/dentist2.htm Stephen |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
dave weil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:00:32 GMT, trotsky wrote: dave weil wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. You and Middius must have more of a relationship than I thought. I doubt it. You actually have more of a relationship with him than I do, since money has actually changed hands between you. Arnold says jump and you say, "How high"? That's pretty submissive... Yeah, that's believable: I'm at Arny's beck and call all the time. Are you grounded in reality on any topic, dave? |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
dave weil wrote: On 8 Oct 2003 10:01:17 -0700, (ScottW) wrote: dave weil wrote in message . .. On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. Now you're gonna have all the crazy's dropping by your house, Dave since Trots as good as published a link to your address. Well, they've always been able to figure that out simply by looking up my name in a people search. I've never hidden my identity, place of residence, etc. I have a listed phone number and everything. That has never stopped Mr. Krueger from claiming all sorts of things about my veracity though. That's his stock-in-trade. dave, can you tell me how you determine someone's address from Fedex tracking no.'s? TIA. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
The Devil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:51:31 -0500, dave weil wrote: It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre Ah, ah, now. I didn't say that. I said the drivers are pretty mediocre, which they are. You're talking out of your arse, Dev. (What new?) Can you give us a ranking of some of the "really good" drivers? There's a dear. Don't forget to take "Xmax" into account! I have no opinion about how the speakers sound. I cannot know that, of course, without hearing them. I may just buy the drivers and crossover from Madisound and make a pair to find out. Why not? You've been stealing my intellectual property for years. Part of what I find interesting is how much Greg is expecting people to pay to have him put a Madisound kit together for them. All of the qualities Greg says must inhabit a speaker to meet his world-class performance benchmark . . . well? How did he design the speakers to posses those qualities? According to Greg, it was just a matter of doing a week's worth of research, settling on some relatively unknown drivers just because people won't be familiar with them (feeeel the buuuuzzzzzz), calling Madisound and asking them for a crossover schematic, getting the polarity right on the tweeters, and then fiddling around with the stuffing until he could feel some air movement around the bass port. Oh, and no neoprene gasket, natch. Dev, you're starting to sound desperate, just because dave weil wouldn't propagate the lie you were complicit in. Like a puppet on a string, really. Does Jiminy Cricket do a good job controlling those strings? What a load of bull****. It's a total con. He hasn't designed anything. There is no Gregness in these speakers. I bet he doesn't even have the first idea how they work. You're not making sense, Dev: are you saying every product on the market has to have specific design work done by the owner of the company to not be a con? Did you hear that Trump Tower WASN'T designed by Donald Trump? The horror! Thanks of the laugh, anyway. speakers in the least. They do FAR more things right than they do wrong. And that puts them ahead of many commercial designs. Maybe. Potential customers will be glad to know they can buy all the parts from Madisound and have a decent cabinet made all for a fraction of the cost Greg is charging. It will be their own judgement call of course whether doing ten minutes soldering and sticking a few drivers in a box is worth a grand to them. Right, which compares to the work that you do how, exactly? Oh, that's right, you lack the necessary ******** to have an actual identity. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
trotsky said: You've been stealing my intellectual property for years. Shouldn't that be "my mother****ing intellectual property"? |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 22:08:29 GMT, trotsky wrote:
You're I wasn't talking to you, Looper. -- td |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:59:15 GMT, trotsky wrote:
dave weil wrote: On 8 Oct 2003 10:01:17 -0700, (ScottW) wrote: dave weil wrote in message . .. On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. Now you're gonna have all the crazy's dropping by your house, Dave since Trots as good as published a link to your address. Well, they've always been able to figure that out simply by looking up my name in a people search. I've never hidden my identity, place of residence, etc. I have a listed phone number and everything. That has never stopped Mr. Krueger from claiming all sorts of things about my veracity though. That's his stock-in-trade. dave, can you tell me how you determine someone's address from Fedex tracking no.'s? TIA. Yes, after you track it, you click on signature proof and then click on continue. On that page you'll find the delivery address. You're welcome. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
dave weil said: dave, can you tell me how you determine someone's address from Fedex tracking no.'s? TIA. Yes, after you track it, you click on signature proof and then click on continue. On that page you'll find the delivery address. You're welcome. Let's hope those instructions are too complex for Krooger. It says "Signature Service Not Requested". More fodder for Mr. ****'s "debating trade" games. Unless your secret identity is "METCUSTOMER", of course..... |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
trotsky wrote:
Why not? You've been stealing my intellectual property for years. I don't know who you are accusing here but if it's true I'm sure that he has many remorses... ;-) |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
dave weil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:59:15 GMT, trotsky wrote: dave weil wrote: On 8 Oct 2003 10:01:17 -0700, (ScottW) wrote: dave weil wrote in message . .. On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. Now you're gonna have all the crazy's dropping by your house, Dave since Trots as good as published a link to your address. Well, they've always been able to figure that out simply by looking up my name in a people search. I've never hidden my identity, place of residence, etc. I have a listed phone number and everything. That has never stopped Mr. Krueger from claiming all sorts of things about my veracity though. That's his stock-in-trade. dave, can you tell me how you determine someone's address from Fedex tracking no.'s? TIA. Yes, after you track it, you click on signature proof and then click on continue. On that page you'll find the delivery address. You're welcome. In that case my apologies--Krueger had no business being privy to this info. unless you specifically said so. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 18:42:07 -0400, George M. Middius
wrote: dave weil said: dave, can you tell me how you determine someone's address from Fedex tracking no.'s? TIA. Yes, after you track it, you click on signature proof and then click on continue. On that page you'll find the delivery address. You're welcome. Let's hope those instructions are too complex for Krooger. It says "Signature Service Not Requested". More fodder for Mr. ****'s "debating trade" games. Unless your secret identity is "METCUSTOMER", of course..... Well, there's *that* too. Why he's not screaming that the FedEx software is in cahoots with the Grand Conspiracy is a mystery. Maybe he thinks it's just lying to him. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:07:04 GMT, trotsky wrote:
dave weil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:59:15 GMT, trotsky wrote: dave weil wrote: On 8 Oct 2003 10:01:17 -0700, (ScottW) wrote: dave weil wrote in message . .. On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. Now you're gonna have all the crazy's dropping by your house, Dave since Trots as good as published a link to your address. Well, they've always been able to figure that out simply by looking up my name in a people search. I've never hidden my identity, place of residence, etc. I have a listed phone number and everything. That has never stopped Mr. Krueger from claiming all sorts of things about my veracity though. That's his stock-in-trade. dave, can you tell me how you determine someone's address from Fedex tracking no.'s? TIA. Yes, after you track it, you click on signature proof and then click on continue. On that page you'll find the delivery address. You're welcome. In that case my apologies--Krueger had no business being privy to this info. unless you specifically said so. Thanks. I appreciate that. No harm done really. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
George M. Middius wrote:
trotsky said: You've been stealing my intellectual property for years. Shouldn't that be "my mother****ing intellectual property"? The theft of Singh's intellectual property has been officially recognized by the US Armed Forces. It can be found under Job Descriptions for Latrine Duty. Bruce J. Richman |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:31:52 GMT, Joseph Oberlander wrote: Oh. Humm - that means I can go look at them if he starts selling them on consignment/etc - because he'll go to a local audio store or two first. It would actually be interesting to hear them. It *is* interesting to hear them. I think it's rather important to hear them before commenting on them. Normally, I would agree. But since Trots doesn't think it is important, why should anybody else? He has a history of doing just that. His marketing plan is to get people to buy them based upon a web page. Because, despite what Arnold and Mike have said (and yes, even the Devil), they ARE NOT mediocre speakers in the least. They do FAR more things right than they do wrong. And that puts them ahead of many commercial designs. Name some comparably priced speakers currently on the market that you think are inferior to the Jupiters, please. ScottW |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Jupiter
"trotsky" wrote in message
dave weil wrote: On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:00:32 GMT, trotsky wrote: dave weil wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Perhaps Fedex is more conducive to helping with conspiracies. In this case it's quite clear that Singh can rise to factual challenges far better than Weil. That's because he's a submissive. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. You and Middius must have more of a relationship than I thought. I doubt it. You actually have more of a relationship with him than I do, since money has actually changed hands between you. Arnold says jump and you say, "How high"? That's pretty submissive... Yeah, that's believable: I'm at Arny's beck and call all the time. Indeed. It seems like Weil is trying to move ahead in RAO's race to total insanity. Are you grounded in reality on any topic, dave? In Weil world, being reasonably agreeable tags you as a "submissive". |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RCA out and Speaker Question in 2004 Ranger Edge Question | Car Audio | |||
question on Pioneer DEH-P4600MP | Car Audio | |||
Subwoofer box question | Car Audio | |||
question about cd player brands | Audio Opinions | |||
Subwoofer position question | Audio Opinions |