Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 6:55*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: grrrrr-ROWF! Sacky dogs the pony. Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive anybody to drink. *then Shhh! should be sloppy An IKYABWAI? How pathetic. no, it is not think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. BTW, do you suppose Clyde's in his cups...again? |
#82
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Shhhh! said: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. BTW, do you suppose Clyde's in his cups...again? I doubt it. Apparently he's back in the States, and he's not the type to get plastered at 7 in the evening. He may have knocked back one or two by now at most. |
#83
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 7:55*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: grrrrr-ROWF! Sacky dogs the pony. Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive anybody to drink. *then Shhh! should be sloppy An IKYABWAI? How pathetic. no, it is not think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. He is the one exerting the most effort to making him compliant to societal norms, at least as far as language and logic goes. I might try now and then, but not as often as Shh! |
#84
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 7:55*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: duh-Sacky reveals the truth of my suspicion. No, I said YOU drag Witless to school. Or at least you go through the motions. no i don't, but thanks for the complement anyway. Your illeterite. You compliment SHHH quite well |
#85
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 7:56*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Clyde Slick said: Sacky disses Witlessmongrel BEHIND HIS BACK! OTOH, at least the Sackster is trying to fill in for Witless while the pooch is away on bereavement leave. Please don't make me go out and find a bunch of OT articles to` post. |
#86
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 8:03*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Sep 27, 6:25*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Sep 27, 3:56*pm, vinyl anachronist wrote: On Sep 27, 12:09 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Sep 27, 8:57 am, vinyl anachronist wrote: On Sep 27, 2:43 am, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky dogs the pony. Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive anybody to drink. then Shhh! should be sloppy An IKYABWAI? How pathetic. no, it is not think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. Is it me? I hope I haven't been entrusted with that duty. I hate picking up dog poop. I think this is a result of the misperception 2pid has that I'm trying to "oppress" his 'differing POV' or make him conform to mine. There's a world of difference between oppressing 2pid and making a fool of him. Meanwhile, if 2pid was a Dem I'd have to strongly consider becoming a republican. I feel that stronge urge to be whatever he isn't as well. I already qaulify, I am not an engineer. There is no evidence that 2pid is either. There's just a bunch of Internet resume BS. I'll keep that under advisement, Major SHHHH! |
#87
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 8:04*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Sep 27, 6:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Sep 27, 3:43*am, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky dogs the pony. Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive anybody to drink. *then Shhh! should be sloppy An IKYABWAI? How pathetic. no, it is not think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is And how do I attempt to make 2pid "obedient"? Oh, wait. I know where you're going with this. You're referring to the fact that I always push 2pid's face in his own doo-doo. LOL! You do seem to jerk his chain. |
#88
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
OK, it's almost midnight. Somebody must be at least halfway through his bottle of the day. grrrrr-ROWF! Sacky dogs the pony. Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive anybody to drink. *then Shhh! should be sloppy An IKYABWAI? How pathetic. no, it is not think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. He is the one exerting the most effort to making him compliant to societal norms, at least as far as language and logic goes. I might try now and then, but not as often as Shh! You're completely misreading Shhh's intention. Not only that, but you're myopically ignoring the only Normal who really does try to socialize Witlessmongrel. (It's not Lord Atkinson.) |
#89
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Clyde Slick said: I already qaulify, I am not an engineer. There is no evidence that 2pid is either. There's just a bunch of Internet resume BS. I'll keep that under advisement, Major SHHHH! Shhhh has posted a fair amount of evidence that he is a longtime Army officer. Witless, on the other paw, keeps his hypothetical engineering knowledge bottled up, probably because he's terrified of pulling a Krooger. |
#90
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 10:24*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 27, 8:03*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Sep 27, 6:25*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Sep 27, 3:56*pm, vinyl anachronist wrote: On Sep 27, 12:09 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Sep 27, 8:57 am, vinyl anachronist wrote: On Sep 27, 2:43 am, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky dogs the pony. Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive anybody to drink. then Shhh! should be sloppy An IKYABWAI? How pathetic. no, it is not think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. Is it me? I hope I haven't been entrusted with that duty. I hate picking up dog poop. I think this is a result of the misperception 2pid has that I'm trying to "oppress" his 'differing POV' or make him conform to mine. There's a world of difference between oppressing 2pid and making a fool of him. Meanwhile, if 2pid was a Dem I'd have to strongly consider becoming a republican. I feel that stronge urge to be whatever he isn't as well. I already qaulify, I am not an engineer. There is no evidence that 2pid is either. There's just a bunch of Internet resume BS. I'll keep that under advisement, Major SHHHH! Exactly. Why should 2pid get a pass? |
#91
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 10:39*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: OK, it's almost midnight. Somebody must be at least halfway through his bottle of the day. grrrrr-ROWF! Sacky dogs the pony. Dragging duh-Scottie to obedience training week after week would drive anybody to drink. *then Shhh! should be sloppy An IKYABWAI? How pathetic. no, it is not think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. He is the one exerting the most effort to making him compliant to societal norms, at least as far as language and logic goes. I might try now and then, but not as often as Shh! You're completely misreading Shhh's intention. I'll say. |
#92
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Shhhh! said: You're completely misreading Shhh's intention. I'll say. Anybody who befriends Scottie Witlessmongrel is guaranteed to have substandard discernment skills. As further evidence of Sacky's clogged perspicacity, he actually believes that increasing the socialization of our medical care system would be WORSE than the status quo. The status quo leaves 20% of us uninsured and a further 40% (I think) underinsured. Not to mention the absurdity of sick people being excluded from the health care system because profits would be threatened. Sacky, like Scottie and the rest of the dimwit "conservatives", truly believe that we have "the best" health care system in the world. They actually say that out loud, without the slightest tinge of irony. So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) |
#93
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
"George M. Middius" wrote
think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. -- Jim Smith |
#94
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 8:41*am, "James Smith" wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. I can see why you'd want to in a thread named "A Theory About [2pid]". Oh, wait. |
#95
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 11:16*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) Though I did think it was nice of Clyde to compliment me about my sound reasoning and good communication skills. |
#96
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article ,
"James Smith" wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. Sure, "James"...whatever you say. |
#97
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 27, 11:41*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Clyde Slick said: I already qaulify, I am not an engineer. There is no evidence that 2pid is either. There's just a bunch of Internet resume BS. I'll keep that under advisement, Major SHHHH! Shhhh has posted a fair amount of evidence that he is a longtime Army officer. I have seen no evidence at all |
#98
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 12:16*am, George M. Middius
wrote: Shhhh! said: You're completely misreading Shhh's intention. I'll say. Anybody who befriends Scottie Witlessmongrel is guaranteed to have substandard discernment skills. As further evidence of Sacky's clogged perspicacity, he actually believes that increasing the socialization of our medical care system would be WORSE than the status quo. The status quo leaves 20% of us uninsured and a further 40% (I think) underinsured. Not to mention the absurdity of sick people being excluded from the health care system because profits would be threatened. Sacky, like Scottie and the rest of the dimwit "conservatives", truly believe that we have "the best" health care system in the world. They actually say that out loud, without the slightest tinge of irony. So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) 20% uninsured, 40% underinsured, even if I accept those numbers, no problem, just susidize their premiums for private insurance. |
#99
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 9:41*am, "James Smith" wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. No, just normal insecurities. I don't think she is a narcissist. she just comes off as a fawning sycophant. It probably isn't her intention, and she probably isn't aware of it, but that is how she comes across, at times. I am sure the she os a very nice person. |
#100
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 10:21*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Sep 27, 11:16*pm, George M. Middius wrote: So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) Though I did think it was nice of Clyde to compliment me about my sound reasoning and good communication skills. Wrong, I complemented you. |
#101
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Sep 28, 9:41*am, "James Smith" wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. No, just normal insecurities. I don't think she is a narcissist. she just comes off as a fawning sycophant. It probably isn't her intention, and she probably isn't aware of it, but that is how she comes across, at times. I am sure the she os a very nice person. OK, from now on I only know you guys. |
#102
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 10:43*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 27, 11:41*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I already qaulify, I am not an engineer. There is no evidence that 2pid is either. There's just a bunch of Internet resume BS. I'll keep that under advisement, Major SHHHH! Shhhh has posted a fair amount of evidence that he is a longtime Army officer. I have seen no evidence at all Well, Clyde, that's why people laugh at you and 2pid. LOL! |
#103
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Shhhh! said: So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) Though I did think it was nice of Clyde to compliment me about my sound reasoning and good communication skills. He offered me a "complement", but he blamed it on you. |
#104
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 11:54*am, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Sep 28, 9:41*am, "James Smith" wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. No, just normal insecurities. I don't think she is a narcissist. she just comes off as a *fawning sycophant. It probably isn't her intention, and she probably isn't aware of it, but that is how she comes across, at times. I am sure the she os a very nice person. OK, from now on I only know you guys. you completely missed the point, you purposely side-stepped it |
#105
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Sep 28, 11:54*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Sep 28, 9:41*am, "James Smith" wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote think about this: who is the one here who most tries to make Scott "obedient". It isn't me, and it it isn't even you. Nor is it Shhhh. that is exaqctly who it is I disagree quite strongly. Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. No, just normal insecurities. I don't think she is a narcissist. she just comes off as a *fawning sycophant. It probably isn't her intention, and she probably isn't aware of it, but that is how she comes across, at times. I am sure the she os a very nice person. OK, from now on I only know you guys. you completely missed the point, you purposely side-stepped it What point did I "side-step"? |
#106
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Clyde Slick said: I am sure the she os a very nice person. OK, from now on I only know you guys. you completely missed the point, you purposely side-stepped it Hahahahaha! Good one! uh.... You do know you were mocking yourself, right? |
#107
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
An insight into Jenn's true nature
|
#108
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
"Jenn" wrote : Let's get back to the meat of the issue he Jenn's conceit and egotistism. No, just normal insecurities. I don't think she is a narcissist. she just comes off as a fawning sycophant. It probably isn't her intention, and she probably isn't aware of it, but that is how she comes across, at times. I am sure the she os a very nice person. That is the carefully crafted persona Jenn wants to project. OK, from now on I only know you guys. So Jenn has put a stop to her name-dropping transgressions : it's about time. -- Jim Smith |
#109
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
"George M. Middius" wrote :
Jenn said: Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. We all have our own burdens to bear. Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath! As inviting as that is, I think that I'll pass on the smelling. I wouldn't find meeting you [_____?] though. You left out some words. My guess would be "especially rewarding". In my opinion she intended to write "I wouldn't mind meeting you...", but her subconscious mind sabotaged the typing of that statement (because it would be a lie). -- Jim Smith |
#110
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Dickie whined: As inviting as that is, I think that I'll pass on the smelling. I wouldn't find meeting you [_____?] though. You left out some words. My guess would be "especially rewarding". In my opinion If I want to hear your opinion, I'll give it to you. |
#111
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Dickie rises again
James Smith said: Sure, "James"...whatever you say. By employing quotes Jenn insinuates that I am using a false identity. So it's true you have no dick. Ironic, isn't it? |
#112
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 1:08*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Shhhh! said: So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) Though I did think it was nice of Clyde to compliment me about my sound reasoning and good communication skills. He offered me a "complement", but he blamed it on you. Once someone gets soused meaningless words seem to fly freely. Say, do you think 2pid is a souse too? |
#113
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Sep 28, 6:25*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Sep 28, 1:08*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Shhhh! said: So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) Though I did think it was nice of Clyde to compliment me about my sound reasoning and good communication skills. He offered me a "complement", but he blamed it on you. Once someone gets soused meaningless words seem to fly freely. Say, do you think 2pid is a souse too? No. That level of assholedness is unfettered. He's one of those guys who should probably drink more. |
#114
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Shhhh! said: So I wouldn't put any stock in Sacky's inability to figure out why you mock and deride duh-Scottie. It's far too deep for him. ;-) Say, do you think 2pid is a souse too? Doubtful. Even though he's very undisciplined, he loves being bossed around, especially by his preacher. What I'm wondering is why "James Smith" is so panicked about Jenn. His screeching is as shrill as Krooger's was. |
#115
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article ,
"James Smith" wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote : Jenn said: Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. We all have our own burdens to bear. Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath! As inviting as that is, I think that I'll pass on the smelling. I wouldn't find meeting you [_____?] though. You left out some words. My guess would be "especially rewarding". In my opinion she intended to write "I wouldn't mind meeting you...", Hey! Celebrate! You got one right. but her subconscious mind sabotaged the typing of that statement (because it would be a lie). I've never lied here. |
#116
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Jenn wrote: In article , "James Smith" wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote : Jenn said: Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. We all have our own burdens to bear. Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath! As inviting as that is, I think that I'll pass on the smelling. I wouldn't find meeting you [_____?] though. You left out some words. My guess would be "especially rewarding". In my opinion she intended to write "I wouldn't mind meeting you...", Hey! Celebrate! You got one right. but her subconscious mind sabotaged the typing of that statement (because it would be a lie). I've never lied here. Seems odd a newcomer would re-introduce himself with accusations of lying. It reminds me of others now absent who thought the same accusation against Jenn was somehow justified. Stephen |
#117
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article ,
MiNe 109 wrote: In article , Jenn wrote: In article , "James Smith" wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote : Jenn said: Sometimes you do come off as a drunk. We all have our own burdens to bear. Meet me, you can allay your fears when you smell my breath! As inviting as that is, I think that I'll pass on the smelling. I wouldn't find meeting you [_____?] though. You left out some words. My guess would be "especially rewarding". In my opinion she intended to write "I wouldn't mind meeting you...", Hey! Celebrate! You got one right. but her subconscious mind sabotaged the typing of that statement (because it would be a lie). I've never lied here. Seems odd a newcomer would re-introduce himself with accusations of lying. It reminds me of others now absent who thought the same accusation against Jenn was somehow justified. Stephen You noticed! ;-) |
#118
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
An insight into Jenn's true nature
In article ,
"James Smith" wrote: "Jenn" wrote : Sure, "James"...whatever you say. By employing quotes Jenn insinuates that I am using a false identity. There are two possibilities here : A) Jenn has factual evidence to support the insinuation. B) It is nothing but a slur. Which is it Jenn? It's a suspicion. Tell the truth - if you can. When have I ever lied here? |
#119
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Dickie rises again
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote: James Smith said: Sure, "James"...whatever you say. By employing quotes Jenn insinuates that I am using a false identity. So it's true you have no dick. Ironic, isn't it? He wants to get to the "meat of the issue". |
#120
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
"George M. Middius" wrote :
What I'm wondering is why "James Smith" is so panicked about Jenn. His screeching is as shrill as Krooger's was. If you speak honestly about Jenn - the worker bees close in to protect their queen. It's what they're programmed to do. In the example above we see the use of misinformation and propaganda. -- Jim Smith |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
the rustbucket theory | Car Audio | |||
NAT: B-S Theory | Audio Opinions | |||
Forum for mic theory? | Pro Audio | |||
Forum for mic theory? | Pro Audio | |||
Sampling Theory | Pro Audio |