Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Danny T wrote:
On Jan 5, 12:17 pm, (hank alrich) wrote: Danny T wrote: On Jan 4, 4:02 pm, Jenn wrote: In article , Danny T wrote: A while back I read an article about Limewire being taken out of service. There are so many sites like Rhapsody that I figured the pirate days were behind us. 9 bucks lets you download everything you can grab so you'd think people would be happy with that. Enter Frostwire..... The new Limewire. We're right back to where we started. Are people so cheap they can't pay a monthly fee of 9 bucks? I've lost hope in people. I can tell you that in my experience, the VAST majority of college-aged people (the largest group of downloaders) either don't care that it's immoral, or they just believe that music should be free. --www.jennifermartinmusic.com Considering what most of them listen to, I'd agree it should be free :-) BTW, McLuhan also covered the shifting of perceptual primacy from the ear to the eye. This underlies satisfaction with low resolution audi files. http://www.nextnature.net/2009/12/th...rshall-mcluhan / That is a sad thing to think. A little reality education on what artists really make would be helpful. All those kids running around with idealistic hearts wanting to save stuff.... even cats... You'd think they would be easy to teach. Seriously, Danny, that article I ref'd above offers deep chewing on this Well that was a long article. He approaches things from a viewpoint that I don't subscribe to so I find fault with his ideas. He approaches our condition from a deep knowledge of our foundations and is seeing a picture much larger than most of us will ever consider. I think we're basic. I think that if we are brought up to believe in the humanist religion we act humanist. That is not how it worked out for me in my own life, nor for many of those with whom I associate regularly. If we are brought up in another, we act that way. Simplistic and not in evidence in my own world. Very many people I know have taken directions that diverge from the teachings they were given in their youth. Most people are humanists these days so most people subscribe to the myth of "its all good". Since I am the unpopular man out in Christianity, most would not understand my simple thoughts. I just think people are selfish creeps that have been taught to think no one else matters but themselves and the best thing to do is say screw it and take what you can, give nothing back. His thought are definitely not simple, in the way that DNA is not simple. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#42
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Danny T wrote:
On Jan 9, 6:16 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: On 09/01/2011 21:41, George's Pro Sound Co. wrote: "Dirk Bruere at wrote in message ... On 04/01/2011 22:02, Jenn wrote: In article , Danny wrote: A while back I read an article about Limewire being taken out of service. There are so many sites like Rhapsody that I figured the pirate days were behind us. 9 bucks lets you download everything you can grab so you'd think people would be happy with that. Enter Frostwire..... The new Limewire. We're right back to where we started. Are people so cheap they can't pay a monthly fee of 9 bucks? I've lost hope in people. I can tell you that in my experience, the VAST majority of college-aged people (the largest group of downloaders) either don't care that it's immoral, or they just believe that music should be free. I'm halfway. I will download lots of pirate stuff, but not stuff I would ever have bought in the first place. OTOH, I do buy stuff if I think it is good enough. -- so when you go to the store you only steal the junk and pay for the good stuff as well? I certainly would if the replication cost was effectively zero if it is good enough you want it stop being a **** bag weasel and pay the guy/or gal that created it Certainly - but I'll pay what its worth to me, not what some record company says. I think around 10 cents a track is about right for the good stuff. Less for the muzak. I think you should change your online name to Dirk the Jerk. You're one of the hairs on the rats ass. Your attitude is ideologically so far from decent that not many people with morals will ever like you much. I'd suggest stepping back and looking at yourself with discerning eyes. You might see what we see. And just because people rape 7 year old girls in Brazil, doesn't make it right. Yes- Same thing! He's telling you what is his capitalist view of the value of a music track. He offers a dime. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#43
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
On 09/01/2011 21:41, George's Pro Sound Co. wrote: "Dirk Bruere at wrote in message ... On 04/01/2011 22:02, Jenn wrote: In article , Danny wrote: A while back I read an article about Limewire being taken out of service. There are so many sites like Rhapsody that I figured the pirate days were behind us. 9 bucks lets you download everything you can grab so you'd think people would be happy with that. Enter Frostwire..... The new Limewire. We're right back to where we started. Are people so cheap they can't pay a monthly fee of 9 bucks? I've lost hope in people. I can tell you that in my experience, the VAST majority of college-aged people (the largest group of downloaders) either don't care that it's immoral, or they just believe that music should be free. I'm halfway. I will download lots of pirate stuff, but not stuff I would ever have bought in the first place. OTOH, I do buy stuff if I think it is good enough. -- so when you go to the store you only steal the junk and pay for the good stuff as well? I certainly would if the replication cost was effectively zero ??? How can such cost ever be zero? In the first place, if music is original we're not dealing with a replica _at the source_. Secondly, any method of stroage or transfer has underlying costs. if it is good enough you want it stop being a **** bag weasel and pay the guy/or gal that created it Certainly - but I'll pay what its worth to me, not what some record company says. I think around 10 cents a track is about right for the good stuff. Less for the muzak. I cannot afford to make a second product if all my "fans" want it for that. This is not a problem. They can make their own music. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#44
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Jenn wrote:
In article , Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: On 10/01/2011 07:49, Sam Trenholme wrote: Well, since I don't rip off orchestras nor buy their CDs my influence is neutral. In fact, the only bit of music I have ripped recently has been ZZ Top. I bought their vinyl back in the 80s and lost it. I'm not going to pay twice. I hope you don't mind me asking you this, but what has caused you to be in an economic position where paying $10 for a legal MP3 album is beyond your budget: I don't use mp3, only wav or flac $10 is not beyond my budget, but I spent it on bands I really like. And I certainly do not pay it for music I have already bought once. Hey! bought the vinyl? Now try cassette! bought the cassette? Now buy CD... etc No, you had the LP and you lost it, so now you want a new copy at the expense of those who deserve to get paid. If he'd lost a hammer he'd have to go buy one. He will take what he can if he can get away with it, as will many. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#45
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
"Danny T" wrote in message ... On Jan 10, 12:59 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: On 10/01/2011 06:34, Danny T wrote: On Jan 9, 6:16 pm, Dirk Bruere at wrote: On 09/01/2011 21:41, George's Pro Sound Co. wrote: "Dirk Bruere at wrote in message ... On 04/01/2011 22:02, Jenn wrote: In article , Danny wrote: A while back I read an article about Limewire being taken out of service. There are so many sites like Rhapsody that I figured the pirate days were behind us. 9 bucks lets you download everything you can grab so you'd think people would be happy with that. Enter Frostwire..... The new Limewire. We're right back to where we started. Are people so cheap they can't pay a monthly fee of 9 bucks? I've lost hope in people. I can tell you that in my experience, the VAST majority of college-aged people (the largest group of downloaders) either don't care that it's immoral, or they just believe that music should be free. I'm halfway. I will download lots of pirate stuff, but not stuff I would ever have bought in the first place. OTOH, I do buy stuff if I think it is good enough. -- so when you go to the store you only steal the junk and pay for the good stuff as well? I certainly would if the replication cost was effectively zero if it is good enough you want it stop being a **** bag weasel and pay the guy/or gal that created it Certainly - but I'll pay what its worth to me, not what some record company says. I think around 10 cents a track is about right for the good stuff. Less for the muzak. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/-My new bookhttp://www.transcendence.me.uk/-Transcendence UKhttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe-Occult Talk Show I think you should change your online name to Dirk the Jerk. You're one of the hairs on the rats ass. Your attitude is ideologically so far from decent that not many people with morals will ever like you much. I'd suggest stepping back and looking at yourself with discerning eyes. You might see what we see. And just because people rape 7 year old girls in Brazil, doesn't make it right. Yes- Same thing! Riiiiight... So copying a file without permission is the same as raping a 7 year old girl. Got it - I'll pass it on to all file sharers - I'm sure they will take the revelation as seriously as it deserves. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/- My new bookhttp://www.transcendence.me.uk/- Transcendence UKhttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe- Occult Talk Show Justify your theft any way you can, but you're still a thief. I think someone ought 'fileshare' his work on http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ that those geedy *******s at AMazon.com and Lulu want to rip us off our money for after all I'd take it cause it isn't worth buying anyway right Dick? George |
#46
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 10, 2:00*pm, "George's Pro Sound Co." wrote:
"Danny T" wrote in message ... On Jan 10, 12:59 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: On 10/01/2011 06:34, Danny T wrote: On Jan 9, 6:16 pm, Dirk Bruere at wrote: On 09/01/2011 21:41, George's Pro Sound Co. wrote: "Dirk Bruere at wrote in message ... On 04/01/2011 22:02, Jenn wrote: In article , Danny wrote: A while back I read an article about Limewire being taken out of service. There are so many sites like Rhapsody that I figured the pirate days were behind us. 9 bucks lets you download everything you can grab so you'd think people would be happy with that. Enter Frostwire..... The new Limewire. We're right back to where we started. Are people so cheap they can't pay a monthly fee of 9 bucks? I've lost hope in people. I can tell you that in my experience, the VAST majority of college-aged people (the largest group of downloaders) either don't care that it's immoral, or they just believe that music should be free. I'm halfway. I will download lots of pirate stuff, but not stuff I would ever have bought in the first place. OTOH, I do buy stuff if I think it is good enough. -- so when you go to the store you only steal the junk and pay for the good stuff as well? I certainly would if the replication cost was effectively zero if it is good enough you want it stop being a **** bag weasel and pay the guy/or gal that created it Certainly - but I'll pay what its worth to me, not what some record company says. I think around 10 cents a track is about right for the good stuff. Less for the muzak. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/-Mynew bookhttp://www.transcendence.me.uk/-Transcendence UKhttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe-OccultTalk Show I think you should change your online name to Dirk the Jerk. You're one of the hairs on the rats ass. Your attitude is ideologically so far from decent that not many people with morals will ever like you much. I'd suggest stepping back and looking at yourself with discerning eyes. You might see what we see. And just because people rape 7 year old girls in Brazil, doesn't make it right. Yes- Same thing! Riiiiight... So copying a file without permission is the same as raping a 7 year old girl. Got it - I'll pass it on to all file sharers - I'm sure they will take the revelation as seriously as it deserves. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/-My new bookhttp://www.transcendence.me.uk/-Transcendence UKhttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe-Occult Talk Show Justify your theft any way you can, but you're still a thief. I think someone ought 'fileshare' his work *on I agree with this model....if the author agrees to share, then it should be shared. If, on the other hand, the author wishes compensation for his work, then he should be compensated. The fact that T-shirts help support artist is a fallacious argument in that it support the opposite view that, if this is the case, it must be because the compensation for the "art" itself is not forthcoming, from the old model were all points resided with the record company and ancillary sycophants it has now gone to agglomerators and pirates. The reality is that, at the latest CES, one of the more popular products are HD televisions that support bit torrent technology (peer-2-peer sharing) which has traditional been relegated to the wannabe pirate fringe. Educating people on how this might dissuade future artist from following their muses is only effective if the "victimless" nature of this theft is eroded from the collective mentality. -CS |
#47
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Something tells me you are now trolling under the name of Dirk. Choose
a name and stick with it. It's not fair to make people think that there are so many people to dislike when all of them are really just the one you.- Hide quoted text - Something tells me that you are nuts. I have only one Google name I post under & that is Mr Soul. Sorry to disappoint. Mike C |
#48
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On 10/01/2011 18:44, Danny T wrote:
On Jan 10, 9:44 am, Mr wrote: Well that was a long article. He approaches things from a viewpoint that I don'tsubscribe to so I find fault with his ideas. I think we're basic. I think that if we are brought up to believe in the humanist religion we act humanist. If we are brought up in another, we act that way. Most people are humanists these days so most people subscribe to the myth of "its all good". Since I am the unpopular man out in Christianity, most would not understand my simple thoughts. I just think people are selfish creeps that have been taught to think no one else matters but themselves and the best thing to do is say screw it and take what you can, give nothing back.- Hide quoted text - Sorry but Christian-like is the last word that I would describe you to someone who didn't know you. Narcissistic, arrogant, self-serving/ promoting would be the words that come to mind most quickly. And then after you threatened to come to NH to beat me up, I would probably add violent& mean to those ways. Mike C Something tells me you are now trolling under the name of Dirk. Choose Nope. Just enter my name in google. Or even go to my site -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ - My new book http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |
#49
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On 10/01/2011 19:00, George's Pro Sound Co. wrote:
"Danny wrote in message ... On Jan 10, 12:59 am, Dirk Bruere at wrote: On 10/01/2011 06:34, Danny T wrote: On Jan 9, 6:16 pm, Dirk Bruere at wrote: On 09/01/2011 21:41, George's Pro Sound Co. wrote: "Dirk Bruere at wrote in message ... On 04/01/2011 22:02, Jenn wrote: In article , Danny wrote: A while back I read an article about Limewire being taken out of service. There are so many sites like Rhapsody that I figured the pirate days were behind us. 9 bucks lets you download everything you can grab so you'd think people would be happy with that. Enter Frostwire..... The new Limewire. We're right back to where we started. Are people so cheap they can't pay a monthly fee of 9 bucks? I've lost hope in people. I can tell you that in my experience, the VAST majority of college-aged people (the largest group of downloaders) either don't care that it's immoral, or they just believe that music should be free. I'm halfway. I will download lots of pirate stuff, but not stuff I would ever have bought in the first place. OTOH, I do buy stuff if I think it is good enough. -- so when you go to the store you only steal the junk and pay for the good stuff as well? I certainly would if the replication cost was effectively zero if it is good enough you want it stop being a **** bag weasel and pay the guy/or gal that created it Certainly - but I'll pay what its worth to me, not what some record company says. I think around 10 cents a track is about right for the good stuff. Less for the muzak. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/-My new bookhttp://www.transcendence.me.uk/-Transcendence UKhttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe-Occult Talk Show I think you should change your online name to Dirk the Jerk. You're one of the hairs on the rats ass. Your attitude is ideologically so far from decent that not many people with morals will ever like you much. I'd suggest stepping back and looking at yourself with discerning eyes. You might see what we see. And just because people rape 7 year old girls in Brazil, doesn't make it right. Yes- Same thing! Riiiiight... So copying a file without permission is the same as raping a 7 year old girl. Got it - I'll pass it on to all file sharers - I'm sure they will take the revelation as seriously as it deserves. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/- My new bookhttp://www.transcendence.me.uk/- Transcendence UKhttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe- Occult Talk Show Justify your theft any way you can, but you're still a thief. I think someone ought 'fileshare' his work on http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ that those geedy *******s at AMazon.com and Lulu want to rip us off our money for after all I'd take it cause it isn't worth buying anyway right Dick? George If I do not lose any money by it, I have no problems if people who would not have bought it anyway download it. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ - My new book http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |
#50
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Nope.
Just enter my name in google. Or even go to my site That would be too easy. Are you on Danny's sh*t list now? Mike C |
#51
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On 10/01/2011 21:26, Mr Soul wrote:
Nope. Just enter my name in google. Or even go to my site That would be too easy. Are you on Danny's sh*t list now? Mike C No idea. I seldom look at who writes the words - I just respond to whats written -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ - My new book http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |
#52
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
No idea.
I seldom look at who writes the words - I just respond to whats written Well you must be because he's accused me of posting as you. This is the second time he's accused me of posting as someone else. He does that every time someone says something negative about him, so as to appear to minimize the damage. Mike C |
#53
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On 10/01/2011 21:50, Mr Soul wrote:
No idea. I seldom look at who writes the words - I just respond to whats written Well you must be because he's accused me of posting as you. This is the second time he's accused me of posting as someone else. He does that every time someone says something negative about him, so as to appear to minimize the damage. Mike C I don't recall saying anything negative about anyone. Just a difference of opinion. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ - My new book http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |
#54
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Danny T wrote:
A while back I read an article about Limewire being taken out of service. There are so many sites like Rhapsody that I figured the pirate days were behind us. 9 bucks lets you download everything you can grab so you'd think people would be happy with that. Enter Frostwire..... The new Limewire. We're right back to where we started. Are people so cheap they can't pay a monthly fee of 9 bucks? I've lost hope in people. Why do people download music (and software and films, but that's tangental)? Because the recording industry gave them that ability. In the days of analogue if you wanted to share music the equivalent of Limewire, BitTorrent, etc, would be arranging a conference call, putting the telephone next to your record player, and inviting people to call in while you played an LP, so they could record in on their tape (or cassette) players. If you owned an album and lost or fatally scratched it, how did you replace it? You bought another copy. Copying from LP to tape resulted in a lower quality version than the original. Then Philips invented the CD. Theoretically better quality sound (I always thought the advantage was the remote control, skipping tracks you didn't want without getting up, etc) was used as a selling point for something where both CDs and CD players were status symbols because of price, and the recording industry went on a profit taking binge of rereleasing some of its paid for back catalogue at premium prices (of which, as I remember, the artists didn't get a proportionate share). Then Apple married CD players (very expensive) with its computers. Then the CD players in computers became cheaper, faster, and recordable. Then MPEG2 introduced mp3 for audio. Then, as a result of the dot com bubble, the internet networks were laid which enabled fast broadband, which enabled file sharing, which is pretty much available to anyone who wants it in the Western world. Who profited from the digitisation of music? Mainly the record selling industry. A few established and a few newer groups of musicians. Did the recording engineers? Investing in equipment to record at 24bit 96k and higher, only for their (possibly autotuned) product to be released on the lowest feasible mp3 bitrate on iTunes? Who lost by the digitisation of music? The record selling industry who abandoned the intrinsic uncopyability of vinyl LPs for the fast buck but easily reproducible CD. People downloading music now are the equlvalent of people recording onto cassette from an AM or FM radio, apart from the fact they don't have to wait for the radion station to play the track they want. They end up with a low quality audio version. The difference is the radio station would have paid needle time, Limewire doesn't. A downloaded track or album isn't a lost sale, but it could be an opportunity to persuade people with ears better than mp3 to buy a premium quality recording of that album (so long as you make it unpiratable). Unfortunately, it won't be the music people who come up with this, it would be the recoridng industry - but that will require some extreme mental evolution. ------------- Rolling Stone asked Dylan about music downloads from the internet and the complaints from the recording industry about people who do not pay for it. Dylan responds: "Well, why not? It ain't worth nothing anyway." |
#55
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 10, 3:50*pm, Mr Soul wrote:
No idea. I seldom look at who writes the words - I just respond to whats written Well you must be because he's accused me of posting as you. *This is the second time he's accused me of posting as someone else. *He does that every time someone says something negative about him, so as to appear to minimize the damage. Mike C What I accuse you of, you are guilty of. You try to start crap with me all the time because you felt shunned. You know and I know the truth and your actions are available through many archives. That's all you'll get from me. |
#56
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
What I accuse you of, you are guilty of. You try to start crap with me
all the time because you felt shunned. You know and I know the truth and your actions are available through many archives. *That's all you'll get from me. Honest to God (and may I be struck down dead if I am lying) I do not, have not and will never feel shunned by you. You are an extreme right- wingnut who has semi-delusional tendencies. I do not like your music nor do I think you are a very accomplished musician. I couldn't stand your vitriolic rants on FB and I cannot stand your politics. You don't have a clue what the truth is either and you wouldn't write what you just wrote. What you think is the truth is that by threatening me with physical violence that I some how backed down or apologized to you. Neither of those things are the case - everything I said about you and every warning I made to others still stand today. I still think you lied about being the Toyes and you may have lied about other things. I still think you either you or one of your representatives added your name to the Wikipedia article about Trop Rock which I think is uterly outrageous considering you just switched to Trop Rock rather recently. Mike C |
#57
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
|
#58
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 11, 9:07*am, wrote:
On 2011-01-11 said: * * What I accuse you of, you are guilty of. You try to start crap * *with me *all the time because you felt shunned. You know and I snip * *Honest to God (and may I be struck down dead if I am lying) I do * *not, have not and will never feel shunned by you. *You are an * *extreme right- wingnut who has semi-delusional tendencies. *I do * *not like your music nor do I think you are a very accomplished * *musician. Many of us could care less children. *TAke your bull**** somewhere else. Please redirect that as CHILD - I have nothing to do with his rants or attacking posts |
#59
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Many of us could care less children. Take your bull****
somewhere else. I hate to sound like someone from AOL, but "me too". Seriously, it is really tedious to read people flaming each other. Take it to email or just killfile each other. - Sam -- #Sam Trenholme http://samiam.org -- Usenet user since September 1993# ######## My email address is at http://samiam.org/mailme.php ######## # The following script works around an annoyance in the Nano Editor # cat | awk '{a=a $0 "\n";if($0 ~ /[a-zA-Z0-9]/){printf("%s",a);a=""}}' |
#60
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Many of us could care less children. *TAke your bull****
somewhere else. I understand how you feel but it is not BS. This twerp threatened to come to my house in NH and do me physical violence. In the light of what just happened in AZ, I'd like everyone in this forum to know that. Mike C |
#61
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
|
#62
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 11, 11:25*am, Sam Trenholme
wrote: Many of us could care less children. *Take your bull**** somewhere else. I hate to sound like someone from AOL, but "me too". Seriously, it is really tedious to read people flaming each other. * Take it to email or just killfile each other. - Sam -- #Sam Trenholmehttp://samiam.org-- Usenet user since September 1993# ######## My email address is athttp://samiam.org/mailme.php######## # The following script works around an annoyance in the Nano Editor # cat | awk '{a=a $0 "\n";if($0 ~ /[a-zA-Z0-9]/){printf("%s",a);a=""}}' What do you call someone that injects his worthless opinion into someone else's business? As much as I think Mike is a lowlife and sick minded freak, who fits the true definition of asshole. |
#63
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 11, 12:57*pm, Danny T wrote:
On Jan 11, 11:25*am, Sam Trenholme wrote: Many of us could care less children. *Take your bull**** somewhere else. I hate to sound like someone from AOL, but "me too". Seriously, it is really tedious to read people flaming each other. * Take it to email or just killfile each other. - Sam -- #Sam Trenholmehttp://samiam.org--Usenet user since September 1993# ######## My email address is athttp://samiam.org/mailme.php######## # The following script works around an annoyance in the Nano Editor # cat | awk '{a=a $0 "\n";if($0 ~ /[a-zA-Z0-9]/){printf("%s",a);a=""}}' What do you call someone that injects his worthless opinion into someone else's business? Government. STFU, CS |
#64
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On 11 Jan 2011, Danny T wrote in
rec.audio.pro: Please redirect that as CHILD - I have nothing to do with his rants or attacking posts You have everything to do with it. But now I will nothing to do with either of you bratty crybabies. Ta ta forever, punks. |
#65
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 11, 1:13*pm, Cyberserf wrote:
On Jan 11, 12:57*pm, Danny T wrote: On Jan 11, 11:25*am, Sam Trenholme wrote: Many of us could care less children. *Take your bull**** somewhere else. I hate to sound like someone from AOL, but "me too". Seriously, it is really tedious to read people flaming each other. * Take it to email or just killfile each other. - Sam -- #Sam Trenholmehttp://samiam.org--Usenetuser since September 1993# ######## My email address is athttp://samiam.org/mailme.php######## # The following script works around an annoyance in the Nano Editor # cat | awk '{a=a $0 "\n";if($0 ~ /[a-zA-Z0-9]/){printf("%s",a);a=""}}' What do you call someone that injects his worthless opinion into someone else's business? Government. STFU, CS LOL |
#66
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 11, 11:33*am, Mr Soul wrote:
Many of us could care less children. *TAke your bull**** somewhere else. I understand how you feel but it is not BS. *This twerp threatened to come to my house in NH and do me physical violence. *In the light of what just happened in AZ, I'd like everyone in this forum to know that. Mike C To try and grab attention off of a tragedy like AZ it truly more sick then I thought you were. You've reached a new low. |
#67
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
To try and grab attention off of a tragedy like AZ it truly more sick
then I thought you were. You've reached a new low. You have a short attention span - nobody wants to hear from you or I. Based on things that you posted on FB, I think that you are quite capable of using deadly force against someone. Mike C |
#68
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
What do you call someone that injects his worthless opinion into
someone else's business? Listen - it was you that expounded on your Christian morals here on this forum. I just want everyone to know that you are a hypocrit and go around threatening to cause violence to someone. As much as I think Mike is a lowlife and sick minded freak, who fits the true definition of asshole. You are a pretty low form of life in my book. Saying that I post as someone else - you're such an idiot. Why don't you apologize for making that remark & I'll shut-up on this thread. Mike C. |
#69
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
You have everything to do with it. But now I will nothing to do with
either of you bratty crybabies. Nil - thanks for pointing out to ol' Danny boy that he's equally at fault. Mike C |
#70
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 11, 8:04*pm, Mr Soul wrote:
To try and grab attention off of a tragedy like AZ it truly more sick then I thought you were. You've reached a new low. You have a short attention span - nobody wants to hear from you or I. Based on things that you posted on FB, I think that you are quite capable of using deadly force against someone. Mike C Anyone that served this country is capable of that. If you are implying that I said anything about using that kind of force against you, you're screaming for attention and a total freak - oh wait - we've already established that. Next time you post something out of context or try to **** me off somehow, why don't you review your thoughts of me. In reality, you must think I'm a super nice and friendly guy. If you really thought I was crazy like you, you would never take the chance at being such an asshole towards me. |
#71
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On 11 Jan 2011, Mr Soul wrote in rec.audio.pro:
Nil - thanks for pointing out to ol' Danny boy that he's equally at fault. **** you, too. You are both appear to be dangerously psychotic creeps. |
#72
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Anyone that served this country is capable of that. If you are
implying that I said anything about using that kind of force against you, you're screaming for attention and a total freak - oh wait - we've already established that. Next time you post something out of context or try to **** me off somehow, why don't you review your thoughts of me. In reality, you must think I'm a super nice and friendly guy. If you really thought I was crazy like you, you would never take the chance at being such an asshole towards me. When did you serve in the military? I seriously doubt if you did that. I think that you are capable of both good & bad - just like everyone. I could care less if I **** you off or not but I am not going to listen to you pontificate about your so-called Christian values, particularly on a public forum, when I know that you don't have these values. And if I am crazy as you say, then how can any of my thoughts be valid? Danny boy - you just don't make much sense. Mike C |
#73
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Anyone that served this country is capable of that. If you are
implying that I said anything about using that kind of force against you, you're screaming for attention and a total freak - oh wait - we've already established that. Next time you post something out of context or try to **** me off somehow, why don't you review your thoughts of me. In reality, you must think I'm a super nice and friendly guy. If you really thought I was crazy like you, you would never take the chance at being such an asshole towards me. Just for the halibut, I googled your name and military and looked what popped up - http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.as...earchTerms=gun. Danny Taddei: "I know I'm almost a year late on this post... but I just found it. I really want one of these gun buckles. I can't find one though..... I live in LA where concealed and open carry have not yet fallen into socialist's hands - Long live the south!" I think anyone who speaks in that kind of language is indeed capable of deadly violence, in the context of today's political climate and right-wing hate machines. |
#74
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 12, 7:14*am, Mr Soul wrote:
Anyone that served this country is capable of that. If you are implying that I said anything about using that kind of force against you, you're screaming for attention and a total freak - oh wait - we've already established that. Next time you post something out of context or try to **** me off somehow, why don't you review your thoughts of me. In reality, you must think I'm a super nice and friendly guy. If you really thought I was crazy like you, you would never take the chance at being such an asshole towards me. When did you serve in the military? *I seriously doubt if you did that. I think that you are capable of both good & bad - just like everyone. I could care less if I **** you off or not but I am not going to listen to you pontificate about your so-called Christian values, particularly on a public forum, when I know that you don't have these values. And if I am crazy as you say, then how can any of my thoughts be valid? *Danny boy - you just don't make much sense. Mike C If you seriously thought I was dangerous to you, you'd tell the police or friends - not complete strangers on the internet. You're sick. |
#75
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 12, 9:52*am, Mr Soul wrote:
Anyone that served this country is capable of that. If you are implying that I said anything about using that kind of force against you, you're screaming for attention and a total freak - oh wait - we've already established that. Next time you post something out of context or try to **** me off somehow, why don't you review your thoughts of me. In reality, you must think I'm a super nice and friendly guy. If you really thought I was crazy like you, you would never take the chance at being such an asshole towards me. Just for the halibut, I googled your name and military and looked what popped up -http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=432342&SearchTerms=gun. Danny Taddei: "I know I'm almost a year late on this post... but I just found it. I really want one of these gun buckles. I can't find one though..... I live in LA where concealed and open carry have not yet fallen into socialist's hands - Long live the south!" I think anyone who speaks in that kind of language is indeed capable of deadly violence, in the context of today's political climate and right-wing hate machines. You're really sick |
#76
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Both of you: TAKE IT OFFLINE!!!
Paul |
#77
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
If you seriously thought I was dangerous to you, you'd tell the police
or friends - not complete strangers on the internet. You're sick.- Hide quoted text - You can count on me contacting the authorities if you threaten me again. |
#78
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
You're really sick.
Yeah - the stuff you wrote on that gun web site is pretty sick. |
#79
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
Both of you: TAKE IT OFFLINE!!!
A gentle suggestion: Do what other people do and get a newsreader with killfiles (the ability to filter obnoxious posters). One good site for accessing Usenet is aioe.org once you get said newsreader. I find Usenet unusable these days without killfile support. - Sam -- #Sam Trenholme http://samiam.org -- Usenet user since September 1993# ######## My email address is at http://samiam.org/mailme.php ######## # The following script works around an annoyance in the Nano Editor # cat | awk '{a=a $0 "\n";if($0 ~ /[a-zA-Z0-9]/){printf("%s",a);a=""}}' |
#80
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you thought it was safe again
On Jan 12, 7:44*pm, Sam Trenholme
wrote: Both of you: TAKE IT OFFLINE!!! A gentle suggestion: Do what other people do and get a newsreader with killfiles (the ability to filter obnoxious posters). *One good site for accessing Usenet is aioe.org once you get said newsreader. I find Usenet unusable these days without killfile support. My problem is that my ISP (AT&T), like many others, doesn't carry Usenet, so pretty much the only option I have it to read RAP via Google Groups, which doesn't have a killfile function. I could change ISPs, but I get a pretty good deal on AT&T, and in all respects except Usenet it's worked for me. Peace, Paul |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is it safe | Audio Opinions | |||
CD markers -- what's safe? | General | |||
CD markers -- what's safe? | Tech | |||
Just when you thought it was safe to turn on your radio.. | Pro Audio | |||
So what's a safe level? | Pro Audio |