Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Perspectives on preamps
We often forget that except for the phono section, the real function
of a preamp is not amplification per se. Any correctly designed tuner, tape deck, DAC, CD player, or what have you has plenty of signal to directly drive a power amplifier. Instead it is to serve as a switching nexus and a level control, plus those functions so necessary but derided by purists like tone control. This leads us to the "passive preamp". This is in basic concept a great idea. It fails because it is in the middle of a bunch of cables that otherwise need to be as short and direct as possible. Even so under the right circumstances it works pretty well. The real solution is a change in thinking. Each unit of signal (a "component" is a resistor, a capacitor or something like that) should possess its own volume control and perhaps some type of switch architecture. Alternatively, there is the "integrated amplifier" which is no more than a power amplifier with a volume control (which many "power amplifiers" have anyway, cf.McIntosh ) and a selector switch for multiple inputs. This change in thinking is occurring at a nonexistent pace, i.e, not at all. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
it can turn aesthetic perspectives in touch with the brown rolling ladder, whilst Mustapha round services them too | Car Audio | |||
Yankee Audiophile Seeking Pen Pal for UK/EU Perspectives | High End Audio | |||
Earthworks ZDT preamps vs. Millennia HV3 preamps | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie 1642-VLZ preamps vs Aardvark Q10 preamps? other suggestions? | Pro Audio |